![](bg8.png)
proach to save and manage discipline-specific meta
data within an discipline-agnostic repository and
database can be successfully implemented as central
and scalalabe service at our university.
REFERENCES
Beckett, D., Berners-Lee, T., Prud’hommeaux, E., &
Carothers, G. (2014). RDF 1.1 Turtle. W3C. Re-
trieved June 10, 2018, from https://www.w3.org/TR/
turtle/
Bizer, C., Heath, T., & Berners-Lee, T. (2009). Linked
Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on
Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3), 1–22.
doi:10.4018/jswis.2009081901
Curdt, C., Hoffmeister, D., Jekel, C., Udelhoven, K.,
Waldhoff, G., & Bareth, G. (2016). Implementa-
tion of a centralized data management system for
the CRC Transregio 32 ’Patterns in Soil-Vegetation-
Atmosphere-Systems’. In C. Curdt & C. Wilmes
(Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Data Management
Workshop (pp. 27–33). Kölner Geographische Ar-
beiten. doi:10.5880/TR32DB.KGA90.6
DataCite MetadataWorking Group. (2017). DataCite Meta-
data Schema Documentation for the Publication and
Citation of Research Data v4.1. doi:10.5438/0014
Decker, S. (2017). Rethinking access to Scientific
Knowledge: Knowledge Graphs. Retrieved Febru-
ary 3, 2018, from https://www.linkedin.com/
pulse/rethinking-scientific-knowledge-graphs-stefan-
decker/
Galkin, M., Auer, S., Vidal, M.-E., & Scerri, S.
(2017). Enterprise Knowledge Graphs: A Seman-
tic Approach for Knowledge Management in the
Next Generation of Enterprise Information Systems.
In Proceedings of the 19th International Confer-
ence on Enterprise Information Systems (pp. 88–98).
doi:10.5220/0006325200880098
Gandon, F., & Schreiber, G. (2014). RDF 1.1 XML Syn-
tax. W3C. Retrieved June 10, 2018, from http://
www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/
ISO. (2017). Information and documentation - The Dublin
Core metadata element set. Geneva, Switzerland:
ISO.
Kálmán, T., Kurzawe, D., & Schwardmann, U. (2012).
European Persistent Identifier Consortium - PIDs für
die Wissenschaft. In R. Altenhöner & C. Oellers
(Eds.), Langzeitarchivierung von Forschungsdaten
(pp. 151–164). Berlin, Germany: Scivero Verl.
Kirsten, T., Kiel, A., Wagner, J., Rühle, M., & Löffler, M.
(2017). Selecting, Packaging, and Granting Access
for Sharing Study Data. In M. Eibl & M. Gaedke
(Eds.), INFORMATIK 2017: Digitale Kulturen (pp.
1381–1392). GI Edition Lecture Notes in Informatics
Proceedings (LNI). doi:10.18420/in2017_138
Klar, J., & Enke, H. (2013). Projekt RADIESCHEN:
Rahmenbedingungen einer disziplinübergreifenden
Forschungsdateninfrastruktur, Report “Organisation
und Struktur”. doi:10.2312/RADIESCHEN_005
Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL). (2017). W3C. Re-
trieved June 10, 2018, from https://www.w3.org/TR/
shacl/
Kraft, A., Razum, M., Potthoff, J., Porzel, A., Engel, T.,
Lange, F., . . . Furtado, F. (2016). The RADAR Project
- A Service for Research Data Archival and Publica-
tion. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information,
5(3), 28. doi:10.3390/ijgi5030028
Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT). (2014). W3C. Re-
trieved June 10, 2018, from http://www.w3.org/TR/
vocabdcat/
Matthews, B., & Fisher, S. (2013). CSMD: the Core Scien-
tific Metadata Model. Retrieved June 10, 2018, from
http://icatproject-contrib.github.io/CSMD/csmd-
4.0.html
SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Refer-
ence. (2009). W3C. Retrieved June 10, 2018, from
https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/
Politze, M., & Decker, B. (2016). Ontology Based Se-
mantic Data Management for Pandisciplinary Re-
search Projects. In C. Curdt & C. Wilmes
(Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Data Manage-
ment Workshop. Kölner Geographische Arbeiten.
doi:10.5880/TR32DB.KGA96.10
Politze, M., Decker, B., & Eifert, T. (2017). pSTAIX - A
Process-Aware Architecture to Support Research Pro-
cesses. In M. Eibl & M. Gaedke (Eds.), INFOR-
MATIK 2017: Digitale Kulturen (pp. 1369–1380).
GI Edition Lecture Notes in Informatics Proceedings
(LNI). doi:10.18420/in2017_137
Shape Expressions Language 2.0. (2017). Retrieved from
http://shex.io/shex-semantics/
Research Data Lifecycle. (2012). Retrieved February 13,
2019, from https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/manage-
data/lifecycle
Schmitz, D., & Politze, M. (2018). Forschungsdaten man-
agen – Bausteine für eine dezentrale, forschungsnahe
Unterstützung. o-bib. Das offene Bibliotheksjournal,
5(3), 76–91. doi:10.5282/o-bib/2018H3S76-91
SPARQL 1.1 Overview. (2013). W3C. Retrieved June
10, 2018, from https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-
overview/
Sporny, M., Longley, D., Kellogg, G., Lanthaler, M., &
Lindström, N. (2014). W3C. Retrieved June 10, 2018,
from https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/
Van Garderen, P. (2010). Archivematica: Using mi-
croservices and open-source software to deliver a
comprehensive digital curation solution. In A.
Rauber (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International
Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects (pp.
145–149). Books@ocg.at. Vienna, Austria: Österre-
ichische Computer Gesellschaft.
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J.
J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Mons, B.
(2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific
data management and stewardship. Scientific data, 3.
doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18
ICEIS 2019 - 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
260