4 DISCUSSION
The use of impolite words in this poster is motivated
by the form of student criticism of the DPR because
it has been considered to harm democracy by not
considering the aspirations of the people in drafting
and discussing laws. According to Sapto (2016),
criticism is an expression of dissatisfaction with
something. Dissatisfaction manifests itself in an
attitude that is not easy to believe, is careful of
irregularities or mistakes, and is accompanied by
sharp analysis. This is in accordance with the nature
of criticism, namely critical.
In a variety of languages, criticism can be
interpreted as a response or criticism of the work,
thoughts, etc., which is sometimes accompanied by
good and bad considerations. Criticism can briefly
be interpreted as a comparison or criticism. This is
in accordance with the origin of the word criticism
which is krinein (Greek) which means to observe,
compare and consider something. Research
conducted by Sapto (2016) showed that the various
language criticisms that arise due to the
dissatisfaction of superiors to subordinates can be
broadly divided into 3 categories, namely (a)
demeaning or painful sentences, (b) subtle sentences
suggesting, and (c) straightforward or to the point
sentences.
Criticism is often associated with impoliteness of
language because sometimes criticism uses words
that have negative connotations. According to
Pranowo (2012), markers for the use of impolite
language can be identified as follows: (1) speakers
express criticism directly or (strike a speech partner)
with harsh words, (2) speakers are encouraged by
their emotions when speaking, (3) the speaker is
protective of his opinion, (4) the speaker
intentionally wants to discourage the speech partner
in speaking, (5) the speaker submits accusations on
the basis of suspicion of the speech partner. As for
Culpaper (1996), negative impoliteness output
strategies are classified as the following: (1)
Frighten, (2) Condescend, scorn or ridicule, (3)
emphasize your relative power, (4) Invade the others
space-literally or metaphorically , (5) Explicitly
associate the other with a negative aspect, (6) Put the
other's indebtedness on record. This is in line with
what has been stated by Culpeper (2017); Culpeper,
Haugh, and Kadar (2017); Prakash and Kumar
(2017); Rasyikin (2018); Olorunleke, Obidiran, and
Mustafa (2017); Anwar (2013); Anwar (2014);
Anwar (2018), and Anwar (2019).
The use of diction with negative connotations
with the potential to be impolite is also illustrated in
posters carried by students during demonstrations at
the DPR / MPR Building. From the data search
results, it was found that negative connotations were
marked by the use of negative analogies,
humiliation, mockery, intimidation, and violations of
privacy space. According to Blitvich (2010),
politeness or impoliteness is very much related to
one's emotions. Anger, hurt, fear, or surprise often
leads to impoliteness. Goffman (1967) in culpaper
(2011) explains the emotional consequences as
follows that is if an event occurs as one might
expect, someone tends to 'feel happy'; if expectations
are not met, someone 'feels bad' or 'feels hurt'.
Student hurt that resulted in the appearance of
impolite diction was triggered by a number of
controversial articles in the RUU KUHP which were
considered problematic and ignited thousands of
students' demonstrations in various cities, including:
1) Article of the RUU KUHP on corruption which
contains a lower sentence than the Corruption Act;
2) Article of the RUU KUHP on insulting the
president and vice president threatening perpetrators
with a maximum imprisonment of 3.5 years; 3)
Article of the RUU KUHP on treason that carries a
death penalty, life imprisonment or 20 years
imprisonment; 4) Article of the RUU KUHP
concerning the insult of flags; 5) Article of the RUU
KUHP concerning contraception; 6) Article of the
RUU KUHP concerning abortion; 7) Article of the
RUU KUHP on Homelessness; 8) Article of the
RUU KUHP on Adultery and Cohabitation; 9)
Article of the RUU KUHP concerning obscenity;
10) Article of Poultry and Livestock Breeding; 11)
Article of the RKUHP concerning Drug Crimes; 12)
Article on the Contempt of Court Article in the RUU
KUHP on contempt of the judiciary or contempt of
court is also criticized; 13) Article of Criminal Acts
against Religion; 14) Article related to gross human
rights violations (articles 598-599) (Haryanto, 2019).
What is interesting to note is that the poster is
largely a form of criticism of the DPR. The diction
that uses the word government / president is only
found in 2 pieces. It could be that this is related to
the socio-political case that occurred in Indonesia.
Students want to be seen as independent, not in
favor of any side, both pro-government and
opposition groups. The selection of the diction DPR
indicates that the demonstration by students is
neutral, solely aimed at rejecting the Criminal Code
Bill, the new KPK Law, the Penal Penitentiary and
other laws deemed by them to potentially harm the
interests of the nation and state. The DPR is a
legislative body whose members consist of various
members of political parties who have been elected
ICELS 2019 - International Conference on Education, Language, and Society
324