Comprehending the whole text (verbal and pictorial)
as an intact message may not be as easy as it seems
because of its complexity. Due to the name ‘comic’ it
bears, its popularity seems to remain as ‘childish’.
Hence, the term graphic novel would be more
attractive and suitable for a larger scope of audience.
No wonder more publishers and bookstores distribute
more graphic novels for they have been gaining fame
even when they contain science and history. To
generally sum up, there is no huge difference between
comic and graphic novel. Advertisements both on
television and printed actually carry the same
complexity as in graphic novels, but it is only for a
very short time viewing.
Therefore, this paper aims to introduce
multimodality as an analytic tool to analyze visual
texts which are rich in semiotic modes, especially
those that juxtapose more than one pictorial forms
elaborated with verbal text, such as in a graphic novel.
The diverse visuals presented a graphic novel make it
interesting to analyze.
The research is conducted by doing literary
research and desk studies by compiling some samples
and collecting qualitative data. Samples are
purposively selected and narrowed down to five
samples, solely to introduce the application in using
multimodal approach to promote visual literacy and
its importance in making meaning in graphic novels.
2 ADOPTING MULTIMODAL AS
AN APPROACH
Multimodality is comprehended as a part from
communication study and social semiotics. The term
multimodality refers to a communication practice
which involves several different modes at the same
time (Kress & van Leeuwen, 1996). When
communicating, people tend to use more than one
mode, for as we speak to someone, not only the
speech is uttered, but it is also followed by certain
gesture, gaze, and even written text. How people
engage themselves in a communication indicates a
practice of multimodality.
Each mode in multimodal has its own power and
capacity in constructing meaning. As an example, a
communication occurs during a seminar may include
speaking and listening (auditory), eye contact and
body language (gesture), printed papers, slide show
with graphics and pictures, and written text in slide
show (visual). To sum up, such communication is
multimodal (Danesi, 2004). Those modes may show
a great disparity, however none could be regarded as
stronger than or more dominant than the others. Each
mode has its own characteristic to create meaning
partially, yet together they will build a distinct
meaning and somehow people will understand those
chains of modes as ‘a good presentation in a seminar’.
Jewit confirmed that all modes have an important
part in contributing the construction of meaning in
different ways (Jewitt, 2008). As stated by Kress, a
mode is a socially shaped and culturally given
semiotic resource in constructing meaning (Kress,
2010). Therefore, it is considered substantial to
appreciate and understand each resource used in that
process (Jewitt & Kress, 2003).
Aforementioned, a multimodal analysis is derived
from a social semiotics and communication theories,
and it considers that every resource is important in
meaning potential within a distinct and specific
context. To apply multimodality as an approach, a
shift of theorising shall be implied.
2.1 Metafunction
Grammar, which initially was only for anything
related to language and linguistics, it has been
enabled to analyze all visual matters in this visual era.
Visual grammar treats all visual images as if they are
languages. Among all of those different semiotic
modes applied at the same time in a text (graphic
novel as a whole), the text has a broader context. It is
not only in the form of written or verbal form, but
signifies far more than that. The text is all practices
that signifies, being meaningful in the form of images
and even sounds (Barker, 2000).
In relation to social semiotics, the social function
of a text and its operation of the semiotic resources to
make meaning are regarded as carrying three
metafunctions namely ideational / logical,
interpersonal, and textual (Kress & van Leeuwen,
2006). The exploration of those three metafunction
described by Kress and van Leeuwen is derived from
Halliday’s theory of seeing grammar not as a fixed
rule, but more as a resource to deliver meaningful
message (Halliday, 2004). The first is ideational /
logical which is exposing pictures or images as a
representation of empirical aspects experienced by
human being. The second is interpersonal which
observes the interrelation of someone with the others
and amongst all of present semiotic modes. The
amalgamation of each sign or mode to build an intact
meaning is the third metafunction, the textual, which
breathes coherence and relevance with the other two.
Altogether, this process will lead to a finding that
each mode is subjectively motivated and shaped by
certain culturally given resources. In the context of
Multimodal Approach in Advacing the Visual Literacy
15