Analysis of the Implementation of the COSO Internal Control
Structure for Provision of Credit at PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat
Ferry Laurensius
1
, Sumini
1
and Melisa Sirait
1
1
Politeknik Wilmar Bisnis, Indonesia
Keywords: COSO, Internal Control Structure, Provision of Credit
Abstract: Uncollectible credit risk or bad credit may impede BPR operations. Risk can be avoided or minimized by
executing consistent internal control structures. If the internal control structure is sufficient in the provision
of credit, the implementation of credit provision can be controlled and able to prevent the occurrence of errors
that can inflict jeopardy on the bank. Object of this research is PT. BPR located at Tembung. This study aims
to determine whether the internal control of the credit systems in PT. BPR are in accordance with internal
control elements based on COSO and provide input or improvement that may be applied related to internal
control system. The research method is applied research using comparative method in data analyses. Data
collection by interview, observation and documentation. The research outcomes indicate that the
implementation of internal control system in PT. BPR is quite good, but there are still certain points which
are less suitable with the internal control system based on COSO and BI which need to be improved.
1 INTRODUCTION
The banking sector plays an important role in
supporting the running of the economy and national
development of a country by contributing to
providing loans to sectors that need funds. This can
occur because of the function of banks as
intermediary institutions where banks collect funds
from the community in the form of deposits and
channeling to the community in the form of credit and
or other forms. People's Credit Banks (BPR), which
is one type of banking, have a role in driving the
progress of economic equality and micro-economic
growth. The role of BPR in supporting Indonesia's
current national economic growth through increasing
access to credit or financing from banks. The problem
that often occurs in giving credit is bad credit. Bad
credit brings a threat to the continuity of BPR such as:
cash turnover slows down because cash availability
decreases, profits decline, liquidity ratio, solvency
and profitability are directly or indirectly affected.
This shows the influence on the health of BPR, where
the most tragic is that customers have no more trust.
PT. BPR X Tembung is a bank-shaped business entity
people's credit which has the main function to save
and channel funds (credit) to the community in the
Tembung area. Based on Law No. 10 of 1998, credit
is the provision of money or equivalent claims, based
on an agreement or agreement between banks and
other parties that requires the borrower to repay the
debt after a certain period of time with interest. PT.
BPR X Tembung also experienced a classic problem
faced by BPRs in general, namely non-performing
loans. At PT. BPR X Tembung itself, the level of non-
performing loans or bad loans has always increased
by almost 2% from 2014 to 2016. Even in 2016 the
NPL level shows that the NPL has exceeded the
prescribed limit. Bank Indonesia sets a limit for BPR
NPLs of 5%(Bank Indonesia, 2013).
To prevent the risks of bad credit that can hinder
the operations of the BPR, BPR is very necessary to
pay attention to the effectiveness of the internal
control structure in the BPR. Risks can be avoided or
minimized by implementing the internal control
structure consistently. If the internal control structure
is sufficient in providing credit, the implementation
of credit provision can be controlled and can prevent
the occurrence of errors that can harm the bank.
This study aims to determine whether the internal
control of the lending system at PT. BPR X Tembung
is in accordance with the elements of internal control
according to COSO and provides input or
1006
Laurensius, F., Sumini, . and Sirait, M.
Analysis of the Implementation of the COSO Internal Control Structure for Provision of Credit at PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat.
DOI: 10.5220/0009500810061010
In Proceedings of the 1st Unimed International Conference on Economics Education and Social Science (UNICEES 2018), pages 1006-1010
ISBN: 978-989-758-432-9
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
improvements that may be applied related to the
internal control system.
2 THEORICAL FRAMEWORK
The main source of income for rural banks (BPR) is
interest income derived from lending. When
distributing credit, BPRs face the risk of credit
collection where errors in the procedure for lending
can cause non-performing loans. The factors that
cause non performing loans are as follows (Fransisca
Claudya Mewoh, Sumampouw and Tamengkel,
2016):
a. External factors of the bank
1. There is doubtful intentions from debtors who
are in doubt.
2. There are difficulties or failures in the liquidity
process of the credit agreement that has been
agreed between the debtor and the bank.
3. Conditions of the management and business
environment of the debtor.
4. Disasters (for example: fire, natural disasters) or
business failures.
b. Internal bank factors
1. Lack of knowledge and skills of credit managers.
2. There is no credit policy at the bank concerned.
3. Provision and supervision of credit carried out by
banks deviates from established procedures.
One way to reduce the risk of non-performing
loans from the internal side is to design and
implement internal controls in the process of lending.
Bank Indonesia in its Guidelines for Internal Control
Standards for Commercial Banks (2003) states that an
effective internal control system is an important
component in bank management and is the basis for
healthy and safe financial operations. Internal control
is a supervisory mechanism established by
management on an ongoing basis, with a purpose
(Bank Indonesia, 2003):
1. Maintain and secure bank assets.
2. Ensure the availability of more accurate reports.
3. Improve compliance with applicable regulations.
4. Reducing financial / loss, the impact of
irregularities including fraud / fraud, and
violation of aspects of prudence.
5. Increasing organizational effectiveness and
increasing cost efficiency.
Elements of the Internal Control System The
COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treatway Commission) introduces five internal
control components that are interconnected with each
other, namely(Tampubolon, 2005):
1. Control Environment
2. Risk Assessment
3. Control Activities
4. Informasi dan Komunikasi
5. Monitoring
Weak internal control systems in banking institutions
can cause (Bank Indonesia, 2003)
lack of oversight mechanisms, unclear
accountability of Bank management and failure
in developing a culture of internal control at all
levels of the organization;
Inadequate implementation of the identification
and assessment of risks from the Bank's
operational activities;
the absence or failure of a principal control of the
Bank's operational activities, such as the
separation of functions, authorization,
verification and review of the risk exposure and
performance of the Bank;
lack of communication and information between
levels in the Bank's organization, especially
information at the take-up level
decision about the decrease in the quality of risk
exposure and
application of corrective actions;
inadequate or ineffective internal audit program
and other monitoring activities;
lack of commitment by the Bank's management
to carry out internal control processes and
enforce strict sanctions
3 RESEARCH METHOD
This type of research method is applied research that
uses comparative methods in analyzing data. The
object of research is the internal control system of
providing credit to PT. BPR X Tembung. The type of
data used in this study is qualitative data. The data
sources used in this study are:
Primary data, obtained directly from the object of
research in the form of data relating to the
procedure of lending and control.
Secondary data, obtained from the company in
the form of data and documents at PT. BPR X
Tembung and from other sources such as books,
journals, financial service authority regulations
(OJK) and Bank Indonesia.
The data collection techniques used by the authors in
this study are:
Observation, namely making direct observations
of activities or procedures for granting credit to
PT. X Tembung, with the aim of getting the data
needed in this study.
Analysis of the Implementation of the COSO Internal Control Structure for Provision of Credit at PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat
1007
Documentation, which is collecting data based
on documents and other related written reports
directly with this study.
Interviews, namely conducting interviews with
employees and Directors at BPR X Tembung.
4 ANALYSIS
Lending by BPR X Tembung in 3 consecutive years
has resulted in net profit, non-performing loans and
loan to deposit ratio as shown in the following table:
Table 1: Lending by BPR X Tembung
Year
Loan to
Deposit
Ratio
(LDR)
Bad Credit NPL
2014 83,78 % Rp 154.148.200 0,8881 %
2015 67,62 % Rp 73.442.300 2,48 %
2016 66,80 % Rp 205.297.600 5,66 %
From the table it can be seen that the LDR is very
large, the total channeled loans increase, but the net
profit decreases, and the condition of the NPL on
BPR X Tembung has increased sharply over the past
3 years. This can occur because of the abundant third
party funds indicated by the percentage of LDR.
Because third party funds are abundant and there
is a huge opportunity to get profits from lending,
credit is also being intensified to make a profit.
However, credit is experiencing congestion in
payments of principal and interest, so that it can affect
BPR income. In order to obtain optimal profit with
minimal bad credit risk, it can be achieved, it is
necessary to have a controlled and optimal credit
management through an internal control system in
granting credit. If the internal control structure that is
owned is consistent and adequate in granting credit,
then the implementation of credit provision can be
controlled and can prevent the occurrence of errors
that can be detrimental. Analysis of the internal
control system of PT. BPR X can be described as
follows according to COSO:
1. Control Environment
PT. BPR X Tembung has an organizational structure,
job description and decree that clearly explains the
division of tasks, responsibilities and work
relationships. However, there is still an
implementation that is not in accordance with the
organizational structure, namely the existence of
vacant positions (bill monitoring section).
In terms of integrity and ethical values, PT. BPR
X does not yet have a code of ethics guideline that
directs the ethical behavior of every employee,
especially employees in lending. Ethics and integrity
are carried out only based on Bank Indonesia
guidelines
In human resource policies, PT. BPR X Tembung
has procedures for the acceptance of new employees,
training, promotions, compensation. PT. BPR X also
has training activities & other motivational activities.
2. Risk assessment
PT. BPR X Tembung has not carried out a
comprehensive risk assessment and has no risk
universe and risk register. In credit distribution, only
5 C debtors are assessed. Important risk assessment is
carried out to design and implement internal controls
that are still needed in lending.
3. Control Activities
There are performance reviews conducted by top
management namely directors in terms of achieving
credit targets every month, against the target bills that
must be achieved every month and debtor payment
reports from month to month.
PT. BPR X Tembung also has and runs credit
policies and procedures contained in the Guidelines
for BPR (PKPB), and BPR X Tembung Credit
Guidelines (PP).
Segregation of duties in the procedure of lending
is carried out by several related functions. In the
credit process there are multiple functions, namely
survey functions and analysis functions carried out by
the same person from AO Lending which can cause
fraud where analysis is not carried out based on the
actual condition of the debtor. In terms of monitoring
bills there is a double duty. The task of monitoring
bills is carried out by other parts randomly, no special
unit is set to run).
There are certain controls or functions to check the
accuracy, completeness and feasibility of authorizing
all transactions credit, namely the internal control
department.
Credit distribution is carried out when authorized
by the authorities.
Credit documents are prenumbered.
Recording in journal is based on evidence of
incoming credit that has been authorized by the
authorized function and enclosed by a complete
document.
UNICEES 2018 - Unimed International Conference on Economics Education and Social Science
1008
In terms of physical control of assets, BPR X
performs physical matching between credit
documents, collection documents, proof of cash
receipts and debtor books. This is done by the Internal
Audit Function
4. Information and communication
There is an accounting information system that
includes methods and records in order to identify,
classify, analyze, classify, record / record and report
bank transactions contained in the PKPB & PP BPR
X Tembung. PT. BPR X also owns and runs a credit
management information system in the form
electronic or not electronic or system manuals using
forms / books / notes.
5. Monitoring
Monitoring should be carried out continuously
through the implementation of internal audits or
annual audits conducted by external auditors. Even
though it has an SPI function, based on the results of
the study, information is obtained that no audit has
been carried out in the process of lending, which
includes evaluation of risks and internal controls.
Monitoring in the BPR is only on checking
documents and administration related to the
implementation of lending by internal control by 1
person. Credit monitoring is carried out by taking into
account the debtor's loan deadline which must be
immediately visited or levied. Giving a warning to the
debtor if the installments or interest that are due are
not paid on time there are 3 times. Giving warnings
using the desk call and sms blast that has been
automated, and a letter for the third warning.
5 RESULTS
From the results of the analysis it was found that the
increase in bad credit at PT. BPR X Tembung can be
seen from the increase in the ratio of Non Performing
Loans, where the NPL of BPR X increased to 5.66%
in 2016. The increase in NPL could be caused by
external factors and internal factors. One of the
internal factors that influence the increase in problem
loans is the weak application of the Internal Control
Structure. Based on the results of the analysis, the
internal control of PT. BPR X must be addressed
immediately to reduce the risk of non-performing
loans. Some recommendations from the results of the
analysis of the Internal Control Structure of PT. BPR
X Tembung is:
1. Improve organizational structure and complete
with clear job descriptions and performance
targets in lending. Empty positions must be filled
immediately so that responsibility for managing
functions can be established.
2. Implement comprehensive risk management and
risk assessment in the function of lending.
Extensive risk assessment on the function of
lending must be followed by self assessment
(CSA) so that the risks of lending can be
immediately anticipated with adequate internal
controls.
3. The segregation of duties in lending is carried out
by separating the functions of the survey and
analysis so that the giving credit more leverage
and prevent fraud.
4. In terms of monitoring bills, it is recommended
that a special unit be assigned to carry out the
task of monitoring bills so that there is no
duplication of tasks that can cause fraud and
hinder other work.
5. Add personnel to the Internal Control department
and further develop the Internal Control program
or establish a special work unit for active
monitoring of the overall implementation of
lending (Audit Committee). Internal Audit /
Audit Committee will usually carry out analysis,
assessment and submission of suggestions. Audit
helps implement systematic, disciplined
evaluations & enhances the effectiveness of risk
management, control & regulatory processes,
and organizational management. This internal
audit is an added value that enhances BPR
operations.
6. Monitoring economic developments and
competing business debtors when current loans
can help BPR anticipate events that will occur on
loans. So that the relationship that wants to be
built between BPR and debtors that are not just
money and bank relations can be realized, thus it
can also create loyalty, and the family
atmosphere desired by BPR can be achieved.
6 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the discussion and analysis described
previously, the authors concluded that:
1. BPR X Tembung has an organizational structure
that is not suitable for its implementation, namely
the existence of vacant positions (bill monitoring
section). PT. BPR X should always make
adjustments and improve organizational
structures so that channels or information flows
are adequate, the objectives and processes
implemented are in line.
Analysis of the Implementation of the COSO Internal Control Structure for Provision of Credit at PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat
1009
2. BPR X Tembung does not carry out risk
management thoroughly. BPR X Tembung only
assesses the risk of the debtor (principle 5C).
BPR X should carry out risk management as a
whole because it can affect the achievement of
goals or objectives.
3. In the credit process there is a multiplication of
functions, namely the survey function and
analysis function carried out by the same person
from AO Lending which can cause fraud. BPR X
should separate the multiple functions that are in
the lending process, namely credit surveys and
analyzes conducted by people who are different
from AO lending.
4. In terms of monitoring bills there is a duplicate
of tasks (the task of monitoring bills is done by
other parts randomly, no special unit is set to run)
which can cause fraud and inhibit other work.
BPR X should reassign the bill monitoring
function unit, so that there is no duplication of
duties.
5. BPR X only monitor the completeness of
documents and administration related to the
implementation of lending by internal control by
1 person only and there is no stipulation or
establishment of a special work unit to actively
monitor the overall implementation of lending.
BPR X should add personnel to the Internal
Control section and further develop the internal
control program or establish an Audit Unit or
Audit Committee to actively monitor the overall
implementation of lending (monitoring
objectives, achievement strategies, financial
reporting, compliance with regulations, internal
controls, and recruitment and supervision).
REFERENCES
Bank Indonesia (2003) Pedoman Standar Sistem
Pengendalian Internal bagi Bank Umum dan Surat
Edaran No.5/22/DPNP, Bank Indonesia.
Bank Indonesia (2013) Pedoman Kebijakan dan Prosedur
Perkreditan Bagi Bank Prekreditan Rakyat dan Surat
Edaran No.14/26/DKBU, Bank Indonesia.
Fransisca Claudya Mewoh, Sumampouw, H. J. and
Tamengkel, L. F. (2016) ‘ANALISIS KREDIT
MACET (PT. BANK SULUT, TBK DI
MANADO)’, Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 4 (1).
Tampubolon, R. (2005) Risk and Systems Based Internal
Audit. PT.Elex Media Komputindo.
UNICEES 2018 - Unimed International Conference on Economics Education and Social Science
1010