4 = very interesting
Alternative strategies were calculated based on
the value of STAS (Sum of Total Attractiveness
Score) because a higher value indicates a more
attractive and more rational strategy to be
implemented in improving the quality of hotel
services in the city of Medan. Based on the results of
the STAS from the two alternative strategies above,
the best strategy chosen was the Improvement of
Hotel Infrastructure with a score of 6.28. This
strategy is more appealing because to face future
competition in the hotel industry which will promote
the development of the MICE industry, therefore the
improvement of hotel infrastructure ought to be
prioritized. Since there is limited space for large scale
of MICE activities in Medan city particularly.
To achieve the strategy required several actions
(actions) as follows:
1. Enlarging the hotel area for MICE facilities such
as Ball Room, parking lot, business centers
according to Barrows et al (2012), event with
guest rooms equipped in many properties like
mini office, business travelers expect and business
centers, particularly in service hotels.
2. MICE infrastructure and design following the
customer's needs. Barrow et al (2012) to
differentiate its property to competitors, the hotel
offers wide range services (other than food and
beverage).
3. Improvement of road access, sanitation and flood-
free area around the hotel. It is in line with
Chidsey (2013), the overall events naturally are
greatly resource-intensive, may possess
environmental consequences for the host city and
population. Specifically for conferences and
conventions which can be categorized as large
scale events, these type of events may cause
pollution, waste and greenhouse gas emission.
The environmental effect of events not simply to
energy usage, it includes water consumption,
carbon emission, and transport. Therefore,
undertaking sustainable practices will be able to
decrease the economic costs and environmental
impact of all related activities at the convention
center.
4. Cooperation with local government to accelerate
infrastructure improvement in the area around the
hotel. Refer to Buathong and Chun Lai (2017), the
motor engine of development sustainable event in
Thailand is collaboration between government
agencies and private sectors. However, there is a
lot of areas which could provide greater support
consist of environmental education, event
sustainability standard, and better know-how on
sustainable event development, budget
management, and national policies.
5. Participate in national and international hotel
association in terms of reward program such as
frequent stay program, to escalate the brand
loyalty and opportunities to receive important
information from customers. ( Ernst and
Young,2001),
6 CONCLUSION
1. The greatest score of strength in the hospitality
industry is a good name and reputation, hence
both factors must be enhanced.
2. The biggest weakness in the hospitality industry
is the limited space for MICE activities.
3. The biggest opportunity is the growth of the
tourism industry
4. The biggest challenge is the high competition in
the hospitality industry
5. The most fitted business strategy to improve the
quality of hotel services in the MICE industry is
through the upgrading of hotel infrastructure
because based on conditions, especially in the city
of Medan, which is still limited in providing space
with a large capacity to support the MICE
industry.
REFERENCES
Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994).
Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability:
Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(3),
53–66.
Athiyaman,A.,Strategic planning inlarge tourism firms:
Anempirical analysis.Tourism Management,vol. 16(3),
pp. 199-205,1995.
Barney, J.B. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained
competitive advantage”,Journal of Management 17:
99-129.
Bosworth, G. and Farrell, H., Tourism entrepreneurs
in Northumberland. Annals of Tourism Research, vol.
38(4), pp. 1474-1494, 2011.
Braun, B. M. 1992. “The Economic Contribution of
Conventions: the Case of Orlando, Florida”, Journal of
Travel Research, 30(3), pp. 32–37.
Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of
assessing model fit. In K. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.),
Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162).
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Buhalis,D.,Marketing the competitive destination of the future .
Tourism Management, vol.21, pp. 97-116, 2000.