sistance to identify scenarios efficiently, this work
proposes an highly modularized three-tier architec-
ture of a VDMS for the management and analysis of
real-world test drives for the scenario-based valida-
tion of automated driving functions.
Based on a formal definition of time-series of
scenes, a processing chain for transforming the raw
vehicle sensor data to a time series of scenes for sce-
nario mining is presented. That processing chain is
a central component of the proposed VDMS whereas
the design of the architecture follows a requirements-
driven approach by analysing the needs of particu-
lar project roles and deriving specific and general re-
quirements on the architecture.
The proof-of-concept is finally evaluated by us-
ing the RESTful API for identifying lane change sce-
narios based on real-world data. That demonstration
shows that even with a significant reduction of the
sample size, robust identification of scenarios is still
possible. Conclusively, the demonstrations show the
feasibility of the VDMS for identifying scenarios in
real-world test drives efficiently. However, in follow-
up work, an in-depth analysis of choosing the scene
duration ∆t on the performance of different scenario-
mining algorithm has to be conducted.
Focussing on the compilation of a sophisticated
set of scenarios for validating automated driving func-
tions (Damm et al., 2018), several topics need to be
addressed in follow-up work. At first, since the set of
relevant scenarios depends on the road type of the ve-
hicle, the current map matching algorithm needs to be
replaced with a more robust one. For the identification
of other scenarios such as overtaking or approaching,
information about the road and other traffic partici-
pants are required. Thus, in future work, image-based
lead vehicle and road detection will be integrated into
the VDMS.
Besides the enrichment of scene understanding,
follow-up work will address the open research ques-
tions defined in Section 1. At first, future work will
focus on the identification of scenarios in real-world
test drives using the proposed VDMS.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank LG Electronics, Vehicle Solution Company,
Republic of Korea, for supporting this project by co-
operating in capturing large-scale test drives and pro-
viding valuable measurement equipment.
REFERENCES
Bach, J., Otten, S., and Sax, E. (2016). Model based sce-
nario specification for development and test of auto-
mated driving functions. In 2016 IEEE Intelligent Ve-
hicles Symposium (IV), pages 1149–1155. IEEE.
Baek, S. and Kim, D. Y. (2017). Empirical sensitivity
analysis of discretization parameters for fault pattern
extraction from multivariate time series data. IEEE
Transactions on Cybernetics, 47(5):1198–1209.
Benmimoun, M., Fahrenkrog, F., Zlocki, A., and Eckstein,
L. (2011). Incident detection based on vehicle can-
data within the large scale field operational test “euro-
fot”. In 22nd Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference
(ESV 2011), Washington, DC/USA.
Damm, W., M
¨
ohlmann, E., Peikenkamp, T., and Rakow,
A. (2018). A Formal Semantics for Traffic Sequence
Charts, pages 182–205. Springer International Pub-
lishing, Cham.
Elrofai, H., Paardekooper, J., Gelder, E. d., Kalisvaart, S.,
and Op den Camp, O. (2018). Streetwise: scenario-
based safety validation of connected automated driv-
ing. Technical report, TNO.
Fraenkel, D. J., Cowie, M., and Daley, P. (2003). Quality
benefits of an intensive care clinical information sys-
tem. Critical Care Medicine, 31(1):120–125.
Frehner, M. and Br
¨
andli, M. (2006). Virtual database: Spa-
tial analysis in a web-based data management system
for distributed ecological data. Environmental Mod-
elling & Software, 21(11):1544–1554.
Haja, A., Koch, C., and Klitzke, L. (2017). The ADAS
SWOT Analysis - A Strategy for Reducing Costs and
Increasing Quality in ADAS Testing. In Proceedings
of the 3rd International Conference on Vehicle Tech-
nology and Intelligent Transport Systems (VEHITS
2017), pages 320–325.
Kalra, N. and Paddock, S. M. (2016). Driving to safety:
How many miles of driving would it take to demon-
strate autonomous vehicle reliability? Transportation
Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94:182–193.
Klauer, S. G., Dingus, T. A., Neale, V. L., Sudweeks, J. D.,
Ramsey, D. J., et al. (2006). The impact of driver inat-
tention on near-crash/crash risk: An analysis using the
100-car naturalistic driving study data. Technical re-
port, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Liu, H., Hussain, F., Tan, C. L., and Dash, M. (2002). Dis-
cretization: An enabling technique. Data mining and
knowledge discovery, 6(4):393–423.
Menzel, T., Bagschik, G., and a. M. Maurer (2018). Scenar-
ios for development, test and validation of automated
vehicles. In 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Sympo-
sium (IV), pages 1821–1827.
Moskovitch, R. and Shahar, Y. (2015). Classification-driven
temporal discretization of multivariate time series.
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 29(4):871–
913.
Olsen, E. C. B., Lee, S. E., Wierwille, W. W., and Goodman,
M. J. (2002). Analysis of distribution, frequency, and
duration of naturalistic lane changes. Proceedings of
Real-world Test Drive Vehicle Data Management System for Validation of Automated Driving Systems
179