research subject or respondent (Philip Kotler 2002).
In general, knowledge can be defined as information
stored in memory. The subset of the total
information that is relevant to the functions of
consumers in the market is called consumer
knowledge. Then Engel shares consumer knowledge
in three general fields, namely product knowledge,
purchase knowledge, and useful knowledge. Product
knowledge includes (1) Awareness of product
categories and brands in the product category; (2)
Product terminology; (3) Product attributes and
characteristics. Trust about product categories in
general regarding specific brands.
The perception usefulness (perceived usefulness)
is the extent to which a person believes that the use
of technology will improve its performance. If
someone finds useful technology believe that he
would use.However, if someone is feeling believe
that technology less useful and he will not use. (
Suyanto kurniawan, 2019). Indicators of Ease of Use
(X1) are: (1) I think the Fintech application is
effortless to use. (2) The use of the Fintech
application is effortless, so I can do it myself
without the help of others. (3) The Fintech
application is very easy to operate so I don't feel any
difficulties. (4) The operation of the Fintech
application is very light and easy so it is not so
troublesome when I use it.
Trust is one important thing to make someone
move from a system that manual to a more advanced
system. Trust usually will not be easily obtained by
someone but requires time first. (Chandra, 2016)
Indicators of confidence level (X2) are: (1)
Fintech can improve performance. (2) Fintech is
able to increase the level of productivity. (3) Fintech
can improve performance effectiveness. (4) Fintech
is able to benefit me.
Product knowledge is defined as information
obtained from a product including categories
products, brands, product attributes, product
features, product prices, and product trust
(Candraditya, 2013).
Indicators of Knowledge (X3) are: (1) I already
know fintech. (2) I have stored information about
fintech. (3) I know the use of fintech is more
efficient. (4) I understand how to use fintech. (5) I
am actively looking for information on using
fintech.
Indicators of Use of Fintech are: (1) I am
interested in using Fintech because the features
offered are complete and interesting. (2) The Fintech
application greatly facilitates the transactions that I
do so I always try to use them. (3) I always try to use
Fintech because there are always attractive offers.
(4) I always use Fintech because I need it.
(Anggraini and Widyastuti, 2017)
Estimation of SEM Parameters - Partial Least
Square (PLS): The path analysis model of all latent
variables in PLS consists of three sets of
relationships: (1) Inner model that specifies the
relationship between latent variables (structural
models). (2) Outer model that specifies the
relationship between latent variables with indicators
or manifest variables (measurement model). (3)
Weight relation, to set scores or calculate latent
variable data.
Steps of structural model fit analysis with SEM-
Partial Least Square (PLS): In this study, data
analysis on SEM-PLS will use the help of SmartPLS
software. (a) Obtain a concept and theory based
model for designing structural models (relationships
between latent variables) and measurement models,
namely the relationship between indicators and
latent variables. (b) Make a path diagram (path
diagram) that explains the pattern of the relationship
between latent variables and indicators. (c) Convert
path charts into equations. (d) Evaluating goodness
of fit is by evaluating the measurement model (outer
model) by looking at validity and reliability. If the
measurement model is valid and reliable then the
next stage can be carried out, namely the evaluation
of structural models. If not, then it must re-construct
the path diagram. (e) Model interpretation.
3 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Data Analysis Techniques Data collected in this
study will be analyzed quantitatively using the SEM
- Partial Least Square (PLS) method that shows in
Figure.1.
3.1 SEM-PLS Test Result
Cross Loading Croos Loading is a construct of
correlation with measurement items greater than the
size of other constructs, so it shows that latent
constructs predict the size of their blocks better than
other block sizes (Fornell and Larcker, in Ghozali,
2011). Test results from Cross Loading can be
shown in Fig.2.