Some Factors Causing Non-optimal Budget for Activities of Notary
Regional Supervisory Board in 2016 Budget Year
Dwi Wahyu Kurniawati
Magister Management of Airlangga University
Keywords: Budget, Notary Regional Supervisory Board
Abstract: The objective of this research is to understand, investigate and analyze some factors being the constraints to
non optimal budget for the activities of Notary Regional Supervisory in 2016 Budget Year, a study in East
Java Regional Office of Law and Human Rights Ministry. Budget planning is a part of subsystem strategic
planning, which is technically to be conducted based on performance of budget system that is preceded with
performance planning. The application of performance budget system in the preparation of planning is
initiated with formulation of strategic issues that are responded by a program and a relevant activity. In the
implementation phase, the process of performance planning is addressed in the description of the National
Medium-term Development Plan into Ministry/Institution Budget Work Plan. The non-optimal Budget for
Activities of Notary Regional Supervisory Board in 2016 Budget Year were caused by: personal factor,
coordination factor, non-responsive and low understanding on the reporting and Budget settlements.
1 INTRODUCTION
Budget problem is a classic issue in every
organization. Like a double-edged sword, , budget
can be a strength and opportunity while at the same
time it can be a barrier or threat for an organization.
Budget is essential for an organization. The budget
in a public sector organization always becomes a hot
topic for discussion, starting from preparation,
implementation up to evaluation stages as it loaded
with political content.
Talking about budget is identical to figures and a
number of estimation to carry out a number program
and activities. Such budget is formed through a
budgeting process This process will become the
success key for activities of budget preparation and
implementation. Budgeting is one of stages in the
planning process and managerial controlling for
public sector organization (Mardiasmo, 2009).
Target is set during the budget planning to achieve
the organization’s goal. The realization of target
achievement is then reported during evaluation to
assess the organization performance from various
including finance.
Budgeting and budget execution cannot be
separated from human participation, humans are the
ones who prepare and implement the budget they
have made. Human behavior arises in the process of
budget preparation and it is also human behavior
that encourages people to survive living with the
budget they have prepared (Lubis, 2014). Human
behavior will affect their perceptions, so the
differences in perception will certainly arise in the
process of budget preparation and implementation.
Motivations and needs of individuals or group differ
from other individuals’ and groups’. Participation,
commitment, coordination, communication and
cooperation from all parties in an organization are
needed in order to unite and synergize such
differences in motivation and needs. This is done so
that the decision making related to budget can be
carried out in an effective and efficient way in order
to achieve the organization’s goal.
A number of behaviorism consequences arise in
the budgeting and budget execution, some of which
are pressure, motivation, aspiration, and anxiety
(Lubis,2014). The consequence triggers the rise of
dysfunctional behavior in an organization. In
addition to that, there are many other factors that
also influence human behavior in doing the
budgeting and executing the budget in an
organization, some of them are size and organization
structure, leadership style, the type of control system
706
Kurniawati, D.
Some Factors Causing Non-optimal Budget for Activities of Notary Regional Supervisory Board in 2016 Budget Year.
DOI: 10.5220/0009500007060711
In Proceedings of the 1st Unimed International Conference on Economics Education and Social Science (UNICEES 2018), pages 706-711
ISBN: 978-989-758-432-9
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
and environmental stability. As a public sector
organization, General Legal Administration (AHU)
& Intellectual Property (KI) sub-sector of East Java
Law Ministry and Human Rights Regional Office
also prepares and implements budget. The budget is
in the form of document of budget and budget
implementation. One of budgeting and budget
implementation documents. One of budgeting
documents is Work Plan and Ministry and Institution
Budget (RKA-K/L) and budget needed to carry out
the intended work plan. The work plan of
Ministry/Institution comprises of information about
vision, mission, objective, program, expected
milestone, activities, as well as expected output,
while budget comprises of information about cost
for each program and activity for the planned year.
The stage of budget preparation is an important
one because an effective budget yet does not focus
on performance can even mess up the programs that
have been prepared in advance. Often in common
practice, budget preparation seems to be a separate
part from strategic formulation and planning that a
success of budget application is not in line with the
success of program and the organizational goal.
Such budgeting cannot result in an effective budget
as a means of management to bridge the
achievement of organizational goal (Basri, 2013).
Budget Implementation for Some programs of
AHU & KI service sub-sector in the Law Ministry
and Human Rights of East Java Regional Office was
non-optimal as it was reflected by the Government
Institution Performance Accountability Report
(LAKIP) in the 2016 Budget Year, mainly for
Regional Supervisory Board Activities.
The supervision toward Notary in East Java area
becomes the authority of Regional Supervisory
Board based on authority delegation by Ministry of
Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia
in order to uphold the legal regulation upon every
violation to obligation as well as ban for Notary
position or Notary Code of Ethics, not limited to
carry out coaching authority. This supervision needs
to be done in a more effective way considering the
notary upon running their profession is prone to do
abuse of office authority and to perform notary
behavior that may cause disadvantage to community.
The provisions regulating Notary Supervisory Board
was contained in the Law No. 2 of 2014 on
Amendment of Law No.30 of 2014 on Notary
Positions and the decree of Ministry and Human
Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, No M39-
PW.07.10 Of 2004 on the Guideline for Duty
Implementation of Notary Supervisory Board.
Related to MPW authority, based on Article 73,
Law No. 2 of 2014 it includes: organizing hearings
of audit and decision making upon public report
through Regional Supervisory Board, Imposition
and Proposal of Sanctions, Temporary Discharge,
and Dishonorable Discharge that are proposed by
Central Supervisory Board and Issuance of Leave
permit to Notary.
Whereas based on Article 70, Law No. 2 of
2014, MPD, holds an authority of: organizing
hearings to examine the alleged infringement to
office authority performance and notary code of
ethics based on society report, periodically notary
protocol examination, issuance of leave permit and
decision on Acting Notary as well as report of the
whole MPD activities to MPW. MPW and MPD
carried out supervision duty to 1585 (One thousand
five hundred eighty five) notaries (Notary data as
per 31st of December 2014) in 38 Regencies/Cities
in the area of East Java Province Area.
The quality performance of Notary Supervisory
Board of East Java area is one of many important
factors that can influence either optimal or non-
optimal performance of 11 (eleven) Notary Regional
Supervisory Board that are notoriously undertaking
supervision function to 1585 ( One thousand five
hundred and eighty-five) Notaries as public serving
officials. Due to the great number of notaries in East
Java Province area as mentioned above, the Notary
Supervisory Board Organization should be
supported with adequate facilities and infrastructure
in order to run its authority optimally.
The implementation of Notary Local/ Regional
Supervisory Board activities with supervision object
coverage of the whole notaries in East Java area
needs support on financial administration,
correspondence system and accountable technical
supervision material that it is necessary to involve
relevant parties in the formulation and supervision of
activity implementation in the field.
2 THEORICAL FRAMEWORK
Robbin and Coulter (2010) stated that planning is a
process starting from defining organization goal,
which is to determine strategy for achieving the goal
in a comprehensive manner in order to integrate and
coordinate the whole organization work, so that the
organization goal is achieved.
Haryanto, et al (2007) in Asikin (2012) explained
that public sector budget is activity plan and
periodical finance (normally in annual period)
comprise of program and activities as well as
amount of fund obtained (revenue/income) and
needed (expenditure/shopping) in terms of achieving
organization goal. Mardiasmo (2009:61) in
Waworuntu (2013) mentioned that budget is an
estimation of performance that will be achieved for
some particular period and be stated in financial
Some Factors Causing Non-optimal Budget for Activities of Notary Regional Supervisory Board in 2016 Budget Year
707
unit”, whereas budgeting is an activity of allocating
limited financial resource for the funding of
organizational expenditure that tends to be limitless
(Haryanto, dkk: 2007) in (Asikin, 2012).
Within the budgeting system, all activities starts
from medium-term development plan that is
accommodated in the Budget Work Plan of
Ministries/Institution (RKAK/L). in the RKAK/L
there will be elaboration of activity program priority
and budget ceiling.
Budget planning is a part of subsystem strategic
planning, which technically to be conducted based
on performance of budget system that is preceded
with performance planning. The application of
performance budget system in the preparation of
planning is initiated with formulation of strategic
issues that are responded by a program and a
relevant activity. In the implementation phase, the
process of performance planning is addressed upon
elaborating the National Medium-term Development
Plan into Ministry/Agency Budget Work Plan.
Based on Law No 17 of 2003 on Financial State,
it mandates the transparency and accountability of
financial state that is manifested through description
of budget realization in each Ministries/Institution
in addition to presenting realization of revenue and
expenditure together with explaining work
performance achievement of Ministries/Institutions.
The implication of Law No 17, of 2003
implementation is it needs a program restructuring
and budget which management and budget
execution should be based on performance.
There are many experts providing definition of
budget. According to Munandar (2000: 19) the
definition of Budget is a plan that is prepared
systematically including the whole company
activities stated in monetary unit (unity) and be
commenced for certain time range.
Other definition relevant to budget according
Christina (2002: 25) stated that:
Budget is a plan prepared systematically in the
form of figure and stated in a monetary unit
including the whole company activities for certain
period of time in the future. Therefore, the prepared
plan is served in a monetary unit , and thus budget
often being called as financial planning. In a budget,
the unit of activity and the unit of monetary occupy
important position in the sense that all activities will
be quantified within one monetary unit, that
achievement of efficiency and effectiveness of
activities done is measurable.
Supervisory Board is a body that has authority
and obligation to conduct coaching and supervision
to Notary. Supervision to Notary is intended for
Notary to carry out their post duties based on and
followed the legislation governing the Notarial post.
Notary in running their post duties must inherently
hold on and base on legislation that regulates the
Notarial post, meaning everything that has been
mentioned in legislation regulating the Notarial post
shall be followed. Based on the provisions in Article
67 up to Article 81 UUJN, it has been regulated
about supervision to Notary.
Supervision and Coaching Institution
(Supervisory Board) to Notary that is formed by
Law and Human Rights Ministry needs to get done
more effectively and to be increased in quality,
because Notary is expected to perform their post
profession by always improving the professional
quality and law protection to community. The role
of Supervisory Board is very crucial in coaching and
supervising the Notarial post continually with regard
to personal behavior in running both their post and
beyond as a cutting edge to guarantee legal certainty
toward society who use notarial service. Local
Supervisory Board (hereinafter called MPD) is
formed in Regency /City to coach and supervise
Notaries with jurisdiction in Regency/City, if the
number of Notary does not compete with the number
of MPD members, it can form MPD consortium for
several regencies/cities based on the provisions in
Article 69, Paragraph 2a, UUJN
3 RESEARCH METHOD
This is a qualitative research that describes, records,
anlayzes and interprets current condition. The
research was conducted at Human Rights and Law
Ministries Provincial Office of East Java. The
research subject were 7(seven) personnel, where 4
(four) persons are the staffs in Human Rights and
Law Ministries Provincial Office of East Java and
3(three) persons were from the Notary Local
Supervisory Board of East Java. The data collection
technique used were observation, interview and
documentation technique utilizing observation
guideline and interview guideline tool. The data
analysis in a qualitative research is a process of
simplifying data into a form that is easily read and
interpreted and done through some steps of data
researching, interpreting and concluding.
4 ANALYSIS
This research is a follow up research from some
factors causing non optimal budget for activities of
East Java Notary Local Superisory Board in 2016
budget year.
UNICEES 2018 - Unimed International Conference on Economics Education and Social Science
708
AHU &KI Service Sub-Sector that is in line with
the Directorate General of General Law
Administration and Directorate General of
Intellectual Property, where that Directorate General
has shared PNBP in accordance with the portion and
returned to respective Human Rights and Laws
Service Division that are available in Indonesia
under Human Rights and Laws Ministries of
Republic of Indonesia.
Data of Budget Absorption for Activities of
Notary Regional Supervisory Board in 2016 Budget
Year.
Tabel 1: Budget Realization
Code Description Ceiling Realizati
on
D Notary
Regional
Supervisory
Board
974,260,000 714,879,
300
521211 Material
Expenditure
92,950,000
68,219,3
00
524111 Ordinary
Trip
Expenditure
171,960,000 126,960,
000
Source: SAS application , Human Rights and Laws
Ministry East Java Provincial Office of 2016, (2016)
Budget for Activities of Notary Regional
Supervisory Board in 2016 Budget Year comprises
of budget for material expenditure amounted to Rp.
92.950.000,- (ninety two million nine hundred and
fifty thousand Rupiah), budget for Ordinary Trip
Expenditure Rp. 171.960.000,- (one hundred and
seventy-one million nine hundred and sixty thousand
Rupiah).
In the beginning of budget preparation, a
disbursement plan was made, but over the time there
was a non-compliance to budget absorption that was
carried out so there was budget left over, if each of
Notary Regional Supervisory Board obeyed carrying
out the disbursement plan the risk of low absorption
could have been avoided.
As questioned what happened to the absorption
of MPD budget in 2016,some of which were because
MPD paid a little attention or not active, due to the
membership component of the MPD itself that
comprised of various components, in addition there
was another reason because the MPD Secretary that
so far being assigned has not managed well due to
another assignment the secretary has, so that in the
activity budget of MPD.
In addition, there is another constraint that was
called as low coordination factor, such thing was as
told by the informant. Based on the interview with
the informant, it was told that MPD didnot
understand about budgeting thing, let say a business
trip, while in dipa it was stated tath business trip was
done for two days , but during the practice, MPD
only did the business trip for 1(one) day that MPD
only made for 1 (one) day in budget settlement,
therefore there was a left over money.
In addition to the above mentioned constraints,
there was another constraint told by informant, while
this related to the official who signed the settlement
documents that sometimes were busy due to official
duty outside the office, that in the end the documents
should wait for signatories.
So far, MPD has not really understand the
budgeting problem, their non-understanding was
because most of MPD components came from
Notaries who do not understand about
administration and financial settlement.
5 RESULTS
The results of the research on the some factors
causing non-optimal budget for activities of notary
regional supervisory board in 2016 budget year
include: 1. Personal factor; 2. Coordination factor; 3.
Non Responsive factor; 4. Not understand about
reporting or settlement.
Based on the interview result with some
informants, it was acknowledged that one of cause
factors for non-optimal activities of Notary Regional
Supervisory Board was personal factor, as stated in
the interview result as follows:
“a question like this refers to technical matters,
the technique in the legal service itself, once we
have accepted dipa, see the posture and then we can
make it into a good order, it goes without saying,
and the last one before dipa was out there was a
development of disbursement plan, so, we have got
the data automatically, while on the other side we
have to focus, and obey, it means that during the
implementation there was no compliance, neither to
disbursement plan not prepared wor plan”.
(informant 1, 50 y.o)
The withdrawn conclusion is, the constraints
referred to technical matters in AHU & KI Service
sub-sector itself, when dipa was accepted, read and
then arranged, the budget executor should comply
with the disbursement plan being developed, but
what happens so far there is no compliance to
disbursement plan and work plan prepared.
Some Factors Causing Non-optimal Budget for Activities of Notary Regional Supervisory Board in 2016 Budget Year
709
In addition, there is another constraint that was
called as low coordination factor, such thing was as
told by the informant.
“ it was lack of coordination, not to mention that
the head of MPD was not so responsive, and he has
handed over fully to the secretary, it doesn't matter
about any absorption, that was that some times
happened”. (informant 3, 56 y.o)
“ it doesn’t work, not the whole, only some, if
we apply, the person in charge also doesnt
understand about budget thing, take SPPD as an
example, the two-day business trip, he made it into
one direct day, the payment was in consequence
only for 1 day, even though he has been examined
for two days, it was only claimed in the report for
only 1 day”. (informant 2, 34 y.o)
Based on the interview with the informant, it was
told that MPD didnot understand about budgeting
thing, let say a business trip, while in dipa it was
stated tath business trip was done for two days , but
during the practice, MPD only did the business trip
for 1(one) day that MPD only made for 1 (one) day
in budget settlement, therefore there was a left over
money.
In addition to the above mentioned constraints,
there was another constraint told by informant, while
this related to the official who signed the settlement
documents that sometimes were busy due to official
duty outside the office, that in the end the documents
should wait for signatories.
“ We have PPK, we don't have PPSM, so we
have to wait, PPSM is available, since KPA as the
proxy of budget user is not available yet, so it has to
wait, it has to wait for everyone to be available”.
(informant 2, 34 y.o)
So far, the AHU & KI Service Sub-Sector never
informs the constraints faced in carrying out the
Notary Regional Supervisory Board activities as it
was told by the informant as follows:
“ the reason was why, it was The sub-sector
itself from the same sector, they never informed that
their constraints were actually this, and since long
time ago up to now perhaps, the questionnaire or
report have never been applied, that’s all, that was
the only in compliance to tell you the truth”.
(informant 1, 50 y.o)
Based on the result of interview with an
informant, it was acknowledged that the head of
MPD was not responsive, where the head of MPD
handed over fully to his secretary, such thing was
told by the next informant as follows:
“ not to mention that the head of MPD was not
so responsive, and he has handed over fully to the
secretary, we don’t mind about what kind of
absorption it may, that was that some times
happened”. (informant 3, 56 y.o)
Not understand about Reporting or Settlement
So far, MPD has not really understand the
budgeting problem, this information was given by
informant as follows:
“ it doesn’t work, not the whole, only some, if
we apply, the person in charge also doesn't
understand about budget thing either, take SPPD as
an example, the two-day business trip, he made it
into one direct day, the payment was in consequence
only for 1 day, even though he has been examined
for two days, it was only claimed in the settlement
for only 1 day”. (informant 2, 34 y.o).
6 CONCLUSIONS
The implementation of MPD budget in 2016 budget
year was not yet optimal because during its
execution there was no strong commitment from the
leader nor compliance, do not comply with the
disbursement plan and work plan that has been
prepared since the budget preparation, in addition to
that, it needs controlling from the leader, where
every work being done by the staffs should be
monitored by the leader until the work is final:
1. In order to prevent any failure upon activities
done by Notary Regional Supervisory Board in
the following years, there are some solutions
needed to be taken some of which are by
holding workshop which invites all members of
MPD without any exception, if necessary a
pinch service by inviting the resource person to
each MPD;
2. To regulate the budget usage based on
disbursement plan and to carry it out obediently;
3. In the provincial area itself, It needs a peer
controlling between the Head of Division, Head
of Section and Head of Sub-sector. And the
Treasury to check what work has been done and
whether or not it is in line with the disbursement
plan;
4. The classical problem that are faced from year
to year is the non-knowledgeable about
settlement reporting, therefore the solution
given may be to develop a guideline or SOP
related to settlement of activities of Notary
Regional Supervisory Board.
UNICEES 2018 - Unimed International Conference on Economics Education and Social Science
710
REFERENCES
Asikin, Decky Firmansyah. (2012). Faktor-Faktor yang
Mempengaruhi Penyusunan Anggaran Berbasis
Kinerja (Studi Empiris pada Pemerintah Kota
Makassar Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan). Skripsi.
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis
Basri. (2013). Analisis Penyusunan Anggaran dan Laporan
Realisasi Anggaran pada BPM-PD Provinsi
Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal Emba, Vol. 1, No. 4. 4, Hal.
202-212
Christina, Ellen. (2002) Anggaran Perusahaan. Jakarta:
Gramedia Pustaka
Haryanto, Arifuddin dan Sahmuddin. (2007) Akuntansi
Sektor Publik Edisi Pertama. Semarang: Badan
Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
Law No. 17. (2013. State Finance
Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta:
ANDI, Hal. 61
Munandar, M. (2000) Budgeting: Perencanaan Kerja,
Pengkoordinasian Kerja, Pengawasan Kerja cetakan
ketigabelas. Yogyakarta: BPFE
Robbin, P. Stephen dan Mary Coulter. (2010) Manajemen,
diterjemahkan oleh Bob Sabran, Wibi Hardani.
Jakarta: Erlangga
SAS Aplication. (2016) Human Rights and Laws Ministry
East Java Provincial Office
Waworuntu, Tika Sari Sandra (2013). Evaluasi
Penyusunan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja terhadap
Kinerja Aparatur Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Kasus
pada Dinas Sosial Provinsi Jawa Barat). Jurnal
Manajemen, Vol. 2, No. 2, Hal. 137-162
Some Factors Causing Non-optimal Budget for Activities of Notary Regional Supervisory Board in 2016 Budget Year
711