support the reliability of the instrument in older adults
in Western and Asian populations.
The intraclass correlation ranged from 0.53 to
0.87, which means that the test and retest reliability
were acceptable to good. The results of this
reliability, besides reflecting the quality of the
instrument, may also be influenced by participants’
condition. Participants, as older adults may
experience obstacles in their cognitive process. Also,
the second assessment was conducted a day before
the fasting month of Ramadhan. This may affect
participants' social-cognitive processes in managing
their physical activities. Therefore, further research is
recommended to confirm the finding.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The Indonesian translation version of the outcome
expectation of exercise exhibits good content validity,
excellent internal consistency reliability and test and
re-test reliability. The findings, therefore, provide
preliminary evidence of the reliability and validity of
the use of the instrument in the Indonesian older adult
population
REFERENCES
Avery, L., Flynn, D., van Wersch, A., Sniehotta, F. F. &
Trenell, M. I. 2012. Changing physical activity
behavior in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and
meta-analysis of behavioral interventions. Diabetes
Care, 35, 2681-2689.
Bauman, A., Merom, D., Bull, F. C., Buchner, D. M. &
Fiatarone Singh, M. A. 2016. Updating the evidence for
physical activity: summative reviews of the
epidemiological evidence, prevalence, and
interventions to promote “active aging”. The
gerontologist, 56, S268-S280.
Darren, G. & Paul, M. 2003. SPSS for Windows Step by
Step: A simple guide and reference, Needham Heights,
MA: Allyn & Bacon.
de Labra, C., Guimaraes-Pinheiro, C., Maseda, A.,
Lorenzo, T. & Millán-Calenti, J. C. 2015. Effects of
physical exercise interventions in frail older adults: a
systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC
geriatrics, 15, 154.
Haas, B. K. & Northam, S. 2010. Measuring self-efficacy:
development of the Physical Activity Assessment
Inventory. Southern Online Journal of Nursing
Research, 10, 35-51.
Hale, D. & Marshall, K. 2017. Physical activity for older
adults. Home healthcare now, 35, 172-173.
Kroll, T., Kehn, M., Ho, P.-S. & Groah, S. 2007. The SCI
exercise self-efficacy scale (ESES): development and
psychometric properties. International Journal of
Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4, 1.
Lee, L.-L., Chiu, Y.-Y., Ho, C.-C., Wu, S.-C. & Watson, R.
2011. The Chinese version of the Outcome
Expectations for Exercise scale: validation study.
International journal of nursing studies, 48, 672-680.
Nabavi, R. T. 2012. Bandura’s Social Learning Theory &
Social Cognitive Learning Theory.
Peyman, N. & Esmaily, H. 2013. Using of social cognitive
theory: predictors of physical activity among women
with diabetes type 2. Journal of Research and Health,
3, 345-354.
Resnick, B. 2005. Reliability and validity of the Outcome
Expectations for Exercise Scale-2. Journal of Aging
and Physical Activity, 13, 382-394.
Sallis, J. F., Owen, N. & Fisher, E. B. 2008. Ecological
models of health behavior.
Sousa, V. D. & Rojjanasrirat, W. 2011. Translation,
adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for
use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and
user‐friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in
Clinical Practice, 17, 268-274.