Figure 8: Comparison of amiable evaluation.
4.2 Discussion
In term of the sociable evaluation, comparison
between the participant groups and the avatar
conditions showed that the sociable evaluation
scores of the high group were significantly higher
than those made by the low group in all four avatar
conditions. In addition, the sociable evaluation score
of the NAT/AT and the NAT/NAT condition were
lower than that of the AT/AT condition in the high
group. This suggests the possibility that the high
group’s evaluation of their sociable-ness in the
virtual world was affected by the attractiveness of
their self-avatar, regardless of the attractiveness of
their accompanying avatar. On the other hand, the
appearance of the avatars did not influence their
sociable evaluation scores in the low group, where
their scores were always lower than the high group,
and were always lower than the median value.
In terms of the cheerful evaluation, the high
group’s evaluation scores were significantly higher
in the three avatar conditions than those of the low
group. The high group’s cheerful evaluation of the
AT/AT condition was significantly lower (F=6.28,
p≤0.05) than that of the NAT/NAT condition, while
there was no significant difference in the evaluations
among the avatar conditions in the low group. This
suggests that the high group evaluated their
cheerfulness higher when their self-avatar's
appearance was attractive than they did when their
self-avatar was not attractive. However, in the low
group, no significant difference was observed in all
avatar conditions and the evaluation scores were
lower than the median value. Therefore, similar to
the sociable evaluation, the appearance of avatars
did not affect the low group’s low self-evaluation of
cheerfulness, where their scores were always lower
than the high group.
In terms of the amiable evaluation, the
evaluation of the AT/AT and the NAT/NAT
conditions were significantly higher in the high
group than those in the low group. In addition, the
high group’s evaluation of their amiableness in the
AT/AT and the NAT/NAT conditions were
significantly higher than their amiable evaluation in
Yee and Bailenson the real world. This suggests that
when the attractiveness of the self-avatar and the
accompanying avatar is balanced, the high group
evaluated themselves as more amiable than they did
in other conditions where the attractiveness of the
avatars are not balanced. On the other hand, there
was no significant difference in the evaluation
among the avatar conditions in the low group. This
result suggests that the low group has low appraisal
of self's amiableness regardless of the avatar's
appearances.
Those results suggest there is a dichotomy
between the participant groups in terms of self-
assessment of extroversion. The tendency is that the
extroversion evaluation of self is influenced by the
appearance of self-avatars in the high group,
although not all evaluations of BIGFIVE
extroversion scores rose in the conditions when
attractive self-avatars were used. Even when the
appearance of the self-avatar is not attractive, if the
attractiveness of the self-avatar and the
accompanying avatar is balanced, the extroversion
evaluation of self is influenced in the high group.
Thus, part of the hypothesis 1 "Those who
regard their self-avatar as their own alter-ego, if their
self-avatar and accompanying avatar are attractive,
their self-evaluation of extroversion becomes higher
compared to when the avatars are not attractive."
was partially supported. In other words, the high
group has a tendency of evaluating their self-
extroversion higher when their self-avatar is
attractive. Their extroversion evaluation is also
affected by the combination of self and
accompanying avatar’s attractiveness, regardless of
the attractiveness of the accompanying avatar alone.
On the other hand, no significant difference was
observed in the evaluation scores of the BIGFIVE
extroversion in the low group. This suggests that
extroversion evaluation of the low group is not
affected by the appearance of the avatars. Thus,
Hypothesis 2: "Those who do not regard their self-
avatar as their alter-ego, their self-evaluation of
extraversion does not change regardless of the self-
avatar's or accompanying avatar's appearances." was
supported. Compared with the high group, the low
group has a low BIGFIVE extroversion evaluation in
real world, and their evaluation is constantly low
regardless of the appearance of the avatars in the
virtual space. This result can be explained that the