target both corporate and retail segments. Today
FinTech comprises five major areas, including: (a)
Finance and investment: Currently investors and
regulators focus on alternative financing
mechanisms, especially crowdfunding and P2P
loans. However, FinTech has gone through this
scope with the aim of including financing its own
technology, for example through crowdfunding,
public offerings, venture capital, private equity,
listing, etc; (B) financial operations and risk
management: This is the first driver of IT spending
carried out by financial institutions, starting in 2008
as financial institutions have been trying to build
better compliance systems to handle the large
volume of changes in post-crisis regulation. From an
evolutionary perspective, the development of
financial theory and quantitative financial techniques
and their translation into financial institution
operations and risk management are the main
features of the 1990s and 2000s, because the
financial industry established a system based on
VaR and other systems used to manage risk and
maximize profits. Henceforth, this is a possible area;
that will continue to grow driven by costs and fines;
(c) Payments and infrastructure: Payment of internet
and cellular communications is a driving force in
several developing countries and is the main focus
of FinTech, this problem is more clearly in Part 5 as
the foundation of FinTech 3.5. Since the 1970s, the
payment process has become a very attractive area
that can lead to the development of domestic and
cross-border electronic payment systems. Currently
it has supported the global foreign exchange market
of US $ 5.4 trillion per day. Likewise the
infrastructure for securities trading and settlement
and also for trading OTC derivatives continues to be
a major aspect of the FinTech landscape, where IT
and telecommunications companies are looking for
opportunities to eradicate traditional financial
institutions; (d) Data security and monetization:
These are key themes in FinTech today especially as
both FinTech 2.0 and FinTech 3.0 start to exploit the
monetary value of data. Following the GFC, it has
become clear that the stability of the financial
system is a national security issue. The digitized
nature of the financial industry means it is
particularly vulnerable to cybercrime and espionage,
with the latter increasingly important in geopolitics.
This digitization and consequent vulnerability is the
result of decades of development, highlighted in
previous sections, and, going forward, will remain a
major concern for governments, policymakers,
regulators and industry participants, as well as
customers. At the same time, FinTech innovation is
clearly present in the uses to which “big data” can be
applied to enhance the efficiency and availability of
financial services; (e) Consumer interface:
particularly online and mobile financial services.
This will continue to be a major focus of traditional
financial services and non-traditional FinTech
developments. This is another area in which
established and new IT and telecommunications
firms are seeking to contest directly with traditional
financial services firms; and, interestingly, it may
well be in developing countries where factors
increasingly combine to support the next era of
FinTech development. This vertical holds the
highest potential of competition with the traditional
financial sector, as this tech companies can leverage
of their pre-existing large customer bases to roll out
new financial produts and services (Arner, 2017).
3.2 Development of Regulations on
Financial Technology in Indonesia
According to data from the Central Statistics Agency
(BPS) from survey data of population aged 15 years
and over, there are 190.5 million people. Of this
amount, 82.2 percent, aka 156.6 million people do
not have an account. Only 17.8 percent, around 33.9
million people have at least one account. This is due
to low financial access and low financial literacy for
the community. Understanding of Indonesian society
towards banking products is still low. The Financial
Services Authority states that only 28.9% of the
adult population understands Indonesian banking
products.
The Financial Services Authority was established
based on Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the
Financial Services Authority which functions to
organize an integrated regulation and supervision
system for all activities within the financial services
sector. In the past, prior to the regulation, the
authority to regulate and supervise integrated
activities in the financial services sector was under
the auspices of Bank Indonesia, but after the Law
No. 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services
Authority, the duties and authorities of Bank
Indonesia were regulated and supervised. transferred
to the Financial Services Authority. Both institutions
have a role in encouraging financial access and
financial literacy for the community. Like, Bank
Indonesia has always encouraged the growth of
financial technology-based payment system services
business. While the Financial Services Authority has
a role to supervise.
In response to the high use of the internet in
Indonesia, the Indonesian Internet Service Providers
Association (APJII) conducted data collection and
the result was that in 2017 out of 262 million people
in the Indonesian population, 50 percent or around
143 million people were connected to the internet.