2 THEORICAL FRAMEWORK
2.1 Stakeholder Theory
Friedman (1962) in (Ghozali, Imam, dan Chariri,
2007) stated that the company's main goal is to
maximize the prosperity of its owners. So according
to him, stakeholders are only defined as owners. In
the end, the Stakeholder Theory emerged by
Freeman (1983) in (Ghozali, Imam, dan Chariri,
2007) which explained the involvement and role of
stakeholders in promoting CSR towards the
company. According to him, stakeholders consisting
of customers, competitors, merchant associations,
media, environment, distributors, government,
consumer protection institutions, local communities,
and business people have active participation that is
very much needed in the successful implementation
of CSR. This makes the existence of a company
strongly influenced by the support provided by
stakeholders to the company (Ghozali, Imam, dan
Chariri, 2007)
Stakeholder theory considers the position of
stakeholders more powerful. This stakeholder group
is the main consideration for companies in
disclosing and / not disclosing information in
financial statements. In view of stakeholder theory,
companies have stakeholders, not shareholders
(Belkaoui, Ahmed Riahi, 2006).
Corporate Social Responsibility is a corporate
strategy to satisfy the desires of stakeholders, the
better disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility
by the company, the stakeholders will be more
satisfied and will give full support to the company
for all its activities aimed at raising performance and
achieving profit.
2.2 Legitimacy Theory
The legitimacy theory and stakeholder theory are
theoretical perspectives that are within the
framework of the theory of political economy.
Because the influence of the wider community can
determine the allocation of financial resources and
other economic sources, companies tend to use
environment-based performance and disclosure of
environmental information to justify or legitimize
corporate activities in the eyes of the public (Gray,
Rob, 1995)
(Ralf, 2007) revealed that the explanation of the
strength of the organization's legitimacy theory in
the context of corporate social responsibility in
developing countries is twofold; First, the capability
to place profit maximization motives makes a clearer
picture of the motivation of the company to increase
its social responsibility. Second, the legitimacy of an
organization can be to include cultural factors that
form different institutional pressures in different
contexts. Legitimacy can provide a powerful
mechanism for understanding voluntary disclosures
for the environment and social activities carried out
by the company, and this understanding will lead to
critical public debate, furthermore the legitimacy
theory shows researchers and the wider community
of ways to be more sensitive to the content of
disclosure company (Tilling, 2004)
Corporate Social Responsibility practices carried
out by the company aim to align themselves with
community norms. With good disclosure of
Corporate Social Responsibility, it is expected that
the company will gain legitimacy from the
community so that it can improve performance
aimed at achieving corporate profits.
2.3 Signaling Theory
According to (Harahap, 2007) signal theory
(signaling theory) explains why companies have the
urge to provide financial reports to external parties.
The company's push to provide information is
because there is information asymmetry between
company management and outsiders (investors)
The company will present an annual report on the
company's CSR activities or reports on the
implementation of GCG (Good Corporate
Governance) in the company.
The purpose of this additional report is to provide
additional information about the company's activities
as well as a means to provide signals to stakeholders
on other matters, for example providing signals
about the company's concern for the surrounding
area, or a sign that the company is not only provide
information based on regulatory provisions but
provide more information for stakeholders. These
signals are expected to be positively accepted by the
market so as to be able to influence the company's
market performance reflected in the market price of
the company's shares.
According to Morris in (Harahap, 2007),
information asymmetry can occur if one party has a
more complete signal of information than the other
party. Information asymmetry occurs if management
does not convey all information obtained in full so
that it affects the value of the company reflected in
changes in stock prices because the market will
respond to existing information as a signal.
According to (Drever, 2016) signaling theory
emphasizes that the reporting company can increase
the value of the company through its reporting.
2.4 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Conceptually, there are many notions of social and
environmental responsibility, better known as
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).
According to Lako in the book CSR and Reform
of the Business & Accounting Paradigm (Lako,