from community organizations do not see political
parties as part of a social movement to influence the
policy and control the state, but only as a "political
vehicle" to gain power. As a result, the
parliamentarians are only oriented to power and
wealth. Not a few of Provincial Parliament members
ignore the forums or extra-parliamentary
participation because they claim that the Provincial
Parliament is the most legitimate representative
institution and that participation is not regulated in
regional laws or regulations
Third, in the recruitment process, political parties
often apply the "take away" approach to candidates
who are seen as "political machines". This approach
tends to ignore the legitimacy aspects, commitment,
capacity, as well as the fight. Ex-soldiers and officials
are selected not because they have visions, but
because they have remnants of the power network.
Entrepreneurs are recruited because they had a lot of
money and could be used effectively for various
purposes ranging from mobilization funds to money
politics. Celebrities are chosen because they have
many fans. Preachers are also recruited because they
have followers of traditional times. Political parties
easily take community leaders, intellectuals, or
academics on campus who pursue power and want to
utilize the party as a way for vertical mobility.
Another problem in the recruitment of political
parties in North Sumatra, both for the legislature and
executive is the lack of regeneration in the political
party. This resulted in the parties often importing
cadres who are able to become party leaders without
a clear regeneration process. The aim is only related
to electoral value, money, and influence. Almost all
political parties carry out a figure recruitment
program. Figure recruitment is intended to prevent
the party from losing voters. A number of political
parties in North Sumatra openly recruit leaders and
there are also several political parties that do it in
private. Figure recruitment is carried out with open
and closed models, for example, Hanura makes an
announcement for the figure recruitment openly,
while PDIP recruits their figures in private. The
recruitment process of political parties in North
Sumatra does seem to be carried out only as part of
the process of implementing the functions of the
parties. The measurement used is more focused on
one's character as well as financial ability. Political
costs are exorbitant in every political activity, both
legislative and executive, so it is not surprising for
political parties to consider the cadres and figures
who have sufficient financial power.
Fourth, the electoral process and recruitment
process work in the context of a less educated and
critical "floating mass". So far, the community has not
received political education, especially from political
parties, resulting in millions of traditional voters who
are very vulnerable to mobilization practices.
Political parties do not play an adequate role in giving
political education to the public. Up until now most
of the people of Indonesia are the silent majority, who
are calm, apathetic (ignorant), and not critical in
facing the political process. As a result, the
participatory political culture (civic culture) has not
been built. Such conditions certainly do not allow for
an open and participatory recruitment process (Dalton
& Kuechler, 1990).
Current cadres recruitment carried out by political
parties in North Sumatra is also carried out by taking
cadres from the wing of the party organization, both
men and women, as well as other party wings. This is
performed by considering the efficiency of the party's
work in recruiting cadres, also related to a more
minimal party funding if the recruited cadres come
from the existing party wing. In general, the political
recruitment system in almost all political parties in
North Sumatra, both for the legislature and executive,
has not fulfilled the principles of democracy and has
not been regulated using modern management.
Political parties do not yet have clear and rigid
recruitment manuals governing how recruitment is
carried out. For some political parties, such as Golkar
and PDIP, which own a recruitment and regeneration
module, at the stage of its implementation, it is not
carried out consistently and with a strong
commitment. This is of course very detrimental to the
development of democracy on the local level, as well
as on a national level.
Since the regional election in 2005, recruitment by
political parties for regional head positions tends to
be carried out exclusively limited to local elites who
are considered to have a high popularity and strong
funding. Transactional recruitment also occurs in the
recruitment of regional head political positions. There
is no exception whether the candidate is a party cadre
or not, the transactional process occurs for all
candidates, both party cadres and non-cadres. The
decision on candidates who carried out in regional
head elections are also in the management of the
central political parties, this often results in
differences of opinion between party managers on a
regional level and the central management. However,
despite these differences of opinion, the decisions of
the central management cannot be contested by the
regional administration. This condition resulted in the
frequent process of determining the candidates to be
carried out by political parties to be determined by