1685 cm
-1
to 1660 cm
-1
(Ong, 2007), but the sample
does not show the same absorption. can be show in
Table 3.
Table 3: Furfural Vibration
No
.
Vibration Furfural
Standard
1. Streching aldehyde complex 3429.43
2. Stretching C-H aldehyde 2445.74
3. Stretching C=O aldehyde 1647.21
4. Stretching C=C aromatic 1415.75
5. Stretching C- aldehyde 1249.87
6. Stretching C-O-C 1041.56
Based on the furfural standard vibration value it
can be concluded that the compound produced from
the hydrolysis of cocoa pod huskwas furfural
because it shows spectra which are almost identical
to the standard furfural vibration. Based on the
furfural standard vibration value it can be concluded
that the compound produced from the hydrolysis of
cocoa fruit skin is furfural because it shows spectra
that are identificationof furfural. Further furfural can
be identified with GCMS. The results of GCMS
identification can be show in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Furfural Results using GCMS Simidzu.
The analysis use GC-2010 Serial No.
020504702444 Shimidzu Corp) strengthens that
hydrolysis compounds are furfural. The furfural
compound for the process with pretreatment was
shown at peak 3, retention time 7,629, area
119881925% area 92.65%.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The conclusion of this study is furfural can be
produced using renewable raw materials. It is cocoa
pod husk. The pretreatment process can reduce
lignin until 10.57% and pentosan until 1.4%.
Pentosan and lignin found in cocoa pod husk after
pretreatment process was 4.13% and 37.5%. The
optimum conditions obtained in the hydrolysis
process of cocoa pod husk with a pretreatment
process and dehydration process attemperature
130
o
C and reaction time of 30 minutes produced a
yield of 82.02% obtained from 6.725g / 7.05g
pentose.
REFERENCES
Ambalkar, V. U and Talib, M., 2017. Synthesis and
Identification of Furfural from Sunflower
Husk.International Advanced Research Journal
in Science, Engineering and Technology. Vol 4
Branca, C., Blasi, C. D. and Galgano, A.,
2012.,Catalyst Screening for the Production of
Furfural from Corncob Pyrolysis. Energy and
Fuels. 26: 1520-1530
Daud, Z., Awang, H., Kassim, A.S.M, Hatta,
M.Z.M. and Aripin, A.S., 2014. Cocoa Pod Husk
and Corn Stalk:Alternative Paper Fibres Study
on Chemical Characterization and
Morphological Structures.Advanced Materials
Research. 911: 331-335.
Griffin., Castle, R., Little, A.D., 1972. Technical
Methods of Analysis. McGraw-Hill Book. 298
Kaur, Ramandeep., 2011.,Hemicellulosic Furfural
Production from Sugarcane Bagasse Using
Different Acids.Sugar Tech. 13: 166-169.
Liu, F., Boissou, F., Vignault, A., Lemee, L.,
Marinkovic, L., Estrine, B., Vigier, K. D. O. And
Jerome, F.Conversion of Wheat Straw to
Furfural and Levulinic Acid in a Concentrated
Aqueous Solution of Betaıne
Hydrochloride.Royal Society of Chemistry
(RSC) Adv. 4, 28836.
Liu, L., Chang, H., Jameel, H. and Park, S., 2018.
Furfural production from a Pre-hydrolysate
Generated using Aspen and Maple Chip.Biomass
and Bioenergy. 104: 1-16
Machado, G., Leon, S., Santos, F., Lourega , R.,
Dullius, J., Mollmann, M.E. and Eichler, P.,
2015. Literature Review on Furfural Production
from Lignocellulosic Biomass.Natural Resources.
7: 115-129.
Nazir, N., Novelina., Juita, E., Amelia, C. And Fatli,
R., 2016. Optimization of Pretreatment Process
of Cocoa Pod Husk Using Various Chemical
Solvents. Advanced Science Engineering
Information Technology. 6: 2088-5334
Synthesis and Identification of Furfural from Cocoa Pod Husk (CPH) with Pretreatment Process before Hydrolysis Process