when meeting hoaxes. (https://dailysocial.id/post/
laporan-dailysocial-distribusi-hoax-di-media-sosial-
2018)
This study wants to question whether there is an
effect of electronic word of mouth, brand image,
brand trust on human intelligence. The purpose of
this study is the results of this study can explain the
effect of electronic word of mouth, brand image,
brand trust on human intelligence in the content of
messages contained in new media. The benefits of
academic research are the results of this study can
explain and develop a study of marketing
communication regarding the influence of electronic
word of mouth, brand image, brand trust on human
intelligence in new media. The benefit of practical
research is that the results of this study can examine
predictions of the effect of electronic word of mouth,
brand image, brand trust on people's intelligence so
that it can be used by any product maker in new
media to increase human intelligence.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Previous research was conducted by Jeffry Layne
Blevins, James Jaehoon Lee and Etin E. McCabe, on
Tweeting for Social Justice in #Ferguson: Affective
Discourse in Twitter Hashtags.
(http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819827030). This
research differs from Jeffry’s research which is
based on the affective side of people. Similar
research was conducted by Kinkin under the title
"Representation of Media Literacy of Health
Communication Dimensions in Indonesia" (Kinkin
Yuliaty Subarsa Putri, 2018. Atlantis Press,
Proceedings of the Internasional Conference of
Communication Science Research). The next
research used Responses to Conflicting Information
in Computer-Mediated Communication: Gender
Difference as an Example, by Chingching Chang.
(http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535344). The
difference with this research is that the product used
in this study is an increase in intelligence. Gender
could be measure for responding to conflicting
information in computer mediated communication.
The next similar research by Valerie Barker and
David M. Dozier, Ami Schmitz, Weiss, this research
about Hernessing Peer potency: Predicting Positive
Outcomes from Social Capital Affinity and Online
Engagement with participatory Websites.
(http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814530291). This
research object is different from Kinkin and Jeffry.
The object of this research is an information
technology product in increasing the intelligence of
high school students in Jakarta.
Word of mouth is a process of word of mouth
using internet or web media. With activities in
electronic of mouth, consumers will get a high level
of market transparency. In other words consumers
have a higher active role in the value chain cycle so
that they can influence products and prices based on
individual preferences. (Park and Kim, 2009). The
electronic dimension of mouth according to Goyette
et.al 2010 is (1) the intensity of defining intensity
(intensity in electronic word of mouth is the number
of opinions received by consumers in a social
networking site, (2) positive valence is comments
that are disseminated by consumers positive, (3)
negative valence is a comment that is disseminated
by consumers that is negative, (4) word of mouth
content is a comment that is conveyed between users
about the content of products such as quality, usage
and others (http:// library .binus.ac.id/eColls /
eThesisdoc / Bab2 / 2014-1-00271-MN%
20Bab2001.pdf (definition of ewom-brand image-
brand trust in intelligence)
Brand image or brand image is a description of
consumer associations and beliefs towards certain
brands (Tjiptono, 2005; 49). According to Kotler
about brands, a brand image is a number of beliefs
about the brand. According to Aaker, brand image as
to how brands are perceived by consumers. Brand
image indicators (Sutisna, 2002: 66) are (1)
consumer perceptions of product recognition, (2)
consumer perceptions of quality, (3) consumer
perceptions of size, (4) consumer perceptions of
endurance, (5) consumer perceptions of packaging
design or model, (6) consumer perception of product
color, (7) consumer perception of price, (8)
consumer perception of local. (Phillip Kotler and
Keller, Kevin Lane, 2007).
According to Delgado et al (2003) brand trust as
an expectation or expectation with confidence in the
reliability and intention of a brand in situations
involving risk for consumers. Brand trust means
consumers are generally willing to rely on the
brand's ability to carry out its functions (Moorman et
al in Chaudhun and Holbrock, 2002).
(http://brandsite.weebly.com/brand-trust/first-post)
Brand trust as the willingness of individuals to
trust the brand's ability to satisfy their needs
(Kumar, 2009:69). According to Luk and Yip,
(2008, 53) brand trust includes intention and trust
and plays the facilitator in the buying process. Lau
and Lee stated that brand trust factors are (1) brand
characteristics have a very important role in
determining consumer decision making to trust a