University Linz respectively analyzing the status-quo
including the three pillars of education, is the ba-
sis for the current work at the Johannes Kepler Uni-
versity Linz: the development of an overall concept
of a seamless talents promotion in computer science
across all age groups and educational levels. The
underlying didactic framework is COOL Informat-
ics, the flexible and ”brain-based” teaching approach
of the COOL Lab of the Johannes Kepler University
Linz. With this concept and its 4 principles - discov-
ery, cooperation, individuality and activity - we have
already gained some positive experiences in bache-
lor programming courses: we could reduce the drop-
out rate, close the usual gender-gap concerning the
performance, as well as increase the average learning
outcomes (Sabitzer and Pasterk, 2014). We are still at
an early stage in the development of the overall con-
cept, where we cannot present empirical results yet.
However, the positive feedback of the participating
students as well as their parents gained so far shows
that we are on the right way.
6 CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
Talents promotion is essential especially in the field of
computer science, where a growing lack of qualified
staff can be observed. There are already several activ-
ities for gifted students at the Johannes Kepler Uni-
versity Linz, in part developed and offered in cooper-
ation with Talente O
¨
O. They allow us to reach chil-
dren and adolescents of all levels of education from
kindergarten up to university level. With this varied
and seamless talents promotion in computer science
we want to increase interest and attract more students,
especially females, for a further career in this field.
We have already got some positive feedback from stu-
dents and parents, which shows that we are on the
right way. Currently, we are developing an overall
concept for a seamless talents promotion in computer
science, based on the three pillars of honors education
as well as on a common didactic framework: COOL
Informatics. The talents promotion at the Johannes
Kepler University Linz is already good and appreci-
ated. With the further development and application of
the planned overall concept, it may become a flagship
for talents promotion in computer science for other
regions, too.
REFERENCES
Adams-Byers, J., Whitsell, S. S., and Moon, S. M. (2004).
Gifted students’ perceptions of the academic and so-
cial/emotional effects of homogeneous and heteroge-
neous grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1):7–20.
Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., and Grimley, M. (2009).
Computer Science Unplugged: School Students Do-
ing Real Computing Without Computers. J. Appl.
Comput. Inf. Technol., 13(1):20–29.
Berger, S. L. (1991). Differentiating Curriculum for Gifted
Students. ERIC Digest #E510.
Bischof, E. and Sabitzer, B. (2011). Computer science
in primary schools - Not possible, but necessary?!
In Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect.
Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol-
ume 7013 LNCS, pages 94–105.
Brighton, C. M., Moon, T. R., and Huang, F. H. L. (2015).
Advanced Readers in Reading First Classrooms. Jour-
nal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(3):257–293.
Clark, L. and Zubizarreta, J. (2008). Inspiring Exem-
plary Teaching and Learning: Perspectives on Teach-
ing Academically Talented College Students. NCHC
Monographs Series.
Coleman, L. J., Micko, K. J., and Cross, T. L. (2015).
Twenty-Five Years of Research on the Lived Expe-
rience of Being Gifted in School: Capturing the Stu-
dents’ Voices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,
38(4):358–376.
Denning, P. J. and Gordon, E. E. (2015). A technician short-
age. Communications of the ACM, 58(3):28–30.
Gagn
´
e, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: the
DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Stud-
ies, 15(2):119–147.
Gagn
´
e, F. (2010). Academic Talent Development and the
Equity Issue in Gifted Education. Talent Development
and Excellence, 2(October):3–22.
Gershkoff, A. (2015). How to stem the global shortage of
data scientists. TechCrunch.
Hinterplattner, S. and Sabitzer, B. (2018). Interdisciplinary
Problem-Based Learning With Gifted Students. pages
8845–8849.
Husing, T. and Korte, W. B. (2010). Evaluation of the im-
plementation of the communication of the european
commission: E-skills for the 21st century. Bonn, Ger-
many: Empirica.
Johannes Kepler University Linz (2019a). Head-
Start@Informatics. http://informatik.jku.at/headstart/.
Accessed: 2019-01-13.
Johannes Kepler University Linz (2019b). Young Computer
Scientists. http://informatik.jku.at/youngscientists/.
Accessed: 2019-01-13.
K
¨
oster, H., Balluseck, H. v., and Kraner, R. (2008). Tech-
nische bildung im elementar-und primarbereich. Tech-
nische Bildung f
¨
ur Alle, page 33.
Kulik, J. A. and Kulik, C.-L. C. (1992). Meta-analytic Find-
ings on Grouping Programs. Gifted Child Quarterly,
36(2):73–77.
Maroldo, G. K. (1986). Shyness, Boredom, and Grade Point
Average among College Students. Psychological Re-
ports, 59(2):395–398.
Mittermeir, R. T., Bischof, E., and Hodnigg, K. (2010).
Showing core-concepts of informatics to kids and
Promoting Talents for Computer Science
563