5
0
66,
7
6
2
82,
7
(1,108 –
5,134)
Based on table 2, it is known that there is a
relationship between physical activity and the
incidence of type 2 DM (p = 0.009; OR = 2.523).
Respondents with less physical activity were 2.523
times more likely for developing type 2 diabetes
compared to people with good physical activity.
Obesity is also a risk factor for the incidence of type
2 diabetes mellitus. Based on table 2, it is known that
there is a relationship between smoking status and the
incidence of type 2 DM (p=0.039; OR=2.338).
Respondents who were smokers were 2,385 times
more likely to develop type 2 diabetes compared to
non-smokers.
Another factor that has a relationship with the
incidence of type 2 diabetes is the smoking status of
the respondents. The results showed that there was a
relationship between smoking status and the
incidence of type 2 DM (p=0.039; OR=2.338).
Respondents who were smokers were 2,385 times
more likely to develop type 2 diabetes compared to
non-smokers
4 DISCUSSION
Type 2 DM is a hyperglycemic disease due to cell
insensitivity to insulin. Insulin levels may decrease
slightly or be in the normal range. Insulin is still
produced by pancreatic beta cells, then type 2 DM is
considered as non-insulin DM. Based on table 2, it
can be seen that there is a correlation between
physical activity with the incidence of type 2 DM.
Based on observations in the field, type 2 DM patients
rarely carry out regular exercise activities for reasons
of being lazy to exercise, and they feel tired quickly.
This, of course, can lead to a lack of response to
insulin (insulin resistance) so that glucose cannot
enter the cell.
This study is in line with the research of
Sukmaningsih WR (2016), which states that a person
who has low physical activity is eight times more
likely to experience type 2 DM [10].
Fikasari’s (2012) study showed that there was a
relationship between physical activity and the
incidence of type 2 DM (p = 0.045 <0.05). Regular
physical activity can reduce the risk factors for type 2
DM because physical activity can reduce weight and
improve sensitivity to insulin, which can improve
glucose control in the blood [Sukmaningsih, 2016].
The results showed that there was a correlation
between obesity and the incidence of type 2 DM.
Based on the results of the study, DM patient with
obese stated that their weight was high because they
did not maintain their diet and didn’t do a regular
exercise. This makes insulin unable to work optimally
to help body cells absorb glucose because it is
disturbed by complications of obesity, such as high
blood fat levels (cholesterol).
The results of this study are in line with the
research conducted by Jin Ook Chung, Dong Hyeok
Cho, Dong Jin Chung, and Min Young Chung (2012)
which states that there is a significant relationship
between obesity and insulin resistance (p <0.05).
Obesity condition causes excess fat deposits.
Freeform fatty acids can circulate in blood vessels
throughout the body and cause oxidative stress which
we are familiar with lipotoxicity. Lipotoxicity will
interfere with insulin receptor function [Jin OC et all,
2012].
The results of the statistics analysis showed that
there was a correlation between smoking habits with
the incidence of type 2 DM. Based on the facts in the
field, they smoke to eliminate tension and stress
because nicotine releases certain compounds to create
a calm and relaxing effect. Besides that they smoke
because they see the habits of their parents, who are
also smokers. This situation certainly causes insulin
resistance and causes blood sugar levels to increase,
which causes type 2 DM disease.
The results of this study are in accordance with the
research of Trisnawati et al. (2013) which states that
there is an influence of smoking habits on the
incidence of type 2 DM (p=0.002). Someone who
smokes 2.4 times more likely to developing type 2
DM compared to non-smokers. According to
previous research, smoking habits caused impaired
glucose metabolism and increased insulin resistance
which causes an increased risk of developing DM.
This result is in accordance with the Coronary Artery
Risk Development in Young Adults study data, which