6 CONCLUSIONS
The furniture can be used as a phone booth or
kiosk at railway station, airport, bus station or public
waiting area. Seating design based on Kuda Kepang
dance and similar dances using horses will be able to
address ergonomics issues. Although it does not
produce a total comfort solution in seating posture
and design, it can transform conservative seating
designs into contemporary and unique seating design.
It definitely improves seating behaviour and trend.
The study reveals that the relationships between Kuda
Kepang movements and seating design. The findings
and proposed prototype seating should be viewed as
preliminary and a further study is necessary to
establish appropriate transformations for seating
design. In the future , this research will expect
original furniture and it will give people the
opportunity to have unique pieces on the idea. The
final furniture from this research is expectantly :
Should fulfil the practical needs of modern
life
Should express the spirit of our times
Should benefit by contemporary advances in
the fine arts and pure sciences.
Should take advantages of new materials
and techniques and develop familiar ones.
Should develop the forms, textures, and
colours that spring from direct fulfilment of
the requirement in appropriate materials and
technique.
REFERENCES
Ahmad, S. I. (2017). The practice of “Kejawen” in kuda
kepang dance. In Proceedings of the 4th Symposium:
The ICTM Study Group on Performing Arts of
Southeast Asia (pp. 160-164).
Akintilo, A.A. (2001), The Chair: A Study in ergonomic
Design and Their application Within Society – Design
for development in the Home Office, university of
Maryland, Baltimore County.
Carstensdottir, E., Gudmundsdottir, K., Valgardsson, G.,
& Vilhjalmsson, H. (2011, September). Where to sit?
the study and implementation of seat selection in
public places. In International Workshop on Intelligent
Farrer, D. S. (2012). The Performance of enchantment and
the enchantment of performance in Malay Singapore.
Moussons. Recherche en sciences humaines sur l’Asie
du Sud-Est, (20), 11-32.
Foley, K. (1985). The dancer and the danced: Trance dance
and theatrical performance in West Java. Asian Theatre
Journal, 2(1), 28-49.
Goldschmidt, G. and Rodgers, P.A.(2013). The design
thinking approaches of three different groups of
designers based on self reports. Design Studies 34.
(2013). Pp 454-471
Gropius, W. (1979) the Theather of Bauhaus, eye
Methuen Ltd.
Hjelm, S. I. (2002). Semiotics in product design. CID.
Hu, B., Zelenko, O., Pinxit, V., & Buys, L. (2019). A Social
Semiotic Approach and a Visual Analysis Approach for
Chinese Traditional Visual Language: A Case of Tea
Packaging Design. Theory and Practice in Language
Studies, 9(2), 168-177.
Hyland, T. (2016). Craftwork as problem solving:
ethnographic studies of design and making.
LI Bing,GUAN Hui-yuan,WU Zhi-hui (2011) Study on
Furniture Modular Design for Mass Customization.
CNKI Journal. Packaging Engineering
Mengshoel, H. C., & Opsvik, P. (1982). U.S. Patent No.
4,328,991. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office.
prototypes: Introducing prototrials and prototrial-driven
cultures. Design Studies, 49, 1-31.
Pye, D.2000. “The Nature and Aesthethics of Design”.
London: A&C Black Ltd
Saul G. (2011) SketchChair: An all-in-one chair design
system for end users. 5th International Conference on
Tangible Embedded and Embodied Interaction,
TEI'11; Madeira; 23 January 2011
Sobel, A., & Sobel, M. (2001). U.S. Patent No. 6,209,962.
Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Tim Parsons.(2009) “Thinking: Objects Contemporary
approaches to product Design”, Switzerland: AVA
Publishing
Umetani, N., Igarashi, T., & Mitra, N. J. (2012). Guided
exploration of physically valid shapes for furniture
design. ACM Trans. Graph., 31
(4), 86-1.
Ventura, J., & Shvo, G. (2016). Breaking the language of
design: semioclastics in the world of industrial
design. International Journal of Design Creativity and
Innovation, 4(3-4), 222-233.