Figure 10: The relation between mean pore of catalyst to
the total conversion and selectivity level.
The relationship between specific surface area,
pore volume and mean of pore catalyst to the total
conversion and product selectivity are shown in
Figure 8, 9 and 10. Figure 8 shows that the increase
in catalyst surface area, will not giving a significant
effect on the total conversion results. In the other
hand, increasing the catalyst surface shows a ten-
dency to produce a higher gasoline fraction. This
condition is inversely proportional to the selectivity
of the diesel fraction. This is possible since the wide
catalyst surface provides a higher chance of adsorp-
tion and cracking reactions to produce lighter frac-
tions of gasoline or hydrocarbons. The same trends
are also shown in Figure 9 and 10. In Figure 9 and
10, it can be observed that the increase in pore vol-
ume and the mean of the catalyst pore range does
not contribute large influence on the total conversion
value, but shows the trend of increasing the selec-
tivity of liquid products to the gasoline fraction.
Increased pore volume as a result of the widening of
the pore size of the catalyst, so that the diffusion
process of the molecules resulting from cracking
MEFA can penetrate the pore, no further reaction
occurs, resulting in hydrocarbon compounds which
is equal to gasoline fractions in higher amounts. This
phenomenon may also be caused by the suitability of
the pore size of the catalyst at the time of cracking
reaction, including the process of reactant adsorp-
tion, catalytic cracking process, and desorption of
cracking molecules from the catalyst surface.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The Co and CoMo metal supported on ZY carriers
exhibit characteristics in increasing catalyst specific
surface area, total pore volume and mean catalyst
pore rate. The data obtained illustrate that Co metal
and CoMo metal presences do not damage the crys-
tal structure of ZY and are evenly distributed on the
pore surface of the carrier. From the processing of
XRD data using expo-2014 method, it was found
that ZY and Co/ZY catalysts were formed with a
triclinic crystal system, while for CoMo/ZY cata-
lysts showed a monoclinic crystal system. Moreover,
in the rubber seed oil MEFA hydrocracking reaction,
ZY catalyst showed a 74.18% higher selectivity for
biodiesel products. The presence of Co and CoMo
metals loaded on ZY increases the activity and se-
lectivity to the formation of the gasoline fraction. To
sum up, the highest gasoline product was produced
by CoMo/ZY catalyst with 59.45% w/t, followed by
Co/ZY catalyst with 55.58% w/t.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Authors would like to acknowledge Rector Universi-
tas Negeri Medan and LPPM-Unimed for financial
support via “Hibah Penelitian KDBK-2019” scheme.
Moreover, a grateful acknowledgement is addressed
to Universitas Negeri Medan Research Center, Indo-
nesia, for facilitating the research.
REFERENCES
Bezergianni, S., Kalogianni, A., & Vasalos, I. A. (2009).
Hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil-vegetable oil mix-
tures for biofuels production. Bioresource Technology,
100(12), 3036–3042.
Choi, M., Na, K., Kim, J., Sakamoto, Y., Terasaki, O., &
Ryoo, R. (2009). Stable single-unit-cell nanosheets of
zeolite MFI as active and long-lived catalysts. Nature,
471(7261).
Da Silva, A. C. V. (2014). Study of the liquid activation of
CoMo and NiMo cat-alysts.
De Jong, K. P., Zečević, J., Friedrich, H., de Jongh, P. E.,
Bulut, M., Van Donk, S., & Fajula, F. (2010). Zeolite
Y crystals with trimodal porosity as ideal hy-
drocracking catalysts. Angewandte Chemie
International Edition, 49(52), 10074–10078.
Degnan, T. F. (2000). Applications of zeolites in
petroleum refining. Topics in Catalysis, 13(4), 349–
356.
Htay, M. M., & Oo, M. M. (2008). Preparation of Zeolite
Y catalyst for petroleum crack-ing. World Academy of
Science, Engineering and Tech-Nology, 48, 114–120.
Khowatimy, F. A., Priastomo, Y., Febriyanti, E.,
Riyantoko, H., & Trisunaryanti, W. (2014). Study of
waste lubricant hydrocracking into fuel frac-tion over
the combination of Y-zeolite and ZnO cata-lyst.
Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 225–234.