Prescription for foot orthoses are divided into two
categories as defined by the American Podiatric
Medical Association, there are (Fox et al, 2019).
1. Functional orthotics to control
abnormal motion may be used to treat foot
pain caused by abnormal motion; they can
also be used to treat injuries such as shin
splints or tendinitis. Functional orthotics
are usually crafted of a semirigid material
such as plastic or graphite.
2. Accommodative orthotics are
softer and provide additional cushioning
and support. They can be used to treat
diabetic foot ulcers, painful calluses on the
bottom of the foot, and other uncomfortable
conditions.
Two types are custom and non-custom orthoses.
Custom foot orthoses start with a thorough
examination of the foot-ankle complex to determine
limitations in range of motion in both the forefoot
and the rear foot, including calcaneal talus
alignment. Once this is done, a gait assessment is
performed without shoes and socks on. An
impression is taken using step-in foam, cast, or a
scan (with an optical digitizer) with the foot held in
subtalar neutral. Any other type of foot orthosis is
non-custom. This includes the type patients may
receive from various outlets claiming custom fit.
There are many minor foot problems for which non-
custom foot orthoses provide appropriate treatment
(Nolan et al, 2010).
Successful foot orthotic
treatment is dependent on the shoes that are used in
conjunction with the orthosis. If a person brings in a
shoe that barely accommodates his or her feet (too
tight or too worn), then placing a foot orthotic into it
will lead to failure. After fitting the patient using the
proper shoes, the orthotist reassesses the patient's
gait to determine whether goals for alignment,
posture, pain, and corrections to the foot-ankle
complex are being met. Education and follow up is
key to a successful outcome (Fox et al, 2019).
Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFOs) are used for
problems dealing with foot and ankle issues. These
orthoses include any devices that pass across the
ankle joint but stay distal to the knee joint. This
orthosis is used for diagnoses that range from ankle
sprains to stroke management and potentially be
used for any neuromuscular condition requiring
support or assistance at the level of the foot and
ankle (Fox et al, 2019).
Figure 1. Ankle–Foot Orthosis (AFOs) (Fox et al, 2019).
A study conducted by Nolan KJ., Saalia KK. et
al (2010) in the evaluation of a dynamic ankle-foot
orthosis in hemiplegic gait showed that there was
increased hip flexion at foot strike and toe-off,
increased hip sagittal plane angular velocity during
the swing phase and decreased abduction. The
dynamic ankle-foot orthosis had a positive effect on
the participant's overall gait (Nolan et al, 2010). A
study conducted by Sankaranarayan H., Gupta A. et
al (2016) in Role of ankle-foot orthosis in improving
locomotion and functional recovery in patients with
stroke showed that ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)
improved locomotion and functional recovery after
stroke (Sankaranarayan et al, 2019).
A study
conducted by Ferreira LAB, Neto HP, et al (2013)
showed that all types of AFO (Ankle-foot Orthosis)
resulted in a significant improvement in gait velocity
compared to a control group without the use of an
AFO. There have been advances in understanding
how AFOs can enhance the patient's ability. This
includes functional electrical stimulation devices
that replace the traditional AFO with electrical
stimulation during various times in the gait cycle
(Ferreira et al, 2013).
Knee orthosis (KO) can provide stability, limits
motion, and controls the medial-lateral movement of
the knee joint. A KO is primarily used when the
ankle-foot complex is fully functional and thus a
knee–ankle– foot orthosis (KAFO) is unnecessary.
A study conducted by Jeffrey W, Sugar T. et al
(2011) showed that patients who got stroke and used