patchouli innovation clusters that the researchers
had explained, but there were also respondents
who were unable to repeat well the material about
patchouli innovation clusters that researchers had
explained that was equal to 15 (15 18.75%) and
there were 53 (66.25%) respondents who were
able to repeat the material very well about the
patchouli innovation cluster that was submitted by
the researcher.
b. Comprehension is measured by the way
respondents can understand and comprehend
material that has been known and can recall the
patchouli innovation cluster that has been
delivered by researchers in detail and can explain
in their own words. From 80 respondents there
were 12 (15%) respondents who could not
understand the patchouli innovation cluster
material submitted by researchers, 8 (10%) were
respondents who did not really understand the
material about patchouli innovation cluster that
researchers had conveyed and there were 60
(75%) respondents who are able to remember and
understand the material and can explain it in detail
about the patchouli innovation cluster that
researchers have conveyed.
c. Application is measured by the ability to connect,
choose, organize, move, arrange, use, apply,
classify, change the structure. From 80
respondents there are 7 (8.75%) respondents who
are unable to apply theories, ideas or goals of the
patchouli innovation cluster development that
researchers have conveyed, but there are 16 (20%)
respondents who are not able to apply theories,
ideas or cluster development goals and 57
(71.25%) other respondents are very capable of
applying theories, ideas or cluster development
goals properly and correctly.
d. The analysis is measured by the ability to think
logically in reviewing a fact/object in more detail.
Characterized by the ability to compare, analyse,
find, allocate, differentiate, categorize. namely the
ability to think to capture & apply appropriately
about theories, principles, symbols in new/real
situations. From 80 respondents there were 9
(11.25%) respondents who could not think
logically in reviewing the material that
researchers had conveyed about the patchouli
innovation cluster, but there were 12 (15%)
respondents who could not think logically in
reviewing material that had been researchers
convey about patchouli innovation cluster and
there are 59 (73.75%) other respondents who are
able to think well and correctly about the material
that researchers have conveyed about patchouli
innovation cluster.
e. Synthesis is measured by the ability to think to
integrate concepts logically so that it becomes a
new pattern. Characterized by the ability to
synthesize, infer, produce, develop, connect,
specialize. From 80 respondents there were 6
(7.5%) respondents who were unable to conclude
properly about patchouli innovation caster
material that had been submitted by researchers,
but there were also 17 (21.25%) respondents who
could conclude material about patchouli
innovation cluster was not so detailed and
complete and there are 57 (71.25%) other
respondents were able to describe and conclude
the material that has been explained by
researchers about the patchouli innovation cluster.
f. Evaluation is measured by the ability to think to
be able to consider a situation, value system,
methods, problems and solutions by using certain
benchmarks as a benchmark. Characterized by the
ability to judge, interpret, consider and determine.
Of the 80 respondents there were 10 (12.5%)
respondents who could not understand what the
researchers explained about patchouli innovation
clusters, but also there were 19 (23.75%)
respondents who understood but not all of them
understood only a portion of the material about
patchouli innovation which he understood, and in
addition there were 51 (63.75) respondents who
were able to master the material on patchouli
innovation clusters that researchers had explained
in the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) forum.
4 CONCLUSION
1. After conducting the research, it was concluded
that the attitudes and interests of patchouli farmers
towards the development of patchouli innovation
clusters based on the 5 indicators tested were: (1)
Receiving 65% of respondents strongly agreed
and accepting the development of patchouli
innovation clusters. (2) Responding of 78.75%
strongly agreed and happy to give questions about
patchouli innovation cluster material and 55% of
respondents strongly agreed and dared to express
their opinions when the researchers had finished
presenting material about the cluster. (3)
Evaluating of 73.75% of respondents strongly
agreed and optimistic about the development of
the patchouli innovation cluster while 26.25% of
the other respondents were pessimistic about the
construction of the cluster. (4) Organizing 57.5%