Interaction of Trade in North Sumatra
Bode Haryanto, Hendrik Khosman, Asmiah Hasibuan, Fenny Wijaya, Putri Herfayati and Tubagus
Rayyan F. Sinuhaji
Chemical Engineering Department Faculty Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia
Keywords: Gravity Model, Interaction, Export, Exchange Rate and Income.
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors that influence the interaction between North Sumatra and
Malaysia. The analytical model used in this study is the Gravity Model with export destination country
(Malaysia) and uses time-series data during the period 1983 - 2016. The estimation results show that North
Sumatra’s Export have no effect on Interaction. While Exchange Rate and Malaysia’s Economy have positive
and significant effect on Interaction.
1 BACKGROUND
One of the prerequisites for strengthening national
connectivity is the creation of connectivity between
Indonesian regions which is realized in the form of;
a) realization of an integrated system between the
national logistics system, national transportation
system, regional development, and communication
and information systems, b) identification of
transportation nodes and distribution centers, c)
strengthening intra-connectivity and between
corridors and international connectivity, and d)
improvement of communication networks and
information technology.
As an efficient, robust and integrated maritime
country the inter-regional linkages are the basis of
accelerating the improvement of people's welfare and
regional progress. Based on the Review of Maritime
Transport 2015 issued by UNCTAD, the index value
in 2004 was 25.88 and in 2015 it was 26.98. Sumatra
Corridor is one of the economic corridors set out in
MP3EI which consists of 11 economic centers,
namely Banda Sumatera Utara, Medan, Pekan Baru,
Jambi, Palembang, Tanjung Pinang, Pangkal Pinang,
Padang, Bandar Lampung, Bengkulu, and Serang.
Increased real national income is often not
followed by improving the quality of life of the
population. If population growth exceeds or equals
the growth of national income, then per capita income
can decrease or not change, and this cannot be called
economic development. Benchmarks for the success
of economic development can be seen from economic
growth, economic structure and the smaller income
inequality between residents, between regions and
between sectors. Development gap (income) between
regions will be able to cause serious socio-economic
problems.
Sumatra's economic corridor is one of the
strategic areas in the Western Region of Indonesia
which is geographically located in the Sumatra
corridor in the ALKI I sea shipping lane and facing
the Malacca Strait directly where most of the world's
major shipping passes and utilizes the channel as its
shipping lane. to expand the national and
international trade network. Sumatra Corridor has
high potential in the economic and social fields and
has a competitive advantage in the sectors of
plantations, marine fisheries, food crops, and trade.
All of these potentials are very prospective to be
promoted to markets in regional and international
scale
2 METODHOLOGY
The Gravity Model was first developed by Newton
(1687) to show that the interaction between two
particles is influenced by the mass and distance
between these particles. Based on this idea, then Jan
Tinbergen (1962) and Pentti Poyhonen (1963) used
the gravity model in international trade even without
a strong theoretical basis. Reinert (2008) suggests that
the use of the gravity model in international trade has
several alternative developments from the basic form
442
Haryanto, B., Khosman, H., Hasibuan, A., Wijaya, F., Herfayati, P. and F. Sinuhaji, T.
Interaction of Trade in North Sumatra.
DOI: 10.5220/0009216004420445
In Proceedings of the 2nd Economics and Business International Conference (EBIC 2019) - Economics and Business in Industrial Revolution 4.0, pages 442-445
ISBN: 978-989-758-498-5
Copyright
c
2021 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
of Newton's gravitational theory that has been
transformed into the following natural logarithms:
lnGFij = lnMi + lnMj – lnDij
The basic formula for calculating the number of trips
(trips) between Pi and Pj, namely trips originating
from region i and choosing the destination j region is:
T
ij
= G
b
ij
ji
d
PP
The functional basic approach of the gravity model
was also put forward by Jan Tinbergen in 1962. This
model is still relatively rough for use in the flow of
international trade. However, the form of function
that it proposes has been widely applied so that it is
called the function of "social interaction" because it
includes migration, tourism and direct investment.
The general law of gravity towards the social
interactions that he expressed in a notation is stated as
follows:
ij
ji
ij
D
MM
GF
Mathematically, this Newton gravity model can
be formulated as follows.
2
.
)(
.
BA
BA
d
MM
gG
Based on the theory review and review of the
results of previous studies related to the purpose and
focus of the research, the research concept that was
built as follows:
Figure 1 Research Conceptual Framework
This gravity model is based on the theory of
export bases which can predict international trade
empirically. This model is developed from its name,
namely the prediction of trade volume between two
countries related in proportion to economic
development (in this case GDP or PNB) and
negatively related to distance (freight) (Rauch, 1999).
Baier and Bergstrand (2001) also made modifications
to the gravity model they used
6
5
4321
ij
jiji
ij
D
ERPPYY
aX
Next it is specified as a model:
INTRKSI = β0 + β1 EXP + β2 KURS + β3 PDBM + ε
3 DISCUSSIONS
The estimation of interaction function between North
Sumatra and Malaysia can be seen in Table 1.
Table 1: Results of Estimation
North Sumatra Export
Based on table 1, the results of partial hypothesis
testing are as follows. The test results show that the
export coefficient value is 0.443074 and is not
significant (sig = 0.2286). These results indicate that
the increase in North Sumatra exports to Malaysia
had no effect on trade interactions between North
Sumatra and Malaysia.
It was found that exports did not have a
significant effect on changes in North Sumatra trade
interactions to Malaysia. Regions that have grown
and developed, their economic activities will expand
to all sectors and in the long run the expansion of
exports will determine the growth of the region. So
that it can be concluded that the export of North
Sumatra will increase to show that North Sumatra has
experienced an increase in the economy.
Baier and Bergstrand (2001) concluded that the
increase in trade was caused by an increase in the rate
of economic growth, while the reduction in tariffs and
reduction in transportation costs did not have a large
influence. When referring to this opinion, of course
increasing trade between the two countries will have
an impact on increasing interaction because Baier and
Bergstrand concluded that reducing tariffs and
reducing transportation costs had no impact. But
Hegre argues that having to be reviewed is more
important is not the relationship between the value of
bilateral trade and the size of the economy but rather
the efficiency of trade.
In addition, it should be noted that the exports
carried out by North Sumatra to Malaysia were also
Interaction of Trade in North Sumatra
443
stranded by exports carried out by companies located
in North Sumatra. This condition can cause that the
increase in exports does not have an impact on
increasing trade interactions between North Sumatra
and Malaysia.
The increase in exports can be caused by the
weakening of the rupiah so that the products exported
become cheaper so that both Malaysia increase
demand for products originating from North Sumatra.
This condition certainly has no impact at all on the
trade interactions between North Sumatra and
Malaysia.
Exchange Rate
Based on table 1, the results of partial hypothesis
testing are as follows. The test results show that the
exchange coefficient value is 104367.2 and
significant (sig = 0,000). These results indicate that
an increase in the nominal value of the rupiah against
US dollars (weakening of the rupiah) will have an
impact on increasing trade interactions between
North Sumatra and Malaysia.
It was found that the weakening of the rupiah
had a positive impact on the increase in North
Sumatra trade interactions to Malaysia. For
interactions with the weakening of the rupiah,
Malaysia has an interaction increase of 104367.2. The
gravitational theory applied in this study basically
wants to measure the interaction strength between
two or more regions. Abbas and Waheed (2015)
concluded that in the gravitational theory approach
showed an increase in trade caused by an increase in
the rate of economic growth. This opinion further
confirms that an increase in the weakening of the
exchange rate will lead to high trade interactions
between North Sumatra and Malaysia.
Malaysia GDP
Based on table 1, the results of partial hypothesis
testing are as follows. The test results show that the
Malaysian GDP coefficient value is 4.362812 and
significant (sig = 0,000). These results indicate that
the economic growth of Malaysia in this case an
increase in Malaysian GDP will have an impact on
increasing trade interactions between North Sumatra
and Malaysia.
It was found that an increase in Malaysia's GDP
would have an impact on increasing North Sumatra
trade interactions to Malaysia at 4.362812. According
to Hosseini (2013) in the gravity model, the
occurrence of trade between the two countries is more
due to the size of the GDP of the two countries and
the distance between the two countries. This opinion
is in line with the results of research that show that an
increase in GDP will have an impact on trade
interactions between North Sumatra and Malaysia in
addition to being close enough. However, Hosseini
also stated that international trade does not only occur
between the two countries but also between the two
companies in the country. This also contributed to the
increase in Malaysian GDP which had more impact
on increasing trade interactions with North Sumatra.
Hosseini argues that in addition to the government
conducting transactions with other countries,
companies in the country also conduct transactions
with companies in other countries so that this
condition causes factors in international trade no
longer the same as the assumption that international
trade is only trade between two or more countries but
trade between companies in various countries.
Differences in transactions between companies in
North Sumatra and Malaysia also influence changes
in trade interactions.
4 CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the analysis, there are several
things that can be concluded from the results of this
study, including:
1. North Sumatra exports to Malaysia do not affect
the North Sumatra trade interactions to Malaysia
2. Exchange rates have a positive and significant
effect on North Sumatra's trade interactions
3. Malaysia GDP has a positive and significant
effect on North Sumatra trade interactions to
Malaysia
REFERENCES
Abbas. Shujaat dan Waheed. Abdul. 2015. Pakistan’s
Potential Export Flow: The Gravity Model Approach.
The Journal of Developing Areas. Vol 49. No 4. Pp 367
– 378.
Hosseini. Hamid. 2013. Poor Predictive Power and the
Unrealism of International Trade Models: Proposing a
More Realistic (Behavioral Economics Based) Model.
Journal of Applied Business and Economics. Vol 15.
No 2. Pp: 72-80.
Kahiya, Eldrede T; Dean, David L dan Heyl, Jeff. 2014.
Export Barriers in a Changing Institutional
Environment: A Quasi-longitudinal Study of New
Zealand’s Manufacturing Exporters. Journal Of
International Entrepreneurship. Vol 12. No 4. Pp 331-
364.
Li, Zhuo dan Shrestha, Silu. 2013. Impact of International
Trade Fair Participation on Export: An Empirical Study
of China Based on Treatment Effect Model. Journal of
EBIC 2019 - Economics and Business International Conference 2019
444
Convention & Event Tourism. Vol 14. No 3. Pp 236-
251.
Oskooee-Bahmani, Mohsen dan Aftab, Muhammad. 2017.
Malaysia-Korea Commodity Trade: Are There
Asymmetric Responses to Exchange Rate Changes?*.
Economic Papers. Vol 36. No 2. Pp 198-222.
Interaction of Trade in North Sumatra
445