3.3 Triangle Symbiotic Mutualism of
Politicians-Professionals-
Entrepreneurs
It should be noted that it is related to the public
understanding of the characteristics of TPPU's
actions. Based on the survey results it is known that
the three characteristics TPPU which are best
understood by the public namely, using funds/assets
from crime to buy property assets, saving funds/assets
of crime in an unknown place, and using funds/assets
of crime to buy a motorized vehicle. While the three
characteristics of TPPU actions accessed through the
PPATK explained that the public tends not to be well
understood is about leaving/empowering fund/illicit
assets to professional services such as consultant,
notaries, etc. Using funds/result of crime to purchase
insurance policies, and using funds/result of crime to
buy auction products" (PPATK, 2017, 2018).
Private sector employees are still in the top
position in the Report of Suspicious Financial
Transactions (LTKM) recorded by the Financial
Crimes Transaction and Analysis Center
(PPATK). In addition, other professions from
housewives to administrators of political parties are
recorded in Suspicious Financial Transaction
Reports. LTKM is a financial report by PPATK
quarterly. The latest data reported by the PPATK is
cumulative until September 2018 for this year.
The PPATK will analyze whether there is an
indication of a crime in the suspicious
transaction. After that, the PPATK will forward the
report to law enforcement officials in accordance with
the indications of a crime found by PPATK. “From
the data, PPATK said only 32.1 percent were
identified as criminal acts with fraud (36 percent),
corruption (18.3 percent), and narcotics (16.1
percent)” (Irawan, 2018).
Apart from the criminal acts of corruption
committed by government officials, another serious
problem in handling cases of money laundering by
the symbiotic triangle mutualism again led to the
form of weak law enforcement in Indonesia, which
caused cases of money laundering and various other
major crimes to be very difficult to overcome. The
legal immunity of some individuals, which is in the
circle of Politicians-Professionals-Entrepreneurs is
proof that they are able to escape the snares of crime
in Indonesia.
Slow legal handling caused by several factors, one
of the Legislature of Indonesia, who refused to certify
the design of money laundering laws in 1996. There
were concerns that the application of laws and
regulations regarding money laundering in haste will
raise the risk of escaping investor capital abroad and
can threaten the country's economy. This is feared to
cause foreign investors not to do business in
Indonesia.
The biggest obstacle in law enforcement
regarding money laundering crimes is about the
evidence that must be carried out by the
Prosecutor. This issue is at least according to Raj
Bhala Efforts to Combat Money Laundering (Anti-
money laundering) explain that there are two
principles in each prosecution of money laundering
which is the duty of prosecutors, namely: First is
understanding complicated elements of money
laundering. Second is the wire transfer system
implemented in almost all countries internally
between banks and financial institutions (Bhala,
2016).
4 CONCLUSION
The contribution of the reform’s content has not been
able to be seen to eradicate the perpetrators of
corruption in Indonesia, money laundering, which is
also often carried out by elites makes the problem
increasingly complex. The KPK which has been
established in the reform era, through its various
contributions to the persistence of the problem of
corruption, also often gets problems, which
sometimes leads to threats to investigators. Protection
of KPK investigators, as well as internal reform, strict
safeguards for investigators so as not to endanger
their lives, and the existence of outside intervention
are very necessary, as a result, what happens now to
improve organizational self-discipline is only lack of
attention.
Recently money laundering practices were
initially carried out on money obtained from liquor
trade, narcotics, etc. However, it was expanded to
money obtained from other sources of crime. As a
close example is money obtained from corruption.
This corruption has damaged national development
which includes: economic, social, political, and
cultural. This is rampant in Indonesia with the main
actors being inseparable from the three links of
mutualism symbiosis, namely Politicians-Business-
Professionals
Indeed, money laundering is still an interesting
issue for the world. The process of transferring illicit
funds from one country to another and the process of
laundering dirty money through placement in the
economic system has raised serious problems both on
a national and international scale. The main purpose
Habitus of Money Laundering Practices in Indonesia: Triangle Symbiotic Mutualism of Politicians-Professionals-Entrepreneur
9