crime because there are still many law enforcement
officials who have not been literate about technology.
Then there are still many law enforcement institutions
in the regions that are not yet supported by the
Internet network.
During 2018 alone there were 292 cases related to
the ITE Law, this number has doubled compared to
the previous year with a total of 140 cases.
Defamation becomes the most favorite criminal case
with 149 cases, followed by hate speech cases with
81 cases, while violation cases are in third place with
71 cases. As many as 35.92 percents of people who
reported cases of the ITE Law were state officials,
including regional heads, agency/ department heads,
ministers, and security forces. While lay reporters or
the public recorded 32.24 percent (Yuliani, 2019).
3.2 The Hoax Phenomenon on Social
Media
Hoax in the Oxford dictionary (2017) is interpreted as
a form of fraud whose purpose is to make humor or
bring danger. The phenomenon of the Hoax case
occurred due to several things, mainly related to the
interests and lack of filtering news information on
social media from the authorities. This makes it easier
for hoax makers and spreaders to do their jobs.
Substantially, the presence of Law No. 19 of 2016
concerning Amendment to Law No. 11 of 2008
concerning Information and Electronic Transactions
is inevitable from social media user protest
movements throughout Indonesia. Especially in the
article on defamation, many of which caused strong
reactions from the public where freedom of
expression on social media was felt to be restricted
(Mahmoud & Auter, 2009).
Based on the latest data from the Ministry of
Information and Technology (2019) which revealed
that of 1,146 respondents, 44.3% of them received
hoax news every day and 17.2% received more than
once a day. Even the mainstream media that are relied
upon as trustworthy media are sometimes
contaminated with hoaxes. Mainstream media is also
a channel for hoax information/news dissemination,
each at 1.20% (radio), 5% (print media) and 8.70%
(television).
While the Head of the office agency of
Communication and Information Medan, Zain Noval
stated that:
"Hoax is not only happening by the mainstream
media, but a hoax is also now very much circulating
in the community through online media. Then, the
channels that are widely used in hoax dissemination
are websites, chat applications (WhatsApp, Line,
Telegram) and through social media (Facebook,
Twitter, Instagram, and Path” (Interview, 2019).
Furthermore, it must be acknowledged that
provocative news on social media attracts the public's
attention. Social media is used by the community to
be a place to convey public opinion that is
humanitarian or human interest on issues that develop
in the community. With the internet, people can opine
through social media such as Twitter, Facebook, Path,
Line, WeChat, Website, Blog, E-mail, and others
(Renata and Rachmaniar, 2016).
Moreover, in Medan from May 2018 to May 2019
there were at least 13 cases of hoaxes handled by the
North Sumatra Regional Police. The biggest hoax
case in Medan is related to politics, mainly in the
lead-up to the general election and riots after the
presidential election. Furthermore, the phenomenon
of hoaxes currently carried out through online media
is not only carried out by news sites that are well
known to the public but by anyone an internet user
can play a role in spreading information.
Head of the office agency of Communication and
Information MedanHead of Medan, Zain Noval said
that:
"Much more information or news that is distributed
individually or in groups cannot be accounted for
truth or hoax indication. Hoax is information or
news that contains things that are uncertain or that
are not facts that occur” (Interview, 2019).
3.3 The Commitment of Stakeholders
The spread of hoaxes on social media has caused
problems for all parties, whether it is spreading
hoaxes or receiving information because it has the
potential to damage community records (Siswoko,
2017).
Various efforts have been made by the Medan city
government to minimize its distribution. However,
several cases related to a hoax that have slander and
hatred towards the Tribes, Religion, and Race in
recent years continue to occur. One social media
activist in Medan, Anwar Saragih said that:
"The strategic steps and government policies so far
have not been maximized, although it has tried to
minimize the spread of hoaxes by issuing several
regulations and supporting infrastructure. On the
other hand, the government is also not optimal in
coordinating across agencies and providing media
literacy to the community of social media users so
that they are ethical when interacting in cyberspace.
However, it has not been able to suppress the
number of hoaxes” (Interview, 2019).
This means that stakeholders, namely the central
government, regional governments, NGOs, social
media volunteers, social media activists, academics