Literature Review Studies in Public Sector’s Enterprise Architecture

Karoll Haussler Carneiro Ramos

, Gabriel Andrade de Souza

and André Felipe Rosa

Department of Administration, FACE, University of Brasília, Darcy Ribeiro University Campus, Brasília, Brazil

Department of Industrial Design, IdA, University of Brasília, Darcy Ribeiro University Campus, Brasília, Brazil

Keywords: Enterprise Architecture (EA), Public Administration, e-Government, Bibliometric, Bibliometric Indicators.

Abstract: Recognize the relevant bibliography is important to researchers. It allows better research performance and the

conjunction of academic knowledge. This study presents a bibliometric analysis of the main articles, on a

worldwide scale, focusing on Enterprise Architecture in public administration. The method uses bibliometric

indicators to show existing correlations, based on data from 82 articles cited in the world’s main journals between

2013 and 2018. A multidisciplinary approach has identified contributions in technology, science, and govern-

ment programs. It is possible to acknowledge that research in corporate architecture in the public sector is

correlated with e-government strategies and interoperability to achieving goals and solving problems in this area.

1 INTRODUCTION

Public agencies have been supporting technology

infrastructures that increasingly focus on delivering

services and conducting the business of government.

The use of these technologies supports major efforts of

reorganization, modernization and reinvention of

government using e-Government as a possible solution

together with promoting organizational change (Dang

and Pekkola, 2017). Such e-Government initiatives

have been credited as engines of efficient public

administration reform and given their progression state

they can be classified based on their implementation

and governance levels (Lim and Tang, 2008).

Although there is no common definition for

Enterprise Architecture (EA) concept in the literature,

many definitions agree that EA concerns the

organizing logic articulating business processes, the

information used and produced by these processes, the

corresponding system applications and the information

technology (IT) infrastructure. To ensure that these

four components are aligned from business to IT needs,

governance standards and practices are requested, as

well as the development of governance levels.

Despite the importance of e-Government and EA,

there are few studies on their impacts on public

agencies performance and empirical evidence is

lacking to portray these performance effects. Many

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0475-5366

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0799-4194

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4735-9742

studies on e-Government are based mostly on

speculative reasoning rather than empirical analysis

with rigorous methodologies (Lim and Tang, 2008).

This paper presents exploratory research which

uses literature review through bibliometric and contex-

tual analysis to study EA within the public administra-

tion and its evolving changes in the last six years.

2 ESSENTIAL ASPECTS OF EA

IN PUBLIC SECTOR

John A. Zachman created the expression EA in the

1980s. To Zachman (1987), EA is a set of descriptive

representations that was important to define an

organization. Therefore, become noticeable the

aspects necessary for the management, as well as its

maintenance.

Nowadays, Bellman and Griesi (2015) present a

definition of EA as the organizing logic of the

business process and IT infrastructure, reflecting the

requirements of integration and standardization of the

companies operating model. The intention of EA is

defining how an organization can achieve more

effectively current and future goals.

One of the most popular applications is its use as a

methodology to improve the interoperability and

642

Ramos, K., Andrade Souza, G. and Rosa, A.

Literature Review Studies in Public Sector’s Enterprise Architecture.

DOI: 10.5220/0007750806420649

In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2019), pages 642-649

ISBN: 978-989-758-372-8

efficiency of inter-and intra-organizational IT systems

(Hiekkanen et al., 2013; Janssen et al., 2013; Lemmetti

and Pekkola, 2014). These Initiatives are usually

voluntary, although some law-mandated examples

exist, as in the U.S. (“The E-Government Act”, 2002)

and Finland (“Act on Information Management

Governance in Public Administration”, 2011).

Governments normally consist of many agencies

with different structures and service/business-areas.

This often leads to duplicated information systems

and fragmented business services and process,

decreasing the possibility of cross-agency

interoperability. Therefore, governments pursue EA

initiatives, in agencies, to increase online services

(Saha, 2010), to provide new tools to manage

business and IT alignment within agencies for better

integration of technologies, to rationalize data

structures and applications, and to provide business

modularity (Dang and Pekkola, 2016).

3 LITERATURE REVIEW IN EA

Kotusev (2017) observed that EA literature reviews

including distribution in time, research groups and

communities, citation and authorship patterns,

publication types and geographical distribution,

reference discipline, theory types and empirical

validity. These variables are also known as

bibliometric indicators of scientific quality, scientific

activity and scientific impact.

Distribution in time of literature review studies

shows that the decade's ending 2000 and decade's

beginning 2010 was the apex of publications in

government or public sector EA studies (Ramos and

Sousa, 2015; Dang and Pekkola, 2017; Lnenicka and

Komarkova, 2019)

In Ramos and Sousa (2015), literature review

analyzed the period from 1999 to 2014, showed the

main EA focus in the public sector was in e-

government, service, government, and

interoperability. Dang and Pekkola (2017) argued that

researches focus on development issues and

frameworks, nobody knows how those frameworks

and practices are actually used and followed, how

well they fit with their purposes, and what the

challenges are stakeholders react. According to

Lnenicka and Komarkova (2019), big data, open data,

cloud computing, and EA framework are relevant

themes in government EA.

Most literature review research uses the same

databases, as AIS Electronic Library, ACM Digital

Library, EBSCO, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore,

JSTOR, Science Direct, Springer Link, Taylor &

Francis and Web of Science, justified for ensuring

highest impact in full-text journals and conference

proceedings (Rouhani et al, 2015; Dang and Pekkola,

2017; Gampfer et al, 2018; Lnenicka and Komarkova,

2019). However, authors do not review any

bibliometric indicators, as SCImago Journal Rank

(SJR or ScimagoJR), H-Scopus or Journal Impact

Factor (JIF), since these databases have articles that,

although indexed, have low academic relevance and

impact, not guaranteed the highest impact in full-text

journals and conference proceedings.

4 METHODOLOGY

This research is a systematic literature review (SLR)

characterized as descriptive, which intends to

comprehend the theme in a broader way, through the

following steps: first, it was defined topics and

research questions: “Where and when were

publications about the topic?”, “Who are the main

authors and their institutional links?”, “What are the

methodological aspects adopted in the research on the

subject?”, “What are the main difficulties and

benefits of deploying enterprise architecture

identified in the studies?”; Second, the database and

criteria for the articles, from the consultation of two

databases that enabled the survey of journals and

scientific events: Capes Periodic Portal and Google

Scholar; Third: Identify and select studies, based on

the analysis of titles and summaries of articles in the

database, considering inclusion and exclusion

criteria. Publication in international journals and

scientific events, publications between 2013 and 2018

and complete scientific paper published in English

met the inclusion criteria. All other articles, as well as

manuals, books, roundtables, patents and book

chapters were excluded; Fourth: categorizing the

articles by reading each one to identify information

necessary to classify the research variables; Fifth:

quantitative and qualitative analysis were made for

data consolidation (all sample) using descriptive

statistics and content analysis (for relevant journals

and scientific events of the sample). The place of

publication, temporary clipping, citations, publishing

name, H-Scopus and SJR, Qualis CAPES, subject

area and category, authors, institutional affiliation and

keywords of the article were information used for the

quantitative analysis, as for the qualitative analysis, the

article objective, nature of study, research design,

approach, data origin, public sphere, organization

studied, sampling, data collection technique, data

analysis technique, difficulties and benefits of

Literature Review Studies in Public Sector’s Enterprise Architecture

643

deployment, description results and research agenda

are among the information used.

The option to search for publications in scientific

events considers that the temporality of publication in

international journals usually takes one to two years,

whereas, from scientific events, it usually takes less

than a year to be published.

The inclusion criteria restrict the article searches in

the databases considering the research context (public

administration) and temporal cut of last six years for

content analysis allows an overview of the theme

evolution.

The Publish or Perish software was used to search

for academic publications and the Portal of Periodical

Publications of the Coordination of Superior Level

Staff Improvement (CAPES) of Brazil allowed the

identification of periodicals evaluated by peer review.

For data consolidation, the quantitative analysis

used the articles collected from the database (82

articles). For the qualitative analysis, there was a

clearance of this sample, resulting in 28 articles,

considering the Qualis CAPES stratum, the SCImago

Journal Rank (SJR) and the H-Scopus for periodicals.

The SJR shows the visibility of journals from

developed countries contained in the Scopus® data-

base. The H-Scopus aims to quantify the productivity

and impact of research by means of the following

measures: number of publications per periodical (“h¹”)

and number of citations of each article (“h²”).

5 THE LAST SIX YEARS OF EA

RESEARCH IN PUBLIC

SECTOR

From the quantitative analysis, it was noticed that,

most articles, 71.95% (59 papers), were published in

scientific events. None of these papers were later

published in a journal. This low recurrence of

subsequent publication of event articles in journals

increases the need to investigate publications also in

proceedings for more comprehensive knowledge of

national research publications on the subject.

The scientific production on EA in journals was

stable in the period of 2014 to 2016, with six articles

per year. However, in terms of publications in

scientific events, there was a noticeable growth in

2014, followed by a drop in 2015, and another

remarkable growth in 2016 and 2017, as shown in

Table 11. As the survey was conducted until August

2018, that year cannot be considered as a full year for

analysis, in order to indicate that there was a decrease

in production on the subject.

Table 1: Distribution in years.

Year Place of Publication Total

Journal Scientific Event

2013 1 6 7

2014 6 10 16

2015 6 5 11

2016 6 16 22

2017 2 18 20

2018 3 4 7

Total 24 59 82

Analyzing the time distribution, the same behavior

verified by Lnenicka and Komarkova (2019) is shown

in his analysis from 2003 to 2018. Despite the

differential forms of data collection, results converge.

Comparing these results with the time distribution

performed by Gampter et al (2018), with an analysis

period from 1987 to 2016, and the object of analysis

been EA, the pattern repeats, except for the fall of

publications in 2015.

The 24 articles were published in 21 different

journals. Journals with recurrence in publications are

“Sustainability”, “Software & Systems Modelling”,

and “Enfoqute”, each with two articles. Only the

“Enfoqute” does not feature H-Scopus and SJR on

ScimagoJR. From the 21 journals, 19 present H-

Scopus, SJR, and Qualis Capes, in which evaluation is

in peer review.

Table 2 shows which are journals with SJR greater

than 0.401. This cut from the 0.401 index shows that

the journal has a higher stratum in Qualis Capes.

Furthermore, for this sample, the SJR index average is

0.53, the median value is 0.48 and the standard

deviation is 0.39.

The average for H-Scopus is 40.64; the median

value is 40. The maximum value of the SJR obtained

was 1.32 from “Government Information Quarterly”.

Therefore, nine journals are considered more relevant.

Table 2: Journals and Indexes.

Journal SJR H N. Papers

Government Information

Quarterly

1,32 76 1

International Journal of Medical

Informatics

1,247 88 1

Journal of Intelligent

Manufacturing

1,18 63 1

Annual Reviews in Control 0,82 64 1

International Journal of

Computer Integrated

Manufacturing

0,77 44 1

Enterprise Information Systems 0,72 40 1

Sustainability 0,54 42 2

Indian Journal of Fundamental

and Applied Life Sciences

0,48 29 1

Software & Systems Modelling 0,48 41 2

ICEIS 2019 - 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

644

It is worth noting that the journal with a maximum

value of H-Scopus was 101 by IEEE Internet

Computing, but it has an SJR of 0.38.

Of the 59 articles of scientific events, 47 scientific

events were identified, wherein International

Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

(ICEIS) and Pacific Asia Conference on Information

Systems (PACIS) have the highest concentration of

articles (4 papers each). Table 3 presents the relation

between events evaluated by SJR, H indexes and the

number of articles published in it.

Table 3: Conferences related to EA in Public Sector.

Conference N. of

Papers

Years

International Conference on

Enterprise Information Systems

(ICEIS)

4 2013;

2016; 2017

(2 papers)

Pacific Asia Conference on

Information Systems (PACIS)

4 2016,

*2017 (3

papers)

European Conference on

Information Systems (ECIS)

2 2013; 2016

Joint Rail Conference (JRC) 1 2013

International Conference on

Computer and Information Sciences,

(ICCOINS)

1 2016

International Conference on

Information and Communication

Technology (ICoICT)

1 2016

International Conference on

Innovative Computing Technology,

(INTECH)

1 2016

International Conference on ICT for

Smart Society (ICISS)

1 2016

AIP Conference Proceedings 1 2017

International Symposium on

Business Modelling and Software

Design (BMSD)

1 2016

International Conference on Science

in Information Technology: Big

Data Spectrum for Future

Information Economy (ICSITech)

1 2015

International Conference on Cyber

and IT Service Management

(CITSM)

1 2016

* Event year is not on the basis of ScimagoJR

These findings of publication places in journals

and events are a contribution to researchers and

professionals in this area who are interested in

submitting articles for publication or even to consult

and read articles of EA subject.

Considering articles of journals and scientific

events indexed on ScimagoJR, which are in total 32

articles, the subject area concentration is computer

science, with 75% of papers (Table 4).

Table 4: Subject area.

Subject Area

N. of

Papers

Frequency

Computer Science 24 75,00%

Engineering 8 25,00%

Social Sciences 7 21,88%

Mathematics 5 15,63%

Environmental Science 4 12,50%

Energy 3 9,38%

Medicine 2 6,25%

Decision Sciences 2 6,25%

Materials Science 1 3,13%

Agricultural and Biological

Sciences

3,13%

Chemical Engineering 1 3,13%

Biochemistry 1 3,13%

Business 1 3,13%

Management and Accounting 1 3,13%

Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3,13%

Considering the 82 articles, 139 authors

participated in researches. Two authors elaborated the

relative majority of researches (30 papers).

Researches counting one author were only 11 articles,

and the average of authors per research is 2.74. The

number of citations of these articles is an important

indicator for verification of author’s relevance. The

author R. Abraham has in a single article, entitled

“Enterprise architecture artifacts as boundary objects

- A framework of properties”, 45 citations, published

in Proceedings of 21st European Conference on

Information Systems (ECIS 2013). Table 5 shows

articles that have above 20 citations.

Table 5: Most cited articles.

Authors Cites (Year) Title

R Abraham 45 (2013) Enterprise architecture

artifacts as boundary objects-

A framework of properties

U Franke,

P Johnson,

J König

38 (2014) An architecture

framework for enterprise IT

service availability analysis

A Vargas,

L Cuenca,

A Boza,

I Sacala,

M Moisescu

28 (2016) Towards the

development of the

framework for inter sensing

enterprise architecture

P Närman,

M Buschle,

M Ekstedt

26 (2014) An enterprise

architecture framework for

multi-attribute information

systems analysis

V Burégio,

Z Maamar,

S Meira

26 (2015) An architecture and

guiding framework for the

social enterprise

Average citations of the 82 papers is 4.5122, the

median value is 1 and the standard deviation is 8.71.

Literature Review Studies in Public Sector’s Enterprise Architecture

645

Regarding the author’s institutional linking, 70

universities were identified. The University of

Technology of Malaysia has the largest number of

published articles (6 papers). Seven articles had no or

missing information. Table 6 shows the author’s

institutional affiliation.

Table 6: Author’s Affiliation.

(Country) Institutional affiliation Occ.

(Malaysia) University of Technology Malaysia 6

(Croatia) University of Zagreb 3

(Brazil) University of Brasília 3

(Indonesia) Bandung Institute of Technology 3

(Iran) Islamic Azad University 3

(Germany) University of Rostock 2

(Indonesia) Bina Nusantara University 2

(Croatia) IBISTM 2

(Iran) University of Tehran 2

(Indonesia) University of Lampung 2

(Emirates) American University of Sharjah 2

(Brazil) Federal University of Rio de Janeiro 2

(Canada) Ryerson University 2

(Indonesia) Telkom University 2

(Sweden) Royal Institute of Technology 2

(Finland)Tampere University of Technology 2

Indonesia is the country with the largest amount

of research (12 papers), followed by Malaysia (7

papers); Germany and Iran, each with 6 papers;

United States of America and France, each with 5

papers; Switzerland, Finland, Brazil and Croatia each

with 4 papers. In terms of continents, Europe

predominates by participating in 14 researches; then

Asia participating in 8 researches; Latin America,

Middle Orient participating in 4 researches each;

North America in 3 researches; Africa and Oceania

with 1 research each.

From the published articles, eight surveys had

participants from, at least, one public organization

(Table 7).

Table 7: Participating public agencies.

Government Agencies City, Country

Ministry of Communication and

Riyadh, Saudi

Arabia

Ministry of ICT Bogota, Colombia

Government of Ontario Toronto, Canada

Integration and Interoperability

Coordination (SERPRO)

Brasilia, Brazil

New York City Transit (NYCT) New York, USA

IT Organization of Iran Tehran, Iran

Among the keywords used in the 82 articles, 230

terms were identified, with only 11 terms with

recurrences in at least 3 papers.

Table 8 shows the frequency of use of keywords

from the researched articles.

Table 8: Keywords.

Keyword Frequency

Enterprise architecture 47

Enterprise architecture framework 13

Public sector 7

TOGAF 6

E-government 5

Framework 5

Balanced scorecard 4

Zachman framework 4

Change management 3

Software architecture 3

Metrics 3

There is no consensus among authors about the

use of keywords for indexing articles. In the

evolutionary aspect of EA.

The results are in line with the Lnenicka and

Komarkova (2019) analyses of the terms enterprise

architecture framework, TOGAF, and Zachman

framework, but there is no evidence of big data or

cloud computing. The question of e-government still

remains according to Ramos and Sousa (2015).

In the public sector, EA has become a tool to

support e-government and interoperability activities.

Methodological aspects of publications regarding

the approaches of research; data collection strategies;

techniques of sampling and analysis. To do so, a new

selection was made in the sample of the 82 journals,

choosing to work with those that were published in

periodicals and scientific events of greater relevance,

such

as those in Table 3 and 4, thus, the new cut of

articles for content analysis has 28 articles.

Initial analyses have shown that most of the

published articles (18 papers) are empirical, which

refers to reports of specific experiences of public

organizations. Of the 9 theoretical articles identified,

all are bibliometric surveys. Only one article

researched about EA methodology.

There is no predominance in research design, in

which 36% (10 papers) are descriptive, 32% (9

papers) are exploratory, 29% (8 papers) are

explanatory research and have a qualitative approach.

The use of this methodological approach is

consistent with the types of research for analyzing the

implementation of EA frameworks.

Regarding the origin of the data, 50% of the

publications (14 papers) used primary sources in the

collection, in which, data were collected in field

surveys. Secondary sources were used in 29% of the

publications (8 papers), essentially based on

bibliographic analysis research. There were 6 papers

ICEIS 2019 - 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

646

that had secondary and primary data. On the data

collection strategies, the greatest recurrence is of case

studies (12 papers), followed by bibliographical

research (6 papers), the following research strategies

were also identified: opinion survey (2 papers),

documentary research (2 papers) and experimental

research (1 paper).

Bibliographic research, survey, observation, docu-

mentary analysis, interview, documentary research, the

Delphi method, focus groups and experimental tests

are among the instruments of analysis used by the

authors. Regarding the data analysis, there was a great

predominance of content analysis (16 papers) and then

descriptive statistics (2 articles).

The relative majority of empirical studies (7

papers) were carried out at a federal level.

Subsequently, there was a concentration of researches

carried out at universities (4 papers). Two research in

the hospital sector were identified as well. It is worth

stressing that the EA theme is an interdisciplinary

matter and is part of many countries governance

agenda. Thus, articles that analyze the EA of

international governments appears.

Among the analyzed articles, it was possible to

classify different types of difficulties related to EA,

which were grouped in 6 thematic categories (Table 9).

Table 9: EA difficulties in the public sector.

Categories Reference Examples

Deficiency of the

EA model(s) to

meet current

organizational needs

Amalia, Supriadi (2017); Hussein,

Mahrin, Maarop (2017); Nama,

Kurniawan (2017); Oberhauser

(2018)

Deficiencies in the

planning and

implementation of

Bakar, Selamat (2016); Kurniawan,

Hiererra (2016); Lee, Oh, Nam

(2016); Moscoso-Zea, Luján-Mora,

Cáceres, Schweimanns (2016); Nam

(2016); Nam et al (2016); Aliee et al

(2017); Bakar, Selamat, Kama

(2017); Haghighathoseini et al

(2018); Oberhauser (2018)

Difficulty of

integration

Amalia, Supriadi (2017); Nama,

Kurniawan (2017); Nunes, Cappelli,

Costa (2017); Mondorf, Wimmer

(2017); AlSoufi (2018)

Conceptual

difficulties

Kaddoumi, Watfa (2016); Lee, Oh,

Nam (2016); Nam et al (2016);

Nunes, Cappelli, Costa (2017)

Technical and non-

technical difficulties

Santikarama, Arman (2016); Seghiri

(2016); Mondorf, Wimmer (2017);

Nama, Kurniawan (2017); Sultan,

Miranskyy (2018)

Lack of agility in

meeting demands

Kaddoumi, Watfa (2016); Amalia,

Supriadi (2017); Nama, Kurniawan

(2017); Nunes, Cappelli, Costa

(2017); Sultan, Miranskyy (2018)

In the same way, it was identified in the literature

possible benefits obtained or expected by public

organizations in relation to the adoption of EA. In this

case, it was possible to classify benefits in 9 thematic

categories (Table 10).

Table 10: EA benefits in the public sector.

Categories Reference Examples

Achievement of

Organizational

Objectives

Lee, Oh, Nam (2016); Yuliana,

Rahardjo (2016); Bakar, Selamat,

Kama (2017); Hussein, Mahrin,

Maarop (2017)

Organizational

Alignment

(from IT to

Business)

Bakar, Selamat (2016); Kaddoumi,

Watfa (2016); Lee, Oh, Nam (2016);

Nam, Oh, Kim (2016); Yuliana,

Rahardjo (2016); Amalia, Supriadi

(2017); Hussein, Mahrin, Maarop

(2017); Nunes, Cappelli, Costa (2017);

Sultan, Miranskyy (2018)

Advance of e-

government

Bakar, Selamat (2016); Lee, Oh, Nam

(2016); Aliee et al (2017); Bakar,

Selamat, Kama (2017)

Contribution to

organizational

change

Abraham (2013); Kaushik, Raman

(2015); Kaddoumi, Watfa (2016);

Moscoso-Zea et al (2016); Yuliana,

Rahardjo (2016); Aliee et al (2017);

Bakar, Selamat, Kama (2017);

Hussein, Mahrin, Maarop (2017);

AlSoufi (2018)

organizational

communication

Santikarama, Arman (2016); Yuliana,

Rahardjo (2016); Bakar, Selamat,

Kama (2017)

organizational

knowledge

management

Bernus, Noran, Molina (2015);

Moscoso-Zea (2016)

Improves

organizational

(and IT)

management

Kaddoumi, Watfa (2016); Lee, SW Oh,

Nam (2016); Amalia, Supriadi (2017);

Hussein, Mahrin, Maarop (2017);

Mondorf, Wimmer (2017);

Haghighathoseini et al (2018)

Improves

organizational

(and IT)

performance

Bakar, Selamat (2016); Kaddoumi,

Watfa (2016); Moscoso-Zea et al

(2016); Seghiri et al (2016)

Promotes the

integration of

organizational

components

Kaushik, Raman (2015); Bakar,

Selamat (2016); Dang, Pekkola (2016);

Lee, Oh, Nam (2016); Moscoso-Zea et

al (2016); Vargas (2016)

6 CONCLUSION

The study analyzed the evolution of EA theme in

Public Sector. It is important to note that articles of

EA focus on the areas of computer science,

engineering, and social sciences, which shows a

multidisciplinary character involving different

Literature Review Studies in Public Sector’s Enterprise Architecture

647

aspects in the public sector. The analysis shows that

consider scientific events and articles published in

proceedings can be significant for comprehending the

theme since research shows that much of the EA

literature appear on scientific events.

Through the bibliometric analysis, we can observe

growth in the approach of the theme in worldwide

scope, in addition to a change of stakeholders region,

which cease to be in majority on the west and come

to appear with relevance in the East. The countries

with the highest volume of publication in the sample

used were Indonesia, Malaysia, Germany, and Iran.

Only after this group, comes the United States of

America. In conclusion, we find that, after three

decades of research, publications and development of

EA in West countries, there is a struggle in the East

to follow up studies and approaches that started and

were implemented through the years. The search for

government transparency as a reflection of

democratic transformations and more politically

involved societies brings EA as a well-researched

solution. Malaysia is a good example of a country that

is passing through a democratic transition and it

appears to be a direct relationship between the

development of EA in the country and its new

democratic policies. A more particular research in

this area can bring greater correlations between the

political changes of East countries and their new

approaches to EA.

REFERENCES

Abraham, R. (2013, June). Enterprise architecture artifacts

as boundary objects-A framework of properties.

Association for Information Systems. In Proceedings of

the 21st European Conference on Information Systems

(ECIS 2013).

Aliee, F. S., Bagheriasl, R., Mahjoorian, A., Mobasheri, M.,

Hoseini, F. and Golpayegani, D. (2017). Towards a

National Enterprise Architecture Framework in Iran.

Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on

Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2017).

AlSoufi, A. (2018). Bahrain National Enterprise

Architecture Framework: a Platform towards a GCC

EA Initiative. GSTF. In Journal on Computing (JoC),

2(1).

Amalia, E. and Supriadi, H. (2017, June). Development of

enterprise architecture in university using TOGAF as

framework. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol.

1855, No. 1, p. 060004). AIP Publishing.

Bakar, N. A. A. and Selamat, H. (2016, August).

Investigating Enterprise Architecture implementation

in public sector organisation: A case study of Ministry

of Health Malaysia. In Computer and Information

Sciences (ICCOINS), 2016 3rd International

Conference on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Bakar, A., Selamat, H. and Kama, M. N. (2017). Assessing

the Capability and Priority of Enterprise Architecture

Implementation in Malaysian Public Sector. In Pacific

Asia Conference on Information Systems.

Bellman, B., and Griesi, K. (2015, July). Enterprise

architecture advances in technical communication. In

Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2015

IEEE International (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

Bernus, P., Noran, O. and Molina, A. (2015). Enterprise

architecture: Twenty years of the GERAM framework.

Annual Reviews in Control, 39, 83-93.

Dang, D. D. and Pekkola, S. (2016, June). Root Causes of

Enterprise Architecture Problems in the Public Sector.

In PACIS (p. 287).

Dang, D. D., and Pekkola, S. (2017). Systematic Literature

Review on Enterprise Architecture in the Public

Sector. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 15(2).

Gampfer, F., Jürgens, A., Müller, M., and Buchkremer, R.

(2018). Past, current and future trends in enterprise

architecture—A view beyond the horizon. Computers

in Industry, 100, 70-84.

Haghighathoseini, A., Bobarshad, H., Saghafi, F., Rezaei,

M. S. and Bagherzadeh, N. (2018). Hospital enterprise

Architecture Framework (Study of Iranian University

Hospital Organization). In International journal of

medical informatics, 114, 88-100.

Hiekkanen, K., Korhonen, J. J., Collin, J., Patricio, E.,

Helenius, M., and Mykkanen, J. (2013). Architects'

Perceptions on EA Use - An Empirical Study. In IEEE

15th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI).

Hussein, S. S., Mahrin, M. N. R. and Maarop, N. (2017).

Preliminary Study of Malaysian Public Sector (MPS)

Transformation Readiness through Enterprise

Architecture (EA) Establishment. In Pacific Asia

Conference on Information Systems.

Janssen, M., Flak, L. S., and Sæbø, Ø. (2013). Government

Architecture: Concepts, Use and Impact. In M. A.

Wimmer, M. Janssen and H. J. Scholl (Eds.), Electronic

Government: Proceedings of the 12th IFIP WG 8.5

International Conference, EGOV 2013 (pp. 135-147).

Koblenz, Germany.

Kaddoumi, T. and Watfa, M. (2016, August). A proposed

agile enterprise architecture framework. In Innovative

Computing Technology (INTECH), 2016 Sixth

International Conference on (pp. 52-57). IEEE.

Kaushik, A. and Raman, A. (2015). The new data-driven

enterprise architecture for e-healthcare: Lessons from

the Indian public sector. In Government Information

Quarterly, 32(1), 63-74.

Kotusev, S. (2017). Enterprise architecture: what did we

study? International Journal of Cooperative

Information Systems, 26(04), 1730002.

Kurniawan, Y. and Hiererra, S. E. (2016, May).

Information systems design for sustainability financial

services company using enterprise architecture

framework: A case study approach. In Information and

Communication Technology (ICoICT), 2016 4th

International Conference on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

ICEIS 2019 - 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

648

Lee, S., Oh, S. W. and Nam, K. (2016). Transformational

and transactional factors for the successful

implementation of enterprise architecture in public

sector. Sustainability, 8(5), 456.

Lemmetti, J., Pekkola, S. (2014). Enterprise Architecture in

Public ICT Procurement in Finland. In Electronic

Government and Electronic Participation: Joint

Proceedings of Ongoing Research and Projects of IFIP

WG 8.5 EGOV and ePart, Dublin, Ireland.

Lim, J. H., Tang, S. Y. (2008). Urban e-Government

initiatives and environmental decision performance in

Korea. Journal of Public Administration Research and

Theory (pp. 109-138).

Lnenicka, M., and Komarkova, J. (2019). Developing a

government enterprise architecture framework to

support the requirements of big and open linked data

with the use of cloud computing. International Journal

of Information Management, 46, 124-141.

Mondorf, A. and Wimmer, M. (2017). Contextual

Components of an Enterprise Architecture Framework

for Pan-European eGovernment Services. In

Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International

Conference on System Sciences.

Moscoso-Zea, O., Luján-Mora, S., Cáceres, C. E. and

Schweimanns, N. (2016, April). Knowledge

Management Framework using Enterprise Architecture

and Business Intelligence. In ICEIS (1) (pp. 244-249).

Nam, K., Oh, S W., Kim, S. K., Goo, J. and Khan, M. S.

(2016). Dynamics of Enterprise Architecture in the

Korean Public Sector: Transformational Change vs.

Transactional Change. Sustainability, 8(11), 1074.

Nama, G. F. and Kurniawan, D. (2017, November). An

enterprise architecture planning for higher education

using The Open Group Architecture Framework

(TOGAF): Case study University of Lampung. In

Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 2017 Second

International Conference on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Nunes, V. T., Cappelli, C. and Costa, M. V. (2017). FACIN:

The Brazilian Government Enterprise Architecture

Framework. In ICEIS (3) (pp. 433-439).

Oberhauser, R. (2018). The Digital Diamond Framework:

An Enterprise Architecture Framework for the Digital

Age. In eKNOW 2018: The Tenth International

Conference on Information, Process, and Knowledge

Management

Ramos, K. H. C. and de Sousa Júnior, R. T. (2015).

Bibliometric analysis of enterprise architecture in the

public administration. International Information

Institute (Tokyo). Information, 18(2), 501.

Rouhani, B. D., Mahrin, M. N. R., Nikpay, F., Ahmad, R.

B., and Nikfard, P. (2015). A systematic literature

review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation

Methodologies. Information and Software Technology,

62, 1-20.

Saha, P. (2010). EA as platform for connected government:

Advancing the Whole of Government Enterprise

Architecture Adoption with Strategic (Systems)

Thinking. In NUS Institute of Systems Science

Singapore.

Santikarama, I. and Arman, A. A. (2016, July). Designing

enterprise architecture framework for non-cloud to

cloud migration using TOGAF, CCRM, and CRMM. In

ICT For Smart Society (ICISS), 2016 International

Conference on (pp. 32-37). IEEE.

Seghiri, R., Boulanger, F., Lecocq, C. and Godefroy, V.

(2016, January). An executable model driven

framework for enterprise architecture application to the

Smart Grids context. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2016

49th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 4546-

4555). IEEE.

Sultan, M. and Miranskyy, A. (2015). Ordering stakeholder

viewpoint concerns for holistic and incremental

Enterprise Architecture: the W6H framework.In

Proceedings of IEEE Fifth International workshop on

Requirements Patterns.

Vargas, A., Cuenca, L., Boza, A., Sacala, I. and Moisescu,

M. (2016). Towards the development of the framework

for inter sensing enterprise architecture. Journal of

Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(1), 55-72.

Yuliana, R. and Rahardjo, B. (2016, April). Designing an

agile enterprise architecture for mining company by

using TOGAF framework. In Cyber and IT Service

Management, International Conference on (pp. 1-6).

IEEE.

Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information

systems architecture. IBM systems journal, 26(3), 276-

292.

Literature Review Studies in Public Sector’s Enterprise Architecture

649