or humiliation between or against groups of the
Indonesian people, with the intention that their
contents be known by the public, threatened with
a maximum imprisonment of two year six
months or a fine of a maximum of four thousand
five hundred rupiah.
2) If the guilty person commits the crime at the time
of carrying out his search and at that time it has
not been past five years since his conviction
became permanent because of such a crime, he
may be prohibited from carrying out the search.
c. Article 310 paragraph (1), (2) and (3) of the
Criminal Code:
1) Anyone who intentionally attacks someone's
honor or good name by accusing him of
something, which means clearly so that it is
publicly known, is threatened with pollution with
a maximum imprisonment of nine months or a
fine of four thousand five hundred rupiah.
2) If it is done by writing or describing it being
broadcast, displayed or posted in public, then it is
threatened because of written pollution with a
maximum imprisonment of one year and four
months or a fine of a maximum of four thousand
five hundred rupiah.
3) Does not constitute pollution or written pollution,
if the actions are clearly carried out in the public
interest or because they are forced to defend
themselves.
d. Article 311 Paragraph (1): If the person who
commits a crime of pollution or written pollution
is allowed to prove what is alleged is true, does
not prove it and the allegation is contrary to what
is known, then he is threatened with slander with
a maximum imprisonment of four years .
2. Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning ITE (Information
and Electronic Transactions):
a. Article 28 paragraphs (1) and (2):
1) Every person intentionally and without rights
spread false and misleading news which results in
loss of consumers in Electronic Transactions.
2) Every person intentionally and without rights
distributes information intended to generate hatred
or hostility of certain individuals and / or groups of
people based on ethnicity, religion, race and
intergroup (SARA).
b. Article 45 paragraph (2): Every person who
fulfills the elements as referred to in Article 28
paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) shall be sentenced to
a maximum of 6 (six) years of imprisonment and / or
a maximum fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000. 00 (one
billion rupiah).
3. Law No. 40 of 2008 concerning the Elimination
of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination:
Article 16: Anyone who intentionally shows hatred
or hatred towards others based on racial and ethnic
discrimination as referred to in Article 4 letter b
number 1, number 2, or number 3, shall be
sentenced to a maximum of 5 (five) imprisonment.
year and / or a fine of a maximum of Rp.
500,000,000.00 (five hundred million rupiah).
Hate Speech has always had an impact on minor
to severe violations that began only in words in
internet media writing that led the reader to justify or
blame those words whose effects were able to move
the masses to trigger conflict among the community.
Therefore, it is necessary to have an action from the
apparatus and law enforcement, especially the Police
to prevent by taking preventive and repressive
actions in handling this Hate Speech case. If not
handled effectively efficiently and in accordance
with the provisions of the legislation will potentially
lead to widespread social conflict, and potentially
lead to acts of discrimination, violence and or loss of
life.
The hate speech is arranged in the constitution
number 11 years 2008 about information and
electronic transaction article 28. Article 45 of the
signs of (2). The content of article 28 verse (2) as
follows:
“Anyone who purposefully and without the right
to spread the information which is aimed for may
cause resentment or hostility the individuals or
group of a particular society by the tribe of, the
religion of, a race, and inter-group relations
(SARA).”
Following the implementation of ITE Law, the
head of Indonesian police issued a letter-number:
SE/6/X/ 2015 to notify the members of Indonesian
Policemen to take a step in handling the
phenomenon of speech hate on the social media. So
the purpose of the circular is only for the internal use
of the Indonesian police members. The Center
Indonesian Law and Policy (PSHK) as an agency
observer and the renewal of law, stated that the
circular is not a product of legislation but as an
internal administrative instrument. A circular letter
was intended to provide guidance further
information about general norm legislation.
(Mangantibe Veisy, 2016)
Points of hate speech are stated in the number
two of the head of Indonesian policy ’s circular letter
covering; contempt, defamation, blasphemy,
provoke, incite, spreading a false rumor, and the
tendency of discrimination, violence, life, and
arising social conflict. The primary purpose of the
Law making on hate speech is to restrict and
eradicate negative effect that can harm the unity and
peace of the nation.