The Evaluation of Yogyakarta Tennis Achievement Development

System

Abdul Alim

, Risti Nurfadhila

Sport Coaching Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Colombo Street, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keywords: Evaluation, Tennis achievement development

Abstract: Sport Achievement is associated with the reputation of a country. Almost all countries make various efforts

to improve their sports achievements, because in fact they realize that with sports the name of the country

can be lifted up to the highest class. Sports achievements development system is one of the pillars that

greatly supports the achievement of sports achievements, the highest sport achievement can only be made

through a systematic, planned, regular and continuous development program. This study aims to evaluate

tennis achievement development system in Yogyakarta. This study is an evaluation research. The subjects in

this study consist of 19 tennis athletes, 12 tennis coaches, and 14 supporting staff. This study used a CIPP

model from Daniel Stufflebeam to measure tennis achievement development system condition. A CIPP

model consists of stages on context, input, process, and product. The data were collected using

questionnaires and analysed using a descriptive analysis. The results showed that tennis achievement

development system in Yogyakarta is at poor level. Research results from athletes, coaches and supporting

staff indicate tennis achievement development system in Yogyakarta is still in the poor category.

1 INTRODUCTION

Facts show that general tennis performance in

Indonesia has decreased. Various efforts in

improving sports achievements have been carried

out by the government. One of the efforts made is to

increase the quantity and quality of sports coaching.

Sports coaching is a very important factor in

advancing and improving sports achievements,

because the level of development depends on sports

coaching. The role of achievement coaching must be

programmed optimally, to organize the coaching

nets in accordance with the programs that have been

arranged in the athlete's coaching system. Special

guidance is needed in finding new seeds and in

improving performance. Optimal performance is

obtained from the efforts of high athletes as well as

good coaching in stages and continuously. Gradually

fostering achievement has implications for the

importance of evaluations that must be carried out

periodically from the athlete's selection stage to the

final stages of the implementation of the training

program and achievements.

The concept of coaching athletes to be able to

achieve optimal performance must be done in stages

and continuously until the peak performance.

Achieving the ultimate achievement of student

coaching cannot be done individually, but must be

systemic. The starting point of the coaching stage is

sports promotion. Sports promotion is the stage that

forms the basis for achieving targets or goals from

fostering a sport. A good speaker will be able to

maximize input to be fostered into athletes who

excel, on the contrary the stage of improper

installation can make the input of prospective

athletes or talents can not be netted maximally, so

the results of the sports coaching process cannot be

achieved optimally.

In fostering the achievements of tennis, the

scouting of talented athletes is absolutely held as

early as possible. This scouting aims to get the seeds

of talented athletes as successors to high-achieving

athletes. Talented players are likened to quality raw

materials for processing into high-quality goods. To

achieve the goal of being an athlete or tennis player

who excels is not easy, because it takes awareness,

discipline, patience, and perseverance. Achievement

cannot be achieved in a matter of weeks or months,

but annually through gradual improvement in the

results of regular practice.

572

Alim, A. and Nurfadhila, R.

The Evaluation of Yogyakarta Tennis Achievement Development System.

DOI: 10.5220/0009797805720575

In Proceedings of the 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science in conjunction with the 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports

(YISHPESS and CoIS 2019), pages 572-575

ISBN: 978-989-758-457-2

The discussion suggests that sports achievement

development system is a very important part of highl

level achievement, but the tennis achievement

development system in Yogyakarta has not been

studied.

Based on the explanation above, a study

regarding the evaluation of tennis achievement

development system in Yogyakarta is required. This

issue becomes the basis of the research to conduct a

research entitled as “The Evaluation of Yogyakarta

Tennis Achievement System”.

2 THEORETICAL REVIEW

2.1 Evaluation Program

Evaluation is a tool or procedure used to find out

and measure something in an atmosphere with

predetermined ways and rules. In addition to using

tests, data can also be collected using questionnaires,

observations, and interviews or other forms of

appropriate instruments (Nurhasan, 2001: 3).

Program evaluation is a systematic investigative

activity about something valuable from an object.

Another opinion (Denzin and Lincoln, 2000: 83)

says that program evaluation is oriented around the

attention of the policy maker of the funder

characteristically including the cause question about

the degree to which the program has achieved the

desired goal. Decisions made are made as indicators

of performance appraisal at each evaluation stage in

three categories: low, moderate and high.

There are many program evaluation models

developed by experts that can be used to evaluate

programs. Evaluation of the CIPP model is a concept

offered by Stufflebeam with the view that the

important purpose of evaluation is not to prove but

to improve (Stufflebeam, H McKee and B McKee,

2003: 118).

Evaluation of the CIPP model can be applied in

various fields. Nana Sudjana and Ibrahim (2004:

246) translate each of these dimensions with the

following meanings: 1) Context: the situation or

background that influences the planning of the

development program; 2) Input: the quality of inputs

that can support the achievement of the development

program; 3) Process: implementation of the program

and use of facilities in accordance with what has

been planned; 4) Product: results achieved in the

administration of the program.

2.2 Sport Achievement Development

System

Sport achievment development sytsem is an effort

made consciously, planned, organized, and directed

to achieve a predetermined goal, while according to

several experts and sources about coaching,

including, the implementation of a sports coaching

includes several components namely organization,

training programs, trainers, athletes , facilities and

infrastructure, funding, support and environment

(Sajoto, 1995: 2-5).

To foster sporting achievements in educational

institutions, in each education channel sports activity

units, sports classes, training and training centers,

sports schools, and staged and sustainable sports

competitions will be held (Undang-Undang Sistem

Keolahragaan Nasional, 2005: article 25 paragraph

6). Guidance and development of educational sports

is carried out with due regard to the potential,

abilities, interests, and talents of students as a whole,

both through intracuricular and extracurricular

activities (National Sports System Act Number 3,

2005: article 25 paragraph 4). According to

Wahjoedi, et al. (2009: 12-14) fostering superior

sports is carried out using the approach of science

and technology (Science and Technology) in

accordance with the coaching cycle from beginning

to end. Sports experts from all over the world agree

on the need for coaching stages to produce high

sports achievements, namely through the stages of

massaging, breeding and achievement.

According to Junaidi (2003: 49), it is mentioned

that the promotion of early age sports is an effort to

move early childhood to do sports activities as a

whole. With the aim of involving as many athletes in

sports as achievement, awareness arises of the

importance of sports achievement as part of efforts

to improve sports nationally. In this case, it is

required to have a good strategy, namely: (1)

providing adequate sports facilities and

infrastructure in elementary schools, (2) preparing

for the provision of sports instructors who are able to

move sports in schools, (3) holding inter-class

competitions, (4) motivating, both from within and

from outside, (5) holding demonstrations against

athletes who excel, (6) stimulating children's interest

through mass media, television, video, etc. (7)

collaborating between schools and the community

especially parents.

Nurseries are a pattern that is applied in an effort

to attract talented scientists who are researched

scientifically. What is meant scientifically is to nett

athletes with scientific application (Science and

The Evaluation of Yogyakarta Tennis Achievement Development System

573

Technology), to choose early childhood children

who are happy and love to exercise then are

identified to be athletes. In this way the development

of early childhood to become an athlete and to

achieve achievement will be higher faster (Said

Junaidi, 2003: 50). Some important considerations

for obtaining superior athlete seeds are presented as

follows: 1) Talent and high potential brought from

birth have a more dominant contribution compared

to the coaching and other supporting processes, so

finding potential athlete seeds is very important, 2)

Avoiding waste in the coaching process if the athlete

being coached has high potential brought from birth,

3) The need for Indonesia is encouraged by the

search for superior athlete seeds at an early age.

According to Bompa (1990) in (KONI, 2000: 7)

talent identification can be done by natural methods

and scientific selection methods; 1) Natural selection

is a selection with a natural approach to develop

children, then grow into athletes. 2) Scientific

selection is a selection that applies scientific

(IPTEK). Choosing young children who like to

exercise can be identified as athletes.

3 METHOD

3.1 Research Design

This research employed evaluation model.

3.2 Research Subjects

This study is an evaluation research. The subjects in

this study were 19 tennis athletes, 12 tennis coaches,

and 14 supporting staff.

3.3 Instrument and Data Collecting

Technique

The data collecting technique was using

questionnaire (CIPP Model). This CIPP model was

chosen because it is a program evaluation model that

covers all components of the management system,

so that the results of the evaluation can present

information about the weaknesses and strengths of

each system component.

In the implementation of the tennis training

program, the context component is very helpful in

determining the quality of training, while the quality

of training is the only step that must be taken to

reach the peak of performance (achievement).

Therefore the support of the government by

providing the necessary facilities such as standard

facilities and infrastructure is crucial. The human

resource input component is absolutely essential for

the initial requirements for fostering achievement so

that it is very necessary to input that meets the

criteria for quality human resources, which will

determine the Yogyakarta tennis coaching program.

Process component in this case is the process of

implementing athlete selection, preparation and

implementation of training programs to find out how

far the trainer is in preparing athletes. After that, the

evaluation will be predictable. Product component is

an embodiment of the effectiveness of the

processing of context, input and process

components. The product is also an illustration of

the quality of tennis coaching that has been carried

out

3.4 Data Analysis Technique

The data analysis technique was done using

percentage.

4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Result Descriptive Analysis

The data analysis results are presented as follows:

4.1.1 Perception of the Tennis Achievement

Development System by Athletes

The data Perception of The Tennis Achievement

Development System by Athletes is described as

follows:

Table 1: Perception of the Tennis Achievement

Development System from Athletes

No Cate

Percenta

1Poo

60,0

2Goo

40,0

Total 100,0

According to the table above, it has been known

that the category of Perception of The Tennis

Achievement Development System by Athletes is on

poor category (60.0%).

YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS

2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)

574

4.1.2 Perception of the Tennis Achievement

Development System by Coaches

The data Perception of The Tennis Achievement

Development System by coaches described as

follows:

Table 2: Perception of the Tennis Achievement

Development System by Coaches

No Category Percentage

1 Poo

65,0

2 Goo

35,0

Total 100,0

According to the table above, it has been known

that the category of Perception of The Tennis

Achievement Development System by coaches is on

poor category (65.0%).

4.1.3 Perception of the Tennis Achievement

Development System by Supporting

Staff

The data Perception of the Tennis Achievement

Development System by supporting Staff is

described as follows:

Table 3: Perception of the Tennis Achievement

Development System by Supporting Staff

No Category Percentage

1 Poo

55,0

2 Goo

45,0

Total 100,0

According to the table above, it has been known

that the category of Perception of The Tennis

Achievement Development System by supporting

staff is on poor category (55.0%).

5 DISCUSSION

The research result has indicated that tennis

achievement development system in Yogyakarta is

at poor level. Research results from athletes, coaches

and supporting staff indicate that tennis achievement

development system in Yogyakarta is still in the

poor category.

When viewed in more detail, the factors which

are still obstacles in tennis achievement

development system in Yogyakarta are the problems

of budget and the welfare of athletes, coaches and

supporting staff; as well as the implementation

process of tennis achievement development process

that is less than good from the selection of trainers,

selection of athletes and the process of implementing

training.

6 CONCLUSION

The research result has indicated that tennis

achievement development system in Yogyakarta was

at poor level. Research results from athletes, coaches

and supporting staff indicate that tennis achievement

development system in Yogyakarta was still in the

poor category.

REFERENCES

Bompa Tudor O. (1990). Theory and Methodology of

Training. Debuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishin

Djoko Pekik Irianto. (2002). Dasar Kepelatihan.

Yogyakarta: FIK UNY

Junaidi, S. (2003). Pembinaan olahraga usia dini.

Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang

M. Fransazeli Makorohim. 2015. Evaluasi program

pembinaan tim bola voli puteri Sumatera Selatan.

Journal Sport Area.

Nurhasan. 2001. Tes dan Pengukuran dalam Pendidikan

Jasmani. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Olahraga.

Stufflebeam, D.L. H McKee and B McKee. 2003. The

CIPP Model for Evaluation. Paper presented at the

2003 Annual Conference of the Oregon Program

Evaluation Network (OPEN). Portland, Oregon.

Wahjoedi.2001. Evaluasi Pendidikan Jasmani. Rineka

Cipta. Jakarta

Undang-Undang Keolahragaan Nasional 2005 pasal 25

Undang-Undang Sistem Keolahragaan Nasional pasal 25

ayat 4

The Evaluation of Yogyakarta Tennis Achievement Development System

575