Hibualamo Philosophy:
An Effort to Build Reconciliation in North Halmahera
M. Guntur Alting
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Hibualamo, Peace, Reconciliation
Abstract: The constantly top-down conflict reconciliation brings the people to their position as an object without the
ability to build reconciliation awareness deriving from the potential social capital of the people themselves.
This paper intends to explain the social capital-based reconciliation of the people in North Halmahera,
North Maluku Province. The fact in the field shows that the collective post-conflict reconciliation in North
Halmahera has not been performed maximally due to the failure of people’s reconciliation resulting in the
occurrence of disharmony. This study uses the qualitative approach particularly case study method, with
data collecting technique uses in-depth interview and observation. The result of this study finds that the
social capital-based post-conflict reconciliation of the people in North Halmahera uses the potential
Hibualamo philosophy, which contains the values of life in the form of: (1). Odora namely preserving
affection by growing the desire of each inhabitant to associate and to develop cooperation among
community groups (2). Odiari namely the importance of upholding the truth value and promoting honesty
and implanting loyalty as a form of anyone's dedication to people's interest. (3). Oadili namely the principle
of equity in social life.
1 INTRODUCTION
Christian – Moslem relationship in North Halmahera
is a relationship that has a complex background to be
understood as a reality merely limited to a formal
relationship among religious followers. In fact, such
relationship is built in two important bonds, namely,
first, kinship in direct line of descent, and second,
the solidarity of the members of a single tribe and
the same village.
In Halmahera up to 1979, there had been a
significant increase in the number of Christians.
Two things caused this increase according to Haire,
namely, first, the mission continuously implemented
by the church and second, the influence of the New
Order government's political policy requiring the
people to follow one of the official religions
acknowledged by the government. Haire sees that
the Halmahera people’s choice to follow the
Christianity religion was caused more by the
rejection of the Halmahera people towards the
domination of the Muslim North Maluku regional
government.
The increasing number of Christians in North
Halmahera (Halut) and the issuance of Joint Decree
(SKB) raised particular suspicion of the Muslims
towards all actions of the Christians including those
in the daily community life. This suspicion has
affected the attitude of the Muslims in Halut who
has started to keep their distance from the Christians.
Even the habit to visit relatives celebrating their
religious feast days has slowly disappeared.
According to L. P. Duan, in older generations,
visiting one another in religious feast days is not
only for expressing felicitation, but more than that,
in such occasion parents will introduce their children
to the relatives they are visiting. In such process,
shall occur the inheritance of family values with the
effort of knowing one another as part of the family
overpassing spiritual bond. Unfortunately, this no
longer happens.
In situation and condition like this, reconciliation
is required. In the Halmahera context, when
Christianity and Islam religions, directly and
indirectly, are considered involved in a riot, cultural
values shall be once again routed out and searched
for as means for implementing reconciliation
process (Crim, 1984). The cultural values
consistently held as the prevailing philosophy of the
Halmahera people in general and North Halmahera
Alting, M.
Hibualamo Philosophy: An Effort to Build Reconciliation in North Halmahera.
DOI: 10.5220/0009933616751682
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Recent Innovations (ICRI 2018), pages 1675-1682
ISBN: 978-989-758-458-9
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
1675
people, in particular, are those of the Hibualmo
philosophy.
A question that can be raised in this script is
“how far can the Hibualamo philosophy bind the
unity and togetherness of the Halmahera people
following the riot? Are the values of the Hibualamo
philosophy still meaningful for the reconciliation
process in Halmahera now and in the future?”
2 HIBUALAMO PEOPLE
Among the island cluster of the North Maluku
Province amounting to approximately 352 small and
large islands, Halmahera is a big island. This island
cluster is located on the equator and at 125/129
degree East Longitude and 3 degrees North Latitude
to 3 degrees South Latitudem (Poerwidagdo, 2003).
It is told that the Halmahera people still
originated from only kin as everyone originates from
a single ancestor who lived or stayed in Gura
village. This village is situated on an island located
in the middle of the Lina Lake. This Lina Lake is
located in the hinterland, on the Rau mountainside
and located right in the center of the Northern
Halmahera. By referring to regional borders, the
Lina Lake is located in the South West of Tobelo; in
the south of Galela; in the Southeast of Loloda; and
in the west of Ibu region; whereas there was Jailolo
region on the North and Kao region on the West.
As told from generation to generation, the
inhabitants of this Lina Lake area consisted of four
clans namely, Hoano (clan) Gura, Hoano Lina,
Hoano Huboto and Huano Momulati. Hoano Gura
was a clan inhabiting the Gura Island located in the
middle of the Lina Lake. These Gura Island and
Clan became the Traditional hub and the Spiritual
hub so that Kimalaha (government leader) and O
Gomatere (Spiritual leader) or referred to also as
Ogomanga Yohakai (traditional ceremony leader)
also lived in the Gura island. Hoano Huboto did not
live permanently; instead, they were spread far from
the Lake and live in hinterland forests as hunters.
Whereas Hoano Momulati lived around the Tuguis
creek, a river flowing from the Lina Lake to the Kao
gulf. Hoano Momulati played a significant role as
the mediator of the ‘inner' civilization and the
civilization coming from the ‘outside' including
concerning trading (Hibualamo, 2002).
When this tobelohoka community was increasing
in number, they started spreading and inhabiting
scattered regions in the Halmahera Island. There are
six prominent tribes all of which originated from the
tobelohoka community, namely:
1. Tobelo tribe (now majority inhabitants of
Tobelo region).
2. Tobaru tribe (now inhabitants of Loloda,
Sahu and Ibu regions).
3. Towilako tribe (now inhabitants of Kao
region).
4. Tugutil tribe (more survived in forest
hinterland. They are now called as an isolated
tribe by the modern people).
5. Galela tribe (now inhabitants of Galela
region)
6. Sahu tribe (now inhabitants of Sahu and
Jailolo regions).
Even though inhabitation regions of the clans as
mentioned earlier are spread, they all named
themselves as O Tobelohoka, tobelo community or
Tobelo tribe. Their language was also not the
Halmahera language, but the Tobeloho language and
all of them acknowledge the O Hibualamo in the
Lina Lake as the great shed of all their wongemi
Tingidu (Dilikini or ancestor spirits). Periodically
and at particular times when facing problems, they
gathered at the Hibualamo to perform higaro or
traditional deliberation. When this tobelohoka
community was increasing in number, they started
spreading and inhabiting scattered regions in the
Halmahera Island (Mangunwijaya, 1987). Before the
Islam and Christianity religions entered Halmahera,
the people there had followed a system of religious
believe having faith that the ancestor spirits were the
guardians of life. These spirits were believed
originating from strong people or figures that had
been dead to become guardians and helpers to those
alive. This system of religious belief can be
categorized as animism belief, as they worship
numerous spirits. However, in this belief was also
known the existence of the highest spirit named as O
Gikiri Moi. In about 1250s, there was a change to
the designation of the highest power; from O Gikiri
Moi into O Jou Latala, meaning God the Almighty.
This change was also affected by the Islam religion.
3 THE FALL OF THE
HIBUALAMAO PEOPLE
Speaking of the current existence of the Halmahera
people, they cannot be separated from the riot
incident surging the Halmahera and its surroundings
some time ago. If people wanted to find the root of
the social conflict and social violence (Banawiratma,
2000). Existing in Maluku, social conflict and social
violence are two different things, as explained by
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
1676
prior: “social conflict in any community since a long
time ago till now is very normal, common and even
necessary. Without conflict, politics shall become
repressive; without conflict, some conglomerates
shall be free to own State economic network;
without conflict, any religious institutions shall have
the tendency to become feudal reactions; without
conflict, the language and culture of the controlling
community become the only benchmark for the
civilized community (cultural hegemony), whereas
the identity of the outskirt community shall be
eliminated (cultural oppression). Without conflict,
the young generation shall not be able to survive the
cocoon of the old generation. For the sake of
economic advancement and political freedom, for
the sake of identity expansion and human dignity
enforcement, we need social conflict.” Whereas
social violence is, anything enforcing other parties
and injuring other parties’ status as well as freedom.
That is violence.
Violence harasses an individual or group human
rights. Violence is control and subjugation over any
person or the North. We usually refer directly to
government decision namely Government
Regulation No. 42 the year 1999 regarding the
establishment of Malifut district. The Malifut
District intended to be expanded comprised the
people originating from the Makian ethnic group
that used to live in 16 villages in the Makian Island.
Due to the incidence of the explosion of the Kie Besi
Makian Mountain in 1975, the people of the Makian
Island were moved to a new place. They were then
resided in a region now known as Malifut, near the
Bobaneigo isthmus, the most southern part of North
Halmahera. With the issuance of Government
Regulation No. 42 the year 1999, they did not get a
positive response from the five villages in the Kao
district located in Malifut. Feeling unsupported by
the five Kao villages, there was a small conflict
raised by the Makian Malifut inhabitants towards the
two Kao villages, namely: Sosol and Wangeotak
villages.
From this small conflict (social conflict), the first
chapter of social violence took place on August 18,
1999, between the Makian ethnic group and the Kao
ethnic group. In the social violence of a group of
people towards the desire of another party; violence
underestimates the dignity of both the victim and the
oppressor; thereby, violence violates the order of the
creations as determined by God. The more dominant
nuance of the conflict taking place in Halmahera
was social violence.
It appeared that the first chapter of conflict had
not been appropriately settled by the government,
resulting in the outbreak of the second chapter of a
far greater social conflict on October 24, 1999;
resulting in the collapse of the 16 Makian ethnic
villages in Malifut and all the related inhabitants
must be evacuated to Ternate. After that in Ternate,
the Makian ethnic group then undertook preliminary
action by seeking for and damaging only the houses
belonging to the Kao people. However, in its
development, it turned out that not only the Kao
people were searched for, but all the Christians. The
incidence of raids towards the Christians was
initiated with the murder of the Risakotta priest in
Tidore on November 3, 1999. Then on November 4,
1999, the Christians in Ternate became the target of
the rage of the Makian people. The Christians in
Tidore and Ternate were therefore evacuated to
Bitung and Manado. From Ternate, conflicts and
violence continued to Halmahera and its
surroundings.
According to Tamrin Tomagola (Kompas, 2000).
The conflict taking place in Kao-Malifut rooted from
three issues, namely: first, land issue. This was
related to natural resources because the land
included in the Malifut area, mainly the Gosowong
village contains a gold mine, the Sosol, and
Wangeotak village were burnt; due to their near and
even joint location with the Malifut villages. It
appeared that the first chapter of conflict had not
been appropriately settled by the government,
resulting in the outbreak of the second chapter of a
far greater social conflict on October 24, 1999;
resulting in the collapse of the 16 Makian ethnic
villages in Malifut and all the related inhabitants
must be evacuated to Ternate. After that in Ternate,
the Makian ethnic group then undertook preliminary
action by seeking for and damaging only the houses
belonging to the Kao people. However, in its
development, it turned out that not only the Kao
people were searched for, but all the Christians. The
incidence of raids towards the Christians was
initiated with the murder of the Risakotta priest in
Tidore on November 3, 1999. Then on November 4,
1999, the Christians in Ternate became the target of
the rage of the Makian people. The Christians in
Tidore and Ternate were therefore evacuated to
Bitung and Manado. From Ternate, conflicts and
violence continued to Halmahera and its
surroundings.
The Kao-Malifut conflict was a conflict resulting
from the usurpation of area or land between the
Makian and the Kao ethnic groups. However, now,
the conflict has developed and has undergone
metamorphosis into a religious conflict, as in such
conflict, religious symbols are used to justify the act
Hibualamo Philosophy: An Effort to Build Reconciliation in North Halmahera
1677
of violence. As a result thereof, the conflict is now
managed by PT. Nusa Halmahera Mineral. Second,
the leadership succession at the provincial level,
approaching the governor election. Third, related to
the religious issue, the act of violence has taken
many victims. Based on the data from Kompas, the
extremely fierce horizontal conflict has resulted in
2,364 fatalities, 1,769 severe and minor injuries, as
well as 2,315 inhabitants running and lost in forests;
in addition, thereto, more than ten thousand houses
and public facilities were burnt to ashes. Not to
mention the loss of properties and assets as well as
the degraded social and humanity values that are
difficult to measure and calculate mathematically.
Whether these existing data are correct or not,
the purpose of quoting these current figures is to
show that the result of conflict and act of violence is
costly as many shall become victims. Family
relationship and kinship as well as friendship as
included in the Hibualamo philosophy have now
fallen apart and destroyed. As the result thereof, the
future existence of plural communities and all forms
of cooperation, tolerance, democracy and potential
to live in peaceful co-existence are threatened to
face destruction and extinction. The occurrence of
an incidence of conflict or act of violence has only
left the trace of sufferings and various inner wounds
as the result of prolonged stress and trauma, even
though the conflict and act of violence now no
longer "exist."
4 REBUILDING HIBUALAMO
4.1 Role of Traditional Institutions
The plurality of the Halmahera people with various
tribes, ethnic groups, religions, and cultures is the
wealth of productive people when pluralism is
considered collective consciousness. However, it
may become "fertile land" for the growth of the
seeds of hostility when the ones emerging amidst the
people are hatred and conceit from one to another
(Qodir, 2003). The loss of the sense of unity and
togetherness or in other words the absence of
collective consciousness on the plurality, due to the
culture unification performed by the new order
power. So that as can be predicted, this nation
becomes a small-minded nation having no
productive-creative initiatives in building a civil
society as a social structure reflecting the occurrence
of equity, freedom, and independence. In other
words, this nation fails to become a civilized and
cultured nation. This culture unification is even
strengthened with the resettlement planning
commonly taking place in Maluku in general, where
there are villages with dominant or even majority
Christian inhabitants. The same is the case with the
Muslims. As the result thereof, when conflict occurs,
the used-to-be plural or diverse community has now
been destroyed and divided entirely into two
religion-based exclusive parts, namely: the Christian
community and the Muslim community (Trijono,
2001). The occurrence of segregation because the
traditional institutions initially becoming bond for
the community in Halmahera due to the similarities
of cultural roots and ancestors have now been
gradually losing their position. During the new order
governance, these institutions had been
marginalized, whereas traditional institutions
possessed local wisdom and capability in dealing
without various issues. Traditional institutions had
lost their tusks as the power to bind the people as
members of a community, while religious
institutions had also been much penetrated by other
interests so as able to contribute in creating the
social gap.
4.2 Hibualamo Philosophy
War among brothers has snapped the people of
Maluku, particularly North Maluku (Halmahera) to
rise from adversity and negligence for disastrous war
and death, misery, hatred as well as stupidity. The
people of North Maluku once again were reminded
that we are all brothers (torang samua basudara).
Therefore, what is a war for if it shall then bring
severe and fatal consequences towards the future
generation? The generation of our children and
grandchildren eventually has to bear a hefty
historical burden, namely being stricken by
stupidity, poverty, as well as misery and
underdevelopment (Kompas, 2002). To survive this
problem, various measures to encourage transition
and transformation of conflict towards peaceful
cooperation and co-existence shall become an urgent
principal need. Departing from this consciousness,
on April 19, 2001, at the Hibualamo Court was held
a gathering of the Hibualamo customary community
to generate an agreement to stop the conflict and act
of violence. This peaceful gathering at the
Hibualamo court was not held by accident; instead,
it had ancestral and historical cultural meaning and
value. Hibualamo originates from the syllable
Hibua, having the definition of ‘home’ and Lamo,
having the meaning of ‘large’. Thus, Hibualamo
means a large home. People said the Hibualamo
located in the middle of the Lina Lake was the great
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
1678
shed of all Delikini or ancestral spirits. Hibualamo
was also a place of the traditional ceremonies led by
spiritual leaders (O Gumanga Yohakai). It has
symbolic meaning that they, both Christians and
Muslims originate from the same tribe, have the
same traditions and values, and dwell in the same
big home. The Hibualamo philosophy also contains
Odora (preserving affection among men); O diari
(the importance of upholding the value of truth); and
O adili (the application of the equity principle in
social life). The peaceful gathering was intentionally
held at the Hibualamo court not only to confirm their
togetherness ever since the era of their ancestors but
also as bond and protection in anticipating
subsequent social development. Thereby, social gap
or segregation emerging between the two large
religious communities in Halmahera can be slowly
minimized, and the role of the Hibualamo tradition
can be rebuilt. This is expected able to become one
spiritual unity in building community defense in
eliminating any potential conflict. The diminishing
spirits of solidarity, togetherness, and peacefulness
are now starting to grow in Halmahera. Everyone,
people are talking about how living in peace is much
more fun, compared to living in war and controversy
resulting in murders, assassination, and deep hatred.
5 THE PRESENT AND FUTURE
IMPLEMENTATION OF
“HIBUALAMO”
If during all this time or previously (at the time of
riot), we regard fellowmen as “the others” who are
different from us, or as “enemies”, it is about time
that the old paradigm must be changed. And this is
the moment for us to share spiritual experiences in
building a shared life in humanity in our pilgrimage
journey towards everlasting life. As a traditional
institution, Hibualamo can be used as a forum for
dialogue and sharing on diverse life experiences.
Whereas as a philosophy of life, the value and
symbolic meaning of Hibualamo can build deep
spirituality of the Creator, namely: Jou Madutu, Jou
Maduhutu, Juo La ta ala: God the Almighty and
build the spiritual values of humanity by striving for
and upholding the truth, equity, and mutual
assistance, as well as by appreciating differences in
shared life now and in the future. In the context of
Halmahera following the riot, leaving behind
suffering, misery, stress, and trauma, the Hibualamo
philosophy can become extremely valuable and
meaningful social capital in maintaining and
continuing the ongoing reconciliation. Why is the
Hibualamo philosophy the one raised? Answering
this question, there are a number of reasons that can
be taken into consideration, namely: first, the
Hibualamo philosophy is commonly known by the
inhabitants of Halmahera and its surroundings.
Second, Hibualamo is a symbol of unifier that is
consistently preserved and that survives till now.
Third, the value and meaning contained therein are
filled with goodness and benevolence as well as the
wisdom that is not contradictory to universal
humanity values and even have profound spiritual
meaning. These reasons encourage the author to
raise and appreciate this Hibualamo philosophy..
6 ROLE OF HIBUA LAMO IN
TOBELO’S KINSHIP SYSTEM
Based on an observation conducted by the
researcher, it was found that Tobelo society is a
society that has a various social, economic, tradition,
religious and cultural backgrounds and it always has
a different view or understanding. Such differences
do not become an obstacle for Tobelo society to
preserve the culture existing in their life.
Hibua Lamo is a culture that holds together the
differences of tribe and religion in Tobelo. Hibua
Lamo acts as a medium that provides peace in
Tobelo. Tobelo society lives by the norms contained
in that culture. It is a common knowledge that
human is an individual and social being. As an
individual being, human always tries fulfilling their
private interests. As a social being, human also tries
making a social relationship with other humans in
order to fulfill their life desire. That particular
concept shows that human cannot develop perfectly
without making social interaction with other
humans.
According to (an interview with Jesayah Banari
on April 16, 2013), Hibua Lamo is a culture that
glues all ethnicities and religions existing in Tobelo
society. Hibua Lamo has existed since the birth of
Tobelo society. Hibua Lamo or “big house”
becomes a symbol or ideology in Tobelo society’s
myth after the Talaga Lina era. The concept of
Hibua Lamo socially and culturally has important
values, namely: 1. Hibua Lamo acts as a spiritual
value for Tobelo society. It can be seen from the
symbolization of the place of ancestors’ origin from
Talaga Lake. Hibua Lamo or big house is a place of
Tobelo creator that must be sacred or becomes a
spirit that must be held and preserved by the current
Tobelo people. 2. Hibua Lamo that acts as a social
value is a symbol of a place that conducts discussion
or higaro including a place that holds a ceremony.
With this social value, Hibua Lamo becomes a social
Hibualamo Philosophy: An Effort to Build Reconciliation in North Halmahera
1679
device that has function to glue and unite the
diversity existing in the social structure of Tobelo
society, for example, in an implementation of Babari
Custom (mutual cooperation). 3. Hibua Lamo that
acts as a Material value is a physical building that
becomes the social and cultural identity of Tobelo
society.
Such values act as the standard of every person
live under the roof of Hibua Lamo custom.
According to an informant, the involvement of
people in implementing Hibua Lamo culture is
depicted by a way of mutual cooperation, which is
also known as Babari custom. The implementation
of Hibua Lamo culture is in the form of marriage
ceremony and big ceremony of Hibua Lamo, which
functions to commemorate the agreement of peace
declaration between Muslim and Christian
communities on April 19, 2001. All elements of
Tobelo society are involved in that event by wearing
the traditional clothes of every tribe that exists in
Tobelo. The procedures of the implementation is:
Each tribe prepares a typical dance of such tribe
(an interview with Yowan Pilendatu on April 16,
2013). Eril Y. Leba (an interview on April 17, 2013)
stated that when we talk about a contribution of
Hibua Lamo culture in society, then we talk about
the role of Hibua Lamo culture. A Custom
Institution of Hibua Lamo is a local wisdom of all
custom people of North Halmahera that really hold
the value and have an important role in the
implementation of regional autonomy. The role
played by the Custom Institution of Hibua Lamo is
not merely about the custom role or custom matters,
but also a role that involves other sections such as
government or politic, economic, culture and safety.
Hibua Lamo culture plays an important role in the
society since Hibua Lamo is a key of peace of
Tobelo society.
Meanwhile, according to Muhamad Boba (an
interview on April 17, 2013), people of North
Halmahera in general and Muslim and Christian
community in Tobelo Sub-district in particular are
bound by the validity of Hibua Lamo kinship and
how important that cultural tradition in uniting all
existing elements of society and playing a role in
binding the ethnic unity of Tobelo society in
crossing the line of their religions for a very long
time until the occurrence of horizontal conflict at the
end of 1999 and the early 2000. Tobelo is a place
where the civilization of local tribes are started from
and under the roof/custom institution of “HIBUA
LAMO”, which acts as a community of custom
society that really holds kinship values with a slogan
ngone o ria dodoto”, which means “we are all
family”.
Hibua Lamo is a place of meeting of various
tribes existing in North Halmahera. Therefore,
Hibua Lamo is called as the roof of custom/custom
institution and it becomes a local wisdom of Tobelo
society. (An interview with Jarot on April 16, 2013),
there are four kinds of custom homes of Hibua Lamo
culture with different philosophical meanings. Black
represents solidarity, red represents fighting spirit of
Canga, yellow represents intelligence, grandeur and
wealth, and white represents holiness of the society
of 10 Hoana, which currently lives in the Tobelo
area. According to Jaina Arahman (an interview on
April 17, 2013), the spirit of Hibua Lamo currently
has the spirit of togetherness and diversity under the
roof of Bhinneka (diversity). It is because the spirit
of archipelago country existing in Tobelo has been
long implemented in the Hibua Lamo custom home.
The concept of cultural preservation with the
government is depicted in the emblem of North
Halmahera that has been used to date. The emblem
of Hibua Lamo placed in the regional logo is a
symbol of unifier. The function of Hibua Lamo is as
a symbol of peace reconciliation in Halmahera land,
which was in a horizontal conflict 12 years ago. By
the symbol, Tobelo people declared to never do riots
anymore and will live side by side.
Hibua Lamo custom home is familiar for custom
event. However, now, it has become a reconciliation
place in Halmahera land. Therefore, this culture
needs to be maintained and preserved. The root of
the horizontal conflict in Tobelo Sub-district is from
an economic factor where a social jealousy occurs as
the cause of a competition of economic actor from
Muslim and Christian community and an elite play
of politic prior to a successive election of Regional
Head. The conflict occurred due to tribe, race and
religion (SARA) matters. According to Dani Titian
(an interview on April 18, 2013), the impact of the
conflict is the occurrence of social discrepancy
between Muslim and Christian community in
Tobelo. It can be clearly seen on any events of a
certain community. Before the horizontal conflict
occurred, both communities visited each other’s
event. But, then, a shift in interaction pattern
occurred whether among individuals, groups, or
societies. Visiting each other’s event in an important
day done by both communities can no longer be
seen, if any, it is only limited to a close family.
Social interaction pattern, which only occurred for
relatives or family can be seen in a family
celebration (marriage and funeral). Because of such
conflict, a shift of values of Hibua Lamo culture
occurred. Tobelo society did no longer put forward
the custom, but they put their respective religion
above it.
According to Rizky Djafar (an interview on
April 18, 2013), at that time, there were some efforts
attempted to be done in order to overcome the
shifting of Hibua Lamo culture. Religious leaders
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
1680
and customary figures of both communities in
Tobelo tried to arbitrate them by campaigning peace,
but they failed. Both groups later had to be separated
for a while by evacuation. They lived like they are
enemies by distrusting each other. Exactly on April
19, 2001, the people of Tobelo society and around it
swore to leave the dark period and made a promise
to stop the riot. With cultural belief as the glue of all
beliefs, they held a ceremony of peace declaration.
The meeting in that declaration was informed and
they made the culture to be used as the peace
medium, which subsequently went well and they are
in peace until now. Furthermore, according to Ajun
(an interview on April 18, 2013), the role of the
government towards Hibua Lamo culture comes
from self-customary institution and regional
government.
An inequality or problem related to the
implementation of regional autonomy never occurs
anymore because the strategic positions are held by
the political elites in the area, for example, the
custom leader of North Halmahera is held by the
Regent of North Halmahera, Jiko Makolano, and the
secretary of custom institution of Hibua Lamo is
held by a member of Regional People’s
Representative Assembly (DPRD) of Halut District.
In regard to custom and conflict, Tobelo society also
gives a simple analogy, “in every meetings, if there
is a conflict, a solution should be made and it must
be done customarily.” Hibua Lamo culture is a
medium that provides peace for Tobelo society,
which must be maintained and preserved.
From various information above, it can be
concluded that the main source of the conflict in
North Halmahera in 1999 is a struggle of religious
territorial. However, the religious matter is like
disguised well under various issues, such as the
policy issue of Malifut Sub-district establishment,
the governor election issue, the natural resources
struggle issue, and the election issue of provincial
capital. Many more issues develop so that it
becomes the analysis diagnosis to understand the
root of the cause of such conflict. However, the
struggle of religious territory is the primary issue
and it becomes the final target from such movement.
The eagerness to make North Halmahera as a base of
movement has been built thousands of years ago
where both religions (Islam – Christian) compete
each other to build a hegemony in that land. Such
phenomena becomes a historical heritage in which
the society is always in negative attitude, always in
high emotion, and differs from one another by
religious background. In relation to this factor, a
harmony of both religions is not created. Such
disharmony later becomes the root of the conflict of
religions.
From the research result and discussion above,
the writer assumes that the culture of Hibua Lamo in
Tobelo gives many impacts to the people in Tobelo.
The social reality of Tobelo society is to live side by
side between different tribes and religions,
especially Islam and Christian religions. Both
religions offer a big change for the social life of the
society, especially in putting the basis of the
religious belief that they believe in. It brings a
different attitude in seeing the reality of life in this
world based on their theological doctrine.
Nevertheless, both religions teach people to respect
each other with a hope that it can result in human
welfare.
In order to reach such goal, they conduct the
politics of spreading area of religious influence that
raises conflict. In the reality of daily life, a social
behavior is not always in line with the theological
doctrine. It can even be rejected since the religion is
only placed symbolically. It can occur because the
values of such doctrine are not seen holistically but
only partially. A serious violation of human rights in
Tobelo is not because of a wrong religious doctrine
but it is because of a wrongdoing of a small number
of people that possesses a power to take advantages
of religion in order to gain power legitimation. Such
conflict causes an estrangement between both
religions existing in Tobelo and value shifting of
Hibua Lamo culture in Tobelo. The efforts made in
order to overcome such value shifting done by
religious figures and public figures of both
communities who attempted to make peace.
Eventually, in Ramadan 2001, they made peace.
A peace declaration was done customarily. All
weapons such as spear, machete, and bomb were put
in the middle of a field. Then, a scared event was
conducted. They traded their machetes then ate betel
nuts by putting the betel nuts at the end of their
machetes. After eating the betel nuts, they
apologized each other. All the weapons were
watered with coconut oil and poured with sugar
(coconut oil is a symbol of calmness and purity, and
the sugar as a symbol a peace). Above those sugar
and coconut oil, they swore. If right after this, there
was somebody who planned to make a war, that
person would be the first victim. That particular day,
on April 19, 2001, was the day of peace. It is worth
to be recognized that custom has a sacred dimension
that can unite people. Since then, a cultural home of
Hibua Lamo is made as a monumental place. Hibua
Lamo is place for discussion, settling all strives in
one joint table, and eating and drinking in
togetherness.
Hibualamo Philosophy: An Effort to Build Reconciliation in North Halmahera
1681
6 CONCLUSION
From the research discussion regarding Hibua Lamo
above, the writer provides conclusions as follows: In
North Halmahera, there is a custom institution
known as Hibua Lamo (big house), which functions
as a roof for all customary societies who live in the
sub-districts and villages in North Halmahera
District. This custom institution implements its task,
function, right and authority in the implementation
of regional autonomy in North Halmahera District in
general and Tobelo Sub-district in particular. This
culture is a medium that glues all ethnicities and
religions existing in Tobelo. The custom institution
of Hibua Lamo is a local wisdom for all customary
societies in North Halmahera that really hold the
cultural values and have an important role in
implementing the regional autonomy. The role held
by the custom institution of Hibua Lamo is not only
the role of custom or matters regarding custom, but
also matters regarding other sections such as section
of government/politics, economic, social, culture
and safety. The role of the custom institution of
Hibua Lamo is to do a reconciliation for two parties
that are in conflict and get involved in every meeting
held by the regional government.
The Hibualamo philosophy offered here as a
social model in the context of building better
Halmahera community still needs to be reviewed
and criticized more deeply and seriously, as this is
only a preliminary effort which is off course
difficult. However, if this effort is accepted as an
element in building "local wisdom" in Halmahera,
this shall become an asset to the cultural
development of Halmahera in the future. We hope
that the Hibualamo philosophy can address the needs
under the Halmahera context, at least to become
bond for the real togetherness and solidarity among
men and nature as well as the environment where
we live and stay.
REFERENCES
Banawiratma, J. 2000. Gereja Indonesia Quo Vadis?
Hidup Menggereja Kontekstual. Kanisius:
Yogyakarta.
Crim, K. e. 1984. The Interpreters Dictionary of The
Bible. Abingdon Press: Nashville.
Dupuis, Jacques, 1998, Toward a Christian Theology of
Religious Pluralism. Maryknoll, N.Y: Orbis Books
Hibualamo. 2002, April 3. Diambil kembali dari
Hibualamo: www.hibualamo/or.id
Kompas. 2000, January 6. konflik Maluku Utara
dikendalikan Elite Jakarta. Diambil kembali dari
Kompas: http://www.kompas.com
Kompas. 2002, April 3. Maluku Utara sebuah Kenangan
Sejarah. Diambil kembali dari Kompas:
http://www.kompas.com
Nanuru Ricardo. 2013, Ontologi Hibualamo dalam
Perspektif Jurgen Habermas, Yogyakarta: Kanisius
Mangunwijaya, Y. 1987. Ikan-Ikan Hiu, Ido Homa.
Jambatan: Jakarta.
Philips, Gerardette. 2013. Beyond Pluralism: Open
Integrity As A Suitable Approach To Muslim Christian
Dialogue. Yogyakarta : Interfidei
Poerwidagdo. 2003. Mendayung Juanga. PPRT: Jakarta.
Qodir, Z. 2003. Mendayung Juanga. PPRI: Jakarta.
Trijono, L. 2001. Keluar dari kemelut Maluku. Pustaka
Pelajar: Yogyakarta.
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
1682