It is very clear that the responses are similar and
confused, and they meet our specifications in terms
of center frequency (f
0
=8.9), of the bandwidth
(BW=0.4 GHz) and even the type of filtering chosen
(Chebyshev) and its order (n=4).
Moreover, the reflection losses in the bandwidth
are below than -20db.
HFSS and CST allow us to map the
electromagnetic field of the structures analyzed, that
is meant, seeing the distribution of the wave TE
10
inside them.
Figure 12: electric fields of the TE
10
mode at f
0
= 8.9GHz
of a) waveguide bandpass filter b) SIW bandpass filter
Figure 12 shows the identical of the
electromagnetic field distribution in the waveguide
and the SIW structure at the center frequency.
For the moment, we designed and simulated two
bandpass filter structures, we analyzed its results, we
found that both of them are respected our
specifications.
So, what makes one of them better than the
other?
To answer this question it is necessary to observe
Table 3, which contains the total dimensions of each
structure.
Table 3: dimensions of each structure
a (mm) L (mm) H (mm)
Waveguide
=1
22.86 131.28 10.16
SIW
=6.15
10.14 63.31 0.664
Reduction % 55.65% 51.77% 93.46%
According to table 3, there is a big difference
between these two structures in terms of dimensions,
such that, the length and width of the SIW structure
are reduced by half, without forgetting the height
which reduced by 93.46%.
Therefore, the dimension factor has a big
importance in the fabrication of the different
devices.
Scientists are currently trying to minimize the
size of components and make them easy to
manufacture and integrate with planar circuits, at a
low cost.
After these studies, we can say that the SIW
structure can meet these requirements.
6 CONCLUSION
In this work, we designed a pass band filter in the
band X by adding inductive iris to two structures the
first is a guide filled with air, the second is a guide
filled with substrate.
As a result, the SIW structure allows us to
miniaturize our filter more than half.
REFERENCES
Adabi, A. & Tayarani, M. (2008). Substrate integration of
Dual inductive post waveguide filter, Progress In
Electromagnetics Research B, 7, 321-329
Caleffo, C. R. (2015). New design procedure to determine
the taper transition for impedance matching between
microstrip line and siw component, Journal of
Microwaves Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic
Applications, 15(3) ,247-260
Damou, M. (2018). Design and optimization of microwave
passive components in SIW technology: Application to
Bandpass filters. PhD thesis Algeria, University of
Tlemcen, Tlemcen.
Hong, J. S, & Lancaster, M. J. CHANG, K (ed.) (2011).
Microstrip Filters for RF/Microwave. 2nd edn, Wiley-
Blackwell, Canada.
Grine, F. (2018). Contribution to the elaboration of a
model of electromagnetic coupling microstrip line -
waveguide integrated into the substrate. PhD thesis
Algeria, University of Constantine 1, Constantine.
Lei, Z. Sheng, S. Rui, L. Chang, K (ed.) (2012).
Microwave bandpass filters for Wideband
communications, Wiley-Blackwell, Canada.
Shang, X. Xia, W. & Lancaster, M. J. (2014). The design
of Waveguide filters based on Cross-coupled
resonators, Microwave and optical technology letters,
56(1), 3–8.
Tubail1, D. & Skaik, T. (2017). A direct approach for
Coupling matrix synthesis for Coupled resonator
diplexers. Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and
Electromagnetic Applications, 16(4), 942-953
Vanhoenacker, D. J & Vorst, A .V. (
1996). Bases de
l'ingénierie micro-onde, De Boeck, Bruxelles
Zhai, Y. Wang, Q. Wang, Z. & Gao, X. X. (2008). The
design of an Iris waveguide filter at 35.75 GHz.
Millimeter Waves GSMM. May 2008, Nanjing, Chine.
IEEE.