Effect of Multiple Intelligence based Perceptual Motor Activity
Model on Motor Skill of Kindergarten Student
Yudanto
1
1
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Motor Perceptual Activity, Motor Skill, Kindergarten Student
Abstract: Motor skill needs to be developed for children at the level of kindergarten. Development can be done
through perceptual motor activities based on multiple intelligences. The research aimed to determine the
effect of multiple intelligences based perceptual motor activity model on kindergarten student motor skill.
This research was pre-experimental research. Research design was done using one group pre-test and
posttest design. Research subjects were 25 kindergarten students. The research instrument was the Test of
Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2) from Ulrich (2000). Data analysis was done using t-test by
comparing the mean results of the pre-test with the mean post test results. Research resulted in all
components of motor skills, namely run, gallop, hop, leap, horizontal jump, slide, striking stationary ball,
stationary dribble, catch, kick, overhand throw, and underhand roll, had significant value of 0.000 <0.05,
so that it could be concluded that there was significant effect of multiple intelligences based perceptual
motor activity model on motor ability of kindergarten students.
1 INTRODUCTION
Preschool is a golden age in the range of
development of an individual's movement. At this
time, children experience extraordinary growth and
development, both in terms of physical,
environmental, cognitive and psychosocial aspects.
Children development takes place in a holistic or
universal process. Therefore, stimulation is
necessary for holistic activities. Stimulation is
needed because not all children experience normal
movement development. Based on the research
done Rachman (2015) related to gross and fine
motor skills in 109 preschool children, the results
showed that in terms of gross motor skills, 19
children were in very good category, 55 children in
good category, 30 children in medium category, and
2 children in less category. Also, in terms of fine
motor skills, 7 children were in very good category,
38 children in good category, 53 children in
medium category, 6 children in less category, and 2
children in very poor category. Based on the
description above, it is necessary to do further
studies on the development of the movement of
preschool children by providing stimulation to help
preschool children achieve the movement
development based on development stage they are
supposed to. Provision of stimulation referred to is
the provision of motor perceptual activities given to
preschool children in physical activities in the
school to ensure the development of their
movements in accordance with the stages of
development of preschool children.
In kindergarten children, forms of physical
activities contain perceptual motoric elements and
are very important to be packaged in the form of
play. This is based on the findings of several
research results, including: 1) perceptual motor
skills have correlation with children's academic
abilities, (Nourbakhsh, 2006: 40); 2) perceptual
abilities in visual, auditory and kinesthetic terms in
children aged 4-6 years has relationship with
academic achievement in terms of reading, spelling,
and mathematics (Dhingra et al., 2010: 143); 3)
programmed physical activity in certain period in
the preschool period has an impact on children's
512
Yudanto, .
Effect of Multiple Intelligence based Perceptual Motor Activity Model on Motor Skill of Kindergarten Student.
DOI: 10.5220/0009789605120516
In Proceedings of the 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science in conjunction with the 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports
(YISHPESS and CoIS 2019), pages 512-516
ISBN: 978-989-758-457-2
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
cognitive skills (Hosseini, et. al., 2011: 764); 4)
appearance in perceptual motor is related to
academic achievement and children who have good
perceptual motor also have good cognitive
(Morales, et. al., 2011: 410); 5) perceptual motor
skills have significant relationship with academic
ability at all three levels of kindergarten children
(Cobb, Chissom, & Davis, 1975: 545); 6) several
studies have shown an association between
intellectual motor perceptual at various age levels
from children to adults, where the relationship is
best demonstrated in children (Thomas & Chissom,
1974: 152); 7) a physical education program that
emphasizes directionality of movement having
influence of perceptual motor development, visual
perception, and readiness (Lipton, 1970); 8) there
is perceptual motor relationship with cognitive
behavior in 63 kindergarten children (Belka &
Williams, 1980: 463), 9) perceptual motor and
reading ability in kindergarten children, indicates
that perceptual motor has direct relationship with
learning and increases children's readiness (Smith,
1970: 44). Perceptual motor program is given, in
the form of jumping into a circle, walking like an
animal, touching and identifying body parts,
climbing balanced beam, and manipulating a ball;
10) children aged 3-6 years is optimal age for
developing perceptual motor (Johnstone & Ramon,
2011: V).
Yudanto (2018) has developed the model for
developing multiple intelligences based through
perceptual motor activities for children in
kindergarten. This research produced a model of
perceptual motor activities consisting of 8 (eight)
theme-based games, namely my personal-themed
game, my family-themed game, my neighborhood-
themed game, animal-themed game, plant-themed
game, vehicle-themed game, universe-themed
game, and my country themed game. For the model
of perceptual motor activities, that has been
developed, it is necessary to do a more in-depth
study to determine the effect on motor skills for
kindergarten students.
2 RESEARCH METHOD
This research was pre-experimental research.
Research design was one group pretest and posttest
design. Research subjects were 25 kindergarten
students. Perceptual motor activity model based on
multiple intelligences for kindergarten students
used in this research was theme-based game,
namely my personal-themed game, my family-
themed game, my neighbourhood-themed game,
animal-themed game, plant-themed game, vehicle-
themed game, universe-themed game, and my
country themed game. This model was given every
day for 4 weeks. Research instrument was Test of
Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2) from
Ulrich (2000). Data analysis used was by t test by
comparing the mean of pre-test results with the
mean of post-test results.
3 RESEARCH RESULT
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of Motor Skill Improvement
Componet n Pre Test Post Test Persentase (%)
Improvement
M
SD
M
SD
Run 25 5.08 1.19 6.8 1.26 33.86
Gallo
p
25 5.32 1.11 7 1.19 31.58
Hop 25 5.48 1.23 7.44 0.92 35.77
Lea
p
25 3.52 1.23 4.96 1.17 40.91
Horizontal Jump 25 4.6 1.80 6.76 1.36 46.96
Slide 25 5.16 2.21 6.84 1.57 32.56
Striking a Stationary Ball 25 6.16 1.77 8.4 1.63 36.36
Stationar
y
Dribble 25 4.16 1.40 5.84 1.43 40.38
Catch 25 3.76 1.74 5.44 1.19 44.68
Kic
k
25 6.32 1.18 7.84 0.47 24.05
Overhand Throw 25 3.76 1.51 5.4 0.96 43.62
Underhand Roll 25 4.44 1.04 6.16 1.49 38.74
Effect of Multiple Intelligence based Perceptual Motor Activity Model on Motor Skill of Kindergarten Student
513
Table 2. T Test of Motor Skill of Kindergarten Student with Wilcoxon
Component Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Run -4.427
b
0.000
Gallop -.4562
b
0.000
Hop -4.344
b
0.000
Leap -4.512
b
0.000
Horizontal Jump -4.417
b
0.000
Slide
-3.981
b
0.000
Striking a Stationary Ball -4.374
b
0.000
Stationary Dribble -4.304
b
0.000
Catch -4.304
b
0.000
Kick -3.920
b
0.000
Overhand Throw
-4.165
b
0.000
Underhand Roll -4.288
b
0.000
The table shows the results of t test for all components of motor skills obtained sig values 0.000 <0.05, it can
be concluded that there is significant influence on perceptual motor activity model based on multiple
intelligences on kindergarten student’s motor skills.
Development of basic movement and its
improvement are important in preschool age. All
normal children are able to develop and learn
various kinds of movements and more complicated
ones. Basic movements are repetitive movements
done continuously from habits and make it as the
basis of their experience and environment. The
development of basic movement is a process to
obtain movement that is constantly evolving based
on: 1) process of developing nerves and muscles
that are also affected by heredity, 2) result of
previous movement experiences, 3) current
movement experience, and 4) movement described
in relation to certain movement patterns.
Aryamanesh & Sayyah (2014: 648) found that early
childhood is a critical period for the development of
basic movement abilities. Basic movement abilities
depend on several internal and external factors,
such as biological, psychological, social,
motivational, cognitive, and others. Intervention of
basic movement abilities in preschool may affect
the mastery of basic movement in elementary
school. Furthermore, Giannakidou, et.al. (2014: 53)
state that basic movement ability at preschool age is
needed in structured and unstructured physical
activity involvement. Exercise for basic movement
skills at the beginning in preschool plays an
important role and describes physical, social and
cognitive developments of children.
Similar opinion is also conveyed in Fisher, et.al.
(2005: 684) claiming that basic movement ability
has significant relationship with daily physical
activities. Hands & Mc Intyre (2015: 1) say that
development of basic mobility in children has an
important role for physical, cognitive and social
development, and is important to build the
foundation for an active lifestyle. Similar opinions
are also expressed by Iivonen (2013: 643-644) by
saying that there was relationship between basic
movement and daily physical activity in preschool
children. Nurtajudin, Rahayu, & Sulaiman, (2015:
155) state that early age is an ideal opportunity for
children to learn developing control over their
muscles and movements. Children at this time still
like movements that are simple in shape such as
jumping, jumping, running, throwing and kicking.
Sujarwo (2010: 36) found that 3-6 years old
children can be considered as a period of learning
skills and development of gross and fine skills.
Hartono, et. al, (2003: 72) stated that for children
who were still in kindergarten, naturally like to
explore their movements and daily activities
dominated by movement activities, need to be given
experience and basic movement skills (locomotor,
non-locomotor, and manipulative) through physical
education. Rumini (2014: 102) stated that physical
activities in childhood are in the form of basic
movements, which include locomotor movement,
stability and manipulative movements that are
packaged in the form of games will be fun.
Sumantri (2015: 36) suggested development of
basic locomotor, non-locomotor, and manipulative
movements play a role in the formation of
children's talents.
YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS
2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)
514
In preschool childhood, multilateral activities
need to be given to develop all physical aspects.
Furthermore, Komputerisna & Diana, (2016: 2)
stated that various kinds of gross motor skills in
children provide important role for physical activity
in their lives. Permana, (2013: 25) said that gross
motoric ability is very influential in a child's
development. If they experience delays in motor
skills, the child will likely experience delays in
development and growth. Smith (2014: 10-11)
further stated that before learning basic skills in a
game, children need to master basic motor skills.
Meanwhile Sutapa (2002: 86) stated that right
mastery of the basic movement patterns will be
very beneficial when studying complex movements.
Right basic movement is the foundation for
movement in the smoothing and performance stages
so that they will get their best quality of movement.
Development of basic movement elements in
multiple intelligences based perceptual motor
activity model in this research includes locomotor
movement, non-locomotor movement, and
manipulative movement. Locomotor movement is a
movement to move, where certain body parts move.
Non locomotor movement is a non-migratory
movement, where only certain body parts are
moved but do not move orchange. On the other
hand, manipulative movement is movement that
involves an object to be moved or manipulated.
Development of basic movement elements
contained in the perceptual motor activity model are
1) locomotor basic movement stimulated in
perceptual motor-based physical activity model,
including running, walking, jumping, jumping, and
engklek/ crank game, 2) stimulated non-locomotor
basic movement in perceptual motor-based physical
activity model, including pulling, twisting, and
bending, and 3) stimulated manipulative basic
movements in perceptual motor-based physical
activity model, including throwing, catching,
reflecting, hitting, and kicking.
4 CONCLUSION
The research shows that multiple intelligences based
perceptual motor activity model affects the motor
skills of kindergarten student. Based on this
research, it is expected that teachers can apply the
model of perceptual motor activity based on
multiple intelligences to improve children's motor
skills in kindergarten.
REFERENCES
Aryamanesh, S., & Sayyah, M. 2014. “Effect of Some
selected Games on the Development of Locomotor
Skills in 4-6 Year-Old Preschool Boys”. International
Journal of Sport Studies, 4 (6): 648-652.
Belka, D.E., & Williams, H.G. 1980. “Canonical
Relationships among Perceptual-Motor, Perceptual,
and Cognitive Behaviors in Children”. Research
Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 51 (3): 463-477.
Cobb, P.R., Chissom, B.S., & Davis, M.W. 1975.
“Relationships Among Perceptual-Motor, Self-
Concept, and Academic Measures for Children in
Kindergarten, Grades One and Two”. Journal of
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41: 539-546.
Dhingra, R., Manhas, S., & Kohli, N. 2010. "Relationship
of Perceptual Abilities with Academic Performance of
Children". Journal Soc. Sci., 23 (2): 143-147.
Fisher, A., Reilly, J.J., Kelly, L.A., Montgomery, C.,
Williamson, A., Paton, J.Y., & Grant, S. 2005.
“Fundamental Movement Skills and Habitual Physical
Activity in Young Children.” Medicine & Science in
Sports & Exercise, 684-688.
Giannakidou, D.M., Nastou, K., Karanatsiou, F., Paulidou,
S., & Antonis, K. 2014. “A Review of the
Relationship between Physical Activity and Motor
Proficiency in Children”. European Psychomotricity
Journal, 6 (1): 52-59.
Hands, B., & McIntyre, F. 2015. Assessment of
fundamental movement skills in Australian children:
the validation of a Fundamental Motor Skills Quotient
(FMSQ). Malaysian Journal of Sport Science and
Recreation, 11 (1), 1-12.
Hartono, M., Rahayu, T., Rustiadi, T., & Soegiyanto, K.S.
2003. “Model Belajar Gerak di Kanak-Kanak”. Jurnal
Nasional Pendidikan Jasmani dan Ilmu
Hosseini, S.S., Panahi, M., Naghilo, Z., & Ramandi, L. D.
2011. The Effect of Exercise Training on Perceptual
Motor Skills and Physicaal Fitness Factors in
Preschool Children". Middle-East Journal of Scientific
Research, 9 (6): 764-768.
Iivonen, K.S., Sääkslahti, A. K., Mehtälä, A., Villberg, J.
J., Tammelin, T. H., Kulmala, J. S., & Poskiparta, M.
2013. “Relationship between Fundamental Motor
Skills and Physical Activity in 4-Year-Old Preschool
Children”. Perceptual & Motor Skills: Physical
Development & Measurement, 117 (2): 627-646.
Johnstone, J. A. & Ramon, M. 2011. Perceptual-Motor
Activities for Children. USA: Human Kinetic.
Komputerisna, A.A. & Diana. 2016. “Gross Motor Skills
of the Children’s Group a Judging from
Demonstration Method of Motion and Song in
Kindergarten Pertiwi Nusa Indah”. Early Childhood
Education Papers (Belia), 5 (1): 1-5.
Lipton, E.D. 1970. A Perceptual-Motor Development
Program's Effect on Visual Perception and Reading
Readiness of First-Grade Children, Research
Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical
Education and Recreation, 41:3, 402-405
Effect of Multiple Intelligence based Perceptual Motor Activity Model on Motor Skill of Kindergarten Student
515
Morales, J., Gonzales, L. M., Guerra, C. V., Virgili, C., &
Unnithan, V. 2011. "Physical Activity, Perceptual
Motor Performance, and Academic Learning in 9 to 16
Years Old School Children". International Journal of
Sport Psychology, 42: 401-415.
Nourbakhsh, P. 2006. "Perceptual Motor Abilities and
Their Relationships with Academic Performance of
Fifith Grade Pupils in Comparison with Oseretsky
Scale". Journal of Kiensiology, 38 (1): 40-48.
Nurtajudin, Rahayu, T. & Sulaiman. 2015. “Pengaruh
Latihan Koordinasi Mata-Kaki-Tangan dan Tingkat
Keseimbangan terhadap Motorik Kasar Anak Usia
Dini”. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 4
(2): 154-158.
Permana, D.F.W. 2013. “Perkembangan Keseimbangan
pada Anak Usia 7 s/d 12 Tahun Ditinjau dari Jenis
Kelamin”. Jurnal Media Ilmu Keolahragaan
Indonesia, 3 (1): 25-29.
Rachman, H.A. 2018. Intervensi Perseptual Motorik dalam
Perkembangan Gerak Anak Prasekolah di Daerah
Istimewa Yogyakarta. Laporan Penelitian Research
Group. Yogyakarta: FIK UNY.
Rumini. 2014. “Pembelajaran Permainan Kids’ Atlhletics
sebagai Wujud
Pengembangan Gerak Dasar Atletik pada Anak-
Anak”. Journal of Physical Education, Health and
Sport, 1 (2): 98-107.
Smith, P. 1970. “Perceptual-Motor Skills and Reading
Readiness of Kindergarten Children”. Journal of
Health, Physical Education, Recreation. 41 (4): 43-44.
Smith, W. 2014. “Fundamental Movement Skills and
Fundamental
Games Skills are Complementary Pairs and Should Be
Taught in Complementary Ways at All Stages of Skill
Development”. Sport, Education and Society, 1-2014:
12.
Sujarwo. 2010. Upaya Mengembangkan Kemampuan
Motorik Kasar melalui Aktivitas Bermain pada Anak
Usia 3-6 Tahun. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani
Indonesia, 8 (1): 36-40.
Sumantri, M.S. (2015). Learning Model of Fundamental
Long Jump Movement
Based on Game Approach. Indonesian Journal of
Early Childhood Education Studies, 4 (1): 35-41.
Sutapa, P. 2002. Pengamatan Pola Perkembangan
Motorik Anak Sebagai Langkah Awal Pemninaan
Calon Olahragawan”. Majalah Ilmiah Olahraga, 8
(1):79-89.
Thomas, J.R., & Chissom, B.S. 1974. “Prediction of First
Grade Academic Performance from Kindergarten
Perceptual-Motor Data”. Research Quarterly
American Alliance for Health, Physical Education and
Recreation. 45 (2): 148-153.
Ulrich, D.A. 2000. Test of Gross Motor Development:
Second Edition. Texas: Pro.ed An International
Publisher.
Yudanto. 2018. Intelligences Stimulation on Kindergarten
Student through Physical Activity Based on Perceptual
Motor. Jurnal Man in India. 98 (1): 63-6
YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS
2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)
516