2 THEORICAL FRAMEWORK
Transformational Leadership
In 1978 James McGregor Burns first introduced the
concept of transformational leadership as a different
type of leadership with transactional leadership.
According to Burns, transformational leadership is a
leadership that pays attention to the relationship
between leaders and followers based on trust, needs
and values that can be accepted by their followers.
Furthermore, the notion of transformational
leadership continues to evolve as Buil explains
transformational leadership as follows:
Transformational leadership defined as a style of
leadership that transforms followers to rise above
their self-interest by altering their morale, ideals,
interests, and values, motivating them to perform
better than initially expected, is currently the most
widely accepted paradigm in the leadership literature
(Buil et al., 2018)
Elain Pieterse, Cornelia Niessen defines
transformational leadership as follows,“
transformational leadership is defined as a
meaningful and creative exchange between leaders
and followers with the aim to guide followers
through a vision-driven change (Niessen, Mäder,
Stride, & Jimmieson, 2017). In accordance with
Cornelia's understanding, transformational
leadership is a style of a leader who builds beneficial
and creative reciprocal relationships to move his
followers through a change in perspective on
organizational goals. With a transformational
leadership approach, followers will change
themselves to contribute according to their
perspective on the organization's vision. A
transformational leader will convince his followers
that organizational goals are a common goal for the
benefit of all personnel in the organization.
Other definitions of transformational leadership
in the leadership literature discussed by Aviolo and
Bass define transformational leadership as follows:
Transformational leadership is multi-faceted and
comprises four sub-dimensions, namely idealized
influence (attributed and behavior), inspirational
motivation, intellectual stimulation, and
individualized consideration. Idealized influence
attributed refers to followers’ attributions of power
and confidence and their identification with their
leader. Leaders consider the need of others over their
own needs and serve as charismatic role models for
their followers, who respond with trust, confidence,
and respect (Buil et al., 2018).
An understanding of transformational leadership
is becoming increasingly interesting as material for
discussion in academia and researchers in the field
of leadership. As Aviolo and Bass explained
transformational leadership as multi-dimensional
leadership in accordance with John R. Schermerhorn
et.al who said that transformational leadership has
four dimensions, namely, charisma, inspiration,
intellectual stimulation and individualized
consideration (Schermerhorn, Jr et al., 2014).
Based on the literature review above, it can be
synthesized that transformational leadership is the
behavior of leaders who are embodied in exemplary
attitudes in empowering organizational resources
optimally to achieve established goals, with
indicators: able to influence subordinates, inspire
and intellectual stimulus.
Professionalism
To obtain the concept of "Professionalism" which
embodies this dissertation, it will first describe
things that are relevant to the terminology. In the
literature on human resource management
professionalism is defined as follows: ... the
individual professional one who works within
limitations is set by the boundaries of knowledge
specialism set by the professional body, and the
government controls in others who have sets for
them (Parnell, 2011, 2015). John A Parnell's study
of professionalism describes that a person is
declared a professional if the person is able to
demonstrate performance within boundaries
arranged in a series of specific knowledge
determined by a professional body and in the target
and planning context that has been set for them by
the government
Chambers describes the details of
professionalism cited by Brian P. West as follows:
Professionalism is tolerated: to contend with
managers who should have what they demand,
where they are the demand for prejudice, the
preservation of the interests of others, is to forgo
professional independence; to admit that intellectual
involvement or self-interest dominate (West, 2003).
Professionali sm is competition between employees
in meeting the criteria or requirements owned by
employees in work that has been determined by the
organization. In addition, professionalism can foster
intellectual freedom of the employees at work and
foster an atmosphere that is conducive to work.
Based on the study of the literature above, it can
be synthesized that professionalism is the character
of a person which is shown from the ability, skill,
and method of execution of work in accordance with
the standards set by official bodies or institutions
recognized by the government with indicators of
knowledge of a field of work , skills in work and
high dedication to his work.