Islam, Oligarchy and Sustainability in Local Indonesia:
A Case Study on Polluted Rivers in Banten Province
Ahmad Munjin
1
, Amsal Bakhtiar
1
1
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords:
Formal political rights, official positions, mobilization, coercive power, material power, wealth
power, elite, oligarchy, democracy, and sustainability.
Abstract: This study discusses the issue of polluted rivers in Banten Province in relation to the implication of policies
of the local administration. Some argue that the pollution resulted from the decision processes which were
not transparent and the abuse of industries in environmental policies. By applying a descriptive-analytic
method, the study discusses how the accused oligarchic local government of Banten had relation to the issue
of polluted rivers. The study finds that some permits of establishing industries in the province were not
examined rigorously, openly and objectively. This became possibly happened due to the agencies behind the
personals of the local government were from cronies who have a close relationship with the local authorities
or the oligarchies. These factual situations brought about less control over the industries’ sustainability
management.
1 INTRODUCTION
By referring to the Report of the World Commission
on Environment and Development: Our Common
Future, well known as The Brundtland Commission
Report 1987, sustainable development is defined as
"development that meets the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs" (The
Brundtland Report, 1987). The global community has
started to talk about environmental issues since the
UN Conference on Environment in Stockholm,
Sweden, on June 15, 1972. However, throughout its
history, the main motive for oligarchic power is the
accumulation of wealth and lack of attention to such
environmental conservation issues.
In the context of local Indonesia, Tangerang City,
Tangerang Regency, and South Tangerang City are
the main areas in Banten Province which are the
buffer of Jakarta as the capital city of the country. The
three regions are filled with factories and industrial
centers so that their position is very strategic. The
availability of infrastructure facilitates the ongoing
economic transactions between provinces so as to
provide added value in accelerating economic growth
in Banten (Dinas LHK, 2013).
However, the rapid development in Banten
Province as one of the largest industrial estates in
Indonesia, has two contradictory impacts. On the one
hand, it produces significant economic growth and on
the other hand produces the potential for
environmental pollution which will damage the
balance of natural resources. In turn, it causes global
warming and climate change (Dinas LHK, 2013).
This study elaborates on three major themes in an
interdisciplinary manner, namely religion, politics,
and sustainability. Religion includes both actors and
doctrines, such as kiai (Islamic cleric) and verses of
the Holy Qur'an that are related to environmental
sustainability issues; Meanwhile, political aspect
includes oligarchic actors and their policies on
environmental preservation; and sustainability which
covers environmental sustainability issues and their
relationship with social, economic and political
aspects.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Researchers on sustainability, such as Grossman
and Krueger (1995), Lim (1997), Saboori and
Sulaiman (2013), Panayotou (2016), Li et al (2018),
and Raza and Shah (2018) find economic growth
activities always proportional reversed with the
quality of the environment -- the economy grows but
the environment is degraded. However, Grossman
and Krueger (1995) found that the phase of
842
Munjin, A. and Bakhtiar, A.
Islam, Oligarchy and Sustainability in Local Indonesia: A Case Study on Polluted Rivers in Banten Province.
DOI: 10.5220/0009918508420850
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Recent Innovations (ICRI 2018), pages 842-850
ISBN: 978-989-758-458-9
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
environmental improvement before a country's per
capita income reached US$8000. Likewise with Lim
(1997) and Li et al (2018) who also find a turning
point in environmental improvement occurs when
regulations and policies become more stringent.
Meanwhile, Hu (2017) found that both industrial
wastewater and industrial solid waste have a negative
impact on economic growth, but not industrial gas
waste. Weiwei Mo (2018) found, "..development of
high tech to be the best strategy to increase GDP
while imposing the least additional environmental
impacts."
In the Banten context, research on sustainability in
the province has been carried out by Apriyanto et al.
(2015). By using the Key Performance Indicators
(KPI), they found that the status of South Tangerang
City is still not fully sustainable but is still in the
starting stage. The contribution of each pillar
(economic, social and environmental) that exists
begins to show a balance.
However, based on a more detailed analysis, it is
known that the environmental pillars in this city are
vulnerable. If a scenario for protecting this pillar is
not carried out, especially in water and land resources
it is not impossible that the development of this city
can become unsustainable due to limitations. The
more land that is built, while the area of vegetation is
far from the standard. Waste generated by the
community and economic activities is increasing but
the management has not been carried out optimally
(Apriyanto et al., 2015).
These studies are concerned with economic and
environmental themes and have not connected them
yet with oligarchic power. This research will try to
contribute to the gap.
3 METHODOLOGY
By applying a descriptive-analytic method, The
methodology of this research is qualitative with
emphasis on the study of literature and
documentation. The primary data source in this study
was interviews with environmental experts. While the
secondary data sources are Banten Province
Environmental Status Data Book (SLHD) 2013-2017
issued by the Banten Provincial Environment and
Forestry Service and the Environmental Statistics of
the Central Statistics Agency (BPS). Other data
sources are books and journals. The data produced
from these sources is read using the "four spheres"
framework for sustainability theory which covers
four domains, namely economic, social,
environmental, and political. The political sphere
plays a role at the level of political-economic,
political-environmental, and social-political policies.
Finally, there is what is called the system interfaces
that include the environment-economy, social
economy, and social-environment (O'Connor, 2007).
In the political sphere, to distinguish the system of
oligarchic government from the elite in democracy,
researchers add power resource theory (Winters,
2011), namely formal political rights, official
positions, coercive power, mobilization, and material
power. Only the latter is a resource of oligarchic
power. The other four are elite power resources in the
domocratic system.
4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
In this section, the researcher explained the
transformation of the power resources of both the kiai
(Islamic cleric) and the jawara in Banten briefly from
the colonial era to the reform era. The clerics survived
the status of their elite power while the Jawara
transformed their power resources from elite power to
the oligarchy. This wealth power at the end turned to
control the kiai's power resources, such as official
positions and mobilization.
4.1 Jawara Transformation from Elite
to Oligarchy
In the colonial era both kiai and jawara were elite
for the Banten community (Tihami, 1992). In the
social sphere (O'Connor, 2007), the two entities are
informal leaders (Argyres and Mui, 2000) who have
traditional authority and legitimacy (Budiardjo,
1991). In the political realm (O'Connor, 2007), their
most prominent elite power is mobilization (Winters,
2011). Among the indicators are the period of
mobilization by kiai and jawara to carry out several
rebellions (Darmadi, 2015).
The first, the rebellion opposed colonialists in the
19th century. The Kiai succeeded in mobilizing the
community to revolt like the peak of the peasant
uprising in Cilegon in 1888 led by Kiai Haji Wasid
(Tihami, 1992); The second, in 1888, several very
influential kiai controlled anti-Western sentiment
through their studies in Mecca. They led a large-scale
rebellion. According to Kartodirdjo (1966), the kiai
prepared and organized rebellions through
networking with their santri (students); and the third,
the kiai also played an important power in mobilizing
communist rebellion in Banten in 1926 as in Hamid
(2010) and Williams (1990).
While the official position of power in the colonial
era was shared by both the kiai and the jawara.
Among the evidence was the kiai as religious leaders
and champions as profane leaders, namely the village
government. Meanwhile, more coercive power is
Islam, Oligarchy and Sustainability in Local Indonesia: A Case Study on Polluted Rivers in Banten Province
843
owned by jawara. One reason is that jawara have a
kind of social power that allows them to violate the
rules of society at any time and bully by using their
powers when needed. All of that, is an elite power
resource for kiai and jawara (Munjin, 2018).
Therefore, in the colonial era, for oligarchic power
resources, both kiai and jawara did not have it. The
seeds of the oligarchy especially in the jawara had
indeed emerged since the colonial era because they
were anthropologically the richest group in society.
However, this wealth is not yet in the oligarch
category (Munjin, 2018).
The dynamics of the power of the kiai's power and
jawara in the Soekarno era (the Old Order) were not
much different from the conditions in the colonial era.
That is, the two informal leader entities both have
elite power resources and the seeds of oligarchic
power. The different ones are actors who face kiai and
jawara. In the colonial era, kiai and jawara faced off
with invaders who became common enemies, in the
Soekarno era they were dealing with the central
government. Results, kiai, jawara, and the central
government were more of a dialectical representation
of elite power than oligarchy (Munjin, 2018).
In the Soeharto era (the New Order), elite power
from kiai and jawara was actually co-opted and
utilized by the New Order regime with prominent
material and coercive power of the regime. In one
hand, the kiai elite power resource such as
mobilization was co-opted by the regime. In other
hand, the relationship of the regime with the jawara
was more economically profitable. This happened
because of the nature of the kiai as an elite while the
jawara acted as an oligarch. So, if the New Order
relationship with the kiai was limited to the context of
elite interests while the relationship with the jawara
also included the business context which is not for
kiai (Munjin, 2018).
In the era of the Reformation, both kiai and jawara
had the same power of mobilization. However, the
magnitude of the power of mobilization of the kiai is
still being used by politicians as happened in the New
Order era. Therefore, the power of the kiai was
fragmented into several political parties. The power
of mobilization of the kiai which is actually large is
weakened. Meanwhile, the power of jawara
mobilization actually gets an additional 'ammunition'
from three other power resources, namely: official
position, coercive and material power. The last two
powers of the jawara which have turned around to co-
opt the power of the kiai mobilization. One of the
concrete proofs is the co-optation of jawara against
Satkar Ulama. Above all, the kiai who were originally
teachers of the jawara were degraded along with the
magnitude of the jawara's oligarchic powers and
undermined the interests of politicians and their
parties (Munjin, 2018). The jawara oligarchic power
represents the economic and political realm
(O'Connor, 2007).
4.2 The Family of Jawara as Oligarchs
Oligarchy is the power carried out by the richest
citizens (Winters and Page, 2009). According to
Jeffrey A. Winters, oligarchs are formed and defined
when extreme wealth stratification occurs and is
maintained by oligarchs. There are two types of
defense, namely property defense and defense of
income through political channels. The term then
emerges, the politics of wealth defense. If you are in
direct power, the motive for the defense of wealth
becomes wider to other non-military power resource
motives. If power is behind the scenes, the motive for
power is merely the defense of wealth. If the
oligarchy is not tamed by law in a democratic system,
its power will lead to extreme material inequalities
and extreme political inequalities (Winters, 2011).
The government system that took place in Banten
province showed almost complete operation of the
oligarchy theory. The first, oligarchy is formed when
there is extreme material inequality (material
stratification). All data show these inequalities, such
as Gini Coefficient Ratio; Gross Regional Domestic
Product (GRDP) based on current prices according to
regencies/cities in Banten province (trillion rupiah) in
2012-2016; GRDP without industrial components
based on current prices according to regencies/cities
in Banten province (trillion rupiah) in 2012-2016;
Adjusted per capita expenditure according to
regencies/cities in Banten province (million
rupiah/year), 2013-2016; Per capita GRDP (million
rupiah) in Banten province in 2016; and the number
of poor people according to regencies/cities in Banten
province (thousand people) from 2013 to 2016. The
most extreme material stratification occurs between
Banten in the northern region, especially Tangerang
regency and Tangerang city and southern region,
Lebak regency and Pandeglang regency (Munjin,
2018).
Figure 1: Banten Province's Gini Index shows an upward
trend in inequality 2002-2016
0.33
0.360.36
0.37
0.34
0.37
0.42
0.4
0.38
0.39
0.42
0.390.39
2002
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
IndeksGini
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
844
The second, material inequality creates
oligarchs and the oligarchic system. The family
members of Tb. Chasan Sochib was confirmed as
oligarchs in Banten.
Table 1: The extended family of Tubagus Chasan Sochib as
Oligarchs in Banten
No Names Positions
1
Ratu Atut Chosiyah
(daughter)
Deputy Governor of Banten 2002-
2007; Governor of Banten 2007-2012
and 2012-2017
2
Tubagus Haerul
Jaman (son)
Deputy Mayor of Serang Period
2008-2013; Mayor in Remaining
Period 2008-2013; Serang Mayor of
2013-2018.
3
Ratu Tatu Chasanah
(daughter)
Member of Banten Province DPRD
2009-2014; Serang Deputy Regent
2010 - 2015; and the Serang Regent
2016-2021.
4
Heryani (wife)
Member of Pandeglang DPRD 2009-
2014; Deputy Regent of Pandeglang
2011-2016.
5
Airin Rachmi Diany
(daughter in law)
Mayor of South Tangerang 2011-
2016 and 2016-2021
6
Hikmat Tomet (son in
law/Ratu Atut
Chosiyah's husband)
Members of Parliament 2009-2014
7
Andika Hazrumy
(grandchild)
Members of the 2009-2014 DPD;
2014-2019 DPR Members; and
Deputy Governor of Banten 2017-
2022.
8
Aden Abdul Khaliq
(son-in-law, husband
of Ratu Lilis
Karyawati)
Member of Banten Province DPRD
2009-2014; Tangerang Regent
Candidate Period 2013-2018.
9
Ratna Komalasari
(Wife/Stepmother of
Atut Chosiyah)
Members of the Serang City DPRD
2009-2014
10
Ade Rossi
Chairunnisa
(Granddaughter of
daughter-in-law, wife
of Andika Hazrumy)
Members of the Serang City DPRD
2009-2014; Deputy Chairperson of
Banten DPRD.
11
Tanto Warsono
Arban (The grandson
of the son-in-law,
Atut Chosiyah's son
in law)
Member of Banten Province DPRD
2014-2016; and Deputy Regent of
Pandeglang 2016-2021
12
Andiara Aprilia
Hikmat
(Granddaughter, Son
of Atut Chosiyah,
wife of Tanto
Warsono Arban)
DPD member from Banten 2014-
2019
The total family wealth as reported in the State
Organizers' Assets Report (LHKPN) to the
Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) divided
by Banten Province's 2016 per capita GRDP. This
family achieves oligarchy levels as evidenced by the
material power index (MPI) (Winters, 2011)
amounting to 6,355 times. Ratu Atut Chosiyah is the
largest material power holder with MPI at 5,943 times
(2006), 4,146 times (2011), and 3,487 times (2002);
The second rank is occupied by Airin Rachmi Diany
with MPI 4,421 times (2010), 2,489 times (2009), and
2,314 (2015); The third ranking was held by Heryani
with MPI 3,505 times (2010) and 1,550 times (2015);
Hikmat Tomet ranked fourth in 2,489 times (2009);
In fifth place, Andika Hazrumy 2,372 times (2009)
and 539,51 (2015). The names are in the category of
oligarchs because the index of material power is
above 2000 times compared to the average
community in their respective regions (Munjin,
2018).
The rest are under 1000 times so that they are not
defined as oligarchs, like Aden Abdul Khaliq in the
number 613.3 times (2012); Aprilia Andi Hikmat in
the position of 489.61 times (2014); Tanto Warsono
Arban at position 415.8 times (2014); Tubagus
Haerul Jaman at 282.31 times (2008), 78.51 times
(2013), 407.19 times (2016) and 407.01 times (2016);
and Ratu Tatu Chasanah at 378.16 times (2010) and
200.9 times (2015). So, of the 12 members of the
Chasan Sochib family, two of them did not fulfill
their obligation to report the LHKPN to the KPK so
that only 10 of them could trace the amount of their
material power resources. Of these 10, five were
confirmed and defined as oligarchs. While the rest, do
not qualify to be defined as the oligarchs (Munjin,
2018).
However, if the total is the result of the total
nominal value of the last LHKPN of each Tubagus
Chasan Sochib family member, excluding Ratna
Komalasari and Ade Rossi Chairunnisa, the wealth of
Tubagus Chasan Sochib's extended family reported to
the KPK reached Rp268,920,388,401. After being
divided by Banten province's GDP per capita in 2016
valued at Rp. 42,310,000, the champion family's
material power index was 6,356 times (Munjin,
2018).
In this context, Chasan Sochib's family is
categorized as an oligarch because of the material
stratification compared to ordinary people far above
2000 times. Thus, if seen by individuals, almost half
are in the category of oligarchs. But, if generalized,
namely one large family, they are all defined as
oligarchs. The oligarchs are certainly not just those
families in Banten. In this study, the Ratu Atut
Chosiyah clan was only one sample. They were
proven to create an oligarchic system of government
because their resources were supported by wealth
Islam, Oligarchy and Sustainability in Local Indonesia: A Case Study on Polluted Rivers in Banten Province
845
power that had been built since the beginning of the
New Order regime (Munjin, 2018).
The third, they are also confirmed as politico
business oligarchy (Robison and Hadiz, 2004) and
carry out property defense politics (Winters, 2011).
After the company of Tb. Chasan Sochib has a
network with power in the New Order era, the project
was abundant so it became a money machine. The
money was used to build a network of both business
and politics. The arrival of the reform era, both money
and network capital provided space for family
members of Tb. Chasan Sochib to rule through
democratic channels. It is here that there is a political
defense of wealth. Through their power they get the
projects of their company, and the money produced is
used for political mobilization. Likewise the opposite.
Unmitigated, they also intervene in the law. There is
what is called the treasure defense regime because the
motive for oligarchic power is wealth based on the
enforcement of claims against property rights.
The fourth, the Banten case proves the effect of
oligarchy, in which extreme material inequality
creates extreme political inequality as well. The
material power index of 6,355 times which shows
sharp inequality compared to the ordinary people has
triggered the dominance of their political power. Of
the four regencies and four cities in Banten province,
only Lebak Regency and Tangerang city have not
fallen into the hands of the Ratu Atut Chosiyah
dynasty (Munjin, 2018).
4.3 Oligarchy versus Sustainability in
Banten
The literature on oligarchy and democracy usually
sees it as two mutually closed political rules. Winters
and Page actually see it as compatible and often even
fusing. Both disagree with the view, rich people
dominate all aspects of politics (Winters and Page,
2009). In a democratic formal political system,
Dahlian pluralistic struggles (Dahl, 1982) are even
segmented (not general and revolutionary). Various
mass mobilizations may voice many issues, such as
race, feminism, gay, ethnicity, religion, morality,
weapons, or the environment. These issues are very
important for most ordinary citizens in a democratic
system. However, for oligarchs, these issues are very
limited and are cross-sectoral concerns (Winters and
Page, 2009).
Environmental issues lacking attention in
oligarchic government became the entry point of this
research. Interface systems, one of which shows
environmental-economic reciprocal relationships
(O'Connor, 2007). The Banten Provincial
Government as in Dinas LHK (2013, 2014, 2015, and
2017) reported, during 2013-2017, the Banten
industrial area had two conflicting impacts. On the
one hand it produces significant economic growth but
on the other hand produces the potential for
environmental pollution. This proposition is in line
with Singh Ahuti's findings, that the use of machinery
and factories led to mass production, which in turn led
to the development of numerous environmental
hazards.
Doctrinally, the Qur'an surah Rum (30): 41 has
launched damage on earth due to acts humankind. In
Surah Sad (38): 27, Allah SWT negates the creation
of sky and earth and what is between them in vain. In
Al-A‘raf (7): 56 contains a prohibition on doing
damage on the earth after (created) well. On the other
hand, Allah also told humans to carry out economic
activities, "Spread on the face of the earth," as in
Surah Al-Jumu'ah (62): 10. At the same time, as in
Surah Hud (11): 61, Allah commanded prosperity of
the earth that can be interpreted as sustainability.
The alarming environmental damage in Banten is
summed up in a clear light on the low quality and
quantity of water in the flow of Cisadane River,
Cidurian River, Ciujung River, and Cidanau River.
The main indicators are very high water flow
fluctuations, flooding in the rainy season and drought
in the dry season. Poor water quality reflects pollution
from industrial and domestic (household) waste in
addition to air quality.
If you look at the water quality in these rivers, the
trend has deteriorated recorded since 2012 until 2017.
In 2012, of the 10% parameters monitored such as
Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Total Iron (Fe), Suspended
Substances (TSS), Total Coli, Chemical Oxygen
Demand (COD), Nitrite (NO2), Permanganate
(KMnO4) and E. Coli, quality does not meet the class
II water quality criteria Government Regulation (PP)
Number 82 of 2001 (Dinas LHK, 2013).
Of the 41 parameters taken in the upstream area of
7 rivers (Cidanau, Ciliman, Cilemer, Cibanten,
Ciujung, Cidurian, and Cisadane) as many as 12
(twelve) times the monitoring period carried out by
the Banten Province Environmental Agency every
month from January to December, there are 90% (37
parameters) that meet the quality standards. Almost
all sampling points in the upstream area indicate mild
polluted water conditions. While in the central area it
shows moderate polluted water conditions because
there were 82% of the 35 parameters meeting the
quality standards. What's worse is that the
downstream areas are heavily polluted because only
60% of the 29 parameters meet the quality standard,
40% do not meet the quality standards (Dinas LHK,
2013).
In 2014, monitoring of river water quality carried
out by BLHD in 4 main rivers, namely Cidurian,
Cisadane, Cibanten, Ciujung with 24 sampling points
showed the results that the average of the 4 measured
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
846
parameters exceeded the standard quality limit. The
four parameters are suspended solids (TSS), BOD,
COD, and Total Coliform (Dinas LHK 2014).
Likewise in 2015, on 5 main rivers, namely Cidurian,
Cisadane, Cibanten, Ciujung and Cirarab with 32
sampling points showed the average results of 6
parameters, namely TSS, BOD, COD, DO, Sulphate
and Fecal Coliform which were measured to exceed
the standard quality limit (Dinas LHK, 2015).
In SLHD 2017, monitoring of 2016 water quality
is carried out in 5 rivers, namely: Cisadane, Cidurian,
Ciujung, Ciranten and 7 rivers in 2017, namely
Cisadane, Cidurian, Ciujung, Cirarab, Cibanten,
Cilemer, and Simanceuri. Each river has a minimum
of 6 monitoring points which are taken at least 2 times
a year. Parameters assessed in the water quality index,
namely TSS, DO, COD, BOD, Phosphate, Total
Coliform and E. Coli/Fecal Coli (Dinas LHK, 2017).
In 2016 and 2017 monitoring, SLHD did not report
the results. The frequency and monitoring points were
not as frequent and as much as those carried out in
2012. This could be due to the reason for the severity
of pollution that did not change or was worse in the
2012-2017 period. Based on personal interviews with
Lina Tri Mugi Astuti, Environmental Observer from
the Indonesian Environment Scientist Association, in
Jakarta, Monday, September 17 2018,
"...sustainability requires a balance between social,
economic and environmental space. There is a
tendency in the regions to hide data or inconsistency
in reporting data pollution because they do not want
the area to be labeled as bad.In terms of industry,
some companies in Cilegon Banten have met ISO
14000 sustainable standards. It's just that, for
industries in the MSME segment it has not been
standardized."
In terms of policy domains (O'Connor, 2007) in
Banten, there was a conflict of interests between
political spheres and environmental spheres. In terms
of policy, the relationship between the two domains
should have been deliberative. When in power, Ratu
Atut Chosiyah delegated authority to her younger
brother, Tb. Chaeri Wardana got the nickname, head
of the Private Position and Rank Consideration
Agency (Baperjakat). It shows his role as an oligarch
behind the scenes. He also runs a wealth defense
policy (Winters, 2011).
Tb. Chaeri Wardana determines the placement of
echelon II, III and IV officials in almost all Banten
Provincial Government Work Units (SKPD). It
shows a conflict of interests in political-
environmental relations in policy domains
(O'Connor, 2007). Because, these officials are related
to environmental problems and feel they have debt.
Among other things, Bina Marga and Spatial
Planning offices; Public health Office; Education
authorities; Office of Water Resources and
Settlements; Mining and Energy Service; Agriculture
and Animal Husbandry Service; Department of
Marine and Fisheries; and Forestry and Plantation
Services (Dami, 2013).
Another environmental problem is critical land.
Until 2013, the area of critical land was not
documented (Dinas LHK, 2013). Only in 2014,
Banten province had a record of the land with an area
of 104,103.01 Ha (Dinas LHK, 2014). Most of them
are located in Pandeglang Regency (44%), Lebak
Regency (31%) and Tangerang Regency (14%). In
2015, it was identified Pandeglang District had the
largest critical land area, namely 33,379 Ha.
Meanwhile, according to the 2015 BPS data, the
only area that has very critical land area is Lebak
Regency with an area of 2,057 hectares. This is due
to the fact that Pandeglang and Lebak Districts also
have geographical conditions, most of which are still
forest areas. However, the area cannot be utilized
optimally, so it is found that a number of areas have
turned into critical land and lost their functions (Dinas
LHK, 2015). In 2017, Lebak Regency actually has the
largest critical land area of 127,170.97 ha, followed
by Pandeglang with an area of 95,851.56 hectares
(Dinas LHK, 2017). Then, the problem is of forest
destruction. As with land, forests in Banten Province
also suffered damage. The main cause was forest
encroachment which mostly occurred in the upstream
areas of the river as happened in 2013 (Dinas LHK,
2013). In 2014, encroachment resulted in 21,192
hectares of forest damage, 1,003.57 hectares in 2015
(Dinas LHK, 2015) and 21,192 hectares in 2017
(Dinas LHK, 2017).
Regarding the implementation of rehabilitation
and conservation, the Banten Province Forestry and
Plantation Office has planted approximately
8,235,414 trees (2008), 11,056,780 stems (2009) and
13,810,280 stems (2010) (Dinas LHK, 2013). In
2014, more than 16,000,000 stems (Dinas LHK,
2014) and 12,768,111 stems in 2015. These efforts
continue to be carried out and improved from year to
year related to the existence of government programs,
namely: one single one tree (Dinas LHK, 2015).
Unfortunately, tree planting in 2016 was not recorded
and in 2017 the number decreased to 1,535,454 stems
with a land area of 3,267 ha (Dinas LHK, 2017).
In terms of policy domains which are the
relationship of the political-environmental domain
(O'Connor, 2007), environmental problems have
been anticipated by the Banten Provincial
Government. According to the Dinas LHK (2013,
2014, 2015, and 2017), this was stated in the strategic
issue of the Regional Medium Term Development
Plan (RPJMD) of Banten Province 2012-2017. This
then became one of the Banten Provincial
Government's missions to develop regional or
regional infrastructure and the environment. The
Islam, Oligarchy and Sustainability in Local Indonesia: A Case Study on Polluted Rivers in Banten Province
847
strategy is to improve water and air pollution control
from industry and domestic; Increase disaster
mitigation and climate change adaptation; Turning
disaster-prone areas into disaster free areas (floods,
droughts, garbage, landslides, and other disasters);
Increasing the participation of forest village
communities in securing forest areas through efforts
to rehabilitate and conserve natural resources and the
environment; Rehabilitation and conservation of
natural resources and the environment through the
movement of critical land rehabilitation (GRLK); and
Improving protected area management.
In the environmental sphere (O'Connor, 2007), of
the many priority issues in Banten, few are focused
and addressed. In 2013, the provincial government
raised seven priority issues and even without handling
them. The seven issues are low waste management
services; increasing pollution of air, land, water, sea,
B3 and B3 waste; increasing volume of domestic and
industrial wastewater; occurrence of inconsistencies
in plans with spatial use; still weak enforcement of
environmental laws and community participation;
declining quality and quantity of raw water resources
(rivers, lakes and springs); and increased land damage
and degradation of forestry resources (Dinas LHK,
2013). Of the seven environmental issues in the 2012-
2017 RPJMD which became a priority issue in 2014
(Dinas LHK, 2014) and 2015 (Dinas LHK, 2015)
were increasing air, land, water, sea and B3 waste
pollution.
In 2017, in accordance with the Banten Province
RPJMD adding environmental issues to 12 priorities,
namely: Not increasing yet Water Quality Index; The
low air quality index; There is still a lack of area for
rehabilitating forests and land; Not optimal function
of forests and protected areas; Lack of compliance
with business or activities with regard to legislation
and permit conditions; The low level of community
participation in environmental protection; There is
still a lack of industry compliance with Waste Water
Quality Standards and Air Emissions; Not maximized
yet utilization of applied technology in the forestry
sector; There is still a lack of stability in the
administration and guidance of forestry industry;
Lack of control over the use of forest areas; The lack
of public awareness in environmental management;
and not increasing yet functions of forests and
protected areas (Dinas LHK, 2017).
Of the dozens of priority issues, most of them are
mere inventory status. Handling is only visible in
2014 (Dinas LHK, 2014) and 2015 (Dinas LHK,
2015). It only focuses on one priority issue, namely
increasing air, land, water, sea and B3 waste
pollution. The reason for the selection of one priority
issue in 2014 and 2015, the first is the calculation of
daily anthropogenic solid waste for the Banten
Province is estimated to be around 9,040,116/m3/
year. Not to mention the pollution material comes
from the rush of traffic flow, to the production
activities of a number of medium and large industries.
Everything produces waste and pollution which
increases every year.
Diverse sources of pollution in both land and
water ecosystems cause a decrease in environmental
quality. So far, what can be monitored by the Banten
Province BLHD is the quality of the rivers and the
rivers. The results of monitoring the main river water
quality in Banten Province show the condition of
heavily polluted river water. Then, in monitoring air
quality, a number of regions experienced an increase
in the number of pollutants due to industrial
production activities and also the rush of traffic flow,
especially in big cities.
The second is the pressure factor. With a population
of 11,452,491 people as in the Dinas LHK (2014 and
2015), Banten Province has complex activities. A
number of regions have also experienced a large
number of large-scale industries, especially those
with large solid, liquid and B3 wastes such as textiles,
wood, steel, and chemicals industries. One example
is Hendra Triana, a man born in Bandung but raised
in Cilegon, Banten next to PT Krakatau Steel Tbk.
Triana is a child of Ahmad, one of the retired
employees of the State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN)
PT Krakatau Steel Tbk. In addition to the potential to
produce B3 waste, according to Triana, this steel
company is suspected of lacking attention to the lives
of people in economic-social interfaces, especially
sanitation problems. Many people around the factory
still do latrines on the land so that they pollute the
environment. In addition, in terms of waste, many
companies using jawara as a checker to protect their
waste. It became worse becauce this behavior is
backed by the local government with the reason to
empower local people. Repeatedly changing the
police chief trying to disturb the problem of waste,
always failed. Then, in terms of religious behavior,
some people in Cilegon still believe that swallowing
saliva while fasting cancels the worship. So that, the
environment is being polluted. This shows the
negative relationship between social-environmental
interfaces (O'Connor, 2007).
The large number of population is also directly
proportional to the energy needs (social-economic
interfaces), the reduction of the area of natural forest
areas, and the increasing daily waste of society
(social-environmental interfaces). Even to
compensate for the economic conditions of the
community which are demanded to be more
prosperous, exploration of biological resources will
still be carried out to meet the increasingly diverse
needs of the community and of course will have an
impact on increasing carbon emissions and waste
products.
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
848
Responding to these conditions, one of the
concerns of the Banten provincial government is the
effort to create a healthy housing and settlement
environment through the Program of Pencanangan
Lingkungan Sehat Pemukiman dan Kampung
Merah Putih. For this reason, in 2011, the
Department of Water Resources and Settlements
(SDAP) has budgeted more than Rp40 billion for
implementation in 8 regencies/cities. The activities
for providing clean water infrastructure and facilities
are allocated Rp18 billion (Chosiyah, 2011).
In 2014 and 2015, the provincial government
made various efforts to bring awareness to all levels
of society in protecting the environment. More than
30,000 trees have been planted along the green forest
program in 2014 (Dinas LHK, 2014) and 2015 (Dinas
LHK, 2015) which reached more than 50 hectares.
Likewise with the Adiwiyata school program which
continues to be encouraged as an effort to foster the
spirit of protecting the environment for students. A
total of 14 schools have been recorded as national
Adiwiyata schools throughout 2014 and 2015.
Unfortunately, for 2016-2017, there are no reports
from the department regarding the program.
5 CONCLUSION
This study aims to examine how much the oligarchic
authorities care about sustainability. Based on the
data presented above, their efforts in resolving
environmental pollution problems are still far smaller
than the magnitude of the problem. However, they
have succeeded in inventorying environmental
problems even though there are still inconsistencies
in presenting data and mitigating efforts. If the
government in Banten province fails to follow up on
priority issues that they have made, pollution will
worsen and threaten economic, social and
environmental sustainability in the three spheres of
sustainability. The Banten case shows that economic
activity is always followed by environmental
degradation.
REFERENCES
Ahuti, Singh 2015. "Industrial Growth and Environmental
Degradation," International Education & Research
Journal, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 5-7, December.
Budiardjo, Miriam et al., 1991. Aneka Pemikiran tentang
Kuasa dan Wibawa, 3rd ed., Miriam Budiardjo, Ed.
Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Dahl, Robert A., 1982. Dilemas of Pluralist Democracy:
Autonomy vs. Control. New Haven and London: Yale
University Press.
Dami, Laurens, 2013. "Inilah Sepak Terjang Adik Atut
dalam Memonopoli Proyek di Banten," Suara
Pembaruan, October 19
Darmadi, Dadi, 2015. "The Geger Banten of 1888: An
Anthropological Perspectif of 19th Century
Millenarianism in Indonesia," Heritage of Nusantara:
International Journal of Religious Literature and
Heritage, vol. IV, no. 1, pp. 65-84, June.
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (LHK) Provinsi
Banten, 2013. "Buku Data Status Lingkungan Hidup
Daerah Provinsi Banten Tahun 2013," Pemerintah
Provinsi Banten, Serang.
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Provinsi Banten,
2013. "Buku Data Status Lingkungan Hidup Daerah
Provinsi Banten Tahun 2013," Pemerintah Provinsi
Banten, Serang.
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Provinsi Banten,
2014. "Laporan Status Lingkungan Hidup Daerah
Provinsi Banten 2014," Pemerintah Provinsi Banten,
Serang,
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Provinsi Banten,
2015. "Laporan Status Lingkungan Hidup Daerah
Provinsi Banten 2015," Pemerintah Provinsi Banten,
Serang.
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Provinsi Banten,
2017. "Laporan Status Lingkungan Hidup Daerah
(SLHD) Provinsi Banten 2017," Pemerintah Provinsi
Banten.
Eriyatno, Eman Rustiadi, and Ikhwanuddin Mawardi Heri
Apriyanto, 2015. "Status berkelanjutan Kota Tangerang
Selatan-Banten dengan menggunakan key performance
indicators (Sustainable status of South Tangerang City-
Banten using key performace indicators)," Jurnal
Manusia dan Lingkungan, vol. XXII, pp. 260-270, July.
Grossman, Gene M., Krueger, Alan B., 1995. "Economic
growth and the environment," The Quarterly Journal of
Economics, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 353-377, May.
Hamid, Abdul, 2010. "The Kiai in Banten: Shifting Roles
in Changing Times," in Islam in Contention:
Rethinking Islam and State in Indonesia, Ota Atsushi,
Okamoto Masaaki, and Ahmad Suaedy, Eds. Jakarta:
Wahid Institute,
Hu, Yunxi, 2017. "Economic Growth and Environmental
Degradation: An Empirical Study on Pollution in
Sichuan Province," Department of Economics of the
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, M.A. Thesis.
Kartodirdjo, Sartono, 1966. The Peasants Revolt of Banten
in 1888, Its Conditions, Course and Sequel: A Case
Study of Social Movements in Indonesia. Dordrecht:
Springer Science+Business Media,
Li, Huijun, Jianhua Zhang, Edward Osei, and Mark Yu,
2018. "Sustainable Development of China’s Industrial
Economy: An Empirical Study of the Period 2001–
2011," Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 764, pp. 1-18, March.
Lim, Jaekyu, 1997. "Economic Growth and Environment:
Some Empirical Evidences from South Korea," The
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL), September.
Mo, Weiwei, Darline Balen, Marianna Moura, and Kevin
H. Gardner, 2018. "A Regional Analysis of the Life
Cycle Environmental and Economic Tradeoffs of
Islam, Oligarchy and Sustainability in Local Indonesia: A Case Study on Polluted Rivers in Banten Province
849
Different Economic Growth Paths," Sustainability, vol.
10, no. 542, pp. 1-16, February
Munjin, Ahmad, 2018. "Oligarki dan Demokrasi: Kajian
Sumber Daya Kekuasaan Kiai dan Jawara di Banten,"
Graduate School, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic
University (UIN), Jakarta, M.A. Thesis
Nicholas Argyres and Vai-Lam Mui, 2000. "Rules of
Engagement, Informal Leaders, and the Political
Economy of Organizational Dissent," in The Annual
Meetings of The Strategic Management Society, the
Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics,
the Western Economic Association, the International
Society for New Institutional Economics, and the
Informs College on Organization Science, pp. 1-37.
O'Connor, Martin Paul, 2007. "The “Four Spheres”
framework for sustainability," Ecological Complexity,
vol. 86, pp. 1-8, December.
Panayotou, Theodore, 2016. "Economic Growth and the
Environment," in The Environment in Anthropology: A
Reader in Ecology, Culture, and Sustainable Living,
Nora Haenn, Allison Hamish, and Richard Wilk, Eds.
New York: New York University Press, ch. 14, pp. 140-
148.
Ratu Atut Chosiyah, 2011. (July) Kompasiana.
[Online].https://www.kompasiana.com/www.ratuatutc
hosiyah.com/55017a31a333 11c56f5137ff/lingkungan-
sehat-cinta-kampung-cinta-tanah-air
Raza, Syed Ali and Nida Shah, 2018. "Impact of Financial
Development, Economic Growth and Energy
Consumption on Environmental Degradation: Evidence
from Pakistan," IQRA University, Islamabad, Munich
Personal RePEc Archive MPRA Paper No. 87095.
Robison, Richard and Vedi R. Hadiz, 2004. Reorganising
Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an
Age of Markets. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Saboori, Behnaz, Sulaiman, Jamalludin, 2013.
"Environmental degradation, economic growth and
energy consumption: Evidence of the environmental
Kuznets curve in Malaysia," Energy Policy, vol. 60, pp.
892–905, June.
The World Commission on Environment and Development,
1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Tihami, M.A., 1992. "Kiai dan Jawara di Banten: Studi
tentang Agama, Magi, dan Kepemimpinan di Desa
Pasanggrahan Serang, Banten," Universitas Indonesia,
M.A. Thesis.
Williams, Michael C., 1990. Communism, Religion, and
Revolt in Banten. Athens: Ohio University Center for
International Studies.
Winters, Jeffrey A. and Benjamin I Page, 2009. "Oligarchy
in the United State?," Perspectives on Politics, vol. 7,
pp. 731-751.
Winters, Jeffrey A., 2011. Oligarchy. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
850