have to do with symbolic interactions. Until now, the
Mead formulation contained in his book Mind, Self,
Society is the most comprehensive and least
controversial presentation of that perspective.
For these theorists, people are always in the
process of interpretation and definition as they move
from one situation to another. All of these situations
consist of the doer, other people and their actions, and
physical objects. However, a situation can only have
meaning through people's interpretation and
definition of the situation. Meanwhile, other people's
actions come from that meaning. So this process of
interpretation functions as an intermediary for every
tendency to act, in addition to that as the action itself.
According to the view of symbolic interaction, as
Herbert Blumer (1969) asserted, it is the social
processes in group life that create and enforce rules,
not the rules that create and enforce group life. In this
context, the meaning is constructed in the process of
interaction, and the process is not a neutral medium
that allows social forces to play their role, but rather
is the substance of social organization and social
forces.
The theory of symbolic interactionism can be
briefly based on three basic premises. First,
individuals respond to a typical situation. They
respond to the environment, including physical
objects (objects) and everyday objects (human
behaviour) based on the meaning that these
environmental components contain for them
individuals are seen to be active in determining their
environment. Second, the meaning is a product of
social interaction, because it is not inherent in objects,
but negotiated through the use of language. Third, the
meaning interpreted by an individual can change from
time to time, in line with changes in the situation
found in social interaction. Changes in interpretation
are possible because individuals can do mental
processes, i.e. communicate with themselves.
(Mulyana, 2010: 71-72)
2.3 Prior Research
Research on the problem of HIV / AIDS, ranging
from treatment, prevention, anti-HIV / AIDS
campaigns is not new. Since the knowledge of this
disease around 1988, the world of medicine plus
related parties including social researchers have been
looking for ways to prevent the spread of this disease
through various studies including the social impact of
this disease.
In a study from STKS Bandung, it was found that
the issues of stigma and discrimination experienced
by PLWHA, both from family, neighbours, the world
of work, schools, and other members of the
community, further aggravated his condition and
were even sicker than the impact of his illness.
Lack of family and community understanding of
HIV / AIDS worsens the situation of sufferers. HIV /
AIDS is still considered a frightening spectre,
because when convicted as PLWHA, what comes to
mind is death. In the community sufferers often
receive unfair treatment or even get discrimination
from the family and community environment.
While research from Surahman et al. found that
sufferers experience anxiety, stress, depression,
mental turmoil, discrimination and stigmatization.
Furthermore, these conditions will inhibit the
development of positive self-concept of PLWHA,
causing feelings of inferiority, and feeling yourself
worthless.
3 RESEARCH METHODS
This research is a qualitative interpretive approach.
The reason is that in this study, the researchers
wanted to explore the experiences of HIV / AIDS
women, especially infected homemakers from their
partners in the cities of Bitung and Manado. As the
interpretivism approach assumes that individuals
always try to understand the world in which they live
and work. Creswell (2013: 11) states humans then
develop subjective meanings of their experiences,
meanings directed at particular objects or objects. The
meanings are also quite numerous and varied so that
researchers are required to look more for the
complexity of views rather than narrowing down the
meanings into categories or ideas. The researcher
tries to rely on as much as possible the views of the
participants about the situation being studied. To
explore these views, questions also need to be asked.
The more open the question, the better it will be so
that researchers can listen more closely to what
participants are saying and doing in their lives.
To direct the research objectives, this study uses
two types of data, namely: Primary data and
secondary data. Primary data is data collected directly
by researchers from informants through in-depth
interviews and observations. Secondary data is data
that is not directly collected or through second hand
or in other forms such as data/writing in newspapers
or so forth. Secondary data usually refers to literature
sources and some sources of information related to
self-concept and HIV / AIDS.