approach, the value of the three companies <1.14
(average industry), namely AALI has a value of
0.64 times, SIMP 0.78 times, and LSIP 0.56
times. Whereas with the Price Earning Ratio
approach, the value of the three companies> 1.41
(average industry), namely PER AALI has a
value of 5.08 times, SIMP of 9.01 times, and
LSIP of 5.7 times. The PBV and PER values in
the range industry based on IDX 1st Quarter
2018 data.
2. In the moderate scenario, the intrinsic value of
the shares of the agriculture plantation company
listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange using the
Discounted Cash Flow method for AALI is
overvalued because the market price on January
2, 2018 Rp 13,275 is higher than the intrinsic
value obtained from the results of research Rp
8,166, for SIMP are in an undervalued condition
due to market prices on January 2, 2018 Rp 625
is lower than the intrinsic value that has been
calculated at Rp. 1,039, while for LSIP is
overvalued because of the market price on
January 2, 2018, Rp. 2,425 is higher than the
intrinsic value calculated at Rp. 684.
Based on calculations using the Relative
Valuation method of the Price Book Value
approach, the value of the three companies <1.14
(average industry), namely AALI has a value of
0.85 times, SIMP 0.90 times, and LSIP 0.57
times. Whereas with the Price Earning Ratio
approach, the value of the three companies> 1.41
(average industry), namely PER AALI has a
value of 5.88 times, SIMP of 9.46 times and
LSIP of 5.77 times. The PBV and PER values in
the range industry based on IDX 1st Quarter
2018 data.
3. In the optimistic scenario, the intrinsic value of
the shares of an agriculture plantation company
listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange using the
Discounted Cash Flow method, for AALI is
overvalued because of the market price on
January 2, 2018, Rp. 13,275 is higher when
compared to the intrinsic value obtained from the
research results of Rp. 11,299, for SIMP it is in
an undervalued condition due to market prices on
January 2, 2018, Rp. 625 is lower than the
intrinsic value that has been calculated at Rp.
1,120, while for LSIP it is overvalued because of
the market price on January 2, 2018, Rp. 2,425 is
higher than the intrinsic value that has been
calculated at Rp. 713.
Based on calculations using the Relative
Valuation method of the Price Book Value
approach, AALI has a value of 1.17 times> 1.14
(average industry), for SIMP 0.97 times and
LSIP 0.60 times <1.14 (average industry).
Whereas with Price Earning Ratio approach, the
value of the three companies> 1.41 (average
industry), namely PER AALI has a value of 7.97
times, SIMP of 10 times, and LSIP of 5.91 times.
The PBV and PER values in the range industry
based on IDX 1st Quarter 2018 data.
4. The recommended intrinsic value of the
calculation results is in the pessimistic, moderate
and optimistic scenario with the DCF method of
AALI and LSIP shares being "sell", and SIMP
shares "buy", while based on AALI, SIMP, LSIP
relative valuations are worth buying or
maintained if investors have owned its shares
because its value is still in the industrial range
and is included in the category of good
performance.
7. FUTURE SCOPE
This study only 5-year history data, it is expected
that for the next research to improve the accuracy
and validity of the data valuation, you should use
longer history data, such as history for 10 years and
can combine by adding contingent claim method.
For investors in investing stock price agriculture
plantation industry, in addition to using the results of
assessments as a basis for reference in decision
making, they should also look at the business,
economic and social political conditions of the
country concerned. Indonesia is the produces the
largest crude palm oil in the world, and the value
palm oil prices greatly affect the price of the
industrial stock. Related to this, in the agriculture
industry we must pay attention to the conditions and
regulations in the largest consumer countries of
CPO, other vegetable oil prices, and attention to
issue environmental sustainability, which is the
phenomena can affect the selling price of CPO.
REFERENCES
Damodaran, A., 2006. Security Analysis for Investment
and Corporate finance. Second ed. New Jersey: John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Foerster, S. R. & Sapp, S. G., 2006. Dividends and Stock
Valuation: A Study From the Nineteenth to the
Twenty-First Century. JEL .
French, N., 2013. The discounted cash flow model for
property valuations: quarterly cash flows. Journal of
Property Investment & Finance, 31(2), pp. 208-213.
ICIB 2019 - The 2nd International Conference on Inclusive Business in the Changing World
92