The Effect of Parent-adolescent Relationship, Emotion Regulation
and Demographic Factors to Sibling Relationship in Adolescence
Laila Atiqah
1
, Rena Latifa
1
and Solicha
1
1
Faculty of Psychology, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Jl. Juanda, No. 95, Tangerang Selatan, Banten, 15412, Indonesia
Keywords: Sibling relationship, parent-adolescent relationship, emotion regulation, adolescence
Abstract: This study was conducted to determine the effect of parent-adolescent relationship, emotion regulation and
demographic factors to the sibling relationship in adolescence. the subjects are 191 students of X Senior
High School in East Jakarta. The result showed that there was a significant effect from variable parent-
adolescent relationship, emotion regulation and demographic factors with significant value of 0.000 or p <
0.05 to sibling relationship. The result of minor hypothesis test that examines the effect of seven
independent variable, there are only one independent variable significant effect to sibling relationship, that
is the variable parent-adolescent relationship, while variable cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression,
gender, age spacing, birth order and family size does not affect to sibling relationship.
1 INTRODUCTION
Family is the most important part of life. In addition
to parents or fathers and mothers, there are siblings
who have an important role in our lives. Sibling
relationships are the total of the interactions
(physical, verbal, and nonverbal communication) of
two or move individuals who share knowledge,
perceptions, attitudes, beliefs, and feelings regarding
each other, from the time that one sibling becomes
aware of the other (Cicirelli, 1995). Sibling
relationships is a unique relationship. Characterized
by love, warmth, conflict and rivalry (Buist,
Deković & Prinzie, 2013).
According to Cicirelli (1995) siblings can have a
major influence on each other's lives. He also
revealed that the influence of siblings in the
socialization process can be stronger than that of
parents. The presence of siblings can act as
emotional support, friends communicate, even as
rivals.
The siblings influence the development of each
other when they act as social partners and role
models. Between them can indirectly influence each
other based on their impact on larger family
dynamics such as acting as something that forms
several components of the family structure, holding
a position that suits the family, or weakening family
sources (McHale, Updegraff, & Whiteman, 2012).
Lohmann (2014) states that there are three
reasons why a healthy relationship with siblings is
very important in life. First, friends may come in
turns but siblings are friends who will not leave.
You can say your relationship is one of the very long
relationships that humans have. Second, your
relationship is not made up and always is. Because
we grow with them, with parents, memories and
similar experiences. Third, the relationship with
siblings is a unique relationship and cannot be found
in other relationships.
Longitudinal research at Harvard University
conducted since 1938 by monitoring the lives of two
groups of men totaling 724 men, got the result that
good close relationships are important to make us
happier and healthier. Based on the study, happy
people are people who rely on relationships with
family, friends and community. The study also said
that a good life is built with good relationships
(Waldinger, 2017).
During a longitudinal study at Harvard
University since 1938, research was also conducted
on whether sibling relationships in childhood were
predictors of major depression in adulthood. Based
on these studies it was found that poor sibling
relationships in childhood may be an important and
specific predictor of major depression in adulthood.
Respondents who had a bad relationship with their
siblings in childhood were significantly more likely
to experience depression in adulthood than those
284
Atiqah, L., Latifa, R. and Solicha, .
The Effect of Parent-adolescent Relationship, Emotion Regulation and Demographic Factors to Sibling Relationship in Adolescence.
DOI: 10.5220/0009929102840291
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Recent Innovations (ICRI 2018), pages 284-291
ISBN: 978-989-758-458-9
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
who have a better sibling relationships (Waldinger,
Vaillant & Orav, 2007).
Problems in sibling relationships that are most
often found are rivalry, conflict and violence (Hegar,
1988). During adolescence, siblings often have
disagreements. The phenomenon of sibling rivalry
when handled well, a healthy competition among
siblings will lead to the acquisition of social skills,
interpersonal and cognitive skills essential for
children's development. Conversely, if there is an
error in handling sibling rivalry, it can cause
psychological problems later on (Leung & Robson,
1991).
Furman and Burhmester in Cicirelli (1995)
examined the quality of warmth and closeness,
status and power, and conflict in sibling relations
during late childhood and adolescence. Rivalry and
conflict peak in early adolescence and decline in late
adolescence. During this period, siblings showed a
decrease in the intensity and involvement of
relationships because more time was spent on peer
relationships.
The quality of positive sibling relationships (such
as pleasure, trust and understanding) decreases in
adolescence and rises in adulthood. Conversely, the
quality of negative sibling relationships (such as
arguing and competition) increases in adolescence
and decreases in adulthood. Mostly due to changes
in adolescence to turbulence at the stage of life, and
unpredictable emotions. It’s difficult to accept
changes in siblings behavior or personality. Whereas
in early adulthood is associated with increased
maturity and ability to accept each other.
Some studies found that changes in relation
sibling relationship is marked by the increasing
conflicts between siblings during early adolescence.
As the subject progressed in adolescence, the level
of conflict in siblings that had previously been high
decreased and intimacy in sibling relations increased
slightly or remained stable between the beginning
and the end of adolescence (Oliva & Arranz, 2005).
In previous research (Furman & Buhrmester,
1985) examined the quality of warmth and
closeness, status and power, and conflict in
relationships siblings during late childhood and
adolescence. Rivalry and conflict peak in early
adolescence and decline in late adolescence. During
this period, siblings showed a decrease in the
intensity and involvement of relationships because
more time was spent on peer relationships.
The quality of positive sibling relationships (such
as pleasure, trust and understanding) decreases in
adolescence and rises in adulthood. Conversely, the
quality of negative sibling relationships (such as
arguing and rivalry) increases in adolescence and
decreases in adulthood. Mostly due to changes in
adolescence to turbulence at the stage of life, and
unpredictable emotions. Siblings find it hard to
accept the changes in behaviour or personality of his
siblings. While in early adulthood associated with
increased maturity and capability to accept one
another.
In Indonesia, there were cases of mistreatment
between siblings which resulted in the loss of one of
their lives. One case that occurred in South
Lampung in May 2017. An older brother killed his
own sibling. The incident happened because both of
them fought because their biological mother was
abandoned by his brother (Kupastuntas, 2017).
Sindonews (2017) mentions another case related
to the murder of a sister by her own sibling, namely
murder which is allegedly a legacy problem. In
September 2017 there were also cases of siblings
taking the lives of their siblings because of the
struggle for family land (Tribunnews, 2017). There
were cases of fights between sister on November 11,
2017 which killed her brother. The fight happened
because the older brother did not accept being
reprimanded by his sister (Sindonews, 2017).
In Haibunda (2018) another case related to the
murder committed by an older brother told his sister.
The center of attention is the four-year-old brother
and baby brother. The reason is that older siblings
feel that mothers are more affectionate to their
younger siblings, and that since his mother became
pregnant many said things like that so that they
became reinforcers of their actions.
Based on these cases, it is important to maintain
the quality of sibling relationships.
Sibling relationships is the relationship of a
person with relatives of both women and men who
have one or both parents of the same (Kennedy &
Volling, 2009). Sibling relationship are described as
the most enduring family relationships, remain
unique and influential regardless of their secondary
interests (Bank & Kahn, 1997; Goetting, 1986 in
Scharf, Shulman, & Avigad-Spitz, 2005).
The sibling relationship is described as an
emotionally ambivalent feeling that is a pair of
siblings who can become warm and also conflict.
For many people, this is a combination of strong
positive and negative emotions that make sibling
relationships very important. Individual differences
in positive and negative terms toward siblings are
relatively stable in childhood and adolescence,
although the average intensity and frequency of
positive and negative interactions between siblings
The Effect of Parent-adolescent Relationship, Emotion Regulation and Demographic Factors to Sibling Relationship in Adolescence
285
decreases with age. (Deater-Deckard, Dunn, &
Lussier, 2002).
Brothers or sisters who are able to support each
other when stress can also be a source of actual
stress can result in worse consequences (Deater-
Deckard, Dunn, & Lussier, 2002). The sibling
relationship is a lasting relationship, surviving from
birth to old age, and longer than a relationship with a
parent, spouse or child. In general, sibling
relationship from birth to old age can play a
beneficial role in the development and maintenance
of social interactions that last a lifetime (Kennedy &
Volling, 2009).
The sibling relationship includes helping,
sharing, teaching, fighting, and playing. Siblings can
also act as supporters, competitors, and
communicating partners (Santrock, 2011). McHale,
Updegraff and Whiteman (2012) state that sibling
relationships are shaped by factors, ranging from
children's characteristics to cultural norms and
values.
The sibling relationships consists of four
dimensions (Furman & Buhrmester, 1985) namely
warmth / closeness is the extent to which a person is
loved and accepted, relative power / status is the
ability to shape, influence, or control the behavior of
others, conflict is a fight or mutual resistance
between siblings, and rivalry is competitiveness and
jealousy between siblings.
According to Kennedy and Volling (2009)
children with a sibling relationship warm and caring
is usually more friendly and easy to share with their
siblings. Siblings of the same sex have greater
warmth and closeness than siblings of different
sexes (Cicirelli, 1995). Warmth can be seen from the
feeling, the number of contacts and the amount of
your involvement. Siblings unusual conflict and high
levels of conflict that could give a negative
impression on family life (Kennedy & Volling,
2009).
Problems with competition usually begin at the
birth of a second child, when caregiver / parent's
attention is no longer focused on a single child, and
can last throughout childhood and adolescence
(Kennedy & Volling, 2009).
Rivalry naturally develops when the eldest child
fights for their mother's love (Adler in Furman &
Lanthier, 2002). Rivalry reflects more
competitiveness for limited resources such as
attention, time, love and approval / acceptance.
The various factors affecting sibling
relationships include parent-adolescent relationships
and demographic (Furman & Buhrmester, 1985),
emotion regulation (Kennedy & Kramer, 2008). This
research will conducted to determine the effect of
parent-adolescent relationship, emotion regulation
(cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression) and
demographic factors (gender, age spacing, birth
order, family size) to the sibling relationship in
adolescence.
Positive sibling relationship occur when
adolescent have a warm and caring relationship with
their siblings, usually when they are young they are
friendly and share a lot and as they get older they
can become competent teachers for their siblings. In
addition, siblings can provide support to their
siblings when they feel sad or hurt. Teaching
younger siblings to express feelings and
communicate emotions can help siblings develop
positive relationships with each other.
While the negative sibling relationship occurs
when the level and intensity of conflicts and high
competition causing many losses. However, it is not
always conflict and competition that affect negative
sibling relationships, for example your competition
to improve achievement and conflict can have the
potential to learn how to manage conflict and
regulate emotions in unpleasant situations. It
required the help of their parents not to compare
their children.
Parent-adolescent relationships defined as the
interaction between parents and adolescent that
include closeness, communication, and comfort
(Somers & Vollmar, 2006). Cohesion and harmony
in the interaction of parent-adolescent relationships
appear to be related to a more positive sibling. In
contrast, parental rejection is related to more
aggressive behavior towards siblings and peers,
while parent's unfair treatment is related to the
development of higher ties between siblings.
Another series of studies found that conflicting inter-
parental relationships have negative effects on
sibling interactions (Oliva & Arranz, 2005).
Parent-adolescent relationship describe
togetherness, with both parties trying their best to
understand the perspectives of others and integrating
flexibility in the process of completion (Kapadia,
2017). Parent-adolescent relationship consists of a
combination of behaviors, feelings, and expectations
that are unique to certain parents and certain
children. The relationship involves the overall
development of the child (Gulhane, 2017).
Children who are secure in attachment to parents
are reported to have more positive sibling
relationships than those who feel insecure in parent-
child relationships. In addition, positive parent-child
relationships are associated with prosocial attitudes
in positive sibling relationships. Whereas coercion
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
286
and overcontrol in parent-child relations correlate
with aggressiveness and hostility in sibling
relationships. Parents contribute to shaping the
quality of the sibling relationship either directly or
indirectly.
The sibling relationship will continue to be good
when parents do not side with one child and give the
same treatment. When children feel secure in their
attachment to parents, the aspects of closeness,
communication and comfort proposed by Somers
and Vollmar (2006) will be seen. Children who have
closeness to their parents, communicate intensively
so as to cause comfort, the quality of their sibling
relationships will be good.
In adolescence, in times when emotional
fluctuations (up and down) take place more often. In
adolescence, individuals maintain more emotional
cycles. This new awareness can improve their ability
to overcome their emotions (Santrock, 2007).
Emotional development becomes adolescence with
different contexts and contexts in the context of
stress and process, which results in problems for
people (Gentry & Campbell, 2002).
Emotional regulation is an individual's way of
reducing the experience of negative emotions
through behavioural control and mental control,
involving a process of awareness and
unconsciousness that can enhance experience and
expression of positive emotions and reduce
experience and expression of negative emotions
(Gross, 1998). According to Gross (2007) emotion
regulation is a strategy that is carried out
consciously or unconsciously to maintain, strengthen
or reduce one or more aspects of the emotional
response, namely emotional and behavioral
experiences.
The child's ability to regulate negative emotions
in the context of siblings can be an important
mechanism for reducing conflict between siblings
and increasing sibling interaction. When children
develop greater control over their emotional
responses, they become better able to engage
positively with siblings (Kennedy & Kramer, 2008).
Based on a large-scale survey by Bowerman and
Dobash (Hegar, 1988) that the respondent's sex
turned out to be related to the influence of siblings,
more girls felt closer to siblings than boys, and boys
and girls felt closer to same sibling. Numerous
studies have shown sex differences in the quality of
relationships. In general, they find that female
partners tend to be more intimate, while between
brothers are the opposite (Feinberg, Solmeyer &
McHale, 2012).
Age differences also affect the way they react
with each other. If the age difference between distant
siblings, both of the same or opposite sex, looks a
more friendly, cooperative, and loving relationship
than if the age difference is close. Close age
differences, regardless of gender, tend to increase
disputes between them (Hurlock, 2000).
The position of a child as an older or younger
sibling is related to the development of a number of
personality characteristics. Usually the explanation
of differences related to the birth order refers to the
interaction between parents and the special position
occupied by siblings in a family. In one study it was
found that after the second child was born, the
mother became more negative, loud, limiting, less
time spent with the first child (Furman & Lanthier,
2002). The small number of siblings tends to
produce more disputed relationships than the large
number of brothers (Hurlock, 2000).
Hurlock (2000) mentions in his book that the
small number of siblings tends to produce more
disputed relationships than the large number of
brothers. There are two reasons, first, if there are
only two or three children in the family, they are
more often together than the large number. Second,
if there are many children, discipline tends to be
authoritarian.
2 RESEARCH METHODS
Demographic information
The sample of this study was 191 participants. They
were all student of X Senior High School, East
Jakarta. 114 participants were Male and 77 were
Female. Sample were taken by accidental sampling
technique.
Measurements
Participants completed a brief demographic
questionnaire which asked respondents to describe
themselves (age, gender, siblings’ age, siblings
gender, birth order and educational background).
Sibling relationships Scale: The Sibling
Relationships Questionnaire (SRQ). The SRQ has 54
item scales consisting of 5 points Likert scale
models (1-5) covering four dimensions:
warmth/closeness, status/power, conflict and rivalry
(Furman & Buhrmester, 1985).
Parent-adolescent relationship scale. It measured
using a Parent-adolescent relationships scale (Riada,
2015). This scale is based on 25 item scales
consisting of 5 points Likert scale models (1-5)
covering three dimensions: closeness,
communication and comfort.
The Effect of Parent-adolescent Relationship, Emotion Regulation and Demographic Factors to Sibling Relationship in Adolescence
287
Emotion regulation scale. It measured using a
Emotion regulation scale (Latifa, 2015). This scale is
based on 19 item scales consisting of 4 points Likert
scale models (1-4) covering two dimensions:
cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression.
Data Analysis.
Multiple regression analysis was the statistical
procedure employed on the scores of each variables.
We use SPSS version 21 to analyzed the data.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The findings presented on tables below:
Table 1
Based on table 1 we can see that the acquisition
of R square is 0.299 or 29.9%. This means that the
proportion of variance of sibling relationships
described by parent-adolescent relationships,
emotion regulation (cognitive appraisal, expressive
suppression), demographic factors (gender, age
spacing, birth order, family size) in the study is
29.9%, while the remaining 70.1% is influenced by
other variables outside the study.
The next step researchers analyze the impact of
all independent variables on sibling relationships.
The F test results can be seen in table 2 below:
Table 2
Based on the F test in table 2 it can be seen that
the p value (Sig.) In the rightmost column is p =
0.000 with p value <0.05. Then the null hypothesis
that states no significant influence of all independent
variables on sibling relationships is rejected. That is,
there are significant influences from parent-
adolescent relationships, emotion regulation
(cognitive appraisal, expressive suppression),
demographic factors (gender, age spacing, birth
order, family size) in predicting sibling relationships
in adolescence.
The next step, the researchers see the regression
coefficient of each IV, if sig <0.05 then the
regression coefficient is significant which means
that the independent variables have a significant
effect on the sibling relationships. The regression
coefficient of each independent variable to sibling
relationships can be seen in table 3 below.
Table 3
1. The parent-adolescent relationship variable has
a regression coefficient value of 0.541 with
significance of 0.000. This means that parent-
adolescent relationships affects significantly
predict sibling relationships. The positive
direction shows that the higher the value of
parent-adolescent relationships the higher the
sibling relationships value.
2. The ‘cognitive reappraisal’ emotion regulation
variables from significant other have a
regression coefficient value of -0.34 with
significance of 0.688. This means that cognitive
reappraisal from significant others do not affect
significantly to sibling relationships.
3. The ‘expressive suppression’ emotion
regulation variables from significant other have
a regression coefficient value of 0.025 with
significance of 0.769. This means that
expressive suppression from significant others
do not affect significantly to sibling
relationships.
4. The gender variable has a regression coefficient
value of -0.300 with significance of 0.620. This
means that gender from significant others do not
affect significantly to sibling relationships.
5. The age spacing variable has a regression
coefficient value of 1.367 with significance of
0.287. This means that age spacing from
significant others do not affect significantly to
sibling relationships.
6. The birth order variable has a regression
coefficient value of 0.298 with significance of
R Square
Change
F
Change
df1 df2 Sig. F
Change
1.547
a
.299 .272 835.620 .299 11.136 7 183 .000
a. Predictors: (Constant), UKKELU, CR, URUTAN, JARUS, JK, PAR, ES
b. Dependent Variable: SRQ
Model Summary
b
Model R R
Square
Adjusted
R Square
Std. Error
of the
Estimate
Change Statistics
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 5.443.232 7 777.605 11.136 .000
b
Residual 12.778.182 183 69.826
Total 18.221.414 190
ANOVA
a
Model
1
a. Dependent Variable: SRQ
b. Predictors: (Constant), UKKELU, CR, URUTAN, JARUS, JK, PAR,
ES
Standardized
Coefficients
BStd. Error Beta
(Constant)
25.914 5.267 4.920 .000
PAR
.541 .068 .533 7.962 .000
CR
-.034 .084 -.032 -.402 .688
ES
.025 .084 .022 .294 .769
JK
-.300 .604 -.032 -.497 .620
JARUS
1.367 1.280 .068 1.068 .287
URUTAN
.298 .695 .027 .429 .669
UKKELU
-1.618 1.257 -.083 -1.287 .200
Sig.
Coefficients
a
Model Unstandardized
Coefficients
1
a. Dependent Variable: SRQ
t
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
288
0.669. This means that birth order from
significant others do not affect significantly to
sibling relationships.
7. The family size variable has a regression
coefficient value of -1.618 with significance of
0.200. This means that family size from
significant others do not affect significantly to
sibling relationships.
Based on the results of testing the hypothesis, the
results showed that there was a significant effect of
parent-adolescent relationship, emotion regulation
(cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression)
and demographic factors (gender, age spacing, birth
order and family size) on the sibling relationships in
adolescence. The results of the study based on the
regression coefficients of each independent variable
indicate that there is a significant influence of
parent-adolescent relationship on the sibling
relationships in adolescence. In contrast to the
variable cognitive reappraisal, expressive
suppression, gender, age spacing, birth order and
family size, all of these components do not have a
significant effect on the sibling relationships in
adolescence.
In this study, variable parent-adolescent
relationship has a significant effect on the sibling
relationships in adolescence. These results are
consistent with previous research (Oliva & Arranz,
2005) which states that there is a link between
cohesion and harmony in parent-adolescent
relationship with more positive sibling relationship.
This result is also consistent with previous study
(Furman & Buhrmester, 1985) that the quality of
parent-adolescent relationships tends to influence
sibling relationships. It can be concluded that
adolescents with high parent-adolescent
relationships tend to have good quality sibling
relationships. Because adolescents with high
parents- adolescent relationships have good
parenthood, intensive communication and are
comfortable around parents so that there is no
jealousy or unfair treatment given to adolescents and
siblings that cause conflict or rivalry between
siblings. In addition, if the relationship of high
parents- adolescent can understand the reasons
parents for different treatment, perceptions of justice
and family values (McHale, Updegraff & Whiteman,
2012).
Cognitive reappraisal and expressive
suppression dimensions of emotional regulation
variables in the results of this study did not have a
significant effect on sibling relationship. The results
of this study are not in line with the previous
research (Kennedy & Kramer, 2008) that the ability
of children to regulate negative emotions in the
context of siblings can be an important mechanism
to reduce conflict between siblings and increase
sibling interaction. The results of this study are that
when children develop greater control over their
emotional responses, they become better able to
engage positively with siblings.
Cognitive reappraisal dimension in this study is
not significant because it can be caused by high
school X adolescents who have not been able to try
to reduce the influence of negative emotions from an
event by changing their perspective. So if there are
negative emotions that are influenced by their
siblings, high school X adolescents have not been
able to try to reduce the influence of these negative
emotions and change their perspective. The
dimension of expressive suppression in this study is
insignificant, it can be caused by high school X
adolescents who have not been able to suppress their
emotions by diverting attention, seeking distraction,
to avoid giving attention to the problem. So that if
high school X adolescents experience conflict with
their siblings are still focused and have not
suppressed their emotions by deliberate action.
Although in this study specifically the cognitive
reappraisal and expressive suppression dimensions
did not have a significant influence on sibling
relationship, it may indicate that emotional
regulation capabilities were not enough, but because
of the significant relationship between parent-
adolescent relationship, sibling relationship also will
remain intact.
Gender, age spacing, birth order and family size
dimension of the demographic factor variables on
the results of this study did not have a significant
effect on sibling relationship. The first dimension of
demographic factors is that gender does not have a
significant influence on sibling relationship. This is
not in line with previous research (Feinberg,
Solmeyer & McHale, 2012) which states that gender
differences significantly influence sibling
relationships. Age spacing dimension does not have
a significant influence on sibling relationship, this is
not in line with Hurlock which states that if age
differences between distant siblings, it appears that
sibling relationship are more positive, whereas if a
close age difference tends to increase disputes
between siblings (Hurlock, 2000).
Birth order dimension does not have a significant
effect on sibling relationship, this is not in line with
previous research (Oliva & Arranz, 2005) which
states that older siblings are less at odds and younger
siblings tend to maintain a level of intimacy.
The Effect of Parent-adolescent Relationship, Emotion Regulation and Demographic Factors to Sibling Relationship in Adolescence
289
Dimensions of family size do not have a significant
influence on sibling relationship, this is not in line
with previous research (Furman & Buhrmester,
1985) that differences in power in sibling
relationship are influenced by family size.
Overall the results of this study, the authors
found that there are some differences with previous
studies. This may be due to differences in the age of
the sample and cultural influences. Previous studies
used age samples of children and there was a
significant influence of parent-child relationships,
emotional regulation and demographic factors. The
role of parents in establishing emotional regulation
ability in childhood is very important, because the
results of this study indicate specifically that the
emotional regulation of adolescents does not have a
significant influence on sibling relationship, because
of the strong influence of parent-adolescent
relationships.
Cultural differences may also contribute to
different results from previous studies. In this study,
the sample was an East Jakarta High School X
adolescent who was an Islamic school, which
applied Indonesian culture and Islam that prioritized
courtesy and respect for older people. So that rivalry
between siblings and conflict is low and the quality
of sibling relationship tends to be good because of
cultural and religious influences.
The author suggests that further research can be
examined with different respondents. In addition, the
authors also suggest further research examining the
influence of other variables so that the wider picture
of the research. For example testing variable
predictors of parent-adolescent relationship. In
addition, further research is recommended to take
samples in several places so that sample variability
is more likely to be analyzed further.
It was found that parent-adolescent relationship
has a significant influence on sibling relationships.
In this case, parent-adolescent relationships are
needed. Especially in the aspect of closeness,
communication and comfort. Because
communication is the main key in every
relationship. If communication between parents and
adolescent is well established, then adolescent will
be more open so that a sense of comfort arises.
Comfort with parents can make people feel a
lack of attention, recognition, understanding,
respect, affection, trust and time are provided. So
that individuals can understand the reason for their
parents' treatment of themselves or their siblings and
do not cause conflict or competition with their
siblings. Thus, it is recommended for parents to
increase closeness, communication patterns and
children's comfort towards themselves so that the
quality of the relationship with their siblings can be
more positive.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The conclusion from this research is that there is a
significant effect of the variables of parent-
adolescent relationship, emotion regulation
(cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression)
and demographic factors (gender, age spacing, birth
order and family size) on the sibling relationship.
Regression coefficient test results for each
independent variable showed that the seven
variables tested were parent-adolescent relationship,
cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression,
gender, age spacing, birth order and family size.
There was one independent variable that
significantly affected sibling relationships. The
variables that significantly affect sibling
relationships are parent-adolescent relationships.
REFERENCES
Anisa, 2017, Gara-gara tempat tidur ibunya dipindah,
kakak tega bunuh adik kandung di Lampung Selatan.
Diakses 10 Oktober, 2017, dari
https://kupastuntas.co/kota-bandar-lampung/2017-
05/gara-gara-tempat-tidur-ibunya-dipindah-kakak-
tega-bunuh-adik-kandung-di-lampung-selatan/
Buist, K. L., Deković, M., & Prinzie, P., 2013, Sibling
relationship quality and psychopathology of children
and adolescent: A meta-analysis, Clinical Psychology
Review, vol. 33, pp. 97-106.
Cicirelli, V. G., 1995, Sibling Relationship Across the Life
Span, New York: Plenum Press.
Deater-Deckard, K., Dunn, J., & Lussier, G., 2002. Sibling
relationships and social-emotional adjustment in
different family contexts. Social Development, 11,
571-590.
Feinberg, M. E., Solmeyer, A. R. & McHale, S. M., 2012.
The third rail of family systems: Sibling relationships,
mental and behavioral health, and preventive
intervention in childhood and adolescence. Clin Child
Fam Psychol Rev, vol. 15, pp. 43–57.
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D., 1985. Children's
perceptions of the qualities of sibling relationships.
Child Development, pp. 448-461.
Furman, W., & Lanthier, R., 2002. Parenting siblings. In
M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting (Vol.
1), Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
290
Gentry, J. H., & Campbell, M., 2002. Developing
adolescents: a reference for professionals. Diakses 22
Maret, 2018 dari www.apa.org/pi/pii/develop.pdf
Gross, J. J., 1998. The emerging field of emotion
regulation: An integrative review. Review of General
Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 271-299.
Gross, J. J., 2007. Handbook of emotion regulation. The
Guilford Press.
Gulhane, G., 2017. Parent-child relationship and self-
concept of adolescent students with visually impaired.
International Journal of Advanced Research and
Development, 2(6), 837-840.
Hegar, R. L., 1988. Sibling relationship and separations:
implications for child placement. Social Service
Review, vol. 62, pp. 446-467.
Hurlock, E. B., 2000, Perkembangan anak. Jakarta:
Erlangga.
Indarini, N., 2018, Kakak bisa bunuh adik gara-gara
ucapan orang lain. Diakses 29 Maret, 2018 dari
https://www.haibunda.com/psikologi/d-
3916709/kakak-bisa-bunuh-adik-gara-gara-ucapan-
orang-lain
Kapadia, S., 2017, Parent–adolescent relationship: a circle
of care, respect, and faith. In S. Kapadia, Adolescence
in Urban India; Cultural Construction in a Society in
Transition. Springer Nature.
Kennedy, D. E., & Kramer, L., 2008, Improving emotion
regulation and sibling relationship quality: The more
fun with sisters and brothers program. Family
Relations, vol. 57, pp. 567-578.
Kennedy, D. E., & Volling, B. L., 2009, Sibling
relationships. In H. T. Reis, & S. K. Sprecher,
encyclopedia of human relationships. London: SAGE
Publications.
Latifa, R., 2015, Model stabilitas pernikahan dewasa awal
berdasarkan atribusi kognisi, regulasi emosi dan gaya
konflik. Disertasi: Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung.
Leung, A. K., & Robson, W. L., 1991, Sibling rivary,
Clinical Pediatrics, vol. 3, pp. 314-317.
Lohmann, R. C., 2014, Healthy sibling relationships: Your
sibling is an important person in your life. Diakses 3
November, 2017 dari Psychology Today:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/teen-
angst/201404/healthy-sibling-relationships
McHale, S. M., Updegraff, K. A., & Whiteman, S. D.,
2012. Sibling Relationships and Influences in
Childhood and Adolescence. Journal of Marriage and
Family, vol. 74, pp. 913-930.
Oliva, A., & Arranz, E., 2005, Sibling relationships during
adolescence. Eurpoean Journal of Developmental
Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 253-270.
Palupi, N. B., 2017, Kronologi adik bunuh kakak kandung
di lembata, keduanya terlibat perebutan tanah
keluarga! Diakses 10 Oktober, 2017, dari
http://wow.tribunnews.com/2017/10/05/kronologi-
adik-bunuh-kakak-kandung-di-lembata-keduanya-
terlibat-perebutan-tanah-keluarga
Riada, M. R., 2015, Pengaruh religiusitas dan parent
adolescent relationship pada psychological well being
remaja di SMP Negeri 1 Kupang, Tesis: Universitas
Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga, Magister Sains
Psikologi, Salatiga.
Santrock, J. W., 2007, Remaja, edisi kesebelas. Jakarta:
Penerbit Erlangga.
Santrock, J. W., 2011, Life-span development,
(Perkembangan masa-hidup) (13 ed., Vol. 1). Jakarta:
Erlangga.
Scharf, M., Shulman, S., & Avigad-Spitz, L., 2005,
Sibling relationships in emerging adulthood and in
adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(1),
64-90. doi:10.1177/0743558404271133
Somers, C. L., & Vollmar, W. L., 2006, Parent-adolescent
relationships and adolescent sexuality: Closeness,
communication, and comfort among diverse u.s.
adolescent samples. Social Behavior and Personality,
vol. 34, pp. 451-460.
Syarif, H., 2017, Diduga masalah warisan, kakak tega
bunuh adik kandung. Diakses 10 Oktober, 2017, dari
https://metro.sindonews.com/read/1170155/170/didug
a-masalah-warisan-kakak-tega-bunuh-adik-kandung-
1484144665
Waldinger, R. J., Vaillant, G. E., & Orav, E. J., 2007,
childhood sibling relationships as a predictor of major
depression in adulthood: A 30-year prospective study.
Am J Psychiatry.
Waldinger, R., 2017, Good genes are nice, but joy is
better. Diakses 10 Oktober, 2017 dari
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2017/04/over-
nearly-80-years-harvard-study-has-been-showing-
how-to-live-a-healthy-and-happylife/
Yusuf, Y., 2017, Duel maut di kembangan, kakak tewas
dicelurit adik kandung. Diakses 15 November, 2017,
dari
https://metro.sindonews.com/read/1256665/170/duel-
maut-di-kembangan-kakak-tewas-dicelurit-adik-
kandung-1510467276
The Effect of Parent-adolescent Relationship, Emotion Regulation and Demographic Factors to Sibling Relationship in Adolescence
291