and high school PE teachers in Special Region of
Yogyakarta is referee training and coaching training
for specific sport branch. Meanwhile, professional
development that is based on working achievement
is tutor training and presenting training.
Professional development activities are
supported by a fund that is guaranteed by the
authority and teachers need not to feel burdened by
the funding problem. However, teachers feel they
have problem with the scheduling in which the time
do not align with their schedules. Moreover,
professional development activities are considered
taking too much time.
4.2 Suggestion
Based on the results of this study, it is concluded
that some issues cannot yet be solved. Therefore,
some suggestions can be formed to improve the
activities in developing teachers’ professionalism.
The suggestions are: giving different kinds of
materials, which means that the materials given
should focus on each teacher’s profession; giving
longer time for practice activities so it will be easier
for teachers to understand it; placing the teachers
according to their profession so they are able to help
one another.
REFERENCES
Armour, K. M., and Yelling, M., 2007. Effective
Professional Development for Physical Education
Teachers: The Role of Informal, Collaborative
Learning, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education
26 (2): 177–200.
Armour, K., 2006. Physical Education Teachers as Career-
Long Learners: A Compelling Research Agenda.
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 11 (3): 203–
207.
Armour, K.M & Yelling, M.R., 2004. Continuing
Professional Devolepment for Experienced Physical
Education Teachers: Towards Effective Provision.
Journal Sport, Education and Society, 9(1). 95-114.
Bechtel, P. A., and O’Sullivan, M., 2006. Effective
Professional Development: What We Now Know.
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 25 (4):
363–378.
Danim, Sudarwan., 2002. Inovasi Pendidikan: Dalam
Upaya Peningkatan Profesionalisme Tenaga
Kependidika,. Pustaka Setia. Bandung.
Darling-Hammond,L. & McLaughlin, M. W., 2011.
Policies that support profesional development in an era
of reform. Kappan, 92(6), 81-92.
Deddy, Mulyana., 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif,
PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
Garret, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F.,
Yoon, K S., 2001. What makes professional
development effective? Results from a national sample
of teachers. American Educational Research Journal,
38(4), 915-945.
Heidorn, B., 2014. Professional development in physical
education. Journal of Physical Education. Recreation
& Dance, 86(1), 3–5.
Heidorn, Brent., 2015. Professional Growth and
Development in Physical Education: A Focus on
PETE Students. Journal of PhysicalEducation.
Recreation & Dance, 86:9.
Lux, K. M., 2010. How to raise the status of physical
education at your school. Journal of Physical
Education, Recreation & Dance, 81(8), 40–42.
Lynn, S. K., & Woods, A. M., 2010. Following the yellow
brick road: A teacher’s journey. Journal of Teaching
in Physical Education, 29,54–71.
Moleong, Lexy J., 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif,
Penerbit PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset, Bandung.
Mulyana, Deddy. 2010. Ilmu Komunikasi: “Suatu
Pengantar, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
Parker, M., Patton, K., Madden, M., & Sinclair, C., 2010.
From committee to community: the development and
maintenance of a community of practice. Journal of
Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 337-357.
Patton, K., Parker,M., and Pratt, E., 2013. Meaningful
Learning in Professional Development: Teaching
without Telling. Journal of Teaching in Physical
Education 32 (4): 441–459.
Permenneg PAN dan RB No 16 Tahun 2009. Jabatan
Fungsional Guru dan Angka Kreditnya, Sinar Grafika.
Jakarta.
Pink, Sarah, 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography, Second
Edition, Images. Media a n d Representation in
Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. London.
Prayitno, 2009. Dasar Teori dan Praktis Pendidikan.
Grasido. Jakarta.
Putnam, R. T. & Borko, H., 2000. What do new views of
knowledge and thinking have to say about research on
teacher learning?. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-
15.
Rachman, Hari A. Hamid A. & Caly S., 2015. Analisis
Kebutuhan Diklat Guru PJOK Pasca UKG Tahun
2015, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.
Setiawan, Caly., 2015. Memaknai Pelatihan Kita.
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.
Sugiono, 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif,
Dan Kombinasi(Mixed Methods), ALFABETA.
Bandung.
Suhartono, S., 2008. Wawasan pendidikan: Sebuah
pengantar pendidikan, Ar-Ruzzmedia. Yogyakarta.
Undang-undang RI no 14 tahun 2005. Undang-undang
Guru dan Dosen, Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
Usman, M.U., 2009. Menjadi Guru Profesional, Remaja
Rosdakarya. Bandung.
YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS
2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)
98