The Influence of Local Tax, Local Retribution, General Allocation
Fund, and Special Allocation Funds on Capital Expenditure
Arthur Simanjuntak, Mitha Christina Ginting, and Duma Rahel Situmorang
Accounting Department Universitas Methodist Indonesia Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Local Taxes, Local Retribution, General Allocation Fund, Special Allocation Fund, and Capital Expenditure
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of local taxes, Local Retribution, general allocation
fund, and special allocation funds on capital expenditure. This study includes 25 Districts and 8 Cities in
2013-2017. Analysis techniques used in this research is multiple linear regression to the data of observation
as much as 100. The results of the study showed that the local tax general allocation fund and special allocation
funds had significant positive influence on capital expenditure. Only Local Retribution had insignificant
capital expenditure. This shows that there is still the dependence of local governments to transfer funds from
the central government. The determinant coefficient showed 84.3 percent Capital expenditures could be
explained or controlled by the Local Taxes, Local Retribution, General Allocation Fund and Special
Allocation Fund while remaining 15.7 percent is explained or influenced by other variables outside our model.
1 INTRODUCTION
The implementation of local government is following
the mandate of the 1945 Constitution, that is, the local
government can regulate and manage its government
affairs to realize a just and prosperous Indonesian
society through improved living standards,
intelligence and the welfare of the whole people to
achieve national development. In Law of The
Republic Indonesia Number 32 Year 2004 explained
the division and formation of regions of the Republic
of Indonesia, which is autonomous and applies the
principle of decentralization. Local autonomy is a
manifestation of the delegation of authority and
responsibilities from the central government to local
governments where the local government has the
authority to regulate its regions both from the
financial sector and from the non- financial sector.
Local Governments are expected to be able to
manage their own finances through the Local
Expenditure Budget which is determined by local
regulations. Preparation of the provincial budget
begins with making agreements between the
executive (Local Government) and legislative (City
Council) on public policy Local Budget and Budget
Priorities, which will serve as guidelines for the
preparation of the budget revenue and expenditure.
The executive makes a draft of the Local Expenditure
Budget by the general policy of the Local
Expenditure Budget and the budget priorities, which
are then submitted to the legislative council to be
studied and discussed together before being
established as a Local Unity (Haryanto, et al. 2007).
The problem faced by the Local Government in
public sector organizations is about budget allocation.
Budget allocation is the sum of fund allocations for
each program. With limited resources, the Local
Government must be able to allocate the revenue
obtained for productive local expenditure. This is
supported by a statement (Felix, 2012) which states
that local governments should be able to allocate
capital expenditure that is higher than routine
spending. Local spending is an estimate of the local
expenditure burden that is allocated relatively and
evenly so that it can be relatively enjoyed by all
groups of people without discrimination, especially in
the provision of public services (Halim, 2007).
During this time, the Local Government uses
more local income for operational spending needs
rather than capital expenditure. Operational
Expenditures are Local Government expenditures
consisting of personnel expenditure, goods and
services expenditure, interest expenditure, subsidy
expenditure, and grant expenditure. When viewed in
terms of benefits, budget allocation to the capital
expenditure sector is advantageous and productive in
providing services to the public. Improving the
170
Simanjuntak, A., Ginting, M. and Situmorang, D.
The Influence of Local Tax, Local Retribution, General Allocation Fund, and Special Allocation Funds on Capital Expenditure.
DOI: 10.5220/0009201001700177
In Proceedings of the 2nd Economics and Business International Conference (EBIC 2019) - Economics and Business in Industrial Revolution 4.0, pages 170-177
ISBN: 978-989-758-498-5
Copyright
c
2021 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
quality of public services can be enhanced through
improving the quality of management, namely by
efforts to minimize the gap between service levels
and consumer expectations (Bastian, 2006).
Capital expenditure is a component of direct
spending in the government budget that produces
output in the form of fixed assets. Capital expenditure
is generally allocated, can be used as a means of local
development, such as the development and
improvement of the education, health and
transportation sectors, so that people can enjoy the
benefits of local development. According to
Mardiasmo (2009) stated that the higher the level of
capital investment is expected to deny the public
participation rate with the event. The development of
industrial infrastructure has a real impact on local tax
increases because meeting the quantity and quality of
services and public facilities will make the
community feel comfortable and be able to run their
business efficiently and effectively to increase their
participation in growth. With the rapid development
of development, is expected that an increase in local
independence in financing its activities, especially in
terms of finance, with the rise in productivity of the
people who are in the area will have an impact on the
local economy along with increasing per capita
income.
The development of industrial infrastructure and
providing facilities to increase investment will have a
positive impact by increasing the Local Original
Revenue so that it can reduce the dependence of the
Local Government on the Central Government. Local
Original Income consists of local taxes, local
retribution, the results of the management of
separated local assets, and other legitimate local
original income (Kawedar, et al. 2008). In Law of The
Republic Indonesia Number 34 Year 2000 on taxes
and retribution, it is mentioned that the local tax is
obligatory contribution made by the individual or
entity to areas without direct payment balance, which
can be imposed by legislation applicable, which is
used to finance the local administration and local
development. Local tax for each districts/city be seen
from the post Local Revenue in the Realized Budget
Report. Sources of local income include, Motorized
Vehicle Tax, Motorized Vehicle Transfer Fee Tax,
Motorized Vehicle Fuel Tax, Surface Water Tax, and
Cigarette Tax.
Local retribution are an essential source of local
income to finance local government and local
development. In Law of The Republic Indonesia
Number 34 Year 2000 stated that local retribution, in
the future referred to as retribution, are local
retribution as payments for particular services or
permits that are expressly provided or provided by the
Local Government for the benefit of individuals or
entities. The ability of regions to grant funding from
areas is highly dependent on the ability to realize
economic potential into forms of economic activity
capable of creating revolving funds for sustainable
local development (Darwanto and Yustikasari, 2007).
Opinion (Yossi, et . Al., 2015) states that Local Tax
and Local Retribution do not influence Capital
Expenditures. The granting of authority from the
Central Government to the Local Government is
balanced with the transfer of funds, facilities and
infrastructure as well as human resources. The
removal of these funds manifests a balanced fund
which consists of the Special Allocation Fund, the
General Allocation Fund and the Revenue Sharing
Fund that has been explained in Law of The Republic
Indonesia Number 33 Year 2004 concerning financial
balance between the Central Government and the
Local Governments.
Special Allocation Funds are and an originating
from the State Revenue Budget, which is allocated to
specific regions to help to fund special activities
which are local affairs and following national
priorities. The use of Special Allocation Funds is
more directed at investment activities in the
development, acquisition, improvement, and
improvement of physical facilities and infrastructure
with a long economic life, including the procurement
of supporting physical facilities, and excluding
capital inclusion. With the allocation of Special
Allocation Fund is expected to affect capital
expenditure, as Special Allocation Funds tend to be
added to the fixed assets owned by the government to
improve public services. Research conducted
(Sumarmi, 2009) states that the Special Allocation
Fund has a positive and significant effect on capital
expenditure in this research area, which is also in line
with research conducted by Sudika and Budiartha
(2017).
General Allocation Funds are several funds
allocated to each Autonomous Region (Province and
Districts/City) in Indonesia each year as development
funds aimed at equitable distribution of financial
capacity between regions to fund the needs of the
Autonomous Region in the context of implementing
decentralization. Studies conducted by Legrenzi and
Milas (2001) to find empirical evidence that funds
transfers in the long-term effect on capital spending
and a decrease in the number of transfers of funds can
cause a reduction in capital expenditure spending.
The same thing also expressed by Holtz-Eaken et al.
(1985) which states that there is a close relationship
between transfers from the Central Government and
The Influence of Local Tax, Local Retribution, General Allocation Fund, and Special Allocation Funds on Capital Expenditure
171
local government spending. This opinion is supported
by the research conducted (Tuasikal, 2008) states
affect the General Allocation Fund Capital
Expenditures. This study aims to analyze the effect of
Local Taxes, Local Retribution, General Allocation
Funds, and Special Allocation Funds on Capital
Expenditures in Districtss/Cities in North Sumatra
Province from 2013 to 2017. Capital expenditure has
an essential role in running the government system,
namely, to improve public welfare and as a form of
good governance.
Research on the General Allocation Fund and
Special Allocation Fund is already done, with more
adding a variable previous research that details the
variables Local Own-Source Revenue Revenue into
Local taxes and Retribution and accompanied with
the use of the latest data, the researchers wanted to
know whether the unique variable will affect capital
expenditure and whether the findings of this study are
consistent with previous studies or even provide new
results.
Problem Formulation:
1. Does the Local Tax Influence on Capital
Expenditures in the Districtss/Cities in North
Sumatra Province from 2013 to 2017?
2. Does the Local Retribution Influence on Capital
Expenditures in the Districtss/Cities in North
Sumatra Province from 2013 to 2017?
3. Does the General Allocation Fund Influence on
Capital Expenditures in Districtss/Cities in North
Sumatra Province from 2013 to 2017?
4. Does the Special Allocation Fund Influence on
Capital Expenditures in Districtss/Cities in North
Sumatra Province from 2013 to 2017?
5. Do Local Taxes, Local Retribution, General
Allocation Funds, and Special Allocation Funds
simultaneously Influence on Capital Expenditure
in the Districtss/Cities in North Sumatra province
from 2013 to 2017?
2 LITERATUR REVIEW
2.1 Capital Expenditures
According to Government Regulation Number 71
Year 2010, Capital Expenditures are budget
expenditures for the acquisition of fixed assets and
other assets that provide benefits over one accounting
period. Capital expenditure is intended to get the local
government's fixed assets, namely equipment,
buildings, infrastructure, and other fixed assets.
Capital expenditure is one component of direct
expenditure used to finance investment needs. Capital
expenditure is a local government spending that
benefits exceed one fiscal year and will add a wealth
of assets or regions and will further add to shopping
routine such as operating and maintenance costs.
2.2 Local Taxes
According to Hasbullah (2015), Tax is an
embodiment of state obligations and the role of
taxpayers to directly and jointly carry out tax
obligations for state financing and national
development. In Law of The Republic Indonesia
Number 34 Year 2000 concerning local taxes and
retribution, it is stated that local taxes are compulsory
contributions made by individuals or entities to the
region without balanced direct benefits, which can be
imposed based on applicable laws and regulations,
which are used to finance the implementation of the
Local Government and local development. Tax
collection in Indonesia refers to a self-assessment
system, which is a tax collection system that gives the
authority, trust, responsibility, to the taxpayer to
calculate, calculate, pay and report for themselves the
amount of tax that must be paid (Diana and Lilis,
2010).
2.3 Local Retribution
Local user fees are an important source of local
income to finance local government and local
development. In (Law of The Republic Indonesia
Number 28 Year 2009) it is stated that Local
Retribution is a local retribution as payment for
particular services or permits that are expressly
provided and given by the Local Government for the
benefit of individuals or entities and Local
Retribution is one of the essential sources of local
income, in order to finance the implementation of
local government.
2.4 General Allocation Fund
General Allocation Funds are several funds allocated
to each Autonomous Region (Province and
Districts/City) in Indonesia each year as development
funds aimed at equitable distribution of financial
capacity between regions to fund the needs of the
Autonomous Region in the context of implementing
decentralization. According to (Nordiawan and
Ayuningtyas, 2010) General Allocation Funds are
funds aimed at equitable distribution of financial
capacities between regions intended to reduce
EBIC 2019 - Economics and Business International Conference 2019
172
disparities in financial capabilities between regions
through acceptance of formulas that take into account
local needs and potentials.
2.5 Special Allocation Funds
Special Allocation Funds are funds sourced from the
State Budget which are allocated to specific areas to
help to fund special activities, which are local affairs
and following national priorities. According to
(Nordiawan and Ayuningtyas, 2010) Special
Allocation Fund is intended to help finance special
activities in specific areas which are local affairs and
following national priorities, expressly to finance the
needs of essential public facilities and infrastructure
that have not reached specific standards or to
encourage the acceleration of local development.
2.6 Conceptual Framework
Based on the above theoretical basis and problem
formulation, the researchers develop the research
framework. The conceptual framework to be studied
by the researcher is as the following.
2.7 Hypothesis
2.7.1 The Influence of Local Taxes on
Capital Expenditures
Local taxes substantial capital expenditure (Yossi et
al. 2015). Local tax is the local original income,
which is determined through local regulations. Local
taxes can be in the form of hotel charges, restaurant
taxes, entertainment tax, advertisement tax, class C
excavation tax, parking tax, and street lighting tax.
The Local Government has the authority to allocate
revenues in the direct expenditure sector or for capital
expenditure. From this description, the hypotheses
that can be formulated are:
H
1
: Local taxes Influence on Capital Expenditures
2.7.2 The Influence of Local Retribution on
Capital Expenditures
Improvement of services to the community can be
increased if the revenue owned by the Local
Government from retribution is also sufficient. Even
though the Local Government receives financial
assistance from the Central Government, the Local
Government must also be able to optimize its local
potential to be able to increase Local Own-Source
Revenue. Local independence can be realized in one
way, namely by increasing Local Own-Source
Revenue from the local retribution sector. If local
retribution increases, the Local Own-Source Revenue
will also increase to increase the allocation of capital
expenditure to improve services to the community.
From this description, the hypotheses that can be
formulated are:
H
2
: Local Retribution Influence on Capital
Expenditures
2.7.3 The Influence of General Allocation
Funds on Capital Expenditures
The General Allocation Fund originates from the
State Budget transfers, which are allocated with the
aim of equitable distribution of funds between regions
to finance their expenditure needs in the context of
decentralization. Research conducted by Wandira
(2013) found that local independence did not
improve; in fact, the opposite happened, namely the
dependence of local governments on central
government transfers (General Allocation Funds)
became higher. (Prakosa, 2004) provides empirical
facts where the General Allocation Fund has a
positive influence on local government capital
expenditure (Sudika and Budiartha (2017)) Show that
the General Allocation Fund has a significant effect
on the allocation of capital expenditure. This gives a
strong indication that the behavior of local spending,
especially capital spending, will be strongly
influenced by revenue sources (General Allocation
Funds). From this description, the hypotheses that can
be formulated are:
H
3
: General Allocation Funds Influence on Capital
Expenditures
2.7.4 The Influence of Special Allocation
Funds on Capital Expenditures
Special Allocation Funds are funds sourced from the
State Revenue Budget, which are allocated to local
Local
Taxes
Local
Retribution
General
Allocation
Special
Allocation
Capital
Expenditure
The Influence of Local Tax, Local Retribution, General Allocation Fund, and Special Allocation Funds on Capital Expenditure
173
governments to finance special activities which are
local affairs and national priorities. Research
conducted (Tuasikal, 2008) Special Allocation Funds
partially positive effect on capital expenditure. The
same thing was said by (Abdullah and Halim, 2004)
empirically said that the Special Allocation Fund had
a positive and significant effect on capital
expenditure. (Sumarmi, 2009) Stated that the Special
Allocation Fund significantly influences the Capital
Expenditure Allocation. This indicates that there is a
relationship between the provision of transfer funds
from the central government (Special Allocation
Funds) with local government capital expenditure.
From this description, the hypotheses that can be
formulated are:
H
4
: Special Allocation Funds Substantial Capital
Expenditures
2.7.5 The Influence of Local taxes, Local
Retribution, General Allocation Funds
and Special Allocation Funds on
Capital Expenditures
The Local Government has the authority to allocate
revenues in the direct expenditure sector or for capital
expenditure. Local tax is Local Original Revenue
whose tariff is determined through Local Regulation.
Local independence can be realized in one way,
namely by increasing Local Original Revenues from
the local retribution sector. If local retribution
increases, the Local Original Revenue will also
increase to increase the allocation of capital
expenditure to improve services to the community.
The General Allocation Fund originates from the
transfer of the State Revenue Budget allocated for
equitable distribution of funds between regions to
finance its expenditure needs in the context of
decentralization whereas the Special Allocation Fund
is a fund sourced from the State Revenue Budget
which is allocated to local governments to finance
special activities which are local affairs and national
priorities.
H
5
: Local Taxes, Local Retribution, General
Allocation Funds, and Special Allocation Funds
Affect Capital Expenditures
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Types of Research
This type of research is causal design. This research
is a replication of previous research. The difference
between this research and previous research lies in the
data in the form of Realization Report of the
Districts/City government budget in North Sumatra
Province for the period 2013-2017.
3.2 Population and Research Samples
Population is "a generalization area consisting of
objects or subjects which become specific quantities
and characteristics determined by researchers to be
studied, and then conclusions can be drawn (Erlina,
2011). The population in this study is the report on
the realization of the Districts/City Local Revenue
Budget in North Sumatra in 2013-2017 In North
Sumatra, there, are 33 Districtss/Cities. The sample,
according to Erlina (2011) is "part of the population
used to estimate population characteristics.”
Sampling is done by purposive sampling method,
which is sampling based on specific criteria.
The criteria used to determine the sample are as
follows:
a. Districtss/Cities in North Sumatra Province have
submitted Reports the Realization of Local
Revenue Expenditures to the North Sumatra
Statistics Office (www.sumut.bps.go.id).
b. Districtss/Cities in North Sumatra Province that
include Special data, and Capital Expenditures
respectively in the realization report of the Local
Expenditure Budget from 2013 to 2017.
Based on the considerations mentioned above, the
researchers used 14 (fourteen) districts governments
and 6 (six) municipal governments as research
samples. To obtain a sample of 100 observations
where there are 20 Districts/City governments (with
details of 14 (fourteen) districts governments and 6
(six) municipal governments) X 5 years of
observation.
3.3 Operational Definition of the
Variable and Measurement Scale
Variable Definition Scale
Local tax (X
1
) Mandatory
contributions to Regions
owed by individuals or
entities that are coercive
based in Law of The
Republic of Indonesia.
Ratio
Local
Retribution (X
2
)
Local retribution as
payments for specific
services or permits that
are expressly provided
and/or granted by the
Local Governmen
t
Ratio
EBIC 2019 - Economics and Business International Conference 2019
174
General
Allocation Funds
(X
3
)
Funds sourced from
the revenue of the State
Expenditure Budget
allocated for equitable
distribution of financial
capacity between regions
to fund local needs in the
context of implementing
Decentralization
Ratio
Special
Allocation Funds
(X
4
)
Funds sourced from
the State Budget
Revenues are allocated to
specific areas to help fund
special activities
Ratio
Capital
Expenditures (Y)
Expenditures used
for procurement of
tangible fixed assets that
have a value of more than
12 (twelve) months for
use in government
activities
Ratio
4 DATA ANALYSIS MODEL
The multiple linear regression model is a regression
model that has more than one independent variable.
In this study, there are four independent variables,
namely Local Tax, Local Retribution, General
Allocation Fund, and Special Allocation Fund. The
multiple linear regression model is said to be a good
model if the model has an assumption of data
normality, and is free from classical statistical
assumptions both multicollinearity, autocorrelation
and heteroscedasticity.
The multiple linear regression equation is:
Y = β
0
+ β
1
X
1
+ β
2
X
2
+ β
3
X
3
+ β
4
X
4
+ ε
5 FINDINGS
N
Minimum Maximum Mean Std.
Deviation
Local taxes
10
0
14.6
5
1329261
8.18E4
361341.57
5
Local Retribution
10
0
23.6
8
274512
4.25E4
62185.57
4
General
Allocation Fun
d
10
0
364.68
5
1316714
7.68E5
371315.66
0
Special Allocatio
Fun
d
10
0
37.28
3
245000
6.97E4
43676.43
2
Capital
Expenditure
10
0
107.53
4
1104423
3.75E5
316824.46
6
Valid N (listwise)
10
0
Sumber: processed data SPSS, 2019
In the Descriptive Statistics indicates the
description of the research variables that shows the
minimum value, maximum value, average value, and
standard deviation. In this study, the standard
deviation value is smaller than the average value so it
can be concluded that the survey is distributed
normally.
5.1 Inferential Statistics Analysis.
Inferential statistical analysis has been done by doing
convensional assumption test. The aim of standard
assumption test is to have a useful dataset of
enormous importance for applied economic research.
The the conventional assumption tests aims of a
normality test, multicollinearity test, autocorrelation
test, and heteroscedasticity test.
Normality test is used to determine if a data set is
well-modeled, be normally distributed and to
compute how likely it is for a random variable
underlying the data set to be normally distributed.
The empirical distribution of the data should be bell-
shaped and resemble the normal distribution.
From the results of processing the data of One-
Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the value of
Kolmogorov-Smirnov is 0.564 and the Asymp value.
Sig-2 Tailed is 0.843 . Significant value greater than
0,05, then H
0
accepted which means that the data
residual normal distribution. Data that are normally
distributed can also be viewed through histogram
graphs and normal PP-plot data graphs.
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Collinearity
Statistics
B Std.
Error
Tolerance VIF
1
(Constant)
5.214 3.136
Local taxes .33
2
.125 .215
8.215
Local Retribution .11
6
.146 .510
3.256
General
Allocation Fun
d
-.03
5
.314 .226
8.267
Special Allocatio
n
Fun
d
.51
3
.231 .718
3.236
a.
Dependent Variable: Capital Expenditure
Multicollinearity measurement in this study is
seen from the tolerance value, and variance inflation
factor (VIF). If the tolerance value is > 0.1 and the
VIF value is < 10, then the regression model is free
from multicollinearity problem (Ghozali, 2013).
From the table 4 has shown that the data in this study
is free from the multicollinearity problems.
The Influence of Local Tax, Local Retribution, General Allocation Fund, and Special Allocation Funds on Capital Expenditure
175
In the scatterplot chart, it is seen that the points
spread randomly and are spread both above and
below the number 0 on the Y-axis. North Sumatra is
based on the input of the independent variable Local
Tax, Local Retribution, General Allocation Fund, and
Special Allocation Fund.
Mode
l
R
R
Square
Adjusted
R
Square
Std. Error o
f
the
Estimate
Durbin
-
Watso
n
1
.912
a
.869 .843 .4136
4
2.114
a.
Predictors: (Constant), Special Allocation Fund, Local
Retribution, Local taxes, General Allocation Fund
b.
Dependent Variable: Capital Expenditure
The autocorrelation test results above show the
Durbin Watson ( dw ) statistical value of 2,114. This
value will be compared with the value of the
researcher’s, table using 5% significance, the number
of observations (n) of 100, and the number of
independent variables 4 (k = 4). So based on the
Durbin Watson table, it can be concluded that there is
no autocorrelation, both positive, and negative.
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t
Sig.
B Std. Erro
r
Beta
1
(
Constant
)
6.243 2.816 2.124 .244
Local taxes .365 .067 .770 3.645 .002
Local
Retribution
.031 .126 .145 4.814 .024
General
Allocation Fun
d
-.023 .351 -.220 -4.104 .035
Special
Allocation Fun
d
.615 .214 .470 4.325 .000
a. Dependent Variable: Capital Expenditure
Based on Table 4.5, the linear regression equation
is obtained as follows:
Y = 6.243 + 0.365X
1
+ 0.031X
2
0.023X
3
+
0.615X
4
+ ε
6 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of hypothesis testing, it shows
that simultaneously Local Tax, Local Retribution,
General Allocation Funds and Special Allocation
Funds had significant positive influence on the
Capital Expenditure in Districts/City Government
North Sumatra. Based on the results of hypothesis
testing, partially shows that Local Tax, Local
Retribution, and Special Allocation Funds had
significant positive influence on the Capital
Expenditure in Districts/City Government North
Sumatra while the General Allocation Fund had
significant negative influence on the Capital
Expenditure in Districts/City Government North
Sumatra.
REFERENCES
Abdullah, Syukriy dan Abdul Halim. 2004. “The Effect of
the General Allocation Fund and Local Original
Revenue on Local Government Spending: Case Study
of Regencies/Cities in Java and Bali.” Proceeding on
the National Accounting Symposium VI, 16-17 October
2003. Surabaya.
Bastian, Indra. 2006. Public Sector Accounting: An
Introduction. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Darwin and Yulia Yustikasari, 2007. Effect of Economic
Growth in Local Original Revenue, and General
Allocation Funds on the Allocation of Capital
Expenditure Budget, National Symposium on
Accounting X. Makassar.
Diana, Anastasia and Lilis Setiawati (2011). Accounting
Information System. Andi Offset: Yogyakarta.
Erlina, 2011. Research Methodology: For Accounting.
USU PRESS: Medan.
Felix, Olurankinse. 2012. Analysis of the effectiveness of
capital expenditure budgeting in the local government
system of Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Accounting
and Taxation, 4 (1), pp: 1-6.
Ghozali, Imam. 2014. Multivariate Analysis Application
with SPSS Program. Semarang: Diponegoro University
Publisher Agency.
Halim, Abdul. 2004. Local Financial Accounting : Revised
Edition . Salemba Empat.
Halim, Abdul. 2007. Public Sector Accounting : Local
Financial Accounting. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
Haryanto, et al. (2007). Public Sector Accounting . First
edition. Diponegoro University.
Hasbullah. 2015. Fundamentals of Educational Sciences .
Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Holtz-Eakin, Douglas, Harvey S & Schuyley Tilly, 1994.
Temporal Analysis of State A Local Government
Spending: Theory and Tests. Journal of Urban
Economics 35: 159 - 174.
EBIC 2019 - Economics and Business International Conference 2019
176
Kawedar, Warsito, Abdul Rohman, and Sri Handayani.
2008. Public Sector Accounting: Local Budgeting
Approaches and Local Financial Accounting.
Semarang: UNDIP Publishing Agency.
Legrenzi, Gabriella & Costas Milas. 2001. Non-Linear and
Asymmetric Adjustments The Local Revenue-
Expenditure Models: Some Evidence from The Italian
Municipalities. University of Milan, Working Paper.
Mardiasmo. 2009. Public Sector Accounting. Yogyakarta:
Andi.
Nordiawan, Deddi, and Ayuningtyas Hertianti. 2010.
Public Sector Accounting. Second Edition. Jakarta:
Salemba Empat.
Prakosa, Kesit Bambang. 2004. Analysis of the Effect of
General Allocation Funds (DAU) and Local Original
Revenues on Local Expenditure Prediction (Empirical
Study in Central Java Province and DIY). Indonesian
Journal of Accounting & Auditing, 8. (pp. 101–118).
Sudika, I Komang and I Ketut Budiartha. 2017. The Effect
of Local Taxes, Local Retribution, General Allocation
Funds, and Special Allocation Funds on Bali Province
Capital Expenditures. E-Journal of Udayana University
Accounting . Vol.21.2. November (2017): 1689-1718.
Sumarmi, Saptaingsih. 2009. The Effect of Local Revenue,
General Allocation Funds, and Special Location Funds
on Districts/City Local Capital Expenditure Allocation
in Yogyakarta Province. Akmenipa Journal . UPY, Vol
4, 2009.
Tuasikal, Askam, 2008. Effect of DAU, DAK, PAD, and
GRDP on Capital Expenditures of Districts/City
Governments in Indonesia. Journal of Accounting
Studies & Research . Vol. 1, No. 2, July 2008. p . 142-
155.
Wandira, Arbie. 2013. The Effect of PAD, DAU, DAK, and
DBH on Capital Expenditures. Journal of Accounting.
Yossi, Sandri Mamonto, JB Kalangi and Krest D. Tolosang,
2015 The Effect of Local Taxes and Local Retribution
on Capital Expenditures (Study in Bolaang
Mongondow Regency for the Period 2004-2013).
Journal of Accounting , Sam Ratulangi University.
Manado
The Influence of Local Tax, Local Retribution, General Allocation Fund, and Special Allocation Funds on Capital Expenditure
177