Histopathological examination showed stratified
squamous epithelial cell with hyperkeratosis and
thickening on stratum granulosum and acanthosis.
There are subcorneal blister surrounded by
lymphocyte infiltrate. It was concluded that the
diagnosis was pemphigus foliaceus. After control,
the patients showed improvement in her skin lesions.
3 DISCUSSION
Pemphigus is caused by autoantibody, especially
IgG
4
, against its antigen, which is desmoglein, a
trans membrane glycoprotein of desmosome.
Desmoglein is part of cell’s adhesion molecule
cadherin. (Payne et al, 2012; Pollmann et al, 2018).
Pemphigus is mainly caused by antibodies to
desmoglein 1 (Dsg1, 160-kDa) in PF, desmoglein 3
(Dsg3, 130-kDa) in PV that predominantly in
mucosal membrane, or both in muco-cutaneous PV.
(Payne et al, 2012;Dimarco, 20 et al,2016);Hammers
et al, 2016) Dsg1 and 3 are found in varying
amounts in the skin and mucous membrane. Dsg1 is
found more in upper layer of epidermis, while Dsg3
is found in lower layer of epidermis. This causes
different clinical manifestation in PV and PF.
(Dimarco, 2016; Pollmann et al, 2018;Ruocco et
al,2013). There are two main types of PF, which is
idiopathic PF, that are found universally and appears
sporadically, and fogo selvagem (FS) which is an
endemic form of PF associated with several
geographic areas.(James et al,2011)
IgG autoantibody of PV and PF bound NH
2
domain of Dsg ectodomain. This domain is the same
area as the area that plays a role in desmoglein
intercellular adhesion, which directly caused
acantholysis. In addition, studies on keratinocytes
show that loss of intercellular adhesion due to
autoantibodies causes desmoglein internalization
and degradation. (Payne et al, 2012; Pollmann et al,
2018). Pathogenic antibodies to desmoglein tend to
bind to matured desmoglein on keratinocytes.
(Pollmann et al, 2018). In PF, pathogenic IgG binds
to Dsg1, causes phosphorylation of p-38 mitogen-
activated protein kinase (MPAK) thus encouraging
apoptosis in keratinocytes.(James et al,2011)
Clinical manifestation of PF and PV can
resemble one another, which is superficial blisters
that rupture easily causing erosions. (Pollmann et al,
2018;James et al,2011) Patients usually complain
about pain and burning sensation on their skin
lesions. (Payne et al, 2012;James et al,2011) It can
be located on chest, face, scalp, upper back and
traumatized area. (Pollmann et al, 2018) Skin lesions
in PV can be found on the entire surface of the skin,
but rarely on palms and feet. There are several clues
that can help us distinguish PF from PV. Skin
lesions of PF are initially found locally and spread
on seborrheic location. This condition can expand to
entire body and can be aggravated by ultraviolet
light. (Payne et al, 2012) Bullae in PF is more prone
to rupture than PV, therefore the clinical
manifestation of PF usually are small erosions with
crusts. (Hammers et al, 2016) Also, PF rarely
involves the mucous membrane. (Dimarco, 2016)
Both V and PF show a positive Nikolsky sign.
(Hammers et al, 2016) Initially in our patient, skin
lesions appeared on her left hand, which lasted for
several weeks, then spreads slowly throughout her
body. There are no similar lesions that were reported
on mucous area, therefore we considered PF as one
of differential diagnoses. However, given the similar
clinical manifestation of PV and PF, we still could
not eliminate PV as differential diagnosis.
Another differential diagnosis from this patient is
bullous pemphigoid. It usually found in adult age
more than 60 years old and caused by IgG
autoantibody against antigen in dermo-epidermal
junction causing subepidermal blister. Skin lesions
that are usually found are tense skin blisters on
normal or erythematous skin on flexors, lower thighs
and abdomen. Sometimes, skin lesions can be found
in the mucous membrane. Nikolsky sign is negative
in patients with bullous pemphigoid. (Culton et
al,2012)
Our patient complained about easily rupture
blisters with erosions that appeared after friction.
Therefore, based on anamnesis and physical
examination, we concluded that bullous pemphigoid
could be excluded from differential diagnoses.
The diagnosis of pemphigus should be supported
by histopathology and laboratory tests. Biopsy
samples are usually taken from newly formed
vesicle or edge of blister. Moreover, direct
immunofluorescent should be carried out by taking
biopsy at least 1 cm from blisters or inflamed skin.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is
also useful to measure IgG antibody titers against
desmoglein in patient’s serum. (Dimarco, 2016;
Pollmann et al, 2018). In this patient, we taken
biopsy sample from newly formed vesicle from her
back.
Histopathologically, pemphigus shows loss of
intraepidermic cell adhesion. (Pollmann et al, 2018).
While in PV, histopathological examination shows
suprabasal blister with acantholysis with “row of
tombstones” that sign of bad prognosis. In PF,
acantholysis can be found right under stratum
corneum and in stratum granulosum. Other finding