consumers, increasing customer demand, corporate
image, tighter government regulations, scarcity of
resources natural power and so on.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The results of the study by conducting research
through several questions indicate that the practice of
SSCM shows that the implementation of SSCM
results in a different level of environmental
performance but perhaps have no affect to the
economic performance or costs of companies in
developing countries. From the results of question
research, it can be seen what factors influence
environmental, economic and social performance that
influence sustainable supply chain adoption. The cost
aspect must cover the total costs used for resources
and handling waste.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was already accepted with the number
of research contract 375/UN5.2.3.1/PPM/KP-
TALENTAUSU/2019, on 2 April 2019 and funded
by Directorate of Research and Community Service,
Directorate General for Research and Development at
the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher
Education of Indonesia.
REFERENCES
Barbosa-p, A. P., 2017. PT.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.036
Cantor, D. E., Morrow, P. C., & Montabon, F., 2012.
Engagement In Environmental Behaviors Among
Supply Chain Management Employees : An
Organizational Support Theoretical Perspective. 33–51.
Carter, C. R., Easton, P. L., & Carter, C. R., 2011.
Sustainable supply chain management : evolution and
future directions.
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S., 2004. A framework of
sustainable supply chain management : moving toward
new theory.
Castillo, V. E., Mollenkopf, D. A., Bell, J. E., & Bozdogan,
H., 2018. Supply Chain Integrity : A Key to Sustainable
Supply Chain Management. 39(1), 38–56.
Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G., 2016. Author ’ s
Accepted Manuscript. Intern. Journal of Production
Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.013
Handfield, R., 2005. Integrating Environmental
Management and Supply Chain Strategies. 19, 1–19.
Hsu, C., & Tan, K. C., 2012. Supply chain drivers that foster
the development of green initiatives in an emerging
economy. 656–688. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-
2011-0401
Kot, S., 2018. Sustainable supply chain management in
small and medium enterprises. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 10(4), 1–19.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041143
Lin, K., Tseng, M., & Pai, P., 2018. Resources ,
Conservation and Recycling Sustainable supply chain
management using approximate fuzzy DEMATEL
method. “Resources, Conservation & Recycling,” 128,
134–142.
Linton, J. D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V., 2007.
Sustainable supply chains : An introduction. 25, 1075–
1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.012
Orji, I. J., 2019. Examining barriers to organizational
change for sustainability and drivers of sustainable
performance in the metal manufacturing industry.
Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 102–114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.005
Rentizelas, A., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Al Balushi, A.
D., & Tuni, A., 2018. Social sustainability in the oil and
gas industry: institutional pressure and the management
of sustainable supply chains. Annals of Operations
Research, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-
2821-3
Taylor, P., Hollos, D., Blome, C., & Foerstl, K., 2015. Does
sustainable supplier co-operation affect performance ?
Examining implications for the triple bottom line. 37–
41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.582184
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K., 2013. Journal of Purchasing
& Supply Management Institutional-based antecedents
and performance outcomes of internal and external
green supply chain management practices. Journal of
Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 106–117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.12.001
ICOCSTI 2019 - International Conference on Chemical Science and Technology Innovation
78