2 LITERATURE REVIEW
We reviewed many studies to obtain a comprehensive
understanding of hybrid
manufacturing/remanufacturing systems. Mitra
(2016) considers a duopoly environment with two
manufacturers in direct competition, both of which
are selling their respective new products on the
primary market. Specifically, he considers whether
one manufacturer gains a competitive advantage over
the other when the other manufacturer decides to
remanufacture and sell remanufactured products on
the price-sensitive secondary market. However, Mitra
does not undertake a quantitative assessment in
relation to the cannibalization effect.
Nanasawa and Kainuma (2017) quantitatively
evaluate the impact of the cannibalization effect on
profits in a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing
system. By considering the selling price and the
timing of the introduction of remanufactured
products, they elucidate the profitability of
remanufactured product sales.
Gan et al. (2017) proposed a pricing model
developed for short life cycle products in closed loop
supply chain consisting of manufacturer, retailer, and
collector. They showed that implementing separate
channels can improve the overall supply chain benefit
compared to single channel approach.
Souza (2012) shows that remanufactured products
have two effects on consumer demand—namely,
market expansion and cannibalization. Generally, the
cannibalization effect is thought to reduce profits as
new-product demand decreases. However, Atasu et
al. (2010) discuss the theory that remanufactured
product sales can reduce or eliminate new-product
sales, and that the sale of remanufactured products
can make it possible to reach additional market
segments. Furthermore, Guide and Li (2010) assert
that examinations of the cannibalization effect are
important to CLSC development.
During the literature review, we found there to be
many studies on the cannibalization effect; however,
only a few are quantitative evaluations.
3 MODEL
A hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system is
modelled and analysed using the proposed model.
Fig.ure1 shows that the CLSC system consists of
three members - namely, a manufacturer, a products
reach their end of use and become the objects of used-
product collection. The used products are acquired by
Figure 1: A closed-loop supply chain system.
the collector. (It is assumed that the consumer, and a
collector. The closed loop is initiated by a
manufacturer who makes new products for
consumers. After a certain period, the same collector
gathers only those used products that meet the quality
level demanded by the remanufacturing process.)
Therefore, all of the collected returns are transferred
to the manufacturer as inputs for the remanufacturing
process.
We divide consumers into two segments. One
comprises primary consumers who are conscious of
novelty. They basically purchase new products, but
there is the possibility of buying remanufactured
products at lower prices. The other comprises ‘green’
consumers aware of functionality. They purchase
remanufactured products only because (we assume)
the price of a new product is higher than that which
they estimate.Before estimating the expected profit,
we introduce the following notations and parameters,
which are used in Equations (1)–(8).
Total expected profit of entire
supply chain
Manufacturer’s total expected profit
Collector’s total expected profit
Demand for remanufactured product
Selling price of new products
Selling price of remanufactured
products
Purchase price of end-of-use
products
Selling price of end-of-use products
ICORES 2019 - 8th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems
254