Study of Species Richness and Structure Community of Herpetofauna
on Kondang Merak Forest, Malang, Indonesia
Ahmad Muammar Kadafi
1
, M. Fathoni
1
, Muhammad Alif Fauzi
1
,
Richo Firmansyah
1
, Bagus Priambodo
2
, Nia Kurniawan
1,
*
1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural and Science, Brawijaya University, Malang 65145, East Java, Indonesia
2
Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural and Science, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang 65145, East Java, Indonesia
Keywords: Herpetofauna, Structure Community, Species Richness, Diversity, Kondang Merak
Abstract: Kondang Merak Forest was known for its tourism destination, despite this area being the only coastal
protected forest in Malang. Because of tourism demand, several anthropogenic activities were recorded and
threatening the ecological balances of the forest including herpetofauna in it. Hence, we provide the
information on the herpetofauna diversity completed with the habitat type on the Kondang Merak forest. A
survey was conducted from November 2018 to June 2019 on each 6 different site points according to a
specific habitat. We analyzed the data using the importance value index and Jaccard similarity to better
known the herpetofauna community structure. A total of 38 species of herpetofauna were recorded consists
of 8 amphibians (Anura), 15 lizards (Sauria), and 15 snakes (Serpentes) species. Based on the habitat type,
we concluded that the distribution pattern and herpetofauna composition may be reflected by the biological
adaptation, environmental carrying capacity, and different landscape vegetation such as coastal area, stream,
temporary pond, secondary forest and monoculture plantation. These findings can be used as baseline data
for further study on genetic study and management strategies on the Kondang Merak forest.
1 INTRODUCTION
Kondang Merak beach was known for its tourism
spot destination in Malang by having big tides and
white-clear sand as its main attractions (Aunurohim,
2013). This destination is located in the Bantur
district, Malang Regency (Malangkab.go.id, 2017),
and categorized as a protected forest region (Luthfi
et al., 2016) comprise of mangrove ecosystem, sea-
grass vegetation, and coral reefs. However, the
previous study shows that anthropogenic activity in
a form of beach tourism, snorkeling activity, and sea
biota exploration is threatening the ecological
balance on the Kondang Merak forest (Luthfi et al.,
2016). These threats are exaggerated by the
conversion of land into agricultural plantations and
roadways crossing through the natural forest habitat
as a result of tourism demand to boost the economic
values. These threats are affecting the herpetofauna
diversity, which plays an important role in the
ecosystem as a predator of invertebrate dan small
vertebrate, and also serves as prey for birds and
mammals (Howell, 2002).
Despite of the habitat landscape conversion, another
factors such as habitat loss (Goode et al., 2005),
unsustainable removal, environmental
contamination, climate change, invasive species,
amphibian declines (Todd et al., 2010), animal trade
(Kusrini, 2009), disease and fungal parasitism on
frog (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) (Kusrini et
al., 2011) are also threatening the herpetofauna
population. The investigation through systematics
identification, taxon distribution, and habitat
association are considered key information to face
the threats and serves as baseline data (Gillespie et
al., 2005). However the data on the herpetofauna is
still lacking in a certain region.
Further, the effort on exploring the herpetofauna
diversity especially in East Java is considered
lacking. Several inventory of herpetofauna diversity
are limited to Meru Betiri National Park (Kurniawan
et al., 2018), Alas Purwo National Park (Broto &
Subeno, 2012), Ironggolo waterfall in Kediri (Hanifa
et al., 2016), Putri waterfall in Batu (Hidayah et al.,
2018), and Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park
and surroundings (Erfanda et al., 2019; Septiadi et
al., 2018). Several efforts to discover the diversity
Kadafi, A., Fathoni, M., Fauzi, M., Firmansyah, R., Priambodo, B. and Kurniawan, N.
Study of Species Richness and Structure Community of Herpetofauna on Kondang Merak Forest, Malang, Indonesia.
DOI: 10.5220/0009586100890095
In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Molecular Bioscience and Biomedical Engineering (ICAMBBE 2019) - Bio-Prospecting Natural Biological Compounds for
Seeds Vaccine and Drug Discovery, pages 89-95
ISBN: 978-989-758-483-1
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
89
on Kondang Merak were previously carried out such
as avifauna (Aunurohim, 2013). But still, the
information related to herpetofauna diversity in
Kondang Merak is lacking, resulting in forest
management inefficiency. The information about
diversity and abundance of herpetofauna can provide
basic information for a crucial decision on the
management of the Kondang Merak forest in the
future. (Riyanto, 2011). Hence, in this study, we
provide the information on the herpetofauna
diversity associated with habitat type on the
Kondang Merak forest.
2 MATERIALS & METHODS
2.1 Study Area
The survey was conducted on Kondang Merak
Beach, Bantur district, Malang Regency, East Java
(S 8
o
23’47”, E 112
o
31’08”). The region is
categorized as a protected forest consist of a
terrestrial ecosystem including lowland rainforest,
mangrove vegetation, and coastal ecosystem
including estuary zones, sea-grass vegetation, and
also coral reefs. We surveyed 6 sites that have
characteristics and potential microhabitat for
herpetofauna (Figure 1).
Figure 1: A surveyed sampling site of herpetofauna in the
Kondang Merak forest.
2.2 Habitat Characteristics
The characteristics of Kondang Merak forest consist
of site point A, an area comprised of timber (teak)
production forest (monoculture) with only a little
vegetation such as shrubs and ground cover
vegetations. Site point B, an area comprised of
temporary ponds only filled during rainy season
covered by large trees and shrubs on the side of it.
Site point C, an area comprised of tree vegetation,
shrubs, and forest floors covered by leaf litter and
small open area. Site point D, an area consists of
habitat corridors between bamboo plant and open
area. Site point E, an area comprised of karst
formation covered by tree canopies and shrubs. Site
point F, an area comprised of canopies along the
streams into the estuary zones. The documentation
of various habitat is shown in (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Documentation of various habitat that we
documented on Kondang Merak forest, A) a primary
forest disturbed by a lane crossing, B) a temporary pond
close to the forest area, C) water stream with a canopies
coverage and D) karst formation covered by small
vegetation on the coastal area.
2.3 Data Collection
The survey was conducted from November 2018 to
June 2019. We used the Visual Encounter Survey
(VES), modified with active exploration methods on
our survey (Crump & Scott, 1994). We documented
and identified an encountered herpetofauna species
following references from Das (2015), Reptile
Database (Uetz et al., 2019), and Iskandar (1998),
and count every individual that was found on each
site. We divided the species based on the
conservation status following the IUCN Redlist of
Threatened Species (IUCN, 2019), a list of
Appendices following Convention on International
Trade in Endangered Species (2016), and national
laws (PERMEN 92/ MENLHK/ SETJEN/ KUM1.8/
2018).
2.4 Data Analysis
The data were analyzed to estimate the importance
index value (INP) and the Shannon-Winner diversity
index (Magguran, 1988) to know the community
structure on each different habitat (Clarke &
Warwick, 2001; Bibi & Ali, 2013). The grouping of
ICAMBBE 2019 - 6th ICAMBBE (International Conference on Advance Molecular Bioscience Biomedical Engineering) 2019
90
each species associated with the related habitat was
analyzed using the presence or absence matrix by
the Jaccard similarity index by
UPGMA (Unweighted pair group method with
arithmetic mean) on MVSP 3.22 software, forming a
dendrogram.
3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Herpetofauna Composition
Based on our survey on Kondang Merak forest in
regard to each site point and different habitat, we
successfully record as much as 38 herpetofauna
species including 8 amphibians species divided into
4 Family (Dicroglossidae, 1 species; Microhylidae, 3
species; Ranidae, 4 species; and Rhacoporidae, 2
species) and 30 reptiles species divided into 10
Family (Colubridae, 7 species; Elapidae, 4 species;
Natricidae, 1 species; Pareatidae, 1 species;
Pythonidae, 1 species; Viperidae, 1 species;
Agamidae, 1 species, Gekkonidae, 8 species;
Scincidae, 4 species; Varanidae, 2 species). The
result of abundance and frequency, indicated by
importance value index, shows that a species of R.
reindwardtii are dominating on site point B and C. A
species of C. marmoratus, C. chalconota, and P.
leucomystax are able to adapt on 3 different site
point, with the remaining species can only be
encountered on 1 or 2 site point. The detailed about
the species that we found were shown in Figure and
Table below (Figure 3, Figure 6, and Table 1 on
Appendix).
Figure 3: Species richness and diversity index of
herpetofauna in Kondang Merak forest based on
encountered species on each site point habitat.
The species richness on each site were observed as
follows; amphibians species on site point B (6
species), C (5 species), F (3 species), D (2 species),
E (1 species), with no encountered amphibians
species on site point A, reptilians species on site
point E (11 species), D (10 species), F (7 species), C
(5 species), A (2 species), and B (1 species). The
highest value of diversity index was showed by site
point E (3.7), then D (3.46), C (3.32), F (3.32), B
(2.81), while the lowest value of diversity index was
showed by site point A (1). The site points E, D, C,
and F showed the value above 3 that indicated the
high diversity, while for site points F and A
indicated the moderated diversity (Krebs, 1994). The
species richness correlated to diversity index due to
more species discovered on site, the more higher
diversity index values, vice versa. The detailed about
the value index was shown in the graphic below
(Figure 4).
Study of Species Richness and Structure Community of Herpetofauna on Kondang Merak Forest, Malang, Indonesia
91
Figure 4: Important value index of herpetofauna on
Kondang Merak associated with different surveyed sites
point.
Based on the grouping of herpetofauna on each site
point by using the Jaccard similarity index, it was
shown that site point A indicated a different
grouping in regard to another site. On site point A,
we only found 2 species of herpetofauna on the
habitat which was covered by monoculture
plantation teak (Tectona sp.), that tend to be dry.
While on another site point, it showed that site point
B has the similarity to site point C, it may be due to
the closely-distance between those sites and similar
canopies with only difference microhabitat which is
temporary ponds which only possessed by site point
B. The detailed of the dendrogram can be seen
below (Figure 5)
Figure 5: Dendrogram showing the clustering of
herpetofauna based on each site on the Kondang Merak
forest using the Jaccard similarity index.
Figure 6: Several documentation of encountered
herpetofauna species in Kondang Merak forest, A) P.
leucomystax, B) F. limnocharis, C) R. reindwartii, D) M.
achatina, E) tadpole M. achatina, F) A. nicobariensis, G)
V. nebulosus, H) V. salvator, I) C. marmoratus, J)
Hemydactilus found guarding their eggs, K) D. volans, L)
M. reticulatus, M) T. insularis, N). P. carinatus.
A
B
C
F
D
E
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
ICAMBBE 2019 - 6th ICAMBBE (International Conference on Advance Molecular Bioscience Biomedical Engineering) 2019
92
3.2 The Implication of The
Herpetofauna Conservation Status
Kondang Merak forest as a habitat of various
herpetofauna plays a role in fulfilling the needs of
foods, shelter, and reproduce (Goode et al., 2005).
Based on the diversity of herpetofauna species,
several site point needs to be maintained and
sustained, because several species is concluding into
a threatened species such as R. reindwartii (IUCN:
Near threatened), V. nebulosus (CITES: Appendix I;
protected), V. salvator (Appendix II), M. reticulatus
(Appendix II), and N. sputatrix (Appendix II). The
specific distribution pattern on different site points
in the Kondang Merak forest may be due to the
adaptation (physiology and behavior ecology) and
environmental carrying capacity of herpetofauna
(Vitt & Caldwell, 2013). The management of the
Kondang Merak forest mainly focused on the spot as
tourism sites. The officials are responsible to
maintain the Kondang Merak forest and give more
attention to the diversity in this area because this
protected forest is possessed a unique species
especially on the lowland forest ecosystem that close
to coastal vegetation (Aunurohim, 2013).
4 CONCLUSIONS
A total of 38 amphibians and reptile species were
recorded in this study, consists of 8 amphibians
(Anura), 15 lizards (Sauria), and 15 snakes
(Serpentes) species. To understand the differences in
distribution pattern and herpetofauna composition.
The differences in distribution pattern and
herpetofauna composition may be reflected in
biological adaptation, environmental carrying
capacity, and different landscape vegetation such as
coastal area, stream, temporary pond, secondary
forest and monoculture plantation. These findings
can be used as baseline data for further study on
genetic study and management strategies on the
Kondang Merak forest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We would thanks to NK Research members of
Brawijaya University for supporting on the data
collecting on Kondang Merak forest and L. Septiadi,
for supporting the research.
REFERENCES
Aunurohim, A. S. 2013. Studi keanekaragaman avifauna
sebagai sarana edukasi ekowisata birdwatching di
Kawasan Wisata Kondang Merak, Malang. Jurnal
Sains dan Seni Pomits, 2(1), 1-5.
Bibi, F., & Ali, Z. 2013. Measurement of diversity indices
of avian communities at Taunsa Barrage Wildlife
Sanctuary, Pakistan. The Journal of Animal & Plant
Sciences, 23(2), 469-474.
Broto, B. W. & Subeno. 2012. Diversity of Herpetofauna
Species at The Section I of Alas Purwo National Park,
Banyuwangi, East Java. Widyariset, 15(3).
Clarke, K. R., & Warwick, R. M. 2001. A further
biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation
in taxonomic distinctness. Marine ecology Progress
series, 216, 265-278.
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species
of Wild Fauna and Flora [CITES]. 2016. Trade
database of Indonesian. URL:
https://cites.org/eng/resources/quotas/index.php.,
Accessed on November 7, 2019.
Crump, M. L., & Scott Jr, N. J. 1994. Visual encounter
surveys. In ‘Measuring and Monitoring Biological
Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians’.(Eds
WR Heyer, MA Donnelly, RW McDiarmid, LC
Hayek and MS Foster.) pp. 84–92. Smithsonian
Institution. Washington, DC.
Das, I. 2015. A field guide to the reptiles of South-East,
Bloomsbury Publishing. Asia.
Erfanda, M. P., Septiadi, L., Devi, S. R., Hanifa, B. F.
2019. Distribution Record of Leptophryne borbonica
(Tschudi, 1838) (Anura: Bufonidae) from Malang,
East Java: Description, Microhabitat, and Possible
Threats. Journal of Tropical Biodiversity and
Biotechnology, 4(2), 82-89.
Gillespie, G., Howard, S., Lockie, D., Scroggie, M.,
Boeadi, M. 2005. Herpetofaunal richness and
community structure of offshore islands of Sulawesi,
Indonesia. Biotropica, 37, 279-290.
Goode, M. J., Horrace, W. C., Sredl, M. J., & Howland, J.
M. 2005. Habitat destruction by collectors associated
with decreased abundance of rock-dwelling lizards.
Biological Conservation, 125(1), 47-54.
Hanifa, B. F., Ismi, N., Setyobudi, W., & Utami, B. 2016.
Komposisi Amfibi Ordo Anura di Kawasan Wisata
Air Terjun Ironggolo Kediri Sebagai Bio Indikator
Alami Pencemaran Lingkungan [The Composition of
Amphibian from Anura Order in the Ironggolo Kediri
from Anura Order in the Ironggolo Kediri Waterfall
Tourism Area as a Natural Bio Indicator of
Environmental Pollution], In Prosiding Seminar
Nasional Pendidikan dan Saintek, pp. 363-368,
Jurusan Biologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah.
Surakarta.
Hidayah, A., Hanifa, B. F., Devi, S. R., Septiadi, L., Alwi,
M. Z., & Afifudin, F. A. 2018. Keanekaragaman
Herpetofauna di Kawasan Wisata Alam Coban Putri
Desa Tlekung Kecamatan Junrejo, Kota Batu, Jawa
Timur [Herpetofauna diversity in Coban Putri Nature
Study of Species Richness and Structure Community of Herpetofauna on Kondang Merak Forest, Malang, Indonesia
93
Tourism Area, Tlekung Village, Junrejo District, Batu
City, East Java], In Prosiding Seminar Nasional VI
Hayati, pp. 79-91, Universitas Nusantara PGRI.
Kediri.
Howell, K. 2002. Amphibians and reptiles: Herptiles, In
Davis, G.,(ed.), African Forest Biodiversity, pp. 17-44,
Eartwacth. London.
Iskandar, D. T. 1998. The amphibians of Java and Bali.
Research and Development Centre for Biology LIPI.
Bogor.
IUCN 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
Version 2019-2. URL: http://www.iucnredlist.org,
Accesed on July 18, 2019.
Krebs, C. J. 1994. Ecology: the experimental analysis of
distribution and abundance (Vol. 4), HarperCollins
College Publishers. New York.
Kurniawan, N., Ananda, A. A., Kamilah, F., Ardiantoro,
A., Bagaskara, S. W., Kurnianto, A. S. 2018.
Exploration of Herpetofauna Habitat as Tourism
Attraction: Ecology, Preferences, and Potentials.
Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Development
Studies, 6(1).
Kusrini, M. D., Artika, I. M., Handinim M. E. 2011.
Prevalensi Serangan Jamur Batrachochytrium
dendrobatidis Pada Berudu dan Keberadaan Bahan
Aktif pada Kulit Katak sebagai Mekanisme
Pertahanan Alami terhadap Mikroorganisme. Laporan
Penelitian. IPB Bogor.
Luthfi, O. M., Alviana, P. Z., Guntur, G., Sunardi, S.,
Jauhari, A. 2016. Size distribution of massive porites
at reef flat in Kondang Merak, Malang, Indonesia.
Reseach journal of life science, 3(1): 23-30.
Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its
measurement, Princeton University Press. New Jersey.
Riyanto, A. 2011. Herpetofaunal community structure and
habitat associations in Gunung Ciremai National Park,
West Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of
Biological Diversity, 12(1).
Septiadi, L., Hanifa, B. F., Khatimah, A., Indawati, Y.,
Alwi, M. Z., & Erfanda, M. P. 2018. Study of Reptile
and Amphibian Diversity at Ledok Amprong
Poncokusumo, Malang East Java. Biotropika: Journal
of Tropical Biology, 6(2), 45-53.
Todd, B. D., Willson, J. D., Gibbons J. W. 2010. The
global status of reptiles and causes of their decline, In
Bishop, D. W., Krest, C. A., (Ed.), Ecotoxicology of
Amphibians and Reptiles Second Edition, pp. 47-67,
Sparling CRC Press. Pensacola, FL, USA.
Traeholt. 1997. Notes on the Food and Feeding Behaviour
of Varanus bengalensis nebulosus on Pulau Tioman,
Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal, 50, 173 -181.
Uetz, P., Freed, P., Hošek, J. 2019. The Reptile Database.
URL: http://www.reptile-database.org, Accessed on
November 10, 2019.
Vitt, L. J., & Caldwell, J. P. 2013. Herpetology: an
introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles.
Academic press. London.
APPENDIX
Table 1. Species list of Amphibia and Conservation status , Notes: herpetofauna in site point, [presence; (+), absent: (-)];
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) LC: Least Concern, NT: Near Threatened; CITES (Convention on
International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) (-): non appendix, (I): Appendix I, (II): Appendix II.
Spesies
Habitat Type
IUCN CITES
PP No. 20
tahun 2018
A B C D E F
Amphibia
Dicroglosidae
Fejervarya limnocharis (Gravenhorst, 1829) - + - - - + LC - NP
Microhylidae
Kaloula baleata (Müller In Oort and Müller, 1833) - - + - + - LC
-
NP
Microhyla achatina (Tschudi, 1838) - + + - - - LC
-
NP
Microhyla palmipes (Boulenger, 1897) - + - - - - LC
-
NP
Ranidae
Amnirana nicobariensis (Stoliczka, F., 1870) - - - + - - LC
-
NP
Chalcorana chalconota (Schlegel, 1837) - + + - - + LC
-
NP
Rhacophoridae
Polypedates leucomystax (Gravenhorst, 1829) - + + - - + LC
-
NP
Rhacophorus reinwardtii (Schlegel, 1840) - + + - - - LC
-
NP
Reptilia
ICAMBBE 2019 - 6th ICAMBBE (International Conference on Advance Molecular Bioscience Biomedical Engineering) 2019
94
Colubridae
Ahaetulla prasina (Boie, 1827) + - - - - - LC
-
NP
Boiga cynodon (Boie, 1827) - - - + - - LC
-
NP
Dendrelaphis pictus (Gmelin, 1789) - + - - - - LC
-
NP
Lycodon subcintus (Boie, 1827) - - - + - - LC
-
NP
Psamodynastes pulverulentus (Boie, 1827) - - + - - - LC
-
NP
Rhabdophis subminiatus (Schlegel, 1837) - - - + - - LC
-
NP
Sybinophis geminatus (Boie, 1826) - - - - + - LC
-
NP
Elapidae
Naja sputatrix (Boie, 1827) - - - + - - LC II NP
Bungarus candidus (Linnaeus, 1758) - - - - + - LC
-
NP
Bungarus fasciatus (Schneider, 1801) - - - - + - LC
-
NP
Laticauda colubrina (Schneider, 1799) - - - + - - LC
-
NP
Natricidae
Xenochrophis melanzostus (Gravenhorst, 1807) - - - - - + LC
-
NP
Pareatidae
Pareas carinatus (Boie, 1828) - - - + - - LC
-
NP
Pythonidae
Malayopython reticulatus (Schneider, 1801) - - - - - + LC II NP
Viperidae
Trimeresurus insularis (Kramer, 1977) + - - - - - LC
-
NP
Agamidae
Draco volans (Linnaeus, 1758) - - + + - - LC
-
NP
Gekkonidae
Cyrtodactylus marmoratus (Gray, 1831) - - + - + + LC
-
NP
Cyrtodactylus petani (Riyanto, Grismer, & Wood,
2015)
- - - - + - LC
-
NP
Cyrtodactylus klakahensis (Hartmann, Mecke,
Kieckbusch, Mader, & Kaiser, 2016)
- - - - + + LC
-
NP
Gehyra mutilata (Wiegmann 1834) - - - - + - LC
-
NP
Gekko gecko (Linnaeus, 1758) - - - - + - LC
-
NP
Hemidactylus frenatus (Schlegel, 1836) - - - + + - LC
-
NP
Hemidactylus platyurus (Schneider, 1797) - - - - + - LC
-
NP
Hemiphyllodactylus typus (Bleeker, 1860) - - - - + - LC
-
NP
Scincidae
Dasia olivacea (Gray, 1839) - - - - - + LC
-
NP
Emoia atrocostata (Lesson, 1830) - - - - + - LC
-
NP
Eutropis multifasciata (Kuhl, 1820) - - - + - - LC
-
NP
Eutropis rugifera (Stoliczka, 1870) - - + + - - LC
-
NP
Varanidae
Varanus nebulosus (Gray, 1931) - - - - - + LC I P
Varanus salvator (Laurenti, 1768) - - + - - + LC II NP
Study of Species Richness and Structure Community of Herpetofauna on Kondang Merak Forest, Malang, Indonesia
95