The second hypothesis states "There was a
significant difference in the effect of players who
have high concentration and low concentration on
smash accuracy the ". The results are as follows:
Table 2: ANAVA results differences in
concentration from high and low to smash accuracy
Source df
Mean
Square
F Sig
Concentration 1 39,200 28,00 0,000
From the ANAVA test results shown in the table
above, it can be seen that the significance value of p
is 0,000. Since the significance value of p is 0,000
<0.05, it means that H
o
is rejected. Based on the
result, it means that there are significant differences
between players who have high concentration and
low concentration on smash accuracy. Based on the
results of the analysis, it turns out that players who
have high concentration have higher score with an
average post-test score 39.3 compared to players
who have low concentration with an average
post-test score 36.5. This means that the research
hypothesis stating that there are significant
differences between players who have high
concentration and low concentration on the smash
accuracy, has been proven.
The third hypothesis states that there is a
significant interaction between the types of imagery
training method (internal imagery and the external
imagery exercise method) and level of concentration
(high and low) on the smash accuracy. The results
are presented as follows:
Table 3: ANAVA interaction results
Source df
Mean
Square
F Sig
Concentration
training
method
1 245,00 175,00 0,000
From the ANAVA test results in Table 3, it is
clear that the significance value of p is 0,000. Since
the significance value of p 0,000 <0.05, it means that
H
o
is rejected. Thus, the hypothesis stating that there
is a significant interaction between the types of
imagery training method (internal imagery and the
external imagery training method) and level of
concentration (high and low) on the smash accuracy,
has been proven.
4 DISCUSSION
Internal imagery training methods have been proven
to be more effective inincreasing smash accuracy
and players’ concentration when performing smash.
This is in line with the theory that imagery training
can improve player performance (Olsson, 2008).
Mental training activates peripheral activities, which
provide afferent information to the motor cortex and
functions to strengthen motor programs (Halgren,
Dale, Sereno, & Tootell, 1999). They further stated
that with the development of neuroimaging
technology, researchers can test various imagery
theories. During mental training, the same
neuromotor pathways was involved in carrying out
certain physical motor task activities (Kosslyn,
Ganis, & Thompson, 2001). Motoric program in the
motor cortex, which is responsible for movement, is
then strengthened as a result of nerve pathways
during mental imagery training. As a result, mental
imagery can assist in practicing skills by increasing
appropriate coordination patterns and by priming the
appropriate motor neurons of the muscles needed to
carry out certain motor tasks.
Concentration has an important role in
influencing a technique or the results of a sports
competition. Attention and concentration are often
interpreted similarly even though they have different
definitions. Attention is a process of direct
awareness of the information (stimuli) received to
decide an action (response) (Sukadiyanto, 2006).
Whereas, concentration is a person's ability to focus
attention on the selected excitement (one object) in a
certain time. Concentration is very important for a
player in performing on the field. The main
component of concentration is the ability to focus
the attention on a certain thing and is not interrupted
by internal stimuli or irrelevant external stimuli
(Schmid & Peper in Satidarma, 2000).
From the results of the interaction, it appears that
the two factors show significant interactions. The
results of this study show that there are significant
differenceswithin each group as a result of different
treatment,.
After trained by internal imagery training
methods, volleyball players who have high