Intention to Online Transaction: Empirical Study on Go-Med
Applications
Budi Setyanta
1
, Didik Setyawan
2
, Dian Citaningtyas Ari Kadi
3
, Eni Andari
3
, Nurwiyanta
3
and Aswin
Siddik Sarumaha
4
1
Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Janabadra Yogyakarta, Tentara Rakyat Mataram street, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2
Fakultas Ekonomi,Universitas Setia Budi Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia
3
Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, Universitas PGRI Madiun, Madiun, Indonesia
4
Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Janabadra Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Keywords:
Intentions to Shop Online, Service Quality, Perceived risk, Trust.
Abstract:
This research aims to identify the effect of trust in moderating the intention of online transactions using the
GoMed application. The sampling technique was purposive sampling with 240 samples according to the
sample adequacy requirements in the Structural Equation Model (SEM) test. The results of this study indicate
that trust moderates the intention of online transactions using the Go-Med application. The intention to online
transactions using the Go-Med application in the large trust group is not affected by risk perception, whereas in
the low trust group. Service quality affects the intention of online transactions using the Go-Med application
in high and low trust groups. Service quality affects the intention of online transactions using the Go-Med
application in high and low trust groups. Chi-square values The effect of service quality in high and low trust
groups is different because of the different chi-square test.
1 INTRODUCTION
The development of internet-based shopping appli-
cations has changed customer shopping behaviour
(Yannopoulos, 2011) and encouraged companies to
keep abreast of online shopping trends (Lim et al.,
2016). The Internet has increased the ability of
customers to find information, choose products, and
make payments (Yannopoulos, 2011) The increas-
ing number of online shopping applications has in-
creased customers who move from shopping in tradi-
tional stores to online stores, including shopping for
health products. Online shopping is perceived by cus-
tomers to be superior and more profitable than tradi-
tional stores (Lee et al., 2017). Previous research in-
dicates that online shopping affects buying behaviour
because it provides convenience in finding informa-
tion and purchasing, saving time and flexible pay-
ments (Meixian, 2015)(Liu, 2012)(Delafrooz et al.,
2009)
The Go-Med application is an online drug shop-
ping service application that makes it easier for cus-
tomers to buy drugs. In the context of online drug
shopping in Indonesia, various benefits in online
shopping have not been able to increase customers’
intention to online transaction. Go-Med service users
are still low compared to other services from the same
online service provider. The phenomenon of online
drug shopping is interesting to study because Go-Med
is the first online drug shopping application in In-
donesia. Online shopping transactions in Indonesia in
2017 are 43% increase compared to 2015 (Iskandar,
2018). The Global Web Index records 86% of internet
users in Indonesia make online transactions in 2018,
the most significant percentage in the world (Wicak-
sono, 2019). This study aims to identify the phe-
nomena of Go-Med online shopping applicationusers
who have little indication that various Go-Med fea-
tures cannot attract the attention of customers to use
them. Medicines are pharmaceutical products that are
related to health. Health is essential for customers;
trust in the reliability of an application is the main
thing for customers. Although customers consider
that online shopping offers several benefits, online
transactions tend to have more significant uncertainty
than traditional retail formats (Lee and Tan, 2003).
Online transactions have a risk of fraud, which can
lead to financial losses for customers who reduce on-
Setyanta, B., Setyawan, D., Kadi, D., Andari, E., Nurwiyanta, . and Sarumaha, A.
Intention to Online Transaction: Empirical Study on Go-Med Applications.
DOI: 10.5220/0009879201150121
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applied Science, Engineering and Social Sciences (ICASESS 2019), pages 115-121
ISBN: 978-989-758-452-7
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
115
line purchases (D’Alessandro et al., 2012). The per-
ceived risk reduces the willingness of customers to
buy goods over the Internet (Barnes et al., 2007).
Higher perception of risk on the part of customers’
acts as a deterrent to their purchase intentions.
This study will identify the role of trust in the
intention to shop online using the Go-Med applica-
tion. Trust is the perception that the other party
does not behave opportunistically, and that the other
party will pay for the promise (Gefen et al., 2003).
This study divides the trust in high and low trust
groups. Previous research regarding the role of trust
in the context of consumer behaviour was more as
an independent variable (Abbad et al., 2011) (Gefen
et al., 2003)(McKnight et al., 2002). (McCole et al.,
2010) developed a research model of the role of trust
as moderating consumer attitudes, that conceptualize
that customer trust depends on the level of consumer
concern on online purchases. Low customer trust in-
hibits electronic transactions (Dinev et al., 2006).
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Intention to Online Transaction
The intention of online shopping is the willingness
of consumers to make online transactions (Pavlou,
2003). The intention of online shopping reflects the
customer’s desire to buy a particular product or ser-
vice because the intention is an essential predictor
of actual buying behaviour. The intention of online
shopping is a predictor of customer purchasing be-
haviour, so the higher the aim of online shopping,
the higher the customer’s desire to shop online (Ling
et al., 2010). The purpose is the tendency to take
action or behaviour or something that immediately
precedes actual buying behavior. Aim to use is the
tendency to conduct to keep applying a technology
(Davis, 1989). The desire to add supporting devices,
continue to use computers, and attempt to influence
other users indicates the level of computer usage. On-
line shopping is a form of e-commerce that allows
customers to buy goods or services directly from sell-
ers through the Internet. Customers find products that
are in demand by visiting retailers’ sites directly or
by searching among alternative the online shop using
shopping search engines. The retailer site displays the
availability and price of the same product in various
electronic retailers (Lim et al., 2016). In the context
of online shopping, previous research shows that ser-
vice quality, perceived risk (Nasser et al., 2015) and
trust (Liu, 2012) affects intention. The intention for
online transactions is related to customer experiences
such as information retrieval, a website search, ease of
payment transactions, post-purchase guarantees, and
reliability of the online store.
2.2 Service Quality
E-commerce is a relatively new transaction channel,
the quality of service expected by customers does not
have a concrete form, customers are still looking for
the appropriate form that is expected (Zeithaml et al.,
2002). Online shop faces the challenge of identifying
service quality attributes that are considered by cus-
tomers in online transactions (Yang and Fang, 2004).
E-service quality is an evaluation and assessment
of customers regarding service excellence in elec-
tronic transactions (Zemblyt
˙
e, 2015). Online cus-
tomers thus expect service quality levels to be the
same or higher than traditional channel customers
(Lee and Lin, 2005). Attributes and measures of ser-
vice quality are essential to determine. (Trocchia and
Janda, 2003) identified that customers consider five
dimensions of the quality of online store services.
Performance, access, security, sensation, and infor-
mation are attributes that are most considered by cus-
tomers in assessing the quality of online shop ser-
vices.
Service quality compares perceived services and
customer expectations (Gr
¨
onroos, 2001). Superior
service quality if the quality received, is higher than
expected. Highservice quality benefits the online
store because it increases customer purchase intention
(Hartwig and Billert, 2018)(
¨
Ozer et al., 2014)
Previous research on the effect of service qual-
ity on purchase intentions in various backgrounds
indicates that the higher the quality of services of-
fered can increase purchase intention (Purc
˘
area et al.,
2013)(
¨
Ozer et al., 2014)(S
´
a et al., 2016)
H1: The higher the quality of services provided,
increases the intention of shopping online
2.3 Perceived Risk
There is no agreement regarding the definition of per-
ceived risk, but many researchers define the perceived
risk of the results of adverse decisions (Gefen, 2002).
(Barnes et al., 2007)(Gefen, 2002) divided the risk
of online shopping into two concepts, focusing on
the uncertainty of the decision to make a purchase
and the consequences of online purchases. Customers
have different tolerance limits in accepting risk. Per-
sonal characteristics influence the perceived risk of
customers (Gidycz et al., 2001).
Although customers consider that online shop-
ping offers several benefits, online transactions tend
ICASESS 2019 - International Conference on Applied Science, Engineering and Social Science
116
to have more significant uncertainty than traditional
retail formats (Lee and Tan, 2003). The perceived risk
reduces the willingness of customers to buy goods
over the Internet (Barnes et al., 2007). Higher per-
ception of risk on the part of customers’ acts as a de-
terrent to their purchase intentions.
Previous research on the perceived risk in the con-
text of customer behaviour has provided evidence
that perceptions of risk influence purchase inten-
tions (Barnes et al., 2007) (Liu, 2012) (Mitchell,
1999)(Sweeny et al., 1999). Previous research shows
that perspectives of risk are negatively and signifi-
cantly related to online purchases, if customer percep-
tions of risk are high, then customer attitudes toward
online shopping are low (Barnes et al., 2007)(Liu,
2012) (Mitchell, 1999)(Sweeny et al., 1999)
H2: The higher the risk perception, the lower the
intention of online shopping.
2.4 Trust
The definition of trust is very diverse, and there is no
single understanding of trust. In conditions of risk,
uncertainty and threat, need trust (Gefen et al., 2003).
(Mayer et al., 1995) define trust as the willingness of
the other party to accept the risk of another person’s
actions based on the expectation that the other party
performs specific necessary actions, whether super-
vised or not. One party does not take advantage of the
weaknesses of the other (Barney and Hansen, 1994),
gives the other party the power to take actions that
represent themselves, the perception that the other
party pays an appointment (Gefen et al., 2003) be-
cause other parties have integrity, kindness, and com-
petence (Gefen, 2002).
Trust affects online shopping ((Abbad et al.,
2011), (Gefen et al., 2003). In the context of online
shopping, trust in the online store is essential for cus-
tomers because customers are willing to accept the
risks that occur due to the online store activities (Mc-
Cole et al., 2010). Online transactions have a sig-
nificant risk. Online transactions meet uncertainties,
weak controls, and opportunities for other parties to
cheat (Hoffman et al., 1999). Communication over
the Internet has a greater vulnerability than face to
face communication. The buyer does not have access
to check the product before purchase physically and
has a vulnerability to the security of personal informa-
tion and credit cards (1). Previous research indices the
higher customer trust in online stores, the higher the
intention of online shopping (Liu, 2012). This study
divides the beliefs grouped as high and low. Trust
involves a person’s willingness to behave in a certain
way because of the belief that the other party will give
satisfaction so that the words, promises, or statements
of others can be trusted. Trust is all knowledge held
by customers and all conclusions made by customers
about objects, attributes, and benefits. This under-
standing shows that trust is a subjective assessment of
customers because customer knowledge distinguishes
customer trust. In the context of online shopping, the
difference in the level of trust is the justification that
trust moderation customer behaviour.
H3: Trust moderates the effect of service quality
on the intention of shopping online.
H4: Trust moderates the effect of perceived risk
on the purpose of online purchase.
Figure 1: Research Model
2.5 Research methods
This research is causal, which explains the causal re-
lationship between dependent and independent vari-
ables. This research is a cross section that explains the
phenomenon in the study period and does not explain
the phenomenon of the next period. The research
sample 240 was by the requirements of sample ade-
quacy in the structural equation model test. The pop-
ulation in this study were individuals who had the in-
tention to shop online in Greater Solo. Sample collec-
tion uses the random sampling method. To increase
the rate response, wait for the respondent to answer
all questionnaire questions and take them directly.
3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Table 1: Descriptive Test
Variable Mean
Service Quality 3.7
Perceived Risk 3.6
Trust 2.4
Intention to on-
line transaction
3.1
Intention to Online Transaction: Empirical Study on Go-Med Applications
117
The detailed test results show that the average ser-
vice quality is 3.7, which indicates that the quality
of service in this study is perceived by customers as
good. The service quality of Go-Med is seen to be re-
liable because it is recognized that Go-Med can pro-
vide services as promised, capable of carrying out its
functions as an excellent online shopping application,
serving customers quickly, and being able to under-
stand customer needs.
The Descriptive test results show that the average
of perceived risk is 3.6, indicating that customers have
a perception that shopping through the Go-Med appli-
cation faces risks. Customers have an impression that
spending on using the GoMed application faces the
threat of the drug brand being delivered not according
to the order, the amount of drug given is not according
to the rule, the medication ordered cannot be served,
thecustomer has a perception that the price is higher
than the pharmacy.
The detailed test results show that the average
of trust is 2.4, indicating that customers have a per-
ception that spending through the GoMed application
faces low customer trust. Customers know that the
Go-Med use does not provide products according to
order, does not have a favourable price, does not have
a complete product, and does not fulfil customer or-
ders. The detailed test results show that the common
intention to the online transaction is 3.1, indicating
that customers have the plan to online purchase and
if they need to buy drugs, they will use the Go-Med
application.
Table 2: Results of the Regression Test Before Moderation
β S.E. C.R
Intention
to on-
line
transac-
tion
Service
Quality
0.217 1.163 1.988
Intention
to on-
line
transac-
tion
Perceived
Risk
-
0.092
0.148 2.104
The research model test was conducted by ana-
lyzing the significance level of the effect of indepen-
dent variables on the dependent variable based on the
C.R. value (z-count) greater than or equal to the z-
table value (z-count z-table). The z-table value at
the 5% significance level is 1.96.
This study develops a research model to test the
effect of service quality on buying intention in the
context of online shopping. The regression test results
before moderation indicate that service quality has a
positive and significant effect on the intention of the
online transaction using the GoMed application (β =
0.217; C.R. = 1.988).
The results of the regression test before modera-
tion indicate that service quality has a positive and
significant influence on the intention of online trans-
actions using the Go-Med application. This study
supports Hypothesis 1, which indices that the higher
the quality of service, the higher the intention to pur-
chase online. The results of this study are support
with previous studies showing that service quality has
a positive and significant effect on intention to shop
online (Purc
˘
area et al., 2013)(
¨
Ozer et al., 2014)(S
´
a
et al., 2016).
The analytical result from this study indicates that
overall service quality affects the customer’s intention
to conduct online transactions using the Go-Med ap-
plication. The analytical results indicate that service
quality is the driver of the intention to buy for health
products using the Go-Med application. Service qual-
ity is an essential variable in customer behaviour. In-
creasing positive behaviour towards online shopping
can be done by providing superior quality services (Li
and Suomi, 2009). Increasing positive behaviour to-
wards online shopping can be done by providing su-
perior quality services (Li and Suomi, 2009). Supe-
rior service quality can improve online store competi-
tiveness compared to competitors. Service quality has
a role as essential in maintaining longterm relation-
ships with customers, building customer loyalty, and
encouraging repeat purchases (Li and Suomi, 2009).
Service quality has an impact on determining the fail-
ure and success of the online business. Increasing
positive behaviour towards online shopping can be
done by providing superior quality services (Li and
Suomi, 2009). This study indicates that the relation-
ship between service quality and intention for online
transactions leads to relationships that have a positive
and consistent effect because being tested on differ-
ent backgrounds has the same relationship direction.
This finding has a contribution in designing marketing
strategies to increase the intention of online shopping
by considering service quality.
The regression test results before moderation in-
dicate that the perception of risk has a negative in-
fluence and significance on the intention for online
transactions (β = -0.092; C.R. = 2.104). The results
of this study support.
Hypothesis 2, which shows that the higher the risk
perceived by customers, reducing the intention to on-
line transactions using the Go-Med application. Con-
sumer behaviour in shopping tends to avoid risk and
choose profitable shopping. The negative influence
of risk perceptions on online transaction intentions
ICASESS 2019 - International Conference on Applied Science, Engineering and Social Science
118
supports previous research that shows that risk per-
ceptions have a negative and significant influence on
the intention of online shopping (Mitchell, 1999)(Teo,
2002) (Sweeny et al., 1999).
This research is consistent with previous research
that the perception of risk and intention for online
transactions is negatively related even though tested
on different backgrounds has the direction of the re-
lationship in line. To design effective strategies to in-
crease the intention of online transactions can con-
sider reducing the potential losses paid by customers.
If the customer has a risk perception that is too
high, the customer tends to delay the transaction and
choose a store that provides security guarantees that
reduce the risk because the perceived risk is an es-
sential variable in purchasing decisions (Salam et al.,
2005). To reduce perceived risk, the online store
needs to maximize service effectiveness, improve the
timeliness of delivery, provide a guarantee of pur-
chase guarantees and guarantee security standards.
Research by(Salam et al., 2005) indicates that finan-
cial incentives reduce perceived risk. Online stores
can minimize the risk that consumers feel by offering
products at competitive prices.
Table 3: Results of the Regression Test Before Moderation
High Trust Low Trust
β S.E. C.R. β S.E. C.R.
Inte
ntion
to
on-
line
trans-
ac-
tion
Serv
ice
Qual-
ity
0.2
56
0.1
18
2.81 0.13 1.5
52
2.11
Inte
ntion
to
on-
line
trans-
ac-
tion
Perc
eived
Risk
-
0.0
63
0.1
01
1.04 -0.
27
0.1
79
2.1
47
difference in chi square test (∆χ2) = 632.465
-601.662 = 30.803 difference of df (df) = 704 -672
= 32 chi square table (32;0,05) =42,585 chi square
table (χ2) > difference in chi square test (∆χ2) The
Constrained model is significantly different from the
Unconstrained Model
The regression test results based on the multi-
group method after being moderated by the trust (see
table 3) shows that in the high trust group, service
quality has a positive and significant effect on the in-
tention to the online transaction (β = 0.256; C.R. =
2.81). The findings indicate that in the high trust
group, there is a phenomenon that tends to be that ser-
vice quality affects the intention of the online transac-
tion.
In the low trust group, service quality had a pos-
itive and significant effect on the intention of online
transaction (β = 0.13; C.R. = 2.11). The findings indi-
cate that in the low trust group, there is a phenomenon
that tends to be that service quality affects the inten-
tion of the online transaction.
Multi-group regression test results in high and low
trust groups; in fact, there are differences in the effect
of service quality on the intention to conduct online
transactions. Statistical tests show that the chi-square
table (χ2)> chi-square count (∆χ2) so that the effect
of service quality on intentions for online transactions
in the high and low trust groups is indicated to differ
significantly. Trust moderates the importance of the
quality of service online purchase plans in the high
and low trust groups. The results of the moderation
test support Hypothesis 3, a trust that moderates the
effect of service quality on the intention of shopping
online.
The finding indicates that service quality in high
and low trust groups affects online purchase intention.
The results mean that in high and low trust groups,
both consider the performance of products and ser-
vices during the process and postpurchase. Ease of
access to online stores is essential because it makes
it easier for customers to find and surf. The security
of personal data and the possibility of loss during the
purchase and post-purchase process are essential con-
siderations for the customer. A pleasant and memo-
rable experience during the buying process forms pos-
itive customer behaviour. The completeness and ac-
curacy of product information offered to make it easy
for customers to choose the product to be purchased.
The results of the multi-group regression test showed
that there were significant differences between high
and low trust groups. Further tests on different condi-
tions are needed so that the concepts hypothesized in
this study can be applied more broadly regarding the
different objects and background of the study.
The regression test results based on the multi-
group method after being moderated by a trust (see
table 3) shows that in the high trust group, perceived
risk has a positive and significant effect on the in-
tention to the online transaction (β = -0.063; C.R. =
1.04). The findings of this study indicate that in the
high trust group, there is a phenomenon that tends to
be that service quality no affects the intention of the
online transaction. Whereas in the low trust group, the
fact was that the perception of risk had a significant
Intention to Online Transaction: Empirical Study on Go-Med Applications
119
adverse effect on the intention of the online transac-
tion (β = -0.27; C.R. = 2.147). The findings of this
study indicate that in the low trust group, risk percep-
tions of the intention to online transaction tend to lead
to negative and consistent phenomena. The higher the
risk perception, the purpose of the online purchase is
getting lower. From the results of the multi-group re-
gression test on high and low trust groups, the fact is
that there are differences in the influence of risk per-
ceptions on the intention to online transaction. This
is supported by the fact that chi-square table (χ2)¿
chi-square difference count, so that the influence of
risk perceptions on intention to online transaction in
high and low trust groups is indicated to differ signif-
icantly, or in other words that trust moderates the im-
portance of perception risk of purpose to online pur-
chase at high and low trust groups. The results of the
moderation test indicate that H4 is supported.
The test results in this study indicate that in the
high trust group, risk perception does not affect the in-
tention of shopping online. Customers who have high
trust in online stores minimize perceived risk. Mini-
mize perceived risk by increase integrity in carrying
out their business. An online store that has kindness
by not taking profits that harm its customers. Online
stores that pay as promised and have the competence
to run their businesses will increase trust.
On the other hand, customers who have low trust
tend to doubt the competence of online stores in
running their businesses. Online stores that fail to
pay their promises will reduce customer trust so the
chances of getting losses increase. Customers who
are known to take higher profits have an impact on
customers’ perceptions of financial losses. This study
provides an understanding that to reduce perceived
risk, online stores need to develop strategies to in-
crease customer trust.
The results of the multi-group regression test
showed that there were significant differences be-
tween the high and low trust groups that supported the
research hypothesis. To test the generalization of re-
search concepts, it requires further testing in different
conditions to find out the consistency of the research
concepts in different backgrounds and contexts.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The findings indicate that before trust differentiates
the intention of online shopping, service quality, and
risk perception influence online purchase intentions.
After dividing the high and low trust groups, in
the low trust group, service quality and risk percep-
tion influence the intention of online shopping. In
the high trust group, online buying intention is not
affected by perceived risk. High trust groups do not
feel the opportunity to lose on online shopping be-
cause customers know the benefits and advantages of
online shopping that can minimize perceived risks.
This study focuses on high and low trust; previ-
ous research has not explained the moderation of trust
in the online transaction intention model. The ques-
tion in the questionnaire of this study is the Indone-
sian context. The final theoretical implications in this
study indicate that trust is proven to moderate the in-
tention of online transactions.
The internet has increased transactions between
sellers and customers virtually. In the context of on-
line shopping, trust is essential for customers to ac-
cept the risks that occur related to transactions. Min-
imizing risk needs to be done by online stores to in-
crease transactions.
This study implies that to increase customer pur-
chase intention, online stores must develop marketing
strategies taking into account the quality of service.
Online stores can pay dearly for the attributes of ex-
cellent service quality. This study made an essential
contribution to the role of trust in moderating service
quality and perceived risk towards the intention of on-
line shopping.
Further research is needed to test the generaliza-
tion of research concepts in the context of the inten-
tion to buy online and in other contexts. Future re-
search is also needed to examine the role of trust in the
online transaction by considering the role of knowl-
edge (Gefen et al., 2003) and the level of customer in-
volvement (Delgado-Ballester and Munuera-Aleman,
2014) on trust.
REFERENCES
Abbad, M., Abbad, R., and Saleh, M. (2011). Limitations
of e-commerce in developing countries: Jordan case.
Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Mid-
dle Eastern Issues.
Barnes, S. J., Bauer, H. H., Neumann, M. M., and Huber, F.
(2007). Segmenting cyberspace: a customer typology
for the internet. European journal of marketing.
Barney, J. B. and Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as
a source of competitive advantage. Strategic manage-
ment journal, 15(S1):175–190.
D’Alessandro, S., Girardi, A., and Tiangsoongnern, L.
(2012). Perceived risk and trust as antecedents of on-
line purchasing behavior in the usa gemstone industry.
Asia pacific journal of marketing and logistics.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of
use, and user acceptance of information technology.
MIS quarterly, pages 319–340.
Delafrooz, N., Paim, L. H., Haron, S. A., Sidin, S. M., and
Khatibi, A. (2009). Factors affecting students’ attitude
ICASESS 2019 - International Conference on Applied Science, Engineering and Social Science
120
toward online shopping. African Journal of Business
Management, 3(5):200.
Dinev, T., Bellotto, M., Hart, P., Russo, V., Serra, I., and
Colautti, C. (2006). Privacy calculus model in e-
commerce–a study of italy and the united states. Euro-
pean Journal of Information Systems, 15(4):389–402.
Gefen, D. (2002). Nurturing clients’ trust to encourage en-
gagement success during the customization of erp sys-
tems. Omega, 30(4):287–299.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust
and tam in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS
quarterly, 27(1):51–90.
Gidycz, C. A., Lynn, S. J., Rich, C. L., Marioni, N. L.,
Loh, C., Blackwell, L. M., Stafford, J., Fite, R., and
Pashdag, J. (2001). The evaluation of a sexual as-
sault risk reduction program: A multisite investiga-
tion. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology,
69(6):1073.
Gr
¨
onroos, C. (2001). The perceived service quality
concept–a mistake? Managing Service Quality: An
International Journal.
Hartwig, K. and Billert, M. S. (2018). Measuring service
quality: A systematic literature review.
Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., and Peralta, M. (1999). Build-
ing consumer trust online. Communications of the
ACM, 42(4):80–85.
Iskandar (2018). Orang indonesia habiskan rp 146 triliun
untuk belanja online.
Lee, G.-G. and Lin, H.-F. (2005). Customer perceptions
of e-service quality in online shopping. International
Journal of Retail & Distribution Management.
Lee, K. S. and Tan, S. J. (2003). E-retailing versus phys-
ical retailing: A theoretical model and empirical test
of consumer choice. Journal of Business Research,
56(11):877–885.
Lee, W.-I., Cheng, S.-Y., and Shih, Y.-T. (2017). Ef-
fects among product attributes, involvement, word-
of-mouth, and purchase intention in online shopping.
Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(4):223–229.
Li, H. and Suomi, R. (2009). A proposed scale for measur-
ing e-service quality. International Journal of u-and
e-Service, Science and Technology, 2(1):1–10.
Lim, Y. J., Osman, A., Salahuddin, S. N., Romle, A. R.,
and Abdullah, S. (2016). Factors influencing online
shopping behavior: the mediating role of purchase in-
tention. Procedia economics and finance, 35(5):401–
410.
Ling, K. C., Chai, L. T., and Piew, T. H. (2010). The ef-
fects of shopping orientations, online trust and prior
online purchase experience toward customers’ online
purchase intention. International business research,
3(3):63.
Liu, T.-H. (2012). Effect of e-service quality on customer
online repurchase intentions. Lynn University.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An
integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of
management review, 20(3):709–734.
McCole, P., Ramsey, E., and Williams, J. (2010). Trust
considerations on attitudes towards online purchasing:
The moderating effect of privacy and security con-
cerns. Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10):1018–
1024.
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. (2002).
The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to
transact with a web site: a trust building model. The
journal of strategic information systems, 11(3-4):297–
323.
Meixian, L. (2015). Convenience and online consumer
shopping behavior: A business anthropological case
study based on the contingent valuation method. The
Anthropologist, 21(1-2):8–17.
Mitchell, V.-W. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: concep-
tualisations and models. European Journal of market-
ing.
Nasser, M. A., Islam, R., Abidin, Z., Shah, I., Azam, M.,
and Prabhakar, A. C. (2015). Analysis of e-service
quality through online shopping. Research Journal of
Business Management, 9(3):422–442.
¨
Ozer,
¨
O., Zheng, Y., and Ren, Y. (2014). Trust, trustworthi-
ness, and information sharing in supply chains bridg-
ing china and the united states. Management Science,
60(10):2435–2460.
Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic
commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technol-
ogy acceptance model. International journal of elec-
tronic commerce, 7(3):101–134.
Purc
˘
area, V. L., Gheorghe, I. R., and Petrescu, C. M. (2013).
The assessment of perceived service quality of pub-
lic health care services in romania using the servqual
scale. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6:573–585.
S
´
a, F., Rocha,
´
A., and Cota, M. P. (2016). From the qual-
ity of traditional services to the quality of local e-
government online services: A literature review. Gov-
ernment Information Quarterly, 33(1):149–160.
Salam, A. F., Iyer, L., Palvia, P., and Singh, R. (2005).
Trust in e-commerce. Communications of the ACM,
48(2):72–77.
Sweeny, J., Soutar, G., and Johnson, L. W. (1999). The
role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship.
Journal of Consumer Research, 20(September):271–
80.
Teo, T. S. (2002). Attitudes toward online shopping and
the internet. Behaviour & Information Technology,
21(4):259–271.
Trocchia, P. J. and Janda, S. (2003). How do consumers
evaluate internet retail service quality? Journal of
services marketing.
Wicaksono, A. (2019). Netizen indonesia paling gemar be-
lanja online.
Yang, Z. and Fang, X. (2004). Online service quality di-
mensions and their relationships with satisfaction. In-
ternational journal of service industry management.
Yannopoulos, P. (2011). Impact of the internet on marketing
strategy formulation. International Journal of Busi-
ness and Social Science, 2(18).
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., and Malhotra, A. (2002).
Service quality delivery through web sites: a critical
review of extant knowledge. Journal of the academy
of marketing science, 30(4):362–375.
Zemblyt
˙
e, J. (2015). The instrument for evaluating e-
service quality. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sci-
ences, 213:801–806.
Intention to Online Transaction: Empirical Study on Go-Med Applications
121