significant difference between group
Figure 12: The graph of the mean of grey level between
neuron and dendrite for IHC expression of intensity.
3.2 Discussions
The software for image processing of the IHC
picture was developed in many forms. CPP® is the
popular software used in Indonesia for photo editing
besides Adobe Photoshop®. This article was showed
another function of CPP® to image processing relate
to medical or biological aspects for examining IHC
pictures.
Analyzing IHC picture give benefits such as
reduce the cost of other technique to tissue protein
measurement. This article explained the simple way
to measure the intensity of IHC expression
(Kaczmarek, Górna, and Majewski 2004).
This method was similar to Pham et al. 2007,
using the CMYK method but this method was
simpler to apply. The differences between
expression in the neuron (high expression) and the
dendrite (less expression) were significantly
different (p<0.05, Table 1). The higher expression
showed the lower grey level and the less expression
showed the higher grey level. It was indicated that
the CPP® could be used as a software to IHC
expression analysis for intensity. This article was
also be a module to operate CPP® to analyze IHC
picture to intensify expression.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The conclusions of this method were :
• Corel Photo Paint® could be used easily to
measure the intensity of IHC expression using
CMYK Split channel
• higher intensity is the fewer grey level, the less
intensity is the higher grey level
REFERENCES
Bankhead, Peter, Maurice B. Loughrey, José A.
Fernández, Yvonne Dombrowski, Darragh G. McArt,
Philip D. Dunne, Stephen McQuaid, et al. 2017.
“QuPath: Open Source Software for Digital Pathology
Image Analysis.” Scientific Reports 7 (1): 16878.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5.
Drijvers, Jefte M., Imad M. Awan, Cory A. Perugino, Ian
M. Rosenberg, and Shiv Pillai. 2017. “The Enzyme-
Linked Immunosorbent Assay.” In Basic Science
Methods for Clinical Researchers, 119–33. Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803077-6.00007-2.
Jensen, Ellen C. 2013. “Quantitative Analysis of
Histological Staining and Fluorescence Using ImageJ:
Histological Staining/Fluorescence Using ImageJ.”
The Anatomical Record 296 (3): 378–81.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22641.
Kaczmarek, E., A. Górna, and P. Majewski. 2004.
“Techniques of Image Analysis for Quantitative
Immunohistochemistry.” Roczniki Akademii
Medycznej W Bialymstoku (1995) 49 Suppl 1: 155–58.
Kaliyappan, Karunakaran, Murugesan Palanisamy,
Jeyapradha Duraiyan, and Rajeshwar Govindarajan.
2012. “Applications of Immunohistochemistry.”
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 4 (6):
307. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.100281.
Padmavathi, K., and K. Thangadurai. 2016.
“Implementation of RGB and Grayscale Images in
Plant Leaves Disease Detection – Comparative
Study.” Indian Journal of Science and Technology 9
(6). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i6/77739.
Pham, Nhu-An, Andrew Morrison, Joerg Schwock, Sarit
Aviel-Ronen, Vladimir Iakovlev, Ming-Sound Tsao,
James Ho, and David W. Hedley. 2007. “Quantitative
Image Analysis of Immunohistochemical Stains Using
a CMYK Color Model.” Diagnostic Pathology 2
(February): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-2-8.
Tuominen, Vilppu J., Sanna Ruotoistenmäki, Arttu
Viitanen, Mervi Jumppanen, and Jorma Isola. 2010.
“ImmunoRatio: A Publicly Available Web
Application for Quantitative Image Analysis of
Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR),
and Ki-67.” Breast Cancer Research: BCR 12 (4):
R56. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2615.
Varghese, Frency, Amirali B. Bukhari, Renu Malhotra,
and Abhijit De. 2014. “IHC Profiler: An Open Source
Plugin for the Quantitative Evaluation and Automated