The Influence of Work Life Balance to Turnover Intention Mediated by
Job Satisfaction to Millennial Generation in Indonesia
Radhiatul Hayati Putri
1
1
Master Program Study of Human Resource Development, Postgraduate School of Universitas Airlangga, Campus B Jl.
Airlangga No.4-6 Surabaya, Indonesia
Keywords:
Work Life Balance, Job Satisfaction, Turnover Intention, Millennial Generation.
Abstract:
This study discusses the effect of work life balance on turnover intention which is mediated by job satisfaction
among millennial generation in Indonesia. This research categorizes as conclusive research which aims to
test hypotheses and relationships between variables through data collection, data processing, and data analysis
in order to form working conclusions. This study uses a quantitative research method with a cross sectional
approach, using instrument in the form of a questionnaire distributed online through various social media
platforms. Respondents in this study were 150 millennial generation born between 1981-1997, who work in
various industry sectors in Indonesia. The results showed that work-life balance had no significant effect on
turnover intention, while also had a direct and significant effect on job satisfaction. Meanwhile, job satisfaction
had a direct and significant effect on turnover intention in the millennial generation in Indonesia. In addition,
this study also found that job satisfaction partially mediates the relationship between work life balance and
turnover intention among millennial generation in Indonesia.
1 INTRODUCTION
The changing era and the development of global-
ization have brought about shifts in organizational
structure, including aspects pertaining workers or hu-
man resources, which are the most important assets
of an organization. Today, workplaces experience a
change in composition where old employees gradu-
ally start retiring and are replaced by a generation
of fresh graduates who will begin their professional
career journey. In general, the world workforce is
composed of four generations of worker, namely The
Baby Boomer (those born during post-World War II
between 1946-1964), Generation X (those born from
1965 to 1980), Gen Y or better known with the term
Millennial which is exclusively aimed at those born
between 1981 and 1997, and Gen Z, those born after
1997 (Smith, 2016).
This research focuses on generation Y, given the
composition of the workforce at this time began to be
dominated by their generation. In August 2018 the
total workforce of three generations (Baby Boomer
Gen, Gen X and Gen Y) in Indonesia amounted to
124,004,950, with Generation Y totalling 57,438,983
or 42% of the total workforce (Central Statistics
Agency, 2019). The results of the study on changes
in the generational composition of labour shows that
generation differences significantly influence job sat-
isfaction, turnover intention, and organizational com-
mitment (Costanza et al., 2012).
Generation Y grew up at a time of rapid tech-
nological explosion, the emergence of the internet,
economic liberation, the proliferation of social media
sharing, etc. It has a big role in forming their person-
alities as individuals who are free, fun-seeking, and
risk-taking. Their values, ethics and work style are
very different from the previous generation (Naim and
Lenka, 2017). These millennial workers have the de-
sire to continue to improve their abilities and compe-
tencies to continue to be able to compete in the world
of work. (Naim and Lenka, 2017). This has an impact
on the emergence of the desire to continue to look
for opportunities to get jobs that are considered more
profitable.
Strick competition in labour market and the vari-
ous benefits offered by competitors are increasing the
turnover rate in the millennial generation. Millennial
workers are the right target, because they are known to
have a low level of loyalty to the organization. When
companies cannot meet their expectations, they easily
make the decision to quit their jobs and look for an-
other one. Based on a survey conducted by Delloitte
Putri, R.
The Influence of Work Life Balance to Turnover Intention Mediated by Job Satisfaction to Millennial Generation in Indonesia.
DOI: 10.5220/0009866501630171
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Creative Economics, Tourism and Information Management (ICCETIM 2019) - Creativity and Innovation Developments for Global
Competitiveness and Sustainability, pages 163-171
ISBN: 978-989-758-451-0
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
163
Consulting on Indonesian millennial workers in 2018,
it was found that 43% of millennial workers who were
dissatisfied with their work planned to leave after 6-
24 months of work and only 28% wanted to stay for
more than 5 years.
The turnover phenomenon certainly has a negative
impact on the organization, because the it must incur
additional costs to recruit and train new employees.
Basically, turnover can be predicted even before the
employees actually quit their jobs, which can be mea-
sured through turnover intention.
(Lobburi, 2012)) states that turnover intention is
an act of employees in the form of a mind to stop
working due to experiencing dissatisfaction, discom-
fort, and a decrease in commitment to the organiza-
tion. The amount of turnover intention of employees,
especially millennial workers is motivated by the high
desire to obtain balance in personal and professional
life or better known as work-life balance.
Work-life balance is an individual’s perception
that the activities of work and activities outside of
work life are balanced and in accordance with the
desired life priorities, so that the individual can be
said to have achieved life satisfaction (Kalliat and
Brough in Simard 2011). Someone is considered to
have achieved balance if they have enough time to
fulfil their obligations in their work life and personal
life without having to bother to balance both sides of
life, so that they feel comfortable being on the right
personal and professional path (Sirajunisa and Pan-
chanatham, 2010).
Many millennial workers have difficulty balanc-
ing work life with their personal lives. One of the dif-
ficult causes of achieving work-life balance, namely
because of their internal struggle about the role they
have. Role conflict occurs when many demands from
work and personal life do not support each other, so
one’s involvement in one role inhibits involvement
in other roles. Conflict can also occur if someone’s
obligations for their role in work and personal life in-
terfere with each other. This is because, as is well
known, generation Y has very high hopes of being
able to realize work-life balance in their lives, in ac-
cordance with their jargon to ”work hard, play hard”.
(Robbins and Judge, 2011) said that individuals
with good work-life balance tend to show 21% bet-
ter performance than those who do not. Nielsen In-
donesia in 2012 conducted a survey of 500 respon-
dents who were employed in various companies, and
the results showed that work-life balance is an impor-
tant factor after finance that affects employees to stay
within their jobs. Jobstreet Indonesia in 2014 also
conducted a survey of which the results showed that
work-life balance had a percentage of 85% as a fac-
tor that led to employee turnover. This is supported
by research conducted by Watson Wyatt Managing
Consultants and quoted by Evangelista et al. (2009)
which states that on average employees decide to quit
their jobs because they want a better opportunities to
achieve a desired balance in their lives.
In addition to having an impact on employee
turnover, the imbalance between work and life out-
side of work also affects the level of job satisfaction.
Job satisfaction can be interpreted as a perception and
sense of achievement of a job well done or that it pro-
vide a valuable fulfilment that is considered impor-
tant in the workplace (Hollenbeck et al., 2018). Spec-
tor (1997), quoted by Octaviani (2015), assesses job
satisfaction as an accumulation of individual feelings
and attitudes related to various aspects of the work,
such as salary, promotion, supervision, benefits, oper-
ational conditions, colleagues, appreciation, nature of
work, and communication.
Satisfaction in work can be achieved if there is a
balance between what is expected by employees and
what they are receiving in doing their work. Em-
ployee job satisfaction is one of the important aspects
that need to be considered in an effort to improve the
quality of a company’s human resources; when em-
ployee job satisfaction is met, they will tend to have
higher motivation to work, otherwise dissatisfaction
will result in high turnover, absence, strikes, and other
negative actions that can adversely affect the com-
pany.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 The Millennial
Gen Y or better known as Millennial Generation
which is exclusively aimed at those born between
1981 and 1997 and Gen Z, those born after 1997
(Smith, 2016). The term millennial is given to gen Y
because they are the generation that has experienced
the new millennium and grew up in an all-digital era
(Kaifi et al., 2012). The era where the millennials
grew has a big role in forming their personalities as
individuals who are free, fun-loving and risk-taking.
Their values, ethics, and work style are considered
very different from the previous generations (Naim
and Lenka, 2017). These millennial workers have the
desire to continue to improve their abilities and com-
petencies to thrive and be able to compete in the work-
place. (Naim and Lenka, 2017). This has an impact
on the emergence of the desire to continue to look
for opportunities to get jobs that are considered more
profitable.
ICCETIM 2019 - International Conference on Creative Economics, Tourism Information Management
164
Millennials really value freedom and work-life
balance in their lives (Macky et al., 2008). They
are more concerned with family and personal life,
therefore they really need a workplace that supports
work-life balance. (Myers and Sadaghiani, 2010)
suggest that the millennial needs of work-life balance
greatly influence their commitment and dedication to
the company.
2.2 Work Life Balance
The term work-life balance is generally used as a
more comprehensive form to explain policies that
were previously known as family friendly, but now
the meaning has expanded and exceeded the scope
of the family. Basically work-life balance can be in-
terpreted as a balance between work life, career, and
ambition with non-work life such as family, pleasure,
leisure, and health (Amjad Ali et al., 2014). Whereas
(Delecta, 2011) proposes work life balance as an in-
dividual’s ability to fulfill work demands and respon-
sibilities as well as family harmony, in the sense of
how individuals can share time fairly for families and
work affairs. Work-life balance speaks of the effec-
tiveness in managing attitudes in work and all other
activities that are considered important in someone’s
life, such as family, social interaction, personal devel-
opment, vacation, and recreation (Noor, 2011).
Based on several definitions of work-life balance
above, it can be concluded that work-life balance is
the intention of individuals to be able to balance and
allocate their time in carrying out their roles in work
and personal life, where such ideal will be achieved
when work life and personal life are balanced without
conflict between roles in their respective implementa-
tion.
Fisher, Stanton, Jolton & Gavin (2003) divide
work-life balance into three dimensions, namely:
1. Work Interference with Personal Life (WIPL)
This dimension defines the extent to which an in-
dividual’s work can interfere with his personal
life. Interference occurs when work pressure re-
quires individuals to fulfill it, so that their role in
the family becomes disturbed.
2. Personal Life Interference with Work (PLIW)
This dimension shows the extent to which an indi-
vidual’s personal life can interfere with his work
life. Interference occurs when the pressure to play
a role in a personal life demands too much out of
someone so that their role in work becomes diffi-
cult to fulfill.
3. Work / Personal Life Enhancement (WPLE)
This dimension defines the extent to which an in-
dividual’s personal life can improve and influence
the individual in doing their work, and vice versa
to what extent the individual’s work can have a
positive influence on his personal life. Each item
of this dimension is a positive effect derived from
work that supports personal life, such as boosting
energy or increasing enthusiasm.
2.3 Job Satisfaction
(Kreitner and Kinicki, 2014) define job satisfaction as
an attitude shown by employees toward work that in-
cludes positive as well as negative behaviours. In line
with (Robbins and Judge, 2011) which states job sat-
isfaction as the general attitude of individuals to their
work. Someone with a high level of job satisfaction
will inspire positive behaviour in their work and vice
versa.
Furthermore, Spector (1997) quoted by Novian-
dini (2014) defines job satisfaction as the degree of
pleasure someone has towards their work, how some-
one feels toward their work and other aspects related
to work. Satisfaction will encourage someone to be-
have towards their work so that it will positively affect
the company or organization. Meanwhile Robbins &
Judge (2011), defines job satisfaction as a form of
positive feelings towards a job, which is a manifes-
tation of various aspects of the work. Job satisfaction
is an assessment and an individual’s attitude towards
their work and is related to the work environment,
type of work, as well as colleagues and social rela-
tionships at work.
2.4 Turnover Intention
Expert opinions varied on the notion of turnover in-
tention, as stated by Fishbein and Ajzen in an ar-
ticle by (Bothma and Roodt, 2013), turnover inten-
tion is the intent of a worker who plans to leave
their job. Whereas Cho and Son (2012) opined that
turnover intention is the behaviour of employees who
tend to want to leave the organization of their own
volition. (Lobburi, 2012) said turnover intention is
an act of employees in the form of a though to stop
working due to experiencing dissatisfaction, discom-
fort and decreased commitment to the organization.
Whereas Wiesberg quoted (Padma and Reddy, 2014)
said turnover intention as a sign to stop working, not
an actual action to quit work.
Therefore, it can be interpreted that the con-
cept of turnover intention is different from turnover.
Turnover intention to employees is only limited to de-
sire or motif from the employees to quit their jobs
and find others that are considered more suitable. In
other word, turnover intention is the perception of em-
The Influence of Work Life Balance to Turnover Intention Mediated by Job Satisfaction to Millennial Generation in Indonesia
165
ployees to stop working while turnover is a realiza-
tion of that desire. Various studies show that inten-
tion turnover is the best predictor of the actual ac-
tion. Thus, turnover intention is a very decisive stage
before turnover actually happen (AlBattat and Som,
2013).
Akhsanu (2012) suggested several factors that in-
fluence the occurrence of turnover, namely: age, du-
ration of work, level of education, organizational
engagement, job satisfaction, and corporate culture.
While indications of the behaviour of employees who
have desires to quit can be marked by increased ab-
senteeism, laziness, dislike and protests against su-
periors, to an increase in violations of work order
(Gecko and Fly, 2010).
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This research can be categorized as a conclusive re-
search which aimed to test hypotheses and relation-
ships between variables. This study used a quantita-
tive research method with a cross sectional approach,
which is to look at and examine information from var-
ious cases at a given time and only done once until
the researcher finds answers to the research questions.
Using the question sheet (questionnaire) as the main
instrument research, the research utilized a Likert-like
scale. Data collection was carried out by distributing
questionnaires online on various social media plat-
forms.
Data analysis in this study was carried out using
the analysis software SPSS application to run a path
analysis. Path analysis is used to analyse patterns
of relationships between variables (Sri and Maharani,
2013). This method aimed to determine the direct
or indirect effects of the independent variables on the
dependent variables. This analysis used software as-
sistance with the provisions of the F test on Alpha =
0.05 or p 0.05 as the F significance level (sig. F).
Whereas for the T test the Alpha significance level =
0.05 or p 0.05, the code (sig. T) is raised where it
is used to see the significance of the indirect influence
of the independent variables on the dependent ones.
3.1 Research Hypothesis
The hypothesis in this study illustrates the relation-
ships seen in the model research in Figure 1. The
formulation of the hypothesis is:
H1: Work Life balance has a significant direct
effect on turnover intention among the millennial
generation in Indonesia.
H2: Work Life balance has a significant direct effect
Figure 1: Research Model.
on job satisfaction among the millennial generation
in Indonesia.
H3: Job satisfaction has a significant direct effect on
turnover intention among the millennial generation in
Indonesia.
H4: Work life balance significantly influences
turnover intention through job satisfaction among the
millennial generation in Indonesia.
The work life balance theory used in this study
refers to the theory of Fisher-McAuley (2003) which
was then validated by Hayman (2005) in the Psycho-
metric Assessment of Instruments Designed to Mea-
sured Work Life Balance. This theory is used to
measure all three dimensions of work life-balance
variables, namely the work of interference on per-
sonal life, personal life interference on work, and
work/personal life enhancement. As for the variable
job satisfaction, it was referring to the indicator de-
veloped by Warr et al. (1979), which consist of 16
indicators. While, for the turnover intention variable,
it was referring to the indicator developed by Lance
(1988) which consists of three indicators, namely the
intention to stop, the desire to find a new job, and the
employees willingness to found and accept a higher
income offer.
3.2 Population and Sample
Population is an object / subject that has certain char-
acteristics in common set by the researcher with the
intention to be studied in order to be able to then draw
conclusions based on information obtained (Sugiy-
ono, 2012). The population in this study was the mil-
lennial generation in Indonesia (22-38 years old). The
sample should ideally be able to represent the true
characteristics of the population. To determine the
number of samples in this study, researchers used the
sampling method from Hair, Black, Babin, Anderson,
and Tatham (2006), namely by multiplying the num-
ber of question items in questionnaire by five. The
total questions contained in the questionnaire used in
this study were 30 questions. Therefore, the minimum
ICCETIM 2019 - International Conference on Creative Economics, Tourism Information Management
166
number of samples from this study is 30x5 = 150 peo-
ple. The sample criteria used in this study were work-
ers who were also millennials born in 1981-1997 from
both gender in Indonesia.
The sampling technique in this study used the
Probability Sampling (Random Sample) technique by
means of Simple Random Sampling¸ which is sam-
pling randomly. All millennial generations in Indone-
sia (ages 22-38 years) have the same opportunity to
be sampled in this study.
4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Respondent Description
Respondents in this study consist of 150 millennials
who work in Indonesia from various industry sec-
tors. The description of respondents’ characteristics
in this study included age, gender, recent education,
marriage status, child ownership, years of service, in-
come, and job position. Form the collected data as
many as 136 respondents or up to 90.7% were 22-30
years of age, with men made up 35.5% and women
64.7% of all participants with as many as 78.7% of re-
spondents are holding a bachelor diploma. While for
marital status, 76.7% are unmarried, 21.3% are mar-
ried, and about 57.1% having one or more children.
A total of 31.3% of respondents had been working
for at least 1 year at their current company. A total
of 32.7% have an income between Rp. 3,000,000 -
Rp. 5,000,000, with 78.7% filling up a job position as
staff.
4.2 Validity and Reliability Test
To test the validity and reliability of the research ques-
tionnaire, researcher carried out a pilot test on 30 ran-
dom respondents. The level of validity can be mea-
sured by comparing the calculated r value with the r
table value for the degree of freedom (df) = n - k with
alpha of 0.05. In this study df = 30 - 2 = 28, with alpha
= 0.05 or 5%, so the r table value used is 0.361. The
validity test results are seen in the following Figure 2.
On Figure 2, it can be seen that all question items
in the questionnaire have a correlation coefficient
value > 0.361, which means all items in the ques-
tionnaire are declared valid and feasible to use. Fur-
thermore, reliability testing was done to see the con-
sistency of the instruments to be used.
The reliability test used was cronbach’s alpha
where an instrument is declared reliable if it has a co-
efficient of 0.60 or more. The results of reliability
testing can be seen in the following Figure 3. From
Figure 3 below, it can be seen that the Cronbach’s Al-
pha coefficient value for each variable has a value of>
0.60, thus the research instrument can be said to have
very good reliability.
Figure 2: Instrument Validity Result.
Figure 3: Instrument Validity Result.
4.3 Description of Research Variables
Each question item in this research questionnaire was
measured using a Likert scale consisting of 5 answer
choices, namely (1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree,
(3) disagree, (4) agree and (5) strongly agree. The
description of the respondent’s answers will be ex-
plained based on the frequency and results of the cal-
culation of the average of each variable that has been
categorized. The interval used in the categorization
was obtained from the highest answer value (5) minus
the lowest answer value (5) divided by the number of
classes (5), so that the interval on categorization is
equal to 0.8.
Work life balance variable consist of 12 questions,
which include 3 dimensions, namely Work Interfer-
ence with Personal Life (WIPL), Personal Life Inter-
ference with Work (PLIW) and Work / Personal Life
Enhancement (WPLE), where each dimension was in-
dicated by 4 questions. Meanwhile job satisfaction
The Influence of Work Life Balance to Turnover Intention Mediated by Job Satisfaction to Millennial Generation in Indonesia
167
variable consists of 14 questions and turnover inten-
tion variable consists of 4 questions. The following is
the recapitulation of respondents’ answers to the three
variables:
Figure 4: Frequency Distribution of Variables.
From the results of the recapitulation, it can be
seen that the highest work life balance level among
the Indonesian millennials, in the dimension of work
interference with personal life, is found in the first
question item (WIPL1) ”My personal life is disrupted
because of my work” with a mean of 3.62. The lowest
is found in the fourth question item (WIPL4) “I have
difficulty conducting work related task and non-work
related tasks simultaneously” with a mean of 3.11.
Furthermore, the highest score for personal life in-
terference with work dimension is found in (PLIW4)
“Personal matters make it difficult for me to do my
job” with a mean of 4.14. The lowest was found in
third question (PLIW2) “I am too tired to work effec-
tively” with a mean of 3.69. In the work/personal life
enhancement dimension, the question item (WPLE3)
”my personal life makes my mood to work better”
with a mean value of 3.83. Overall, the work life bal-
ance variable has a mean value of 3.68 or is in the
high category.
It can be seen that the highest level of job satis-
faction in the millennial generation in Indonesia is in
the second question item (JS2) ”I am free to choose
the method that I want to do the work” with a mean
value of 3.55, seventh question (JS7) “I have opportu-
nities to use all of my skills and abilities” with a mean
value of 3.55, while the lowest value is in the tenth
question item (JS10) “I am satisfied with the way the
company manages its own HR” with a mean value of
2.70. Overall, job satisfaction variable have a mean
value of 3.22 or is in the moderate category.
It can be seen that the highest turnover rate of
intention among the Indonesian millennials is in the
third question (TI3) ”if I get another job offer that
provides better salary, I will quit this job” with a mean
value of 3.62 while the lowest is in the question item
(TI1) ”I often think of quitting my current job” with
a mean of 2.88. Overall turnover intention variable
have a mean value of 3.18 thus it lies in the medium
category.
Next, the researcher conducted the Classical As-
sumption Test, which consists of Normality Test,
Multi Collinearity Test and Heteroscedasticity Test.
In the Normality Test using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Test, the Asymp Sig (2-tailed) value was obtained at
0.87 which is more than α = 5%, which means that
the data is normally distributed.
Furthermore, the multi colinearity test can be seen
in the tolerance (a) and variance inflation factor (VIF).
Multi collinearity occurs when the VIF value is be-
low 10 (<10). A set of data is considered good when
it does not experience multi collinearity. From the
result of the multi collinearity test on the work life
balance variable, the VIF value is 1.357, which indi-
cates that the VIF value is ¡10. It can be said that
multi collinearity does not occur in the work life bal-
ance variable. The results of multi collinearity tests
on job satisfaction variables obtained VIF value of
1357, which indicates that the VIF value <10. It can
be concluded that the data used in this research do not
experience multi collinearity.
Heteroscedasticity test was carried out using
Glacier test. A set of data is considered good when
it does not experience heteroscedasticity. The results
of the Glacier test obtained a significance value for the
work life balance variable of 0.51 and for the job satis-
faction variable of 0.482. Both of these variables have
significant values ¿ α = 0.05, thus it can be concluded
that the data used in this research do not experience
heteroscedasticity.
4.4 Hypothesis Testing
In order to see the influence between variables and
to prove the hypothesis, researcher conducted a study
using Path Analysis. The variables used were Work
Life Balance (X), Job Satisfaction (Z), and Turnover
Intention (Y). In path analysis, it can be divided into
two, namely path coefficients I and II.
ICCETIM 2019 - International Conference on Creative Economics, Tourism Information Management
168
The SPSS output on path analysis is shown below:
Figure 5: Diversity Value of Path Coefficient I & II.
Figure 6: Result of Individual Test for Path Coefficient I &
II.
Based on Figure 5 it can be seen that the coef-
ficient of determination produced for coefficient I is
equal to .263 or 26.3% indicating that the diversity
of work satisfaction variable that can be explained by
work life balance amounted to 26.3%, while others
are explained by other variables which are outside the
data testing model. Meanwhile the coefficient of de-
termination produced was equal to 0.284 or 28.4% in-
dicating that the diversity of turnover intention can be
explained by work life balance and job satisfaction,
while the other 71.6% is explained by other variables
that were outside the data testing model.
Based on the Figure 6 it can be seen that the path
coefficient 1 is to test the hypothesis direct influence
of work-life balance on job satisfaction. A research
hypothesis is said to have an effect when its signifi-
cance value (p-value) < α = 5%, whereas when the
significance value (p-value)> α = 5% then one vari-
able does not have an effect on the others. Based on
the calculation that had been done, it shown the sig-
nificance (p-value) = 0.00 < α = 5%. Hence, it can be
concluded that H2 is accepted, which means that the
work life balance has a direct effect on job satisfac-
tion.
The path coefficient II tested 3 hypotheses,
namely:
1. The direct effect of the work life balance on
turnover intention. A variable of a study is con-
sidered to have an effect when the significance
value (p-value) ¡α = 5%, whereas if the signifi-
cance value (p-value)¿ α = 5% means a variable
does not have an effect on the others. Based on
the calculation, it can be seen that the significance
value (p-value) = 0.016 ¡ α = 5%. Therefore, H1
was accepted which means that the work life bal-
ance directly influence turnover intention.
2. Direct influence of satisfaction on turnover inten-
tion. A variable of a study is considered to have an
effect when the significance value (p-value) ¡α =
5%, whereas if the significance value (p-value)¿ α
= 5% means a variable does not have an effect on
the others. Based on the calculation, it can be seen
that the significance value (p-value) =0.000 ¡ α =
5%. Therefore, H3 was accepted, meaning that
the job satisfaction has a direct effect on turnover
intention.
The indirect effect of the work life balance on
turnover intention through job satisfaction by
multiplying the value of beta between X and Z
with the value of beta Z to Y, as formulate bellow:
Beta(X Z Y )
= Beta(X Z)xBeta(Z Y )
= Beta(0, 407)x (0, 218)
= 0.089 (1)
Based on the calculations, it can be drawn that
the beta value of the direct effect between X and Z
is 0.199 and the indirect effect is 0.089. This shows
that the direct effect value is greater than the value of
indirect influence through job satisfaction, i.g. 0.199
¿ 0.089. This result indicates H4 is to be accepted,
which means that work life balance significantly in-
fluences turnover intention through job satisfaction.
Based on data obtained through questionnaires
and from the results of data processing, it was found
that work life balance has a significant direct effect on
turnover intention. This can be seen from the value of
Sig 0.016¿ α = 0.05. Whereas, from the correlation
point of view, it can be drawn that there is a negative
correlation between work life balance and turnover
intention among indonesian millennials, with a cor-
relation value of -0.199. It can be interpreted that the
higher the work life balance, the lower the turnover
intention in the millennial generation in Indonesia,
and vice versa the lower the work life balance they
have, the higher the turnover intention rate.
In addition, this study also found that work life
balance has a significant direct effect on job satisfac-
tion. This can be seen from the value of sig 0,000¿ α =
0.05. Whereas, from the correlational point of view, it
can be seen that there is a positive correlation between
job satisfaction and turnover intention among Indone-
sian millennials, with a correlation value of -0.513. It
can be interpreted that the higher the work life bal-
ance, the higher the job satisfaction for the millennial
generation in Indonesia, and vice versa the lower the
work life balance they have, the lower their level of
job satisfaction.
Furthermore, this study also found that job satis-
faction has a significant direct effect on turnover in-
tention. This can be seen from the value of sig 0,000¿
The Influence of Work Life Balance to Turnover Intention Mediated by Job Satisfaction to Millennial Generation in Indonesia
169
α = 0.05. From correlational point of view, it can be
seen that there is a negative relationship between job
satisfaction and turnover intention among millennial
generation in Indonesia, with a correlation value of
-0.402. It can be interpreted that the higher the job
satisfaction they have, the lower their turnover inten-
tion, and vice versa the lower the job satisfaction they
have, the higher their turnover intention rate.
This study also found the role of job satisfac-
tion that mediates the effect of work life balance on
turnover intention. The higher the work life balance
among the millennial generation, the higher their job
satisfaction level that will reduce the turnover inten-
tion, and vice versa.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of work life balance analysis and
the effect on turnover intention which is mediated by
job satisfaction among Indonesian millennials, it can
be concluded that: work life balance has a significant
direct effect on turnover intention and job satisfac-
tion; job satisfaction has a direct influence on turnover
intention; and job satisfaction mediates the effect of
work life balance on turnover intention.
The results of this study are in accordance with
the theory of the millennial generation, where the
turnover rate in this generation is very high. The high
turnover rate in this generation is greatly influenced
because of their desire to achieve balance between
work and personal life. When their expectations of
a job cannot be fulfilled it will affect job satisfaction
and ultimately lead to turnover.
LIMITATION AND SUGGESTION
This study only uses a sample of 150 respondents, a
number that is considered miniscule to describe the
characteristics of the Indonesian millennials in gen-
eral. Respondents in the study came from various oc-
cupational backgrounds; researcher believe it would
be better to focus on one sector of the industry or
even one company, as the culture and work environ-
ment would be relatively the same. In addition, the
distribution of questionnaires conducted online, lim-
ited researcher to explore further information about
the phenomena raised in this study. Hopefully further
researches can be conducted with the addition of in-
depth interviews with more respondents to enrich the
perception and information about the attitude of the
millennials toward their jobs and workplaces.
REFERENCES
AlBattat, A. R. S. and Som, A. P. M. (2013). Employee dis-
satisfaction and turnover crises in the malaysian hos-
pitality industry. International Journal of Business
and Management, 8(5):62.
Amjad Ali, C., Kundi, G. M., Qureshi, Q. A., and Akhtar,
R. (2014). Relationship between work-life balance &
organizational commitment. Research on Humanities
and Social Sciences, 4(5):1–7.
Bothma, C. F. and Roodt, G. (2013). The validation of the
turnover intention scale. SA Journal of Human Re-
source Management, 11(1):1–12.
Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B.,
and Gade, P. A. (2012). Generational differences in
work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of
Business and Psychology, 27(4):375–394.
Delecta, P. (2011). Work life balance. International Journal
of Current Research, 3(4):186–189.
Hollenbeck, J. R., Noe, R. A., and Gerhart, B. A. (2018).
Human resource management: Gaining a competitive
advantage. McGraw-Hill Education.
Kaifi, B. A., Nafei, W. A., Khanfar, N. M., and Kaifi, M. M.
(2012). A multi-generational workforce: Managing
and understanding millennials. International Journal
of Business and Management, 7(24):88.
Kreitner, R. and Kinicki, A. (2014). Organizational behav-
ioral.
Lobburi, P. (2012). The influence of organizational and so-
cial support on turnover intention in collectivist con-
texts. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR),
28(1):93–104.
Macky, K., Gardner, D., Forsyth, S., and Cennamo, L.
(2008). Generational differences in work values, out-
comes and person-organisation values fit. Journal of
managerial psychology.
Myers, K. K. and Sadaghiani, K. (2010). Millennials in the
workplace: A communication perspective on millen-
nials’ organizational relationships and performance.
Journal of business and psychology, 25(2):225–238.
Naim, M. F. and Lenka, U. (2017). Mentoring, social me-
dia, and gen y employees’ intention to stay: towards a
conceptual model. International Journal of Business
and Systems Research, 11(1-2):28–41.
Noor, K. M. (2011). Work-life balance and intention to
leave among academics in malaysian public higher ed-
ucation institutions. International journal of business
and social science, 2(11).
Padma, S. and Reddy, M. S. (2014). Work-life balance and
job satisfaction among school teachers: A study. IUP
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(1).
Robbins, S. P. and Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational be-
havior . hoboken.
Sirajunisa, K. and Panchanatham, N. (2010). Influence
of occupational stress on work life balance among
women professionals. The Journal of Commerce,
2(1):44.
Smith, A. (2016). Leading millennials in the workplace:
Recruitment, retention and integration. Medical
ICCETIM 2019 - International Conference on Creative Economics, Tourism Information Management
170
Group Management Association-Washington DC.
Recuperado, de http://www. mgma. com/practice-
resources/articles/fellow-papers/2016/leading-
millennialsin-the-workplace-recruitment-retention-
and-integration.
Sugiyono, S. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kuali-
tatif dan r & d cetakan 17. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
The Influence of Work Life Balance to Turnover Intention Mediated by Job Satisfaction to Millennial Generation in Indonesia
171