The Implementation of E-Catalogue of BPJS Kesehatan:
Are Pharmaceutical Companies in Indonesia Fit Enough?
Maria Goretti Sri Puji Paramitha Susetyawati , and Dian Purnama Sari
Department of Accounting, Widya Mandala Chatolic University, Surabaya, Indonesia
Keywords: Financial distress, Ratio analysis, BPJS Kesehatan, Pharmaceutical Company.
Abstract: This research aims at making analysis by using two financial distress predictive methods, namely Altman's
and Grover's. The calculative outcomes of those two methods are then paired and compared with the
condition of the increase of decrease in profit of the company and the condition of other companies
throughout the research. The objects of research are all pharmaceutical companies registered to Bursa Efek
Indonesia (Indonesia Stock Exchange) in 2014-2017. The research use data acquired from then
pharmaceutical companies. The findings show that a number of companies are categorized within a grey
and distress zone based on Altman's method. The Grover method, however, predicts that the majority of
companies are in the category of distress during the period of research. This indicates that it is necessary for
the BPJS to review the E-Catalogue program to keep pharmaceutical companies in Indonesia to survive and
participate in the field of healthcare in the country.
1 INTRODUCTION
National Health Insurance (JKN, Jaminan Kesehatan
Nasional) is still a hot topic in Indonesia. A number
of policies by the National Social Security for
Healthcare(BPJS Kesehatan, Badan Penyelenggara
Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan) as the in-charge
institution are still inviting pros and cons. Policies
such as tiered reference (effective since September
22, 2018), Primary care physician (DLP, Dokter
Layanan Primer), additional fees (Permenkes 51,
2018), and the E-Catalogue that put medicines in
‘similar‘ price and other policies are still in question.
Some of them are not well-run, and yet the BPJS
keeps conducting them. The E-Catalogue is one of
the policies that have a big impact on the field of
healthcare in Indonesia due to the fact that patients,
besides being dependent on doctors, rely strongly on
the medicines themselves for their medication.
E-Catalogue is a program of medical supply for
the people and is a system of electronic information
related to available medicines from all
pharmaceutical factories in Indonesia, along with
their smallest price units. The medical supply is
based on the number of consumers' demands
(Nurdin, 2014). The prices offered in the E-
Catalogue are also within the lowest or smallest
units, which is intended for the government to help
patients who are in the membership of the BPJS.
This policy may sound good for the patients, and the
institution in charge of the JKN, but is it ‘fit' enough
for pharmaceutical companies in Indonesia?
In 2018 the committee of Indonesian Association
of Pharmaceutical Companies (GP-Farmasi, Komite
Gabungan Farmasi Indonesia) stated that the
national industry was facing a slowdown. As relayed
from Fauzia (2018), the Head of GP-Farmasi, it is
known that the pharmaceutical industry growth in
the last two years was even less than 5 percent. This
is thought to be the impact of the implementation of
E-Catalogue by the BPJS Kesehatan in 2013. The
medical consumption of people showed growth;
however, it was not followed by sales of
pharmaceutical products, which, on the contrary,
was decreasing. The low fixed rate of the price is
considered to be a major factor that caused the
declining sales.
Moreover, the Head of the GP-Farmasi in
Indonesia suggested that 300 out of 900 medical
supplies available in the E-Catalogue cannot be
offered to the people due to their too low prices. The
Government of Procurement Goods/Services
(LKPP) is considered to have made a mistake in
calculating the cost of medical production by
pharmaceutical companies. This statement is backed
Susetyawati, M. and Sari, D.
The Implementation of E-Catalogue of BPJS Kesehatan: Are Pharmaceutical Companies in Indonesia Fit Enough?.
DOI: 10.5220/0009399200230029
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Anti-Corruption and Integrity (ICOACI 2019), pages 23-29
ISBN: 978-989-758-461-9
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
23
by the data coming from multiple pharmaceutical
companies in Indonesia, such as PT Kalbe Farma,
Tbk, and PT. Kimia Farma, Tbk showing that they
had experienced a slowdown of their business
growth in the year of 2015 – 2017 (Fauzia, 2018).
This is a serious issue considering that
pharmaceutical companies in Indonesia were able to
supply as many as 70 percents of domestic medical
demands in 2017 (Ministry of Industry of the
Republic of Indonesia, 2017). If the E-Catalogue is
continued with disregard of the pharmaceutical
companies' financial condition, it is possible for
these companies to face bankruptcy. It is not
difficult to imagine the bitter consequence if medical
supplies for patients in Indonesia are declining or,
for worse, disappearing. It is not impossible for the
patent medicines that are not produced as generics to
vanish from the Indonesian market. The case could
get worse if all the medical supplies are put in the E-
Catalogue with prices decided by the LKPP (The
Government of Procurement Goods/Services) that
are too cheap to the pharmaceutical companies. If
this scenario happens, the patients are put at high
risk of losing proper medical healthcare.
This research intends to analyze the financial
distress prediction of pharmaceutical companies in
Indonesia. The bankruptcy of a company in general
often begins with financial distress within the
company and an unpredictable profit rate in the
future.
The bankruptcy of a company is often marked
with financial distress in it and the uncertainty of
profit in the future. The financial distress predictive
analysis will be done by looking up through
financial reports of all pharmaceutical companies
registered to the Indonesia Stock Exchange within
the year of 2014 – 2017 by using four prediction
methods of company bankruptcy. The selection of
the year will be based on the ongoing year of the
government's E-Catalogue program.
2 THEORETICAL
FRAMEWORKS
Altman and Hotchkiss (2010) state that there are
four general terms used to describe the inability of a
company in resolving its problems, namely failure,
insolvency, default, and bankruptcy. Failure is a
condition where the return rate made by the
company from its investment is significantly and
consistently lower than the general return rate.
Insolvency is a situation where the company's
performances are declining showed by their inability
to pay their liabilities or debts – which in return
indicates the lack of liquidity within the company.
Default is a condition where the company fails to
pay the debt and the interest within the deadline that
can be caused by the contract failure between the
company and the investor. Bankruptcy occurs when
the company is facing the uncertainty of survival
caused by its ongoing financial performance decline.
The financial distress of a company begins when
they fail to execute their scheduled payment or if
there is a cash-flow prediction that the same
situation will repeat in the future (Brigham and
Ehrhardt, 2005). Two things, namely economic and
financial aspects, can cause this condition. The
economic problem includes things such as the
company's weakness and improper location, whereas
the financial problem is where the company owes
too much debt or insufficient capital. Financial
distress conditions can be seen through the
calculation and ratio analysis of the company's
financial condition, and the stakeholders can use
them to predict the probability of the company's
future bankruptcy.
3 RESEARCH METHOD
This is descriptive research, which, according to
Nazir in Bimawiratma (2016), is a research aim at
making a description, or systematic projection of the
truth, characteristics, and relationship among the
researched objects. This research employs two
methods, namely the Altman and Grover financial
distress methods, and provides a description of
bankruptcy predictive analysis of pharmaceutical
companies registered to Bursa Efek Indonesia
(Indonesia Stock Exchange) within 2014 – 2017.
These two methods are selected due to the emphasis
on a company's profit and sales that match the
condition of pharmaceutical companies after the
implementation of the E-Catalogue. Each calculation
of the analysis is provided in Table 1.
ICOACI 2019 - International Conference on Anti-Corruption and Integrity
24
Table 1: The Altman & Grover’s Analysis Formula of
Calculation
Method
of
Analysis
Altman
Z-Score
Formula
Z-Score Altman = 1,2 X1A + 1,4 X2A +
3,3 X3A + 0,6 X4A + 1,0 X5A
Information
X1A=Working Capital (Current Assets
– Current Liabilities) / Total Assets
X2A=Retained Earnings / Total Assets
X3A=Earnings before Interest and
Taxes / Total Assets
X4A=Market Capital and Preferred
Stock
X5A = Sales / Total Assets
Criteria of Calculation Result of
Categorization
a. Z-Score > 2,99 : fit company
b. 1,81 < Z-Score < 2,99 :
vulnerable situation
c. Z-Score < 1,81 : unfit company and
bankruptcy potential
Grover
Formula
Z-Score Grover = 1,650X1G +
3,404X2G + 0,016ROA + 0,057
Information
X1G = Working Capital / Total Assets
X2G = Earnings before Interest and
Taxes (EBIT) / Total Assets
ROA = Return on Assets / Total Assets
Criteria of Calculation Result of
Categorization
a. Z-Score 0,01: bankruptcy
category and unfit company
b. Z-Score -0,02: fit company and
bankruptcy potential
4 RESEARCH FINDINGS
4.1 General Description of Research
Object
The objects of the research are companies working
in the pharmaceutical field and are registered to the
Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2014
– 2017 and fit in with the criteria set in sample
collection. Based on the criteria of sampling, 10
companies were finally included as the objects of the
research namely PT Darya Varia Laboratoria Tbk,
PT Indofarma (Persero) Tbk, PT Kimia Farma
(Persero) Tbk, PT Kalbe Farma Tbk, PT Merck
Indonesia Tbk, PT Pyridam Farma Tbk, PT Merck
Sharp Dohme Pharma Tbk, PT Industri Jamu &
Farmasi SidoMuncul Tbk, PT Taisho
Pharmaceutical Indonesia Tbk, and PT Tempo Scan
Pacific Tbk.
4.2 The Findings of Altman Analysis
The result of data calculation and tabulation by
using Altman's bankruptcy predictive analysis is
shown in table 2.
Table 2 The Result of Altman’s Analysis Method
Source: Tabulated Data (2018)
Information (Ket): S: Safe Zone; G: Grey Zone;
D: Distress
In the year of 2014, there are two companies that
were indicated to have financial distress and two
others that were in the grey area, and meanwhile, the
other six were falling into the category of fit and not
being indicated to have financial distress. The
indicated to be financially distressed companies
were Indofarma (Persero) Tbk with a ratio of 1,59
and Merck Sharp Dohme PharmaTbk with a ration
of 1,12 while the grey area companies are Kalbe
Farma with 2,72 ratio and Pyridam FarmaTbk with a
ratio of 2,33.
In 2015 the number of companies within the
financial distress fell into one company, and the grey
area went up to four. Indofarma (Persero) Tbk with
1,65 ratio became the only company in 2015 with
financial distress prediction, and the other grey area
four are Darya Varia Laboratoria Tbk, Kalbe Farma
Tbk, Merck Sharp Dohme Pharma Tbk, and Pyridam
Farma Tbk.
Z-Score Ke t Z-S core Ke t Z-Score Ke t Z-Score Ke t
1 DVLA 3.13 S 2.95 G 2.97 G 2.91 G
2 INAF 1.59 D 1.65 D 1.75 D 1.28 D
3 KAEF 2.72 G 2.57 G 2.07 G 1.67 D
4 KLBF 3.78 S 3.63 S 3.65 S 3.59 S
5 MERK 4.02 S 4.20 S 4.07 S 3.71 S
6 PYFA 2.33 G 2.67 G 2.69 G 3.11 S
7 SCPI 1.12 D 2.18 G 3.22 S 2.58 G
8 SIDO 6.96 S 6.89 S 6.33 S 5.71 S
9 SQBB 4.57 S 4.06 S 4.24 S 4.22 S
10 TSPC 3.22 S 3.04 S 3.14 S 2.95 G
Altman
No Kode
2017201620152014
The Implementation of E-Catalogue of BPJS Kesehatan: Are Pharmaceutical Companies in Indonesia Fit Enough?
25
In 2016 Indofarma (Persero) Tbk still became a
financial distress indicated company with 1,75
ratios, and there were three companies inside the
grey area, namely Darya Varia Laboratoria Tbk with
2,97 ratio, Kalbe Farma Tbk with 2,07, ratio and
Pyridam Farma Tbk with a ratio of 2,69.
In 2017, there were two companies within the
financial distress category. Besides Indofarma
(Persero) Tbk, Kalbe Farma was also indicated to be
financially distressed with a ratio of 1,67 and those
in the grey area were Darya Varia Laboratoria Tbk
with 2,91 ratio, Merck Sharp Dohme Pharma Tbk
with 2,58 ratio and Tempo Scan Pacific Tbk with as
many as 2,95 ratios.
4.3 The Findings of Grover Analysis
The result of data calculation and tabulation by
using Grover’s bankruptcy predictive analysis is
illustrated in table 3.
Table 3: Result of Grover’s Formula of Data
Calculation
Source: Tabulated Data (2018)
Information (Ket) : S : Safe Zone; D: Distress
In 2014, 2015, and 2016 Grover method's
analysis indicated that all companies that became the
objects of research were in financial distress
condition. All ten companies had a ratio of 0,01.
The category fit in with Grover analysis with 0,01
ratio is an unfit or bankrupt company. In 2017 there
was only one company categorized to be fit, namely
Indofarma (Persero) Tbk, with a ratio of -0,03.
4.4 Are Pharmaceutical Companies in
Indonesia Fit Enough?
The calculation result of the four financial distress
analyses is presented in Table 4 as follows.
Table 4: The Comparison of Four Analyses Result
Source: Tabulated Data (2018)
Information: A: Altman; Gr: Grover; S: Safe
Zone; G: Grey Zone; D: Distress
In deciding the congruency of financial distress
predictive method, this research applies the
comparison of the annual profit of all sample
companies and observes their differences. The
comparison can be seen in Table 5.
Table 5 Annual Profit Comparison (in Millions of Rupiah)
Source: Tabulated Data (2018)
The gap between the increase and the decrease of
company profit within the period of 2014 – 2017 is
also summed up to determine if the increase or the
decrease of profit happened significantly or if it
happened in more than one period of the year. The
finding of the comparison can be observed in Table
6.
Z-Score Ke t Z-S co re Ke t Z-Score Ke t Z-Score Ke t
1 DVLA 1.33 D 1.31 D 1.28 D 1.27 D
2 INAF 0.32 D 0.33 D 0.19 D -0.03 S
3 KAEF 1.10 D 0.93 D 0.77 D 0.66 D
4 KLBF 1.58 D 1.50 D 1.54 D 1.50 D
5 MERK 2.13 D 1.99 D 1.90 D 1.64 D
6 PYFA 0.43 D 0.53 D 0.65 D 0.84 D
7 SCPI 0.65 D 0.80 D 1.71 D 0.82 D
8 SIDO 1.70 D 1.64 D 1.64 D 1.51 D
9 SQBB 2.71 D 2.46 D 2.61 D 2.60 D
10 TSPC 1.24 D 1.13 D 1.14 D 1.09 D
Grover
No Kode
2014 2015 2016 2017
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
DVLA 125.796 80.929 107.894 152.083 162.249
INAF (54.222) 1.440 6.565 (17.367) (46.284)
KAEF 215.642 236.531 265.549 271.597 331.707
KLBF 1.970.452 2.121.090 2.057.694 2.350.884 2.453.251
MERK 175.444 182.147 142.545 153.842 144.677
PYFA 6.195 2.657 3.087 5.146 7.127
SCPI (12.167) (62.461) 139.321 134.727 122.515
SIDO 405.943 415.193 437.475 480.525 533.799
SQBB 149.521 164.808 150.207 165.195 17.896
TSPC 638.535 584.293 529.218 545.493 557.339
2014 2015 2016 2017
A Gr A Gr A Gr A Gr
DVLA S D G D G D G D
INAF D D D D D D D S
KAEF G D G D G D D D
KLBF S D S D S D S D
MERK S D S D S D S D
PYFA G D G D G D S D
SCPI D D G D S D G D
SIDO S D S D S D S D
SQBB S D S D S D S D
TSPC S D S D S D G D
ICOACI 2019 - International Conference on Anti-Corruption and Integrity
26
Table 6: The Annual Profit Gap (in Thousands of Rupiah)
Source: Tabulated Data (2018)
From the summary of companies', the profit gap
in Table 6 indicates that a number of companies had
significant profit declines and occurred in more than
one period of the year. Therefore, the researcher
here described each one of the pharmaceutical
companies.
4.4.1 PT Darya Varia Laboratoria Tbk
(DVLA)
PT Darya Varia Laboratoria Tbk (DVLA) was inside
a safe zone in 2014. However, it went through a
decline and was positioned under the grey zone from
2015 – 2017 according to the Altman calculation
method. This was different from the result from the
Grover method, which predicted distress on the
company from 2014 until 2017. Based on the
company profit gap, DVLA experienced a
significant increase in profit in 2015 and 2016 after
having a loss many years before. The profit increase
then declined in 2017. Moreover, the company
closed two of its subsidiaries in 2014 and 2016,
indicating an unfit (grey zone) situation that might
lead to distress.
4.4.2 PT Indofarma (Persero) Tbk (INAF)
PT Indofarma (Persero) Tbk (INAF) went through a
distress situation during the research period based on
Altman and Grover's analysis. This prediction is
backed by a significant profit downfall and the
company loss in 2016 and 2017. The company
suffered more losses up to 166,5% in 2017. The
company profit gap showed a significant decrease
indicated by the loss of profit for as much as IDR
23.933.106.631 from 2015 to 2016 and made
another one with the amount of IDR
256.216.197.879 and then another IDR
28.917.360.089 from 2016 to 2017. The 2017 loss
was even 166,5 % higher than the one in 2016. The
profit decline of the company was also backed by
the record of sale decrease of medical supplies made
by the company. In 2015, the sale plummeted to as
much as 256.216.197.879 in another IDR
105.460.436.781 in 2017. Aside from that, the
company's liability was also increasing in that year.
4.4.3 PT Kimia Farma (Persero) Tbk
(KAEF)
PT Kimia Farma (Persero) Tbk (KAEF) was in the
grey zone category based on Altman analysis from
2014 to 2016 and was in distress in 2017. On the
other hand, the Grover suggested that the company
was in distress from 2014 to 2017. Considering the
profit gap in 2016 that was far lower than before and
after that, there was a certain condition in the
company that despite making more profit, it was still
suggested to be in distress by Altman and Grover.
4.4.4 PT Kalbe Farma Tbk (KLBF)
PT Kalbe Farma Tbk (KLBF) was in a grey zone
during the research period, according to Altman
analysis from 2014 to 2016, before moving to the
safe zone in 2017. The company suffered a
significant profit decrease from 2014 to 2015 at the
time of the E-Catalogue began to take place.
4.4.5 PT Merck Indonesia Tbk (MERK)
PT Merck Indonesia Tbk (MERK) Based on the
Altman analysis calculation, the company was in the
category of the safe zone during the period of
research. Different from the three analyses, Grover
predicted that the company was in distress from
2014 to 2017. Considering the profit and other
conditions of the company, PT MERK went through
an unstable profit rate. During the period of
research, there was a closure on a company subunit
and the relocation of an employee due to a special
agreement with Merck KgaA in Germany.
4.4.6 PT Pyridam Farma Tbk (PYFA)
PT Pyridam Farma Tbk (PYFA) was classified as
the grey zone category by Altman's analysis from
2014 to 2016 before moving to the safe zone in
2017. Grover's Method suggested that the company
was in distress during the research period. From
Profit Gap
2014 2015 2016 2017
DVLA (44.866) 26.964.954 44.188 10.165.893
INAF 55.662 5.125.369 (23.933) (28.917.360)
KAEF 20.888 29.018 6.048 60.109.969
KLBF 150.638 (63.396) 293.190 102.366.477
MERK 6.702 (39.601) 11.297 (9.165.553)
PYFA (3.538) 429 2.059 1.981.085
SCPI (50.293) 201.783 (4.594) (12.212.261)
SIDO 9.250 22.282 43.050 53.274.000
SQBB 15.286 (14.600) 14.988
(147.299.368
)
TSPC (54.242) (55.074) 16.274 11.846.045
The Implementation of E-Catalogue of BPJS Kesehatan: Are Pharmaceutical Companies in Indonesia Fit Enough?
27
2014 to 2017, this company suffered quite a
significant decrease in profit and made improvement
the years after.
4.4.7 PT Merck Sharp Dohme Pharma Tbk
(SCPI)
PT Merck Sharp Dohme PharmaTbk (SCPI) was
categorized as inside distress in 2014 by Altman,
Grey zone in 2015 and 2017 and safe zone in 2016.
Grover's method also predicted that the company
was in distress during the time of the research. The
company suffered a loss in 2013 and 2014 but was
able to make a profit in the next three years.
However, the profit of the company kept down
falling from 2015 to 2017. This condition was a
subsequent impact of domestic decrease of the sale
in 2015. The company made a decline in domestic
sales for as much as 71.791.597.000 but made
improvement of export to more than 2 trillion rupiah
and therefore made a profit in 2015. Despite making
201.783.091.000 profit gain in 2015, the company
suffered a significant decline in two consecutive
years. The company was also unable to meet the
minimum requirement of free float set by the
Indonesia Stock Exchange (Bursa Efek Indonesia).
The company's request for delisting from the stock
market (BEI) also reflected its unfit condition.
4.4.8 Industri Jamu dan Farmasi Sido
Muncul Tbk (SIDO)
Industri Jamu dan Farmasi Sido Muncul Tbk (SIDO)
was in fit condition according to Altman analysis.
The finding of the calculation method is supported
by the stable and even increasing profit gain of the
company from 2014 to 2017. However, the Grover
method suggested that the company was in distress
from 2014 to 2017. It is probably due to the fact that
Altman's method still calculates stock market price
and sales, whereas Grover only calculates profit and
Return on Assets. Grover methods signal the
companies to keep themselves away from distress
possibility. The discrepancy within the company is
probably caused by the fact that many of their
products on the market are not even listed in the E-
Catalogue.
4.4.9 PT Taisho Pharmaceutical Indonesia
Tbk (SQBB)
PT Taisho Pharmaceutical Indonesia Tbk (SQBB)
was categorized to be in the safe zone by Altman's
method, while Grover's suggested the opposite by
stating that the company was in distress during the
research period. Taisho Pharmaceutical Indonesia
Tbk also suffered a profit decline in 2017 as much as
147.299.368.000. The decline in 2017 was not
equivalent to the profit gain in 2014 and 2016. The
increase in the profit was only around 14 – 15 billion
Rupiah, whereas the loss in 2017 was as much as
100 billion rupiah. Besides that, the company also
requests delisting from the Indonesia Stock
Exchange.
4.4.10 PT Tempo Scan Pacific Tbk
(TSPC)
PT Tempo Scan Pacific Tbk (TSPC) also received
the safe zone from three Altman's methods from
2014 to 2016 and became in the grey zone in 2017.
The finding of the Grover method suggested that the
company was in distress during the research period.
The profit gained by the company declined
significantly in 2014 and 2015 and increased in
2016. The profit gain in 2017 was still lower than in
2016. The efficiency and layoff were done in 2014.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The pharmaceutical companies in Indonesia went
through turbulence after the E-Catalogue took place
by the BPJS in 2013. The prediction on
pharmaceutical companies suggested that they are in
financial distress category. Grover's method
predicted that the majority of the pharmaceutical
companies in Indonesia were in distress financially.
This means that from the Return on Assets
standpoint, these companies are financially unfit.
The research focuses on the E-Catalogue policy
launched by the BPJS since 2013. The period after
the implementation of E-Catalogue (2014- 2017)
indicates that E-Catalogue affected the financial
condition of pharmaceutical companies in Indonesia.
From a profit and Return on Assets standpoint, the
conclusion is that almost all pharmaceutical
companies in Indonesia are classified to be unfit.
Studies on E-Catalogue policy need to be done in
order for the pharmaceutical companies to survive
considering that the field of healthcare strongly
depends on pharmaceutical companies in terms of
medical supplies
This research only predicts pharmaceutical
companies within the fit or unfit category.
Considering the fact that none of the companies
suffered from bankruptcy during the time of the
ICOACI 2019 - International Conference on Anti-Corruption and Integrity
28
research, this research does not compare which
methods work better in predicting the bankruptcy
and only takes the profit gain and calculation
method into the equation.
REFERENCES
Altman, E. I, Hotchkiss, E. 2010. Corporate Financial
Distress and Bankruptcy. USA: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.
Antara. 2016. LKPP: E-katalog bisa wujudkan persaingan
sehat. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/lkpp-e-
katalog-bisa-wujudkan-persaingan-sehat.
Arieza, U. 2017. 2 Perusahaan Ini Mau Delisting dari BEI:
Merck Sharp dan Lamicitra. Didapat dari
https://economy.okezone.com/read/2017/07/05/278/17
29191/2-perusahaan-ini-mau-delisting-dari-bei-merck-
sharp-dan-lamicitra.
Avenhuis, J.O. 2013. Testing the Generalizability of the
Bankruptcy Prediction Models of Altman, Ohlson, and
Zmijewski for Dutch Listed and Large Non-listed
Firms. University of Twente, Enschede, the
Netherlands.
Bimawiratma, P.G. 2016. Analisis Akurasi Metode
Altman, Grover, Springate dan Zmijewski dalam
Memprediksi Perusahaan Delisting (Studi Empiris
pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia
Periode 2009 - 2013).
https://repository.usd.ac.id/6719/2/122114016_full.pdf
Brigham, E. F. and Ehrhardt, M. C. 2005. Financial
Management : Theory and Practice. China : Thompson
South-Western.
Burhanudin, Wulandari F., Widayanti R. 2017. Analisis
Prediksi Kebangkrutan Menggunakan Metode Altman
(Z-Score) pada Perusahaan Farmasi (Studi Kasus Pada
Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia
Tahun 2011 - 2015). BENEFIT Jurnal Manajemen dan
Bisnis.
Fauzan H, Sutiono F. 2017. Perbandingan Model Altman
Z-Score, Zmijewski, Springate, dan Grover Dalam
Memprediksi Kebangkrutan Perusahaan Perbankan.
Jurnal Online Insan Akuntan. 2 (1): 49 – 60.
Fauzia, M. 2018. Industri Farmasi Nasional Mengalami
Perlambatan Pertumbuhan Bisnis.
https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2018/04/09/214000
426/industri-farmasi-nasional-mengalami-
perlambatan-pertumbuhan-bisnis.
Kementerian Perindustrian Republik Indonesia. 2017.
Nilai Potensi Capai USD 5 M, Industri Farmasi Kuasai
70 Persen Pasar Domestik.
http://www.kemenperin.go.id/artikel/18101/Nilai-
Potensi-Capai-USD-5-M,-Industri-Farmasi-Kuasai-70-
Persen-Pasar-Domestik.
The Implementation of E-Catalogue of BPJS Kesehatan: Are Pharmaceutical Companies in Indonesia Fit Enough?
29