(88%) subjects that were classified as normal and 9 (12%) subjects were suspected to have HNP.
Table 6: Relation between Sitting Duration and Suspicion of HNP.
Interpretation of
Sitting Duration
Suspected
HNP (%)
Normal (%) Total p PR
CI 95%
Lower Upper
Prolonged 7 (9.33%) 41 (54.67%) 48
0.48 2.11 0.74 4.50
Normal 2 (2.67%) 25 (33.33%) 27
Total
9 66 75
From the table above, the p value which is
computed by using fisher statistic test in SPSS is
0.48 with prevalence risk >1 and 95% confidence
interval.
From 75 respondents who are employees of the
cardboard factory PT. Perdana Mega Jaya in
Tangerang city, there were 48 (64%) respondents
with prolonged sitting duration and 27 (36%)
respondents with normal sitting duration. The results
showed that of nine people suspected of hernia
nucleus pulposus, seven (9.33%) were respondents
who belonged to prolonged sitting duration group,
while two (2.67%) respondents belonged to normal
sitting duration group. Although the prevalence was
higher in the group of respondents whose duration of
sitting was long, but through Fisher's calculation, the
p value showed a value of 0.48 so that the difference
could be considered insignificant because it
exceeded the 0.05 limit.
4 DISCUSSION
Based on data from the results on 75 respondents at
PT. Perdana Mega Jaya, Tangerang, on March 23
and 30, 2019, we found 9 out of 75 (12%)
respondents had a physical examination showing a
suspicion of nucleus pulposus hernia. All
respondents were divided into 3 age groups which
are younger than or equal to 25 years old, 26-45
years old, and older than 45 years. Of the 9
respondents suspected of nucleus pulposus hernia, 2
respondents belonged to the age group of younger
than 25 years old, 6 respondents belonged to the age
group 26-45 years old, and 1 respondent belonged to
the age group of older than 45 years old. If each of
the respondents whose results showed a suspicion of
hernias nucleus pulposus being held against their
respective age groups, the results of the age group of
26-45 years were the peak of this suspected nucleus
pulposus hernia with a prevalence of 14.63%. The
results of this study are in accordance with Gopal et
Mahaldevan's research in 2015 which stated that the
peak incidence of nucleus pulposus hernia is in the
age range of 26-45 years old (Gopal and
Mahadevan, 2015).
From the data from the study of 75 respondents,
9 subjects were suspected of having a nucleus
pulposus hernia. The nine subjects if grouped by
body mass index were spread into 1 person out of 10
respondents classified as underweight (10%), 6
people from 41 respondents who were classified as
normal (14.63%), 1 person from 13 respondents
classified as overweight (7.69%), and 1 person from
11 respondents classified as obese (9.09%). This is
consistent with the research conducted by Kanayama
et al., Who said that body mass index did not
significantly influence the incidence of herniation in
the nucleus pulposus (Kanayama et al, 2009).
Based on research data based on a short
questionnaire and the results of physical
examinations conducted at PT. Perdana Mega Jaya,
Tangerang, found that 66 respondents consisting of
41 respondents with a long duration of sitting and 25
respondents with a short duration of sitting did not
show any abnormality or suspected nucleus pulposus
hernia, or in other words normal. However, there
were also nine respondents consisting of seven
respondents with a long duration of sitting and two
respondents with a short duration of sitting who
showed suspicion of nucleus pulposus hernia based
on a series of physical examinations that had been
carried out. Based on fisher's test, p value is 0.48
which means that the relationship between duration
of sitting and the incidence of nucleus pulposus
hernia is not significant. Obtained prevalence ratio
2.11 with 95% confidence interval.
The Relation between Sitting Duration and Suspected Hernia Nucleus Pulposus among Cardboard Factory Workers in Tangerang