3 DISCUSSION
Cutaneous sarcoidosis are classified into specific
lesions with histopathological findings of naked
granulomas, and nonspecific lesion that appear from
a process that does not form granulomas.(
Haimovic
A,2012) Skin manifestation are present in one fifth
of sarcoidosis. Differentiating these lesions is
important because cutaneous lesions have a
prognostic significance. (Mana J et al., 2012).
Non-
specific lesion such as erythema nodosum typically
associated with good prognosis and spontaneous
resolution while maculopapular lesions and
subcutaneous lesions are linked with remission of
systemic disease in two years. (Mana J et al., 2012).
Whole plaques and lupus pernio are closely
associated with chronic disease. (Mana J et al.,
2012).
The last type of lesions are disfiguring and
can have cosmetical, social, and psychological
impact. (Mana J et al., 2012).
Cutaneous lesions are found on our patient’s
nose and both ears. These lesions are identified to be
erythematous plaque lesions. It is known that plaque
lesions are typically persistent and associated with
chronic forms of sarcoidosis. (Mana J et al., 2012).
It
is consistent with the findings in our patients, whose
lesions appeared since two years ago, therefore
indicating a chronic form of sarcoidosis. Relatively
symmetric plaques and nodules that occur on the
nose, earlobes, cheeks, and digits, are consistent
with lupus pernio, which has a tendency for systemic
involvement. Nail changes are hardly found in
sarcoidosis.(Momen SE et al., 2013).However, when
present, it is closely associated with systemic
sarcoidosis. The prevalence of nail sarcoidosis was
reported (1.6%) of 188 patients with cutaneous
sarcoidosis.(Velen NK et al., 1987) Despite its
rarity, dermatologists must consider nail
sarcoidosisas a sign of chronic systemic disease.
.(Momen SE et al., 2013).One paper reviewed 33
patients with nail sarcoidosis to describe the changes
of nail.
3
The most common findings included nail
dystrophy, longitudinal ridges, subungual
hyperkeratosis, onycholysis, nail hyperkeratosis and
nail loss consecutively. Confirmation of sarcoidosis
was made from histopathological findings from of
the nail biopsies, which were the presence of naked
granulomatous. Among 33 patients, seven patients
are noted to have granulomatous infiltrates of the
dermis.(Losada-Campa et al., 1995; Kalb RE et al
1985).
In our patient, we also findonycodistrophy,
onycholysis and digital clubbing. Histopathological
examination revealed typical naked
granulomas.(Fernandez-Faith E et al., 2007).These
findings point us towards nail sarcoidosis.
Wakelin and James stated that the findings of
surrounding skin changes of erythematousplaques
over the proximal nail folds might direct towards a
diagnosis of sarcoidosis (Haimovic A et al 2012)
These skin changes are caused by the formation of
granulomas which have microcompressive effects in
the dermal compartment between the nail plate and
the phalanx.(Wakelin SH et al., 1995).Despite the
nail changes and granuloma lesion in the biopsy of
nail, one should have more evidence to confirm the
diagnosis of sarcoidosis in this patient. Nail
involvement in sarcoidosis is rare and is usually a
marker of chronic disease.Although most of the
cases reported are associated with digital bone cysts,
sarcoiddactylitis, and lupus pernio,cases without
these associations have also been described
proposed that most nail changes are secondary to
granulomatous compression of nail structures(Velen
NK et al., 1987).
Sarcoidosis is known to be “the great imitator”
because of its diverse manifestations and the ability
to resemble other cutaneous disease. .(
Haimovic
A,2012).Therefore, a stepwise approach of diagnosis
needs to be taken in every patient with
granulomatous inflammation.(Chopra S et al., 1999).
A stepwise approach to diagnose sarcoidosis in this
patient is divided into two parts. First, excluding
alternative cause of granuloma. Second, find at least
one additional organ involvement. Alternative
known cause of granuloma is very wide, including
tuberculosis, atypical mycobacteriosis, fungal
infections, reaction to foreign bodies, leishmaniasis,
rheumatoid nodules, and Melkersson-Rosenthal
syndrome. (Aranegui et al., 2010).
However, in this patient, another known cause
of granuloma are unlikely. Granulomatous lesion is
highly caused by sarcoidosis according to patient’s
history, negative culture of MTB, and MOTT, and
normal chestx-ray examination. Although PCR
showed positive for MTB,it will not affect the
diagnosis because positive result can still be found
in 80% of cutaneous sarcoidosis patient. Several
studies have shown the presence of Mycobacterium
DNA in sarcoid granuloma, suggesting previous
exposure to Mycobaterium, which might have
induced a granulomatous reaction. The common
problem raised during PCR assays is the high risk of
false positive results due to common laboratory
contamination or presence of killed or dormant
bacilli in the patient specimens. However, the key to
the diagnosis of tuberculosis is a positive result on
tissue culture which is the gold standard of