Yogyakarta. Results of phase I suggested that the
quality of the material of the product being
developed was “Very Appropriate” (84.375 %).
(2) Assessment by Material Expert Phase II:
Phase II was conducted on April 19, 2018 at Sports
Science Faculty of Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Results of phase II indicated that the quality of the
material of the product being developed was “Very
Appropriate” (93.75 %).
3.1.2 Data Validation by Media Expert
Media expert in this research was Nawan Primasoni,
a lecturer of Sports Coaching Education at Sports
Science Faculty of Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Selection of the expert was based on his high level
of competences in the field of media and
applications.
Validation process was conducted in two stages.
The first stage aimed at discovering weaknesses so
that the expert could propose solutions for
improvement. The second stage was conducted after
revision was made. At this stage, expert filled in
questionnaire which was provided by the
researchers. The questionnaire covered three aspects
including physical, design, and application of the
product.
(1) Assessment by Media Expert Phase I: Phase I
assessment was conducted on April 23, 2018 at
Sports Science Faculty of Universitas Negeri
Yogyakarta. Phase I assessment resulted in the fact
that the quality of the product being developed was
“Very Appropriate” (84.37%).
(2) Assessment by Media Expert Phase II: Phase
II was conducted on May 15, 2018 at Sports Science
Faculty of Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. This
assessment showed that the quality of the material
being developed was “Very Appropriate” (93.75%).
3.1.3 Small Group Testing
Small group testing was conducted on May 15, 2018
at 4 pm or during Selabora UNY’s gymnastics
training session. A total of 5 club members
participated in this testing. Data collection process
began by showing the video and distributing the
guidebook to the children. After some explanation
regarding materials in the video, the children were
allowed to practice the moves according to the
stages presented in the media. After practice,
researchers distributed questionnaire to children.
According to these 5 respondents, the product being
developed was considered “Very Appropriate”
(92.9%).
3.1.4 Field Testing
Field testing was conducted on May 16, 2018 at 4
pm or during Selabora UNY’s gymnastics training
session. A total of 10 club members participated in
this testing. Data collection process began with
showing the video and distributing the guidebook to
the children. After some explanation regarding
materials in the video, the children were allowed to
practice the moves according to the stages presented
in the media. After practice, researchers distributed
questionnaire to selected children. Results of this
testing indicated that the product was “Very
Appropriate” (98.3%).
3.2 Discussion
Inside this audiovisual-based “Freehand Basic
Movement Techniques in Rhythmic Gymnastics for
Children Aged 7-11 Years” product, there are
several basic movement techniques based on Code
of Point in Rhythmic Gymnastics. Gymnastics
techniques must be taught properly so that children
can master the skills well.
The adoption of these learning media products in
rhythmic gymnastics clubs’ training can be
considered an innovation in learning. This learning
video is more optimal and attractive in delivering
material compared to the existing videos since this
video shows movements in slow motion and
explains the steps in doing gymnastics moves,
making it easier for athletes to learn details of the
movements. This learning media are also more
effective compared to the existing learning media
since this video is equipped with a guidebook that
helps children understand each movement. These
media can be used as learning source for children
and help make rhythmic gymnastics learning more
interesting.
In general, the trainees participated in this
research considered these learning media as very
appropriate. Through the questionnaire, they stated
that the media being developed in this research were
excellent, attractive, and fun. However, it is also
clear that drawbacks or weaknesses exist.
Application of these learning media among children
who have not been able to read is hard. In such case,
they demand parental guidance. In addition, these
products show only freehand moves with limited
rhythmic gymnastics movements.
However, in spite of being used not as the main
source of learning, it is expected that these
“Freehand Basic Movement Techniques in
Rhythmic Gymnastics for Children Aged 7-11