Jambon suffering from IDD as 315 people, the most
are found in Krebet and Sidoharjo Village
(Ponorogo Regency Health Office, 2015). Sidoharjo
Village is located at the end of Jambon Sub-district
and is area expansion from Krebet Village since
September 2007.
Sidoharjo Village is often known as the idiot
village. Out of 6257 total population of Sidoharjo
Village, approximately 249 people have mental
disabilities. It is caused by many factors, including
the location of the village on the slopes of the
limestone mountains with barren land so that it only
can be planted cassava as a staple food that is daily
consumed. Second, the lack of iodine content, even
none, contained in the salt consumed every day
(Ponorogo Regency Health Office, 2014).
Elementary School 4 Krebet is a public primary
school located in Dusun Sidowayah, Sidoharjo
Village, Jambon Sub-district, Ponorogo Regency.
This school accepts all children either normal or
with special needs. Although the Ministry of Health
has developed regulations and guidelines for the
availability of iodized salt, IDD prevalence is still a
significant public health problem. Therefore, this
study aims to examine factors related to IDD among
school children in Elementary School 4 Krebet,
Sidoharjo Village, Jambon, Ponorogo, East Java.
2 METHOD
2.1 Study Design, Time and Location
A school-based cross-sectional study was conducted
in Elementary School 4 Krebet, Dusun Sidowayah,
Sidoharjo Village, Jambon Sub-District, from
February to June 2016. The sub-district is found in
Ponorogo Regency, 20 km from the Ponorogo City.
The village, which is located at the end of Jambon
Sub-district, is area expansion from Krebet Village
since September 2007. Sidoharjo Village is located
at an altitude of 325 meters above sea level, in a
barren land and gets an average rainfall of 2000-
2500 mm once a year, with temperatures of 21-23ºC
(Ponorogo Regency Health Office,2014).
2.2 Sampling Procedure
The sample size was calculated by G-Power
software 3.1.9.2 considering the following
assumptions: 50% expected prevalence of IDD, a
5% error margin and at a 95% confidence level.
After adding a non-response rate of 10%, a sample
size of 72 was obtained. To select study participants,
this study used a systematic sampling technique. The
number of children from each class was divided by
the total number of samples to get the sampling
fraction. In addition, the total number of children
who meet the criteria chosen from each class was
proportional to the population size.
Study participants should meet the inclusion and
exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria are the child
has lived in the village at least for the last year and
able to communicate. The exclusion criteria are the
child consumed iodine supplement for the last six
months and not present during data collection.
2.3 Data Collection and Procedure
The palpation method of the thyroid gland indicates
the enlargement, surface, and consistency of the
thyroid (Benoist et al., 2008). The palpation was
performed by trained health officers to assess the
size of the thyroid gland. According to the WHO
criteria, goiter was clinically defined: grade-0 when
there is no palpable goiter and categorized as not
suffering from IDD, grade-1 when there is palpable
and visible goiter with extended neck, and grade-2
when visible goiter with the head in normal position
is found (WHO, UNICEF, ICCIDD, 2001). In this
study, grade-1 and grade-2 were categorized as
suffering from IDD.
To specify the iodine content of salt, the
enumerators took the used salt for cooking at the
participant home. Iodine test was used to assess the
iodine content of the salt. Compared with the chart
color, the iodine content of salt was ensured. Iodine
concentration in salt is classified eligible or meet the
requirement when ranging between 30-80 ppm and
ineligible when less than 30 ppm (Ministry of
Health, 2001).
Information on food frequency from outside the
village was collected using a 30 items-Food
Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). The questionnaire
was completed in the presence of skilled
enumerators. The tool was previously developed and
validated in a preliminary study. Each sample was
asked to answer the details of food in the
considerations column. At first, the reported answer
in FFQ was changed to a frequency score. Score 50
when consumed more than once a day, score 25
when consumed once a day, score 15 for four to six
times a week, score 10 for two to three times a week,
score 1 when consumed once a week, and score 0
when never consumed. Then, the total score from
each sample was divided by total sample to find the
average score, the average is 316.27. Classified to
frequently consumed when the sample’s score is or